aww poor neowin :(


Recommended Posts

What I do or do not do is not my point, nor am I judging anyone who does it. I'm just saying, don't pretend it's not illegal and act all high and mighty by pretending that a website asking nicely for your support is the same as the evil movie studios and ripping DVDs. The whole, "on principle, I rip DVDs to better control my viewing experience is the same as me blocking ads", just sounds silly. Neowin could turn that around and block users who block their ads, but they don't.

The UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act of 1998 is severly outdated, its still illegal in the UK to rip a CD to transfer onto an mp3 player even though programs like iTunes offer that functionality. I dont agree nor care with such draconian laws, i paid for the dvd/blu-ray/music cd and i will make a personal copy if i so wished to do so, if i go to jail then i go to jail it doesnt make it right though.

The UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act of 1998 is severly outdated, its still illegal in the UK to rip a CD to transfer onto an mp3 player even though programs like iTunes offer that functionality. I dont agree nor care with such draconian laws, i paid for the dvd/blu-ray/music cd and i will make a personal copy if i so wished to do so, if i go to jail then i go to jail it doesnt make it right though.

Well, as long as it doesn't come back to bite you in the ass, good luck to your selective law-abiding. Just remember, if someone else decides THEY don't like what they call a 'draconian law', you'll support them fully, right?

People that use the site don't subscribe and block the ads are just leechers.

If i ran this site and leeches were using it, then i wouldn't be happy about it either.

Either use the site with the ads or don't use the site, easy choice really.

(i understand there is a grey area involving data capped users though)

You, sir, need to climb down off your pedestal and stop being so judgemental.

The people who don't believe in offering a mutual support in return for all the hard work volunteered by many staff members and members are such a pain to deal with, they are the most vocal and to boot the arguments posed to "back themselves up" are pretty weak too.

We ask people to don't be a dick and block a stream of revenue that provides for this site, staff and covers event costs. It's pretty straight forward isn't it?

To be fair, I think you guys are often guilty of looking at things from your own point of view, and not taking anyone else's into account. Does blocking advertising harm Neowin? well of course it does, it harms all sites. Thing is though, our bandwidth costs money as well, and for people like myself who have seriously limited amounts of data usage the advertising displayed on the site is obnoxious. It slows down the site significantly when you browse with a slightly slower connection, and it does cause issues for some people. It isn't just Neowin, most people who use ad blockers do so on all websites.

It isn't a question of "being a dick" in a lot of cases, for someone like myself browsing the net over a very limited 3G broadband connection would cause serious slowdowns on most sites, so its just a matter of saving money. I want to subscribe when I can afford it, but honestly statements like that are just offensive and offputting.

Congrats you learned how to use firebug or whatever add on you used to do it it's not hard. What if instead of hoping one day you learn to quit being selfish and being a freeloader and not even just letting them show ads so they can pay for the bandwith you are using they just decided to ban you here and now and let you come back when you subscribed so they knew they would be able to pay for the bandwith you use? Oh you don't think that sounds nice of them to do? Well blocking ads on a site that you are allowed to use for free isn't nice either so i guess it could work both ways.

You are also seriously judgemental and arrogant, and you too need to climb down off your pedestal and stop attacking people.

Reply to Frank Fontaine...

So the users who think people should stop complaining about ads or messages asking people to white list Neowin are Judgemental and on pedestals... maybe we're concerned users who want the best for a community they visit regularly? Does that make me a bad person then?

I also consider that a personal attack and i would like it if you would not do that cheers.

Reply to Frank Fontaine...

So the users who think people should stop complaining about ads or messages asking people to white list Neowin are Judgemental and on pedestals... maybe we're concerned users who want the best for a community they visit regularly? Does that make me a bad person then?

I also consider that a personal attack and i would like it if you would not do that cheers.

I consider you accusing me of being a leech because I choose to block ads to be a personal attack as well, I mean what's good for the goose is good for the gander right. If you apologise, and retract your derogatory statement, I will retract mine as well, otherwise... well... you will be getting no apology from me. Calling anyone leech is judgemental, whether you can accept that fact or not.

I want the best for Neowin as well, I just wish that web developers would give some consideration to the people that visit their websites. Advertising like Google adsense isn't a problem, it isn't obnoxious, and it consumes very little bandwidth, but with stuff like IntelliTXT and flash banners, and so on, it really does suck bandwidth, and just annoy the hell out of users. I don't want Neowin to go under by any stretch, but surely it isn't unfair to advocate the point that there should be some middle ground with regards to advertising?

Is this the only way for you to have an Internet connection in your home?

I can have 26.4 Dialup when home on weekends.. And that's not an option during the week when I'm at a boarding house without access to a phoneline.

