aww poor neowin :(


Recommended Posts

What I do or do not do is not my point, nor am I judging anyone who does it. I'm just saying, don't pretend it's not illegal and act all high and mighty by pretending that a website asking nicely for your support is the same as the evil movie studios and ripping DVDs. The whole, "on principle, I rip DVDs to better control my viewing experience is the same as me blocking ads", just sounds silly. Neowin could turn that around and block users who block their ads, but they don't.

The UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act of 1998 is severly outdated, its still illegal in the UK to rip a CD to transfer onto an mp3 player even though programs like iTunes offer that functionality. I dont agree nor care with such draconian laws, i paid for the dvd/blu-ray/music cd and i will make a personal copy if i so wished to do so, if i go to jail then i go to jail it doesnt make it right though.

The UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act of 1998 is severly outdated, its still illegal in the UK to rip a CD to transfer onto an mp3 player even though programs like iTunes offer that functionality. I dont agree nor care with such draconian laws, i paid for the dvd/blu-ray/music cd and i will make a personal copy if i so wished to do so, if i go to jail then i go to jail it doesnt make it right though.

Well, as long as it doesn't come back to bite you in the ass, good luck to your selective law-abiding. Just remember, if someone else decides THEY don't like what they call a 'draconian law', you'll support them fully, right?

People that use the site don't subscribe and block the ads are just leechers.

If i ran this site and leeches were using it, then i wouldn't be happy about it either.

Either use the site with the ads or don't use the site, easy choice really.

(i understand there is a grey area involving data capped users though)

You, sir, need to climb down off your pedestal and stop being so judgemental.

The people who don't believe in offering a mutual support in return for all the hard work volunteered by many staff members and members are such a pain to deal with, they are the most vocal and to boot the arguments posed to "back themselves up" are pretty weak too.

We ask people to don't be a dick and block a stream of revenue that provides for this site, staff and covers event costs. It's pretty straight forward isn't it?

To be fair, I think you guys are often guilty of looking at things from your own point of view, and not taking anyone else's into account. Does blocking advertising harm Neowin? well of course it does, it harms all sites. Thing is though, our bandwidth costs money as well, and for people like myself who have seriously limited amounts of data usage the advertising displayed on the site is obnoxious. It slows down the site significantly when you browse with a slightly slower connection, and it does cause issues for some people. It isn't just Neowin, most people who use ad blockers do so on all websites.

It isn't a question of "being a dick" in a lot of cases, for someone like myself browsing the net over a very limited 3G broadband connection would cause serious slowdowns on most sites, so its just a matter of saving money. I want to subscribe when I can afford it, but honestly statements like that are just offensive and offputting.

Congrats you learned how to use firebug or whatever add on you used to do it it's not hard. What if instead of hoping one day you learn to quit being selfish and being a freeloader and not even just letting them show ads so they can pay for the bandwith you are using they just decided to ban you here and now and let you come back when you subscribed so they knew they would be able to pay for the bandwith you use? Oh you don't think that sounds nice of them to do? Well blocking ads on a site that you are allowed to use for free isn't nice either so i guess it could work both ways.

You are also seriously judgemental and arrogant, and you too need to climb down off your pedestal and stop attacking people.

Reply to Frank Fontaine...

So the users who think people should stop complaining about ads or messages asking people to white list Neowin are Judgemental and on pedestals... maybe we're concerned users who want the best for a community they visit regularly? Does that make me a bad person then?

I also consider that a personal attack and i would like it if you would not do that cheers.

Reply to Frank Fontaine...

So the users who think people should stop complaining about ads or messages asking people to white list Neowin are Judgemental and on pedestals... maybe we're concerned users who want the best for a community they visit regularly? Does that make me a bad person then?

I also consider that a personal attack and i would like it if you would not do that cheers.

I consider you accusing me of being a leech because I choose to block ads to be a personal attack as well, I mean what's good for the goose is good for the gander right. If you apologise, and retract your derogatory statement, I will retract mine as well, otherwise... well... you will be getting no apology from me. Calling anyone leech is judgemental, whether you can accept that fact or not.

I want the best for Neowin as well, I just wish that web developers would give some consideration to the people that visit their websites. Advertising like Google adsense isn't a problem, it isn't obnoxious, and it consumes very little bandwidth, but with stuff like IntelliTXT and flash banners, and so on, it really does suck bandwidth, and just annoy the hell out of users. I don't want Neowin to go under by any stretch, but surely it isn't unfair to advocate the point that there should be some middle ground with regards to advertising?

Is this the only way for you to have an Internet connection in your home?

I can have 26.4 Dialup when home on weekends.. And that's not an option during the week when I'm at a boarding house without access to a phoneline.

It seems like it takes a lot of energy to fight to continue to be, well, a dick about this. I forgot I had a browser still set to block ads when I saw the graphic, so it was a good reminder. But you're saying that not only should they not tell you what you already know, you'll take further steps to block the block notice (which aren't ads now, so you can't scream "privacy issue!") just to assert your authority over your browser and this website, like some chest-thumping primate who just protected his mate.

I don't appreciate being called names like that. It certainly doesn't add credibility to your statement. I already said that I will subscribe, but the further you will continue to push the envelope the less inclined I will be.

Using that logic, you should tell off any service that send you reminder notices.

And I call those notices junk/spam email that goes straight in the bin.

I don't appreciate being called names like that. It certainly doesn't add credibility to your statement. I already said that I will subscribe, but the further you will continue to push the envelope the less inclined I will be.

I'm just a member, who hasn't said anything the owner didn't already say.

And I call those notices junk/spam email that goes straight in the bin.

So, if your bank or credit agency sends you a reminder, you junk it?

