[Official] Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2


Recommended Posts

Oh great soccer moms and half of America is going to be butthurt in tears after this.

Some SP storyline spoilers.

Games are turning kids into Terminator, etc, etc. Hey, 9/11 will probably be blamed on games after that gets mainstream coverage.

The video isn't playing for me, but there is another mirror over here.

It's unfortunate that the scene is given to us with no context whatsoever (and most of us don't understand the language). For the average Fox news viewer, it's basically going to look like a game in which the intended purpose is to kill innocent people, even though everybody with an IQ over 60 knows that isn't true.

The video isn't playing for me, but there is another mirror over here.

It's unfortunate that the scene is given to us with no context whatsoever (and most of us don't understand the language). For the average Fox news viewer, it's basically going to look like a game in which the intended purpose is to kill innocent people, even though everybody with an IQ over 60 knows that isn't true.

Apparently there is actually an achievement for not pulling the trigger at all... (in other words you have a choice).

To be honest I've had second thoughts on this and for once I actually do think it better have a worthwhile context, if not it is really just sensationalism for the sake of it. It's not really a boundary that NEEDS to be pushed, in terms of boundaries I think the likes of Heavy Rain doing adult themes, nudity that's not for the sake of it, language, violence, realistic death is more understandable for the medium of gaming story telling.

I have a feeling though something like this wouldn't be pushed into a game by a reputable developer like IW for the sake of it, I just hope the story takes itself pretty seriously to be aligned with such a concept as what's shown in the video.

Either way IW/Activision will be hitting the headlines, so you do hope it's not being done primarily as a marketing move by our favourite Bobby Kotick.

The 'no' dedicated server thing really screws over the south africans who wanna play the game.

Whenever we join overseas servers, we get booted because our pings are too high, we have our own gaming site (1 of a few: games.saix.net ) that hosts servers for us to play on.

damn you activition!

How is that disturbing? I fail to see why people make a big deal out of everything. Innocent people have always been getting shot. I actually find it interesting that they let you do it from the terrorist's perspective.

Also I wonder what's going to happen with this in Australia now :p

Edited by HazeFaceKillah
It is disturbing, because people love being self righteous and hippocrates. like on GTA.. you kill innocents and take their cars, do the hookers and kill them for your monies, how is that different?

Well for a start GTA has always adopted a more comical approach to violence, even in GTA4 it's not suppose to mimic "real life". I'd suspect COD will be somewhat trying to tackle real world issues in a more serious tone than GTA.

Therefore the issue it has is does it sit on the fence with realism and in other words a scene like this just comes across as distasteful or "we're doing it for the lulz and drama", or does a scene such as this really fit into the game? It's hard to say seeing as we aren't seeing the scene in context, it's just a direct lift right out of the game without any back story.

There's a difference between adult/mature themes in games and just outright "we're doing it for the sake of it violence", some gamers fail to see that at times and just class all violence as "adult themes, STFU media/government/complaining moms".

Well, regarding whether the scene we just saw was without any back story, we will have to wait till it is released...or delayed to be able to judge.

At the present, everyone is just over-reacting to some leaked footage, that probably was not the first chapter, but in the middle of the game perhaps.

I just hope it is justified, if only to shush all the soccer moms and politicians.

But Faux news will have a ball with this one; If they already haven't lol.

Just saw the video and I think they'll be hearing from those b****y soccer mom prettysoon. But activision has done really good job taking out the video on the internet though.

As I said before you all a** holes will be playing the game while I'll be on the goddamn f****** plane. :angry:

just watched the video myself...

well , it does look like its meant to be a very badass way of introducing the main villain... like right before the player character gets shot at the end, you can see the guy and the van , and if you watched

and skip to 1:26, you will recognize them in the leaked video even tho its blurry... Edited by carmatic

i still think that this is a pretty unusual move for IW ...if it were up to me i'd put the player as one of the civilians, and have the level play out as an optional stealth minigame, well obviously optional anyway since if you get shot and killed, its just part of the storyline...

if you run to safety it ends the level...

but if your good enough and you follow the bad guys all the way through without getting spotted, you'll be rewarded with all sorts of goodies, including the encounter with the boss... heck maybe even pick up a gun or two along the way and start a little shootout just as theyre escaping onto the van, it'd be 'mile high club'-difficult but that's how i'd have it anyway

this way, the end result is the same, an optional early encounter with the end boss , since they made their sequence skippable.... and they'd get a whole less flak that way

i mean , im getting the impression that IW is losing touch of reality, like getting rid of dedicated servers? killing civilians?

Edited by carmatic

It is confirmed that you can select whether or not you want to play through the next scene. And 18+ is plastered all over the box. So it isn't like there's a warning.

Also the news say kids shouldn't be playing it, if it's 18+ who's to blame there? Oh wait. The ridiculously fail parents.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Stellarium 26.2 by Razvan Serea Stellarium is a free open source planetarium for your computer. It shows a realistic sky in 3D, just like what you see with the naked eye, binoculars or a telescope. It is being used in planetarium projectors. Just set your coordinates and go. Stellarium key features: Realistic simulation of the sky, sunrise and sunset Default catalogue of over 600,000 stars Downloadable additional catalogues for up to 210 million stars Catalog data for all New General Catalogue (NGC) objects Images of almost all Messier objects and the Milky Way Artistic illustrations for all 88 modern constellations More than a dozen different cultures with their constellations Solar and lunar eclipse simulation Photorealistic landscapes (more are available on the website) Scripting support with ECMAScript (a few demo scripts are included) Extendable with plug-ins: 8 plug-ins installed by default, including: artificial satellites plug-in (updated from an on-line TLE database) ocular simulation plug-in (shows how objects look like in a given ocular) Solar System editor plug-in (imports comet and asteroid data from the MPC) telescope control plug-in (Meade LX200 and Celestron NexStar compatible) The major changes of this version: Added new sky culture Added new plugin: Planes Many improvements in plugins Many improvements in Core and GUI Many updates in sky cultures. [full release notes] Download: Stellarium 26.2 (64-bit) | 456.0 MB (Open Source) View: Stellarium Home Page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Yup. Google is just scraping the entire internet for their own ad profits without sharing revenue with the sources. It's obviously stealing, but since these sites depend upon Google's search scraps to survive... As for me, I just stopped using Google for anything except Reddit searches. If Reddit's own search wasn't complete crapola, I'd never use Google search again.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      418
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!