It seems like it takes a lot of energy to fight to continue to be, well, a dick about this. I forgot I had a browser still set to block ads when I saw the graphic, so it was a good reminder. But you're saying that not only should they not tell you what you already know, you'll take further steps to block the block notice (which aren't ads now, so you can't scream "privacy issue!") just to assert your authority over your browser and this website, like some chest-thumping primate who just protected his mate.

I don't appreciate being called names like that. It certainly doesn't add credibility to your statement. I already said that I will subscribe, but the further you will continue to push the envelope the less inclined I will be.

Using that logic, you should tell off any service that send you reminder notices.

And I call those notices junk/spam email that goes straight in the bin.

I don't appreciate being called names like that. It certainly doesn't add credibility to your statement. I already said that I will subscribe, but the further you will continue to push the envelope the less inclined I will be.

I'm just a member, who hasn't said anything the owner didn't already say.

And I call those notices junk/spam email that goes straight in the bin.

So, if your bank or credit agency sends you a reminder, you junk it?

I consider you accusing me of being a leech because I choose to block ads to be a personal attack as well, I mean what's good for the goose is good for the gander right. If you apologise, and retract your derogatory statement, I will retract mine as well, otherwise... well... you will be getting no apology from me. Calling anyone leech is judgemental, whether you can accept that fact or not.

I want the best for Neowin as well, I just wish that web developers would give some consideration to the people that visit their websites. Advertising like Google adsense isn't a problem, it isn't obnoxious, and it consumes very little bandwidth, but with stuff like IntelliTXT and flash banners, and so on, it really does suck bandwidth, and just annoy the hell out of users. I don't want Neowin to go under by any stretch, but surely it isn't unfair to advocate the point that there should be some middle ground with regards to advertising?

I didn't mean it as a personal attack on any user as such just a group of users, if you fall in to this catagory then i'm afraid it was aimed at you... i don't want to cause any personal distress mind you so for that i do apologise.

Yes i agree about un-obtrousive ads, but i do also consider Neowins ads to be just that (except the ones show up in the text and then add a full blown pop up message, that IS intrusive!)

I didn't mean it as a personal attack on any user as such just a group of users, if you fall in to this catagory then i'm afraid it was aimed at you... i don't want to cause any personal distress mind you so for that i do apologise.

Yes i agree about un-obtrousive ads, but i do also consider Neowins ads to be just that (except the ones show up in the text and then add a full blown pop up message, that IS intrusive!)

Surely though, you should realise that calling ANYONE a leech IS an extremely insulting statement. You are levelling an insult at a group of people, and presuming something about them, that is called prejudice pal, and it's wrong. If I turned around and made a statement like (before anyone brings the warn book on, this is hypothetical only) "all Subscribers are a bunch of arrogant, high and mighty so and so's that think subscribing makes them morally better than everyone else" I would be warned for it, and it would upset you, rightly so in both cases. So tell me, what gives you the right to make exactly the same kind of generalisation in reverse? it is patently rude and uncalled for.

The only justification for blocking ads I can see is if they make your computer spaz out with all the Flash or infect it with malware (which is what happened on another site I visit. They didn't get a second chance). I subscribed because I've been reading Neowin for years and I was really impressed with the new look and features; I also saw how much work went in because of the problems.

If you can't afford ~0.5p a day maybe you need to prioritise your finances a little better and get rid of your internet connection?

The only justification for blocking ads I can see is if they make your computer spaz out with all the Flash or infect it with malware (which is what happened on another site I visit. They didn't get a second chance). I subscribed because I've been reading Neowin for years and I was really impressed with the new look and features; I also saw how much work went in because of the problems.

If you can't afford ~0.5p a day maybe you need to prioritise your finances a little better and get rid of your internet connection?

Hmmm, what about the other 20-30 sites I visit daily that want me to sub up as well? You can tell by my post count and years active that I have divided loyalties.

I'll unblock ads fine, but don't make me feel bad for not subbing.

I don't worry about what they call me. I'm going to do what I'm going to do regardless and I expect them to do the same thing.

Some people are more thick skinned than others of course, but it is a simple principle of respect, and to make a comment like that is disrespectful. He may disagree with the opinions of blocking ads, as may other people, but calling us "leeches" and accusing us of "being dick's" is just uncalled for. The staff seem to call for respect on this message board, but who the rule actually applies to is a bit more questionable :/

Personally I work as staff on IPB boards, and I even block advertising on them, I am not solely trying to screw Neowin out of a few pennies, like a lot of people here, I post on more than one forum, and if I was to unblock one I would have to unblock them all.

Hmmm, what about the other 20-30 sites I visit daily that want me to sub up as well? You can tell by my post count and years active that I have divided loyalties.

I'll unblock ads fine, but don't make me feel bad for not subbing.

