For Apple Followers, It's a Matter of Faith


Recommended Posts

And it wasn't known to me, was first time iv seen it that I remember

All you need to know is that Mephistopheles and swuzzlebum were happy. Until he cheated on her with OS/2 (last post on that thread).

I find it amusing that no one has even brought up Free Software into this discussion. Maybe because it's a proper philosophy! trollface.png

I bought maybe 50 songs before the store went DRM free, so I paid a whopping $15 bucks to upgrade to 256kbit, DRM-free music. I didn't have to, but why not?

Also, it was a much better deal than completely losing the things you bought.

You shouldn't have paid anything to Apple.. it was a pure ripoff tactic and they could have done it because unlike you tons of people had thousands of songs bought through iTunes with DRM.. So charging them to take it off just so they can use it on other devices was plain ripoff.

You're right there, but it's also more restrictive for my purposes. For instance, I only have one device that can play Amazon VOD: my computer. I can't even get Amazon VOD content on my Xbox because it requires having Windows Media Player on your desktop to stream it. Meanwhile, I have three devices that can play an iTunes rental or download (I do mostly rentals and just download the free TV show pilots :p): my computer, my iPhone, and my iPad.

I don't know what you are really talking about.. I watch all my Amazon content on Xboxs, PS3s, Panasonic TV and my mobile devices without any problems.. I don't need WIndows Media Player. I am not sure what that even means.

What's the point in having a more "open" solution if I have less devices that support it and have no plans to buy a device that does support it?

There you go.. Apple till you die.. no way anyone can come out with anything better.. you will always be using Apple products.. that's what the article is talking about and the view you express..

It's not minority that belongs to Apple cult.. it's almost all of them.. like you for example.. it's just that mostly everyone has issues admitting they are "those type of users".. Nobody wants to be viewed as a loon. Your posts in every negative thread about Apple show that.. You are one of the people mentioned in the article. I'm sorry to say.

You see.. the difference between me and you is that I can't stand the company that's so greedy, so fascist like and I can't stand Steve Jobs for being an egoistical and lying scumbag. I do use Apple products. THere are many things right and many things wrong with it and there is almost everything wrong with the way Apple handles business (towards me as a consumer), but you won't see me dissing something that's a good piece of hardware from Apple.. just the fact that they are lying sacks of crap.. There is no reason for them not to open up a bit and still make great hardware.. but they won't.. because they are the greediest, the most evil company in our recent history. Microsoft and Intel are small kids for Apple.

Talk about revisionist. Amazon MP3 opened in September 2007, 5 months after Apple had already sealed EMI as a DRM-free partner and 7 months after your most hated man in the world wrote his Thoughts on Music letter. A few months later (around Jan 2008), however, Amazon did get agreements with more major labels before Apple (Apple wouldn't go completely DRM free until Jan 2009 mostly due to CEO bickering; Apple wanted to keep prices down, record labels wanted to hike them up), but saying Apple didn't go DRM-free because Amazon was "kicking its ass" is flat-out wrong.

Again.. you drink the Apple kool-aid.. what almighty Steve Jobs says that has to be true and what they really want.. he can't be saying things that are really excuses for Apple to keep making money. He's a lying sack of crap and nobody in this world should trust him.. They have proven over and over again that they have no interest in helping consumers get any flexibility.. The company is an embodiment of closed platforms and holding consumers hostage.

And yes, Amazon kicked their ass for almost 2 years.. what happened and what deals they might have had or not is completely irrelevant.. I was buying music DRM free while Apple crap was all DRMed.. and at the end.. I had to pay hundreds of dollars to Apple to get DRM free licenses for the music I already bought.

They can go screw themselves..

PlayOn isn't sanctioned by any of those content providers at all (and frankly, if Hulu and others could block it without blocking all computers, I'm sure they would). It basically just plays the content from those sites on your comptuer and transcodes it so your UPnP device can watch it.

That's THE WHOLE FREAKING POINT!!!.. You can use and create code that will stream from your computer to any devices via UPnP or DNLA and they can't really stop you because it's OPEN..

