[Feedback needed] Atlas, the next version of Neowin


Recommended Posts

Overall, it's looking very nice! Much more efficient use of the available space...

One thing bothering me though - the rounded corners are only supported by Firefox, whereas IE users will get the non-rounded corners? Argh! Neowin making me switch to IE for browsing purposes? I suppose there's no need to be too dramatic, as long as it's not too difficult to revert to the non-rounded through some simple CSS tweaks!

Apologies if this was mentioned already, but I might've missed it when quickly skimming through the 9 pages.

You can always use Stylish to apply any tweaks you'd like. I'm sure the devs wouldn't mind telling you what to change to remove the rounded corners.

All in all, it's kind of ironic they haven't recognized that technology has moved forward and everyone either has a widescreen monitor or a high res 4:3 monitor, you know since they're doing a solo crusade to force some browser to ugprade to a work in progress standard.

after all the people who don't use a high res 4:3 monitor or wide screen monitor could use one of the low res device(i.e. mobile) layouts.

Not everyone that has a wide screen monitor browses with the browser maximized; I don't. I have Fx open about 3/4 of the way; the remaining portion is either for messenger or yahoo widgets. To me, it seems like a waste of screen real estate to browse maximized.

We're not denying anyone the option of increasing the width of the site via Stylish or a custom CSS file of any sort. What we are saying is that the site does not operate as designed if we offer it.

We don't want to offer options that make the site work in ways we did not intend. If users want to have the width increased, they can do a simple CSS file with the contents #container { width: 100%; }, and be done with it. Otherwise, we have to put the code in to offer a feature which, in our opinion, breaks the site, and requires a lot more support because of it.

Personally, I think that's perfectly reasonable.

I don't understand tho, you guys tried this with the last refresh and got a ton of bad feedback about it. It doesn't make any sense for force it again especially as your *still* getting a ton of bad feedback about it. I think those giving feedback understand *why* you want to do it, but at the same time it's kinda fail to just shun off the feedback in favour of the "vision"

I don't understand tho, you guys tried this with the last refresh and got a ton of bad feedback about it. It doesn't make any sense for force it again especially as your *still* getting a ton of bad feedback about it. I think those giving feedback understand *why* you want to do it, but at the same time it's kinda fail to just shun off the feedback in favour of the "vision"

You do know the current site is a fixed width by default. You have to know WHAT button to click to make it semi fluid/larger width.

(though I agree about the white bg helping it feel wider...)

cnn.com

bbc.co.uk

= Fixed width,

Also, here is the site at a fluid width.

http://qkpic.com/e1e9e

Edited by Timan
you do know the current site is a fixed width by default. You have to know WHAT button to click to make it semi fluid/larger width.

yes... you put that it after the feedback last time and it's worked fine so far. Removing it leads to the dislike seen in this thread.

I don't understand tho, you guys tried this with the last refresh and got a ton of bad feedback about it. It doesn't make any sense for force it again especially as your *still* getting a ton of bad feedback about it. I think those giving feedback understand *why* you want to do it, but at the same time it's kinda fail to just shun off the feedback in favour of the "vision"

Don't forget the views of the silent majority.

Design looks great! Can't wait to use it.

The font in the screen shot that Timan posted (fluid width) seems to work much better than the font in the original screen shot. I actually like the squared design better than the rounded (on Fx) and will use stylish to make it so. I also don't have any problems with the fixed design as i used Fx in a windowed mode.

Awesome work guys!

All in all, it's kind of ironic they haven't recognized that technology has moved forward and everyone either has a widescreen monitor or a high res 4:3 monitor, you know since they're doing a solo crusade to force some browser to ugprade to a work in progress standard.

after all the people who don't use a high res 4:3 monitor or widescreen monitor could use one of the low res device(i.e. mobile) layouts.

So you complain that Neowin disadvantage one type of user by giving them exactly the same experience as all other types of user, but you then suggest that they actually disadvantage a type of user by giving them a worse experience (the mobile skin). I see your logic... I see it, but it's not logical. At least with this fixed-width layout all users are getting the same Neowin experience - no one is getting discriminated against and no one is becoming disadvantaged (you can't call 'extra space at the sides' disadvantaging users when you suggested that some users be given the mobile skin just because they can't afford or do not want a larger monitor...)