I consider you accusing me of being a leech because I choose to block ads to be a personal attack as well, I mean what's good for the goose is good for the gander right. If you apologise, and retract your derogatory statement, I will retract mine as well, otherwise... well... you will be getting no apology from me. Calling anyone leech is judgemental, whether you can accept that fact or not.

I want the best for Neowin as well, I just wish that web developers would give some consideration to the people that visit their websites. Advertising like Google adsense isn't a problem, it isn't obnoxious, and it consumes very little bandwidth, but with stuff like IntelliTXT and flash banners, and so on, it really does suck bandwidth, and just annoy the hell out of users. I don't want Neowin to go under by any stretch, but surely it isn't unfair to advocate the point that there should be some middle ground with regards to advertising?

I didn't mean it as a personal attack on any user as such just a group of users, if you fall in to this catagory then i'm afraid it was aimed at you... i don't want to cause any personal distress mind you so for that i do apologise.

Yes i agree about un-obtrousive ads, but i do also consider Neowins ads to be just that (except the ones show up in the text and then add a full blown pop up message, that IS intrusive!)

I didn't mean it as a personal attack on any user as such just a group of users, if you fall in to this catagory then i'm afraid it was aimed at you... i don't want to cause any personal distress mind you so for that i do apologise.

Yes i agree about un-obtrousive ads, but i do also consider Neowins ads to be just that (except the ones show up in the text and then add a full blown pop up message, that IS intrusive!)

Surely though, you should realise that calling ANYONE a leech IS an extremely insulting statement. You are levelling an insult at a group of people, and presuming something about them, that is called prejudice pal, and it's wrong. If I turned around and made a statement like (before anyone brings the warn book on, this is hypothetical only) "all Subscribers are a bunch of arrogant, high and mighty so and so's that think subscribing makes them morally better than everyone else" I would be warned for it, and it would upset you, rightly so in both cases. So tell me, what gives you the right to make exactly the same kind of generalisation in reverse? it is patently rude and uncalled for.

The only justification for blocking ads I can see is if they make your computer spaz out with all the Flash or infect it with malware (which is what happened on another site I visit. They didn't get a second chance). I subscribed because I've been reading Neowin for years and I was really impressed with the new look and features; I also saw how much work went in because of the problems.

If you can't afford ~0.5p a day maybe you need to prioritise your finances a little better and get rid of your internet connection?

The only justification for blocking ads I can see is if they make your computer spaz out with all the Flash or infect it with malware (which is what happened on another site I visit. They didn't get a second chance). I subscribed because I've been reading Neowin for years and I was really impressed with the new look and features; I also saw how much work went in because of the problems.

If you can't afford ~0.5p a day maybe you need to prioritise your finances a little better and get rid of your internet connection?

Hmmm, what about the other 20-30 sites I visit daily that want me to sub up as well? You can tell by my post count and years active that I have divided loyalties.

I'll unblock ads fine, but don't make me feel bad for not subbing.

I don't worry about what they call me. I'm going to do what I'm going to do regardless and I expect them to do the same thing.

Some people are more thick skinned than others of course, but it is a simple principle of respect, and to make a comment like that is disrespectful. He may disagree with the opinions of blocking ads, as may other people, but calling us "leeches" and accusing us of "being dick's" is just uncalled for. The staff seem to call for respect on this message board, but who the rule actually applies to is a bit more questionable :/

Personally I work as staff on IPB boards, and I even block advertising on them, I am not solely trying to screw Neowin out of a few pennies, like a lot of people here, I post on more than one forum, and if I was to unblock one I would have to unblock them all.

Hmmm, what about the other 20-30 sites I visit daily that want me to sub up as well? You can tell by my post count and years active that I have divided loyalties.

I'll unblock ads fine, but don't make me feel bad for not subbing.

Did you read the first paragraph? It kind of provides a context for the second.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 changelog: Added support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. Improved exception handling and automated bug report upload. Fixed several minor bugs and small memory leaks. Build 26 (June 24) Fixed a rare exception when a transfer completed. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 | 14.5 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Briefly used Turbo Pascal (and Turbo C++) in 97 and soon after that I bought PC magazine that included a full version of Delphi 2. I still use Delphi today, some 29 years later.
    • Age of Empires Mobile comes to PC, here's how to carry over progress from your phone by Ivan Jenic Image: YouTube/Microsoft Microsoft just released Age of Empires Mobile for PC. The game, officially called Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, is available for free on Steam and Microsoft Store, almost two years after its initial release for handheld devices. Age of Empires is one of those franchises that entire generations grew up with. The original came out in 1997, and immediately got people hooked to building civilizations and crushing their enemies on the battlefield. However, the franchise today is a far cry from its roots, as Age of Empires Mobile is, well, a game optimized for handheld devices, and not a classic RTS title we’ve all loved for years. And, of course, it includes in-game purchases. The PC version is still a mobile game at its core, but it’s been optimized for desktop play. There’s mouse control, full keyboard compatibility, and a refined UI. Microsoft also refreshed the visuals with some 4k textures, so the game should look better on larger screens. The game supports Crossplay, so you can switch between your phone, tablet, and PC without losing anything. But linked progress doesn’t come out of the box, as you have to enable it first. Here’s how to link your progress: On your mobile device, open Age of Empires Mobile. Go to Settings (Gear icon) > Account. Select Bind Account and choose a sign-in option. Once you enable account binding, sign in on PC using the same method, and your progress will be accessible across all your devices. Xbox Game Pass subscribers also get a bonus reward pack on PC, which includes: 1 Monthly Pass Token 1 Custom Resource Chest 10 Universal 60-Minute Speed-Ups 1,000 Empire Coins Exclusive Player Portrait Frame You can find more info about Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, as well as download links, on the Age of Empires official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      458
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!