If we were to live in Apple world (thank God we don't), you would have to pay for each one of these services, then buy only hardware from Apple and use their software.. I mean all of your money would have to go to Apple without a single choice.

You shouldn't have paid anything to Apple.. it was a pure ripoff tactic and they could have done it because unlike you tons of people had thousands of songs bought through iTunes with DRM.. So charging them to take it off just so they can use it on other devices was plain ripoff.

So it wasn't Apple's idea to put DRM on the songs in the first place, and Apple doesn't make much off of the sales of songs anyway, but Apple has to pay the bandwidth costs to take it off and upgrade you to 256kbit AAC? I would love it if Apple soaked those costs, but I also understand that I live in the real world. By the way, Amazon doesn't let you re-download songs and movies either.

I don't know what you are really talking about.. I watch all my Amazon content on Xboxs, PS3s, Panasonic TV and my mobile devices without any problems.. I don't need WIndows Media Player. I am not sure what that even means.

Amazon VOD on Xbox 360 has to go through Windows Media Player, which means you have to have a Windows PC on and connected to your network that has the media. There's no native Xbox 360 app, or at least that's what the Xbox 360 VOD page on Amazon's website leads me to believe.

There you go.. Apple till you die.. no way anyone can come out with anything better.. you will always be using Apple products.. that's what the article is talking about and the view you express..

It's not minority that belongs to Apple cult.. it's almost all of them.. like you for example.. it's just that mostly everyone has issues admitting they are "those type of users".. Nobody wants to be viewed as a loon. Your posts in every negative thread about Apple show that.. You are one of the people mentioned in the article. I'm sorry to say.

No, not Apple 'till I die. Apple while they make the best products to suit my needs.

FYI, I don't buy movies and TV shows from the iTunes Store (well, I don't buy either of those at all anyway, in any format) because they have DRM and I can access almost all of that content on Hulu anyway. I do rent from iTunes because it's not exactly expensive and it's easy.

You see.. the difference between me and you is that I can't stand the company that's so greedy, so fascist like and I can't stand Steve Jobs for being an egoistical and lying scumbag. I do use Apple products. THere are many things right and many things wrong with it and there is almost everything wrong with the way Apple handles business (towards me as a consumer), but you won't see me dissing something that's a good piece of hardware from Apple.. just the fact that they are lying sacks of crap.. There is no reason for them not to open up a bit and still make great hardware.. but they won't.. because they are the greediest, the most evil company in our recent history. Microsoft and Intel are small kids for Apple.

Stop buying from Apple and using Apple products. It might help you with your rage.

Again.. you drink the Apple kool-aid.. what almighty Steve Jobs says that has to be true and what they really want.. he can't be saying things that are really excuses for Apple to keep making money. He's a lying sack of crap and nobody in this world should trust him.. They have proven over and over again that they have no interest in helping consumers get any flexibility.. The company is an embodiment of closed platforms and holding consumers hostage.

So no facts to refute my claims, but I'm drinking the kool-aid? It's a conspiracy, man!

And yes, Amazon kicked their ass for almost 2 years.. what happened and what deals they might have had or not is completely irrelevant.. I was buying music DRM free while Apple crap was all DRMed.. and at the end.. I had to pay hundreds of dollars to Apple to get DRM free licenses for the music I already bought.

Where the hell are your numbers? In terms of digital downloads, iTunes has been a front-runner for a long time. Hell, iTunes is now the leading distributor of music period.

They can go screw themselves..

:laugh:

That's THE WHOLE FREAKING POINT!!!.. You can use and create code that will stream from your computer to any devices via UPnP or DNLA and they can't really stop you because it's OPEN..

Great! I don't care if you circumvent intended use cases. Hell, I'm sure I do the same all the time. I'm just saying that giving PlayOn as an example is ridiculous. None of the vendors want that to happen, but they have no control over it. Why would Apple or any other company create and advertise what probably violates quite a few ToS agreements? Even Google wouldn't be that crazy. I think the only reason PlayOn has lived on this long is because very few people really know about it.