It's obvious that you just can't please everyone. Just because larger monitors are now fairly popular amongst the technology enthusiasts, it doesn't mean everybody wishes to maximise their browser window and have it cover the whole screen. I actually see no point in that, especially when most sites tend to be the same sort of width (the width of the current Neowin front page), so surely Neowin can't be the only website that annoys you people by not being fluid? You must get annoyed by a lot of websites... I'm going to get a much larger monitor soon and I am extremely happy that the Neowin developers have designed this new theme with this width in mind because it means I will not have to have my browser window too big and I can have my buddy list, Facebook widget and Zune software (in mini-mode) showing at all times.

This is just my opinion by the way, but I feel strongly about this - I'm getting a bigger monitor so I can do more at once and fit more on the screen, not so I can pointlessly maximise my browser window when I can currently do that just fine, and view all websites perfectly, on my 17" laptop screen...

See I like how InsanelyMac does it. They have the option up top of doing fixed or fullscreen. I am lost as to how a "tech site" wouldn't allow for widescreen monitors.

Here is InsanelyMac.

http://www.insanelymac.com/

See I like how InsanelyMac does it. They have the option up top of doing fixed or fullscreen. I am lost as to how a "tech site" wouldn't allow for widescreen monitors.

Here is InsanelyMac.

http://www.insanelymac.com/

In my opinion that looks awful when using the "full screen" version on my 22" monitor at work (so much white space, logos/search bar positioned horribly), but looks very nice when using the "fixed width" version, on this 22" monitor, with space at the sides. Yes, it's nice they offer that choice because, in my opinion, choice is always a benefit, however, that's because it seems to work for their site (to some extent... it still looks horrible in my opinion). Looking at Timan's screenshot in one of his latest posts, it looks like it wouldn't work for Atlas - loads of white space, the promo image changer only covering half of that section etc.

I'm not speaking for any developers here, but I doubt Timan's screenshot is how the developers would like Neowin to look.

So you complain that Neowin disadvantage one type of user by giving them exactly the same experience as all other types of user, but you then suggest that they actually disadvantage a type of user by giving them a worse experience (the mobile skin). I see your logic... I see it, but it's not logical. At least with this fixed-width layout all users are getting the same Neowin experience - no one is getting discriminated against and no one is becoming disadvantaged (you can't call 'extra space at the sides' disadvantaging users when you suggested that some users be given the mobile skin just because they can't afford or do not want a larger monitor...)

It's obvious that you just can't please everyone. Just because larger monitors are now fairly popular amongst the technology enthusiasts, it doesn't mean everybody wishes to maximise their browser window and have it cover the whole screen. I actually see no point in that, especially when most sites tend to be the same sort of width (the width of the current Neowin front page), so surely Neowin can't be the only website that annoys you people by not being fluid? You must get annoyed by a lot of websites... I'm going to get a much larger monitor soon and I am extremely happy that the Neowin developers have designed this new theme with this width in mind because it means I will not have to have my browser window too big and I can have my buddy list, Facebook widget and Zune software (in mini-mode) showing at all times.

This is just my opinion by the way, but I feel strongly about this - I'm getting a bigger monitor so I can do more at once and fit more on the screen, not so I can pointlessly maximise my browser window when I can currently do that just fine, and view all websites perfectly, on my 17" laptop screen...

Just include a button for it like there is now and everyone is happy.

Noooooooooooooooo! Why do people insist on having all that wasted space on the left and right hand sides? I have a widescreen monitor, I dare say quite a few people here do as well, so let us use that space!

Remember, people read websites in an "F" shape, not a "T" shape =\

I understand the reasonings behind making it easier for the developers, but what about the users? They should be your primary focus.

Just include a button for it like there is now and everyone is happy.