Did you read the first paragraph? It kind of provides a context for the second.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • OpenAI's new GPT-5.5-Cyber tops Claude Mythos 5 in vulnerability benchmark by Pradeep Viswanathan OpenAI today announced a major expansion of Daybreak, a cybersecurity initiative designed to help defenders find, validate, and fix software vulnerabilities earlier in the development process. The availability of powerful AI models has definitely changed the cybersecurity landscape by making vulnerability discovery much faster. However, the bigger bottleneck for the industry is now patching those vulnerabilities. Impacted software teams need to validate the discovered issues, understand their impact, develop fixes, test them, and deploy patches. Back in March, OpenAI launched a preview of Codex Security, which uses agentic reasoning with automated validation to discover high-impact issues and actionable fixes specific to the codebase. Since then, it has scanned more than 30 million commits across over 30,000 codebases; more than 70,000 findings were marked as fixed by human reviewers, while over 500,000 findings were automatically determined to be fixed. Now, OpenAI is releasing an updated Codex Security plugin that can run deep scans, review recent code changes, generate security reports, trace attack paths, validate findings, and create codebase-specific patches for human review. It can also triage findings from existing scanners, advisories, bug bounty reports, and ticketing systems. OpenAI says the plugin can export results to vulnerability management systems and integrate with workflows using SARIF files, CodeQL queries, the Codex CLI, and the Codex app. Back in May, OpenAI announced the preview of GPT-5.5-Cyber, a new model built on top of the recently released GPT-5.5, designed for specialized cybersecurity work. Today, OpenAI launched the full version of GPT-5.5-Cyber through a limited release for verified defenders. On CyberGym, GPT-5.5-Cyber scored 85.6%, compared with 81.8% for GPT-5.5 and 83.8% for Claude Mythos 5. It also scored 39.5% on ExploitGym, compared with 25.95% for GPT-5.5, and 69.8% on SEC-bench Pro, compared with 63.1%. OpenAI also announced the new Daybreak Cyber Partner Program, which will allow security vendors and service providers to use GPT-5.5 with Trusted Access for Cyber in their products and services. Accenture, Akamai, Cisco, Cloudflare, CrowdStrike, IBM, Palo Alto Networks, Proofpoint, SentinelOne, Wiz, Zscaler, and others were listed as initial partners for this program. OpenAI is also launching Patch the Planet with Trail of Bits, HackerOne, Calif, researchers, and maintainers. More than 30 open-source projects have committed to participate, including cURL, Go, Python, Sigstore, and pyca/cryptography.
    • AMD confirms 26.6.2 FSR driver breaks on many Windows PCs by Sayan Sen Earlier today AMD released a major graphics driver update as it brings support for FSR 4.1 to Radeon RX 7000 series GPUs. The new update, version 26.6.2, also brings support for Assassin's Creed Black Flag Resynced and more. And while the driver technically supports Windows 10 version 21H2 and newer, the tech giant has confirmed that there is a major issue with the new driver on non-Windows 11 PCs as it fails to launch properly on such systems. The error message says, "The version of AMD Software that you have launched is not compatible with your currently installed AMD graphics driver." Therefore on the surface it looks like a compatibility problem. AMD has also confirmed that the device manager will display the yellow bang or yellow exclamation sign alongside your GPU under the Display adapters dropdown. Here is what the Radeon team's official advisory recommends to affected users: "Users Running Windows 10 and AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 26.6.2 May Encounter Yellow Bang in Device Manager Affecting AMD Radeon RX Series Graphics ... Our Engineers are currently investigating this issue and will provide a fix once it is available. Affected users may revert to AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 26.6.1 as a temporary workaround." As such you should revert back to the previous 26.6.1 driver which was released earlier this month. In case you were looking to play Assassin's Creed Black Flag Resynced and DOOM: The Dark Ages | Revelations you will probably have to wait a while if you want the driver to support those games officially. You can find the support article here on Microsoft's website.
    • https://uupdump.net/selectlang...7829-4524-978d-7b5fe79263e3
    • A McDonald's restaurant uses about 1.5 to 2 million gallons of water per year for operations like food preparation, cleaning, and restrooms. That is a lot less than the 2,083 gallons of water per megawatt hour mentioned above.
    • Turbo Pascal Original authorAnders Hejlsberg (at Borland) DeveloperBorland Release20 November 1983; 42 years ago[1][2] Operating systemCP/M, CP/M-86, MS-DOS, Windows 3.x, Classic Mac OS PlatformZ80, x86, 68000, PC-98 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turbo_Pascal It was the one language I actually learned to program in.   I wasn't very good at it and never used it at work.    If anyone has any personal Turbo Pascal stories or personal accomplishments using it, please take a moment to share.   Thanks. Peace
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      mnsgroup earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      208
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      100
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      88
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!