So it wasn't Apple's idea to put DRM on the songs in the first place, and Apple doesn't make much off of the sales of songs anyway, but Apple has to pay the bandwidth costs to take it off and upgrade you to 256kbit AAC? I would love it if Apple soaked those costs, but I also understand that I live in the real world. By the way, Amazon doesn't let you re-download songs and movies either.

Listen.. you live in the la la land.. you keep drinking the kool-aid and believe that Apple really wants DRM free world..it's just that those damn providers all force them to DRM it.. yet other providers (at least in music) didn't have that problem 2 years prior to Apple "liberating" our libraries by taking additional money from us.. the encoding rate is NOTHING.. it doesn't cost them anything.. it's something they could have given you for free because whether it's 192kbit or 256 is very little difference. It's an excuse to charge money.

And Apple is the embodiment of DRM.. everything they do is closed, protected and actually most of the stuff they make goes beyond standards.. just because they want to appear they are ahead of everyone and they can't stand competition.

Read this.. a very nice article from Ars Technica.

http://arstechnica.c...er-lock-ins.ars

and another nice article

http://arstechnica.c...e-aint-dead.ars

Apple is rotten to the core.. there is no two ways about it. They are the greediest and most controlling crooks in technology world.

I find it amusing that no one has even brought up Free Software into this discussion. Maybe because it's a proper philosophy! trollface.png

Meh, free software isn't really free, especially from a business standpoint, MS It you can find dime a dozen, OSX IT or *nix IT not so much and pay for it in salary. But on the same token, I prefer free software like OpenOffice over MS Office

So it wasn't Apple's idea to put DRM on the songs in the first place, and Apple doesn't make much off of the sales of songs anyway, but Apple has to pay the bandwidth costs to take it off and upgrade you to 256kbit AAC? I would love it if Apple soaked those costs, but I also understand that I live in the real world.

Really? $570 million isn't much to you?

http://www.coolfer.com/blog/archives/2008/03/how_much_profit.php

Another estimate was made last year

by PacificCrest analyst Andy Hargreaves. He estimated per-song revenue at $0.69, network fees at $0.05, operating expenses at $0.05 and credit card fees at $0.10. That comes out to a 10% operating margin. On music sales of $1.9 billion, that gives us an operating margin of $190 million.

Artists have been complaining about the profit margins for years.

Listen.. you live in the la la land.. you keep drinking the kool-aid and believe that Apple really wants DRM free world..it's just that those damn providers all force them to DRM it.. yet other providers (at least in music) didn't have that problem 2 years prior to Apple "liberating" our libraries by taking additional money from us.. the encoding rate is NOTHING.. it doesn't cost them anything.. it's something they could have given you for free because whether it's 192kbit or 256 is very little difference. It's an excuse to charge money.

What other providers? Maybe it's the Apple haze clouding my brain, but I don't remember many legal alternatives to get mainstream DRM-free music before iTunes went DRM-free and the Amazon MP3 store opened. As for going DRM-free, why exactly do you feel entitled to get the new higher quality, DRM-free songs for free? I don't know of any other service that would've offered a similar perk. Hell, I don't know of any other service that would've only charged less than a 1/3rd of the cost of the original song to upgrade it. I didn't see Microsoft going "Hey guys, we're shutting down our PlaysForSure licensing servers. We're going to unlock all your music for you." No, I actually saw "Hey guys, we're shutting down PlaysForSure, so if you need to authorize those closed down WMA's past a certain date, you're screwed." Same happened when Sony shut down Sony Connect and the same thing happened when Yahoo shut down its music service. At least Apple's DRM'ed tracks can still be authorized and used. You were never forced to upgrade and you never lost the ability to use them.

And Apple is the embodiment of DRM.. everything they do is closed, protected and actually most of the stuff they make goes beyond standards.. just because they want to appear they are ahead of everyone and they can't stand competition.

Read this.. a very nice article from Ars Technica.

http://arstechnica.c...er-lock-ins.ars

and another nice article

http://arstechnica.c...e-aint-dead.ars

Apple is rotten to the core.. there is no two ways about it. They are the greediest and most controlling crooks in technology world.