As I have said, choice is always a benefit, but I'm not a Neowin developer so I don't know the ins and outs of the design :p I doubt they would deny users the choice if Atlas looked decent in a fluid manner, but as The_Decryptor pointed out, the design just doesn't lend itself to that, judging by Timan's screenshot. This might not be the reason, but if you'd worked hard designing something which looks really nice, would you like to see it used in a way which, in your opinion, breaks it? :/

but if you'd worked hard designing something which looks really nice, would you like to see it used in a way which, in your opinion, breaks it? :/

I wouldn't care how people use it as long as they are happy. And the users do want the choice myself included. Just add the button there and the discussion is over. And its not impossible to do.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Amazon Prime Day 2026: Best Dolby soundbar deals from Sony, Samsung, JBL, Polk, and more by Sayan Sen Yesterday we covered the JBL BAR 800 which is a 5.1.2 Dolby Atmos/Vision soundbar. The unit is on sale for its lowest ever price of just $800 making it a solid offer. However, there are many more options to choose from and in this article, we have made a compilation of the best deals including from Sony, Polk, Yamaha, Denon, Samsung and more. Sony's BAR models are currently at their lowest prices which makes them solid offerings. The company's BRAVIA Theatre Bar lineup is designed to suit different home cinema needs. The Bar 5 is an entry-level 3.1-channel soundbar with a wireless subwoofer, supporting Dolby Atmos®, DTS:X, S-Force PRO Front Surround, and Vertical Surround Engine for immersive audio with clear dialogue. The Bar 6 upgrades to a 3.1.2-channel configuration by adding dedicated up-firing speakers for more convincing overhead Atmos effects while retaining the wireless subwoofer. At the premium end, the Bar 7, Bar 8, and flagship Bar 9 are single-soundbar solutions featuring Sony’s 360 Spatial Sound Mapping technology, which creates phantom speakers for a wider surround field. Bar 7 includes nine speaker units, Bar 8 increases this to eleven, and Bar 9 offers thirteen speaker driver units promising the most expansive soundstage and acoustic performance. All models should integrate seamlessly with compatible BRAVIA TVs and support the BRAVIA Connect app for setup and control. Get them at the links below: Sony BRAVIA Theater Bar 9 Soundbar (HT-A9000): $998.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $1498) Sony BRAVIA Theater Bar 8 Soundbar (HT-A9000): $798.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $998) Sony BRAVIA Theater Bar 7 Soundbar (HT-A7100): $618.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $768) Sony BRAVIA Theater System 6: $548.00 | Sony BRAVIA Theater Bar 6: $448.00 Sony BRAVIA Theater Bar 5 (HT-B500): $278.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $348) Sony HT-S400 2.1 soundbar: $198.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $248) Aside from those, we also have more discounts including from Samsung, Polk Audio, and more: Samsung Q-Series Soundbar HW-QS90H 7.1.2: $797.99 (Amazon US) (Was: $998) Polk Audio Signa S4: $336.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $449) Hisense AX3120Q: $229.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $259) Check out more soundbar deals that you may like at this link. Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Stellarium 26.2 by Razvan Serea Stellarium is a free open source planetarium for your computer. It shows a realistic sky in 3D, just like what you see with the naked eye, binoculars or a telescope. It is being used in planetarium projectors. Just set your coordinates and go. Stellarium key features: Realistic simulation of the sky, sunrise and sunset Default catalogue of over 600,000 stars Downloadable additional catalogues for up to 210 million stars Catalog data for all New General Catalogue (NGC) objects Images of almost all Messier objects and the Milky Way Artistic illustrations for all 88 modern constellations More than a dozen different cultures with their constellations Solar and lunar eclipse simulation Photorealistic landscapes (more are available on the website) Scripting support with ECMAScript (a few demo scripts are included) Extendable with plug-ins: 8 plug-ins installed by default, including: artificial satellites plug-in (updated from an on-line TLE database) ocular simulation plug-in (shows how objects look like in a given ocular) Solar System editor plug-in (imports comet and asteroid data from the MPC) telescope control plug-in (Meade LX200 and Celestron NexStar compatible) The major changes of this version: Added new sky culture Added new plugin: Planes Many improvements in plugins Many improvements in Core and GUI Many updates in sky cultures. [full release notes] Download: Stellarium 26.2 (64-bit) | 456.0 MB (Open Source) View: Stellarium Home Page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      418
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!