[Official] Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2


Recommended Posts

Oh great soccer moms and half of America is going to be butthurt in tears after this.

Some SP storyline spoilers.

Games are turning kids into Terminator, etc, etc. Hey, 9/11 will probably be blamed on games after that gets mainstream coverage.

The video isn't playing for me, but there is another mirror over here.

It's unfortunate that the scene is given to us with no context whatsoever (and most of us don't understand the language). For the average Fox news viewer, it's basically going to look like a game in which the intended purpose is to kill innocent people, even though everybody with an IQ over 60 knows that isn't true.

The video isn't playing for me, but there is another mirror over here.

It's unfortunate that the scene is given to us with no context whatsoever (and most of us don't understand the language). For the average Fox news viewer, it's basically going to look like a game in which the intended purpose is to kill innocent people, even though everybody with an IQ over 60 knows that isn't true.

Apparently there is actually an achievement for not pulling the trigger at all... (in other words you have a choice).

To be honest I've had second thoughts on this and for once I actually do think it better have a worthwhile context, if not it is really just sensationalism for the sake of it. It's not really a boundary that NEEDS to be pushed, in terms of boundaries I think the likes of Heavy Rain doing adult themes, nudity that's not for the sake of it, language, violence, realistic death is more understandable for the medium of gaming story telling.

I have a feeling though something like this wouldn't be pushed into a game by a reputable developer like IW for the sake of it, I just hope the story takes itself pretty seriously to be aligned with such a concept as what's shown in the video.

Either way IW/Activision will be hitting the headlines, so you do hope it's not being done primarily as a marketing move by our favourite Bobby Kotick.

The 'no' dedicated server thing really screws over the south africans who wanna play the game.

Whenever we join overseas servers, we get booted because our pings are too high, we have our own gaming site (1 of a few: games.saix.net ) that hosts servers for us to play on.

damn you activition!

How is that disturbing? I fail to see why people make a big deal out of everything. Innocent people have always been getting shot. I actually find it interesting that they let you do it from the terrorist's perspective.

Also I wonder what's going to happen with this in Australia now :p

Edited by HazeFaceKillah
It is disturbing, because people love being self righteous and hippocrates. like on GTA.. you kill innocents and take their cars, do the hookers and kill them for your monies, how is that different?

Well for a start GTA has always adopted a more comical approach to violence, even in GTA4 it's not suppose to mimic "real life". I'd suspect COD will be somewhat trying to tackle real world issues in a more serious tone than GTA.

Therefore the issue it has is does it sit on the fence with realism and in other words a scene like this just comes across as distasteful or "we're doing it for the lulz and drama", or does a scene such as this really fit into the game? It's hard to say seeing as we aren't seeing the scene in context, it's just a direct lift right out of the game without any back story.

There's a difference between adult/mature themes in games and just outright "we're doing it for the sake of it violence", some gamers fail to see that at times and just class all violence as "adult themes, STFU media/government/complaining moms".

Well, regarding whether the scene we just saw was without any back story, we will have to wait till it is released...or delayed to be able to judge.

At the present, everyone is just over-reacting to some leaked footage, that probably was not the first chapter, but in the middle of the game perhaps.

I just hope it is justified, if only to shush all the soccer moms and politicians.

But Faux news will have a ball with this one; If they already haven't lol.

Just saw the video and I think they'll be hearing from those b****y soccer mom prettysoon. But activision has done really good job taking out the video on the internet though.

As I said before you all a** holes will be playing the game while I'll be on the goddamn f****** plane. :angry:

just watched the video myself...

well , it does look like its meant to be a very badass way of introducing the main villain... like right before the player character gets shot at the end, you can see the guy and the van , and if you watched

and skip to 1:26, you will recognize them in the leaked video even tho its blurry... Edited by carmatic

i still think that this is a pretty unusual move for IW ...if it were up to me i'd put the player as one of the civilians, and have the level play out as an optional stealth minigame, well obviously optional anyway since if you get shot and killed, its just part of the storyline...

if you run to safety it ends the level...

but if your good enough and you follow the bad guys all the way through without getting spotted, you'll be rewarded with all sorts of goodies, including the encounter with the boss... heck maybe even pick up a gun or two along the way and start a little shootout just as theyre escaping onto the van, it'd be 'mile high club'-difficult but that's how i'd have it anyway

this way, the end result is the same, an optional early encounter with the end boss , since they made their sequence skippable.... and they'd get a whole less flak that way

i mean , im getting the impression that IW is losing touch of reality, like getting rid of dedicated servers? killing civilians?

Edited by carmatic

It is confirmed that you can select whether or not you want to play through the next scene. And 18+ is plastered all over the box. So it isn't like there's a warning.

Also the news say kids shouldn't be playing it, if it's 18+ who's to blame there? Oh wait. The ridiculously fail parents.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
    • Cheers everyone for the replies. It's been very useful. 👍
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!