Quite a few of the attributed forms of DRM (except for the iPod/iPhone lock-in to iTunes) are pretty universal to the industry. For instance, HDMI is used by a lot of vendors instead of DisplayPort because they need HDCP. Apple wanted to use DisplayPort, but needed to keep its media partners happy (it's a company, after all), so they baked HDCP into it. It's not used for anything except DRM'd HD iTunes content (again, video content is pretty much universally DRM'd anyway). Phone locking and anti-jailbreaking measures are nothing new and are an unfortunate measure that comes from doing business with telecom giants. Just ask Motorola, HTC, and others.

As for locking Mac OS X down to Apple hardware, it's is in their best interest as a hardware company. If they didn't lock it down, they'd have to, one, completely shift their business strategy to become a software business and, two, charge way more for OS X and bake in some sort of Genuine OS X licensing scheme just like everybody has known to love in the Windows world. It's not like they exactly lock it down tight either. In fact, Snow Leopard has probably been the easiest version of OS X to crack since it went x86 compatible.

To this day, though, I still don't agree with their decision to require authentication chips in their iDevice peripherals. It didn't really affect me (I'm not a big TV Out guy), but I do feel for the people that bought peripherals that didn't have the authentication chips and expected them to work on their new devices.

Really? $570 million isn't much to you?

http://www.coolfer.com/blog/archives/2008/03/how_much_profit.php

Artists have been complaining about the profit margins for years.

Those are complete guesses. We don't have conclusive numbers because Apple lumps iTunes Store sales figures into a broader category, but they continue to insist that they make just above break-even. http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20100225/apple-billions-of-songs-billions-of-apps-not-much-profit/. They could be hiding something, but we all know how much Apple likes to gloat if they have a success on their hands, so probably not.

So let me get this correct, because i have an iPad, MBP, and iPods I'm a fanatic or cult of Mac

Yes. And so am I because I own a Mac Pro, LED Cinema Display and iPod touch. You want to get together and plan the destruction of the world and annihilation of the human race? Maybe Elliott would like to join us as well. I bet I can persuade my mom as well as she uses an eMac together with some friends.

I'll be sure to get a bottle Prosecco and a couple of beers if you guys bring something over to snack. I'm free next Wednesday!

I dunno about actually calling it a religion. If you did, there are a lot of other things you could call religions.

Like when Glenn Beck came on tour to my college campus and people lined up for a full day before the doors opened.

Or when a new Twilight movie comes out.

Or a new Star Wars movie back in the day.

People on this forum take this Mac vs PC thing way to seriously.

People on this forum take themselves way to seriously. It's funny how most PC users around here have more issues with Apple, than Apple users have with PCs. Looks to me like the whole For Apple Followers, It's a Matter of Faith subject is the other way around on Neowin. :laugh:

People on this forum take themselves way to seriously. It's funny how most PC users around here have more issues with Apple, than Apple users have with PCs. Looks to me like the whole For Apple Followers, It's a Matter of Faith subject is the other way around on Neowin. :laugh:

I use both I've mentioned this on here previously I have a MacBook Pro and I have a self-build PC that I run Windows 7 on. Personally like you say I ain't got a problem with Windows. Windows has a huge software library and the latest version (7) runs brilliantly for me. I like both the operating systems for different reasons.

The idea that Apple users are somehow iSheep is in my opinion quite a flawed and generalised statement. I get the same enjoyment in opening a new Apple product as I do opening new PC hardware or trying out the newest version of Windows. It's no different to me. And I see people on Windows centric forums like this one which do the same. On this very forum you can have topics with over 1000 posts discussing the latest Microsoft operating system while its still in closed beta following PDC or PAX or whatever event just the same as how the Mac users huddle around WWDC topics.

PC and Mac users are no different really.

