[WC2010] Round of 16 - Germany vs. England (Match 51)


Who will win game 51?  

66 members have voted

  1. 1. Germany or England?

  2. 2. How many goals will Germany score?

  3. 3. How many goals will England score?



Recommended Posts

Germany were excellent. England were utter pants. We've been setting ourselves up for an embarrassment all tournament and I knew all it would take would be a decent team to makes us look stupid. We should of known we were screwed when we stumbled our way through the group stages.

Well done Germany. Good luck for the rest of the tournament.

  • Like 1

I guess the OCTOPUS was right again!! :D

I'm gonna kill that Octopus!

FIFA you are sh*t and have the only sport where tech isn't used to make the game fair!

Tho well done to germany, you did play very well, I think you should have won bit with a score of 3-2 not 4-1

Well that was a slaughter. The second goal certainly should have stood (and we know the English press will have a field day with it from tomorrow) but even if they'd gone into the second half 2-2 they were simply played off the field by Germany.

Hopefully this might just force FIFA to get with the program and introduce some way to overturn blatantly wrong referee decisions. America had a goal robbed last week (at the same time 3 or 4 of their players were being fouled in the penalty area) and that cost them a win as well. When the stakes are as high as the World Cup you have to have some means to right wrongs.

Let's be real here, the ref committed armed robbery against England. Do you think England would be so up the pitch at the beginning of the second half pushing everyone forward and allowing the Germans to score twice on the counter if they were tied 2-2?

All of you that say "it doesn't matter because we still would have won 4-2" don't know what you are talking about. If England tied it 2-2 Germany would NEVER get those 3 on 3 counter attacks like they did because England wouldn't have everyone up the field to begin with.

Sad...

  • Like 2

Let's be real here, the ref committed armed robbery against England. Do you think England would be so up the pitch at the beginning of the second half pushing everyone forward and allowing the Germans to score twice on the counter if they were tied 2-2?

All of you that say "it doesn't matter because we still would have won 4-2" don't know what you are talking about. If England tied it 2-2 Germany would NEVER get those 3 on 3 counter attacks like they did because England wouldn't have everyone up the field to begin with.

Sad...

Yes they were robbed but they lost 4-1, ok give them that goal 4-2 they still would of lost.

Let's be real here, the ref committed armed robbery against England. Do you think England would be so up the pitch at the beginning of the second half pushing everyone forward and allowing the Germans to score twice on the counter if they were tied 2-2?

All of you that say "it doesn't matter because we still would have won 4-2" don't know what you are talking about. If England tied it 2-2 Germany would NEVER get those 3 on 3 counter attacks like they did because England wouldn't have everyone up the field to begin with.

Sad...

indeed.

If the goal counted. Then it will be a 2-2 for the first half. The morale is boosting for england and germany feels the pressure. So the final result is still unclear.

People saying that mostly ignored football has to be played as a TEAM. TEAM MORALE is very important. And probably they just start watching football until these past few days.. :rofl:

The "goal" that England supposedly scored was to even that one from the '66 Final against Germany. 44 year old justice!

if you ever compared those 2 goals, you'll see the 1966 was debatable and 2010 is clearly a goal.

You completely missed the point of my post...

just ignore him..lol

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Windows 95 offered the ability to add and edit the right click menus, on a per file type basis. This feature seems to be missing in the new file explorer. Are they bringing it back as a "new" feature?
    • It's nearly time to replace my aging Founders Edition 3080, it doesn't OC as nicely as it used to and it's running around 10c warmer than it did when I first bought it.  I don't have budget for much more than what I spent on the 3080 and locally, that means the best GPU I can manage is a 9070XT. On this basis I have a few questions: 1. At present I don't use ray tracing, if this was to change, would this GPU be an issue? 2. How does it compare on a performance basis? 3. Are the drivers worse or better than those for nVidia? 4. Linux support, is it there? 5. Anything else I should be aware of if I were to make this change? 6. Is it a good idea or shall I try and keep the 3080 a little longer.
    • What OS is that? It looks a bit like Mac OS but the command line suggests it isn't, either way I like it!
    • Outlook classic is inherently better than new outlook, for a number of reasons. That said, if the only reason people need office is to read email, they should just use thunderbird.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Rising Star
      olavinto went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      250
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      74
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      69
    5. 5
      +Edouard
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!