[WC2010] Round of 16 - Germany vs. England (Match 51)


Who will win game 51?  

66 members have voted

  1. 1. Germany or England?

  2. 2. How many goals will Germany score?

  3. 3. How many goals will England score?



Recommended Posts

Germany were excellent. England were utter pants. We've been setting ourselves up for an embarrassment all tournament and I knew all it would take would be a decent team to makes us look stupid. We should of known we were screwed when we stumbled our way through the group stages.

Well done Germany. Good luck for the rest of the tournament.

  • Like 1

I guess the OCTOPUS was right again!! :D

I'm gonna kill that Octopus!

FIFA you are sh*t and have the only sport where tech isn't used to make the game fair!

Tho well done to germany, you did play very well, I think you should have won bit with a score of 3-2 not 4-1

Well that was a slaughter. The second goal certainly should have stood (and we know the English press will have a field day with it from tomorrow) but even if they'd gone into the second half 2-2 they were simply played off the field by Germany.

Hopefully this might just force FIFA to get with the program and introduce some way to overturn blatantly wrong referee decisions. America had a goal robbed last week (at the same time 3 or 4 of their players were being fouled in the penalty area) and that cost them a win as well. When the stakes are as high as the World Cup you have to have some means to right wrongs.

Let's be real here, the ref committed armed robbery against England. Do you think England would be so up the pitch at the beginning of the second half pushing everyone forward and allowing the Germans to score twice on the counter if they were tied 2-2?

All of you that say "it doesn't matter because we still would have won 4-2" don't know what you are talking about. If England tied it 2-2 Germany would NEVER get those 3 on 3 counter attacks like they did because England wouldn't have everyone up the field to begin with.

Sad...

  • Like 2

Let's be real here, the ref committed armed robbery against England. Do you think England would be so up the pitch at the beginning of the second half pushing everyone forward and allowing the Germans to score twice on the counter if they were tied 2-2?

All of you that say "it doesn't matter because we still would have won 4-2" don't know what you are talking about. If England tied it 2-2 Germany would NEVER get those 3 on 3 counter attacks like they did because England wouldn't have everyone up the field to begin with.

Sad...

Yes they were robbed but they lost 4-1, ok give them that goal 4-2 they still would of lost.

Let's be real here, the ref committed armed robbery against England. Do you think England would be so up the pitch at the beginning of the second half pushing everyone forward and allowing the Germans to score twice on the counter if they were tied 2-2?

All of you that say "it doesn't matter because we still would have won 4-2" don't know what you are talking about. If England tied it 2-2 Germany would NEVER get those 3 on 3 counter attacks like they did because England wouldn't have everyone up the field to begin with.

Sad...

indeed.

If the goal counted. Then it will be a 2-2 for the first half. The morale is boosting for england and germany feels the pressure. So the final result is still unclear.

People saying that mostly ignored football has to be played as a TEAM. TEAM MORALE is very important. And probably they just start watching football until these past few days.. :rofl:

The "goal" that England supposedly scored was to even that one from the '66 Final against Germany. 44 year old justice!

if you ever compared those 2 goals, you'll see the 1966 was debatable and 2010 is clearly a goal.

You completely missed the point of my post...

just ignore him..lol

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft announces the return of Xbox exclusives with Gears of War and Clockwork Revolution by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe Microsoft had plenty of announcements to make today at the Xbox Games Showcase celebrating 25 years of the gaming brand. Now, under the leadership of the new Xbox CEO Asha Sharma, Xbox games are going back to their original release methods. She appeared in the livestream itself to announce the return of Xbox console exclusives. This means two major upcoming games from first-party studios won't be coming to PlayStation or Nintendo consoles: Gears of War: E-Day from The Coalition and Clockwork Revolution from InExile. Both titles will only be coming out on Xbox Series X|S consoles and Windows PCs, ditching any plans they had for PlayStation. "These are not timed exclusives," confirmed Microsoft. "We’re committed to investing in and growing XBOX both on console and beyond." The company confirmed that any already announced Xbox titles for PlayStation, under previous leadership, will continue to arrive for the rival platform. This means games like the new Halo remake, Forza Horizon 6, Fable, and State of Decay 3 will still be available on PlayStation, either at launch or later. It sounds like any new projects announced by the company will avoid other consoles in the same way. Microsoft first opened the floodgates by bringing titles like Sea of Thieves, Grounded, Hi-Fi Rush, and Pentiment to PlayStation and Nintendo consoles back in 2024. Since then, almost every new game release from Xbox Game Studios has arrived for rival consoles alongside Xbox and PC. This decision follows Sony's plans to ditch its own multiplatform releases too. Outside of multiplatform live service titles, the PlayStation maker is even abandoning its PC porting endeavors that started years ago.
    • I'm missing the beginning part of this equation... but for the sake of the convo, you don't get to take a $250(?) set of normally priced RAM, jack it up to over $500/600/800 just because of a market shift, then lower it back down to more than what it was originally and call that a "sale". Not the author of this post... the manufacturer/seller.
    • SpaceX has secured a significant cloud-services deal with Google, agreeing to a monthly payment of $920 million for computing power.  This agreement, covers approximately 110,000 NVIDIA GPUs and other components.... https://cio.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/investments/google-to-buy-computing-from-spacex-at-920-million-per-month/131543026    
    • no thanks is overpriced and its not the fastest ram neither.
    • It is, but it also has a bad performance reputation even on high-end gaming PCs. Some people say it's the engine's fault, others say it's the games developers' fault, who knows... At the end of the day, for the average gamer, the take is this: PC game with Unreal Engine 5? Be affraid and cross your fingers, it's a 50/50 chance.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      243
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      66
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!