People on this forum take themselves way to seriously. It's funny how most PC users around here have more issues with Apple, than Apple users have with PCs. Looks to me like the whole For Apple Followers, It's a Matter of Faith subject is the other way around on Neowin. :laugh:

A bit telling how Apple users are so quick to go on the offensive at PCs and Microsoft over a news article in the BPN forum (read: a perfectly normal occurrence) that, in fact, makes no mention whatsoever of their imagined enemies, don't you think?

Gee, we already have a scientific study to prove it, you guys don't really need to go out of your way to show what's already been proven, you know.

A bit telling how Apple users are so quick to go on the offensive at PCs and Microsoft over a news article in the BPN forum (read: a perfectly normal occurrence) that, in fact, makes no mention whatsoever of their imagined enemies, don't you think?

Gee, we already have a scientific study to prove it, you guys don't really need to go out of your way to show what's already been proven, you know.

It goes both ways, you know... But for your sake lets pretend that isn't the case. ;)

Guys, if you look at +Elliott posts history, all of them are defending Apple .... so no use arguing with him ...

And Boz has a history of continuously attacking Apple. Like I said, it goes both ways.

Its just a company that makes products. The whole "iPhone reception" and "iPad can't access the web" issues is exaggerated into a world of FUD. People tend to be fans of devices they like to use. Apple make devices people like to use. Apple didn't invent such a notion, just capitalized on it.

It's not a religion actually.. it's like the worst cult that brainwashes you and does everything to make money off you while in return promising everlasting something and telling you you are sooo much better, cooler than others because you use their products/belong to their cult.

while i agree that apple fanboys are slow they arent the worst. They are willing to pay for thier product. Tell a linux fanboy he has to pay even $1 for his distro.

while i agree that apple fanboys are slow they arent the worst. They are willing to pay for thier product. Tell a linux fanboy he has to pay even $1 for his distro.

Fail. He pays. He donates for the distro to be developed further. Or pays for the dvd/cd version, instead of the free download, just to support the maker. Do some research.

About this Apple thing. I'm not saying that Apple products are crap, I even use Snow Leo (on PC) for some apps that are exclusive to this OS (like Logic Studio). But Apple has a long history of misleading marketing and commercials, design over functionality, etc. I really don't understand those fanboys that hate you just because you notice a bug or flaw in some Apple product. It's quite stupid to pretend that your device/OS/whatever "just works", when there are websites like macfixitforums.com. And yes, I can say this, compared to Microsoft, Apple is nothing, in many ways. Yes, they may have some things that got very popular, but keep in mind that Windows (and other MS apps) are for 90%+ people of this world. It's impossible to have a bug-free OS, or something that "just works" in this case, because it can't be tested in all scenarios. Apple knows this, and, knowing they're a minority, they turned this into a marketing campaign. But even so, their products are far from perfect. And, to be honest, I'll have a MS product any day instead of an Apple product.

You can say whatever you want, but Apple fanboys are really fanatics. Not all of them, but most of them. They would buy even a can of **** if Jobs would say it will prevent cancer. This is a serious psychical issue.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • When I think about a network, there are really two aspects, the hardware and the wiring. So here is what I would do for both. Wiring: Use Cat6A for the patch panel and all structured cables (cables installed in walls). Run plenty of Wireless Access Point (WAP) cables, as a general rule, assume a signal can only pass through 2-3 walls and can't pass through a floor (that is conservative, but trust me on this if you want strong WiFi)  Cat6 patch cables are fine for now if you don't plan to run 10gig, those are easy to replace later if needed. Run OS2 single-mode fiber to anywhere you think you may have a server or sub-switch. (yes, single-mode for everything on a small network, don't mess with multimode unless you have entire racks of servers and that minor module cost and power savings will matter). If you really want to future proof, also run fiber to any high density WAP locations, it is likely that WiFi 8 WAPs will push the limits of 10g. Run 6-12 pairs of single-mode fiber between your MDF and the building's MDF, even if you only need 1 or 2 pairs now, those extra pairs will pay off down the road. Hardware: (its easy to say "get all the features incase you need them", so instead of futureproofing, I am going to take approach of suggesting areas worth investing in, and areas you can save money). Don't overspend thinking you need every feature on every port. You don't need 10g on every port, you don't need PoE on every port. Don't overspend on redundancy either, unless you are ready to buy two of everything, don't waste money buying two of some things and not others. Dual power supplies are worthwhile, but probably not HA or multi-path redundancy.  Get 1 "distribution layer" switch that your router/firewall will connect to, your access layer switches. This should be a 10g switch with a combination of copper and SPF ports and should be a fully managed switch. Given that you said it is a small network, I suggest also using that distribution layer switch for servers and WAPs, meaning it will need PoE. Speaking of wireless, get good professional tri-band WAPs, and either turn on the band stirring options, or limit 2.4 to an IoT only SSID. This will provide a solid WiFi capable nearly everything but the highest of bandwidth clients...you could even consider skipping wiring workstations depending on usage. Access layer switch for workstations and printers can be cheaper switches, 2.5g is a good sweet spot between price and future proofing, but even 1g is fine for most individual clients (the kind that could probably be fine on WiFi). You can consider saving a little on access layer switches by only getting 1 PoE switch for whatever needs it (remember your WAPs are connecting to the distribution switch, not here), and non-PoE for your workstations, because desk phones are falling out of favor. You can also save money here by not buying managed switches if you don't need them--but really do some soul searching there, if you go this route, then anything that isn't on your workstation VLAN would either need to be connected to the distribution switch, or its own switch. Also, don't feel like you need a fancy fabric stacking switches for your access layer, that is the point of the higher-end distribution layer, to remove the need for things like that at this level. Home Hardware: I'm realizing the above assumed an office setting, if this if for your house and home lab then the above still applies, but you'll probably want everything managed and PoE, just because, but you probably also don't need multiple access layer switches. if your total port count is below 24, just skip separating distribution layer and access layer and just get one nice switch with the features you want. For home use, don't worry about home running every device to the main switch, there is nothing wrong with running sub-switches for your media areas and office, those essentially become your access layer, just look for sub-switches with a 10g uplink so sharing bandwidth isn't an issue.
    • Google Meet brings Gemini note-taking to AI Pro and Ultra subscribers by Karthik Mudaliar Google's Gemini-powered "Take notes for me" feature inside Google Meet is now available to Google AI Pro and Ultra subscribers. The features work on Google Meet for web as well as on mobile, and Google says that subscribers can use it for meetings they host in many supported languages. As the name suggests, "Take notes for me" allows Gemini to listen to a meeting, generate a summary, identify action items, and save the notes as a Google Doc in the user’s Drive. After the meeting, the organizer receives an email recap with the summary and action items, while the notes can also be attached to the related Calendar event depending on the meeting setup and sharing settings. The feature isn't automatically turned on for everyone, though. Google says that all meeting participants are notified when note-taking is turned on, and users can start it from the pencil icon in Meet or enable it for future calls through Meet’s meeting records settings. For work or school accounts, administrators can also control whether the feature is available and may require explicit participant consent for note-taking, recording, or transcription features. The feature first launched back in 2024, when it was available just for selected Workspace users. Over the years, Google added refinements and more options, including the ability to enable it when scheduling meetings via Google Calendar. Google's support docs say that the feature currently supports English, French, German, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Portuguese, and Spanish, but only one language at a time. Meetings with multiple spoken languages are not currently supported, and Google recommends using the tool for meetings between 15 minutes and eight hours. The new feature makes Google Meet closer to its rivals that have AI tools already built in. Microsoft Teams has recently started offering Copilot and intelligent recap features that summarize meetings, surface highlights, and help with follow-ups, while Zoom’s AI Companion can also generate meeting summaries from desktop and mobile meetings.
    • GnuCash 5.16 by Razvan Serea GnuCash is a personal and small business finance application, freely licensed under the GNU GPL and available for GNU/Linux, BSD, Solaris, Mac OS X and Microsoft Windows. It’s designed to be easy to use, yet powerful and flexible. GnuCash allows you to track your income and expenses, reconcile bank accounts, monitor stock portfolios and manage your small business finances. It is based on professional accounting principles to ensure balanced books and accurate reports. GnuCash can keep track of your personal finances in as much detail as you prefer. If you are just starting out, use GnuCash to keep track of your checkbook. You may then decide to track cash as well as credit card purchases to better determine where your money is being spent. When you start investing, you can use GnuCash to help monitor your portfolio. Buying a vehicle or a home? GnuCash will help you plan the investment and track loan payments. If your financial records span the globe, GnuCash provides all the multiple-currency support you need. Between 5.15 and 5.16, the following bugfixes were accomplished: Bug 421610 - RFE: Include logical dates for View->Filter by "date range"The Select Range section of the Date tab of the register's Filter By dialog box is changed to provide relative, specific date, or days ago options for the start and end of the filter range. The Show number of days item label is changed to Show from days ago to better reflect what it does. Bug 436105 - esc key not working as expected in register: Enable the escape key to cancel a field edit. Bug 797384 - Gnucash doesn't handle commodity prices with big numerator/denominator properly. Bug 798004 - Next gen UI for stock transactions Bug 799314 - Add "enter now" option in scheduled transaction editor. tab to allow users to select the scheduled transactions to be included in a “Since Last Run…” window. If there are no instances of a selected transaction triggered by today’s date, the next instance is triggered. Bug 799751 - autocomplete crash Bug 799759 - Users can't Enable entries via Checkboxes on Scheduled Transactions PageAllow the Enabled box in the list of scheduled transactions to be operated instead of having to open the transaction editor dialog and change the Enabled checkbox. Also added use of the Name column as the secondary column sort for all the other columns. Bug 799762 - Poor handling of cases where hidden/placeholder accounts are used in the account register Bug 799766 - Double line preference not respected in search register Bug 799767 - POST /accounts in bindings/python/example_scripts/rest-api is broken Bug 799777 - `xaccSplitSetParent`: reparenting a committed split silently drops its KVP slots (online_id, cap-gains links) Other changes & improvements: Numeric values may now be selected to copy in the Accounts page. Add new Finance::Quote source Finnhub.io: Free API key (personal/non-professional use) available at https://finnhub.io. Set FINNHUB_API_KEY environment variable to API key to use this source. As of June 2026, free tier API limit is 60 API calls/minute. The Investment Lots report has new optional columns for Computed Annual Growth Rate. Python Bindings: Improved translation of primary object (Account, Transaction, Split, etc.) so that they can be treated as normal Python objects. This is accomplished with SWIG magic so no existing code is obsoleted. Python Bindings: Better conversion of GLists to Python lists. Python Bindings: Destroy the QofSession in the Python Session dtor to prevent leaving the database locked. [engine] Add first-class online_id accessors for Split and Account and make them available to Python bindings, removing the unused Transaction online_id property. Improve C++ implementation of QofBook. Correct the Doxygen doc for qof_instance_get/set_kvp. [gnc-log-replay.cpp] fix incorrect guid dump Add some Boost library requirements needed by libgnucash-guile to CMakeLists.txt so that missing feature will fail at configure time. Use Compile-time Regular Expressions instead of std::regex in gnc-filepath-utils.cpp and instead of boost::regex in the CSV importer, with the CTRE v3.11.1 header added to borrowed [gnc-filepath-utils.cpp] null check char* arguments Add ChartJS licenses. Removed AEX from list of commodities. euronext.com is now using JS based anti-webscraping. [report-core] always offer options summary in reports. This is useful to debug reports. The Add options summary option is removed because it's no longer optional. Remove remaining obsolete IMContext from sheet Fix blurry text in HiDPI offscreen-rendered widgets Add port field to database connection dialog: The convention of appending the port number after the host isn't obvious. When editing a split in the register treat the account as being changed only if it isn't the one selected before editing instead of if the user performed an edit Return immediately from qof_book_destroy if hash_of_collections is null. If qof_book_destroy is called on a QofBook* freshly created with qof_book_new (usually because it was used to create a session that now must be destroyed) it would try to empty the non-existent hash tables, crashing. Clean up Flathub metadata to solve warnings at flatpak build time. Be consistent in naming GncPluginPage and GncPluginPageRegister HTML: Remove unimplemented function declarations. [gnc-html.cpp] remove unused buggy string conversion functions Convert libgnc-html to C++ Apply -Wall -Werr -Wmissing-prototypes to C++ compilation on Windows and fix the resulting errors. New and Updated Translations: Arabic, Croatian, Danish, Dutch, German, Finnish, Hungarian, Korean, Norwegian-Bokmal, Spanish Download: GnuCash 5.16 | 176.0 MB (Open Source) Links: GnuCash Home page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Microsoft finally launches WSL Containers in public preview by David Uzondu Microsoft has announced that WSL containers, a feature that allows developers to run Linux containers natively inside Windows without the need for Docker Desktop, is now available in public preview several weeks after Microsoft previewed it at Build 2026. To use the new container feature, you first have to install the latest pre-release version of the Windows Subsystem for Linux by running a quick update command in your terminal: wsl --update --pre-release After installing, you'd get access to the new Linux container CLI (wslc.exe) and the programmable API. Microsoft said that the CLI has a "familiar format" that matches the toolsets developers already use every day. If you know standard Docker commands, your muscle memory will translate directly to wslc.exe, which even features a built-in alias called container.exe. You can quickly run a full Ubuntu KDE desktop container by exposing ports, or pass your graphics card straight into a machine learning environment to run PyTorch workloads. Passing the --gpus all flag inside the run command instantly links your hardware. Image via Microsoft As for the API, developers can now embed Linux container operations directly inside native Windows applications without exposing the command line to users. The team integrated the API directly into MSBuild and CMake, so developers can define container steps directly in project files. Apart from bringing the CLI and API into public preview, Microsoft also said that it's working on a new default file system called virtiofs to speed up file transfer rates between Windows and Linux. Microsoft also introduced an experimental networking mode named consomme, which resolves compatibility issues with corporate VPNs by routing Linux network traffic straight through Windows. One thing to note about WSL containers is that they don't run in your standard WSL distributions; instead, every application and CLI session spawns its own lightweight Hyper-V utility VM in the background. This basically reduces the chances of one app snooping on the container of another app.
    • Google reportedly limited Meta's Gemini access over limited AI compute by Karthik Mudaliar Google is reportedly limiting Meta's use of its Gemini AI models after Meta tried buying more computing capacity than even Google could supply. According to the Financial Times, Google told Meta in March that it could not provide the full Gemini capacity that Meta had requested. This shortfall even disrupted and delayed some of Meta's internal projects. Due to this, Meta even told its employees internally to use AI tokens more efficiently. Meta wasn't the only one to get hit by this sudden refusal by Google; even other customers were affected. But Meta was hit harder because of its unusually high demand for Google's models. The move from Google makes it evident that companies all over are in limited supply of both infrastructure and compute. Alphabet said in April that Google Cloud revenue grew 63% year-over-year to $20 billion in the first quarter, helped by enterprise AI infrastructure and AI solutions. In pursuit of more compute, Meta had earlier signed a multi-billion-dollar AWS agreement as well as a large AMD GPU deal for AI data centers. But the crunch would be short-lived as both Meta and Google have also ramped up infrastructure investments heavily. Meta said in November that it was committing more than $600 billion in the U.S. by 2028 for AI technology, infrastructure, and workforce expansion. In the first quarter of this year, Meta also raised its expected capital expenditure for 2026 to a range of $125 billion to $145 billion, citing higher component pricing and additional data center costs for future capacity. However, this doesn't make the company immune to the current dependence on outside suppliers. Meta has also spent many years promoting Llama as an open-weight alternative to closed models from Google, OpenAI, and Anthropic. But if the reported reliance on Google's Gemini models is severe enough for internal work to get impacted, then it looks like even frontier labs and Big Tech aren't fully self-sufficient. Source: Financial Times
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      533
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      269
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      150
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!