Recommended Posts

You're acting as if they're holding the game hostage from you. They're just giving you a chance to play the game earlier than the release date. It's not like you're not going to get the game you've paid for. It's not meant to be funny in any way, it's meant to promote Portal 2's release while simultaneously helping some independent developers in the gaming community -- I see nothing wrong with that.

have to agree they arent holding it from you they are just saying if the community can earn enough potatoes before the release date they will unlock it for all steam users at that point , they arent saying you need to buy the pack to unlock it, its that the more people who are working on getting them the faster it gets done.

I have to say this is isnt really funny anymore, Valve are just taking the ****.

Refund.

I believe this is called "Cutting your nose off to spite your face".

+1 I'm doing the samething. Valve becoming like EA

That doesn't even make any sense, Valve are adding the (community driven) opportunity to unlock the game early; and that makes them like a company that make bad games regularly for a high price with little post-release support?

That makes about as much sense as saying "Well this coffee is hot, so it must be pink".

You're acting as if they're holding the game hostage from you. They're just giving you a chance to play the game earlier than the release date. It's not like you're not going to get the game you've paid for. It's not meant to be funny in any way, it's meant to promote Portal 2's release while simultaneously helping some independent developers in the gaming community -- I see nothing wrong with that.

I was talking about the constant change of release dates, I know the game is finished - reviewers have had their copies for a while.

I was talking about the constant change of release dates, I know the game is finished - reviewers have had their copies for a while.

So every game that's finished should be immediately given to gamers -- shipments be damned, servers be damned, the laws of supply and demand be damned -- just because they're done? I don't even remotely agree. Reviewers have had copies for less than a week, I believe. This isn't a constant changing of release dates -- this is giving people on Steam the opportunity to play the game early by helping independent developers. The PS3 and 360 copies will still launch when they do, and the retail outlets of the PC version will as well. It's just a fun promotion for those who buy the game on Steam.

I'd remove that before getting a warning count.... If I was given a warning count for just mentioning that I had pirated something once, this will surely get you one. Can not post about pirated content in any way I believe.

No, you can talk about them, just not any of the process involved in getting them.

https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/879762-discussion-of-leaked-games/

No, you can talk about them, just not any of the process involved in getting them.

https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/879762-discussion-of-leaked-games/

I was given a warning once for just saying I had watched a movie that was pirated. It was in the forum about the movie, it had not come out yet, and for me just saying I had it and watched it was enough apparently for it... so just making sure no one else has it happen to them. Didn't say how I had it, just that I did have it. So I could see the same thing happening for someone doing basically the same thing lol.

I was given a warning once for just saying I had watched a movie that was pirated. It was in the forum about the movie, it had not come out yet, and for me just saying I had it and watched it was enough apparently for it... so just making sure no one else has it happen to them. Didn't say how I had it, just that I did have it. So I could see the same thing happening for someone doing basically the same thing lol.

The link which Corris posted is for gaming forum. ;)

It's going faster than I thought. Already on 5% now. I wonder how far it is when I wake up tomorrow. :)

are we assuming each bar is a percentage marker. I have seen in a lot of places people using percentages yet i could not find any percentage number listed anywhere lol :p

are we assuming each bar is a percentage marker. I have seen in a lot of places people using percentages yet i could not find any percentage number listed anywhere lol :p

99 bars fit in the whole bar. So it's about a percent per bar. But of course it's all assumptions. Valve can still modify a lot of stuff if they feel it's going to fast or slow. In the end I believe they'll still have total control of when they want to unlock it. :)

99 bars fit in the whole bar. So it's about a percent per bar. But of course it's all assumptions. Valve can still modify a lot of stuff if they feel it's going to fast or slow. In the end I believe they'll still have total control of when they want to unlock it. :)

I don't know how the progress meter is metered, I think if we get 1% per hour (which is basically the rate we are going at, it'll take 99 hours, we'll not unlock it at this rate).

Its friday afternoon, people are still at work. I have a feeling it will pick up quite a bit tonight and into tomorrow.

Yeah, it's already picking up some (look at the link 6 posts above mine, the average time reduced and average % per hour and what not are constantly rising so far), but only the east coast of the US is starting to get off work, we still have tons of people at work just in the US alone. Once they get off and have the weekend off it will pick up.

Either way, we are set up right now for a very light Monday release.

And before anyone says they won't release on the weekend. You never know, they obviously thought this system out well....no reason they couldn't tie it in so when it reaches 100% the decryption files are automatically pushed through Steam.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Would be good to see Google also being forced to do the same. No promotion of Chrome on Google search. Stop installing into the app data of a locked down machine, etc
    • FileZilla 3.70.6 by Razvan Serea FileZilla is powerful Open Source FTP/SFTP client with many features. It includes a site manager to store all your connection details and logins as well as an Explorer style interface that shows the local and remote folders and can be customized independently. The program offers support for firewalls and proxy connections as well as SSL and Kerberos GSS security. Additional features include keep alive, auto ascii/binary transfer, download queue, manual transfers, raw FTP commands and more. FileZilla key features: Cross-platform support – Available for Windows, macOS, and Linux. FTP, FTPS, and SFTP support – Handles standard and secure file transfer protocols. Tabbed user interface – Easily manage multiple connections at once. Site Manager – Save and organize server connection details. Drag & drop support – Quickly transfer files by dragging them. Filename filtering – Include or exclude specific files using filters. Directory comparison – Compare local and remote directories. Synchronized browsing – Navigate in sync between local and remote folders. Transfer queue – View, manage, and prioritize file transfers. Speed limits – Control upload/download speed to manage bandwidth usage. Keep-alive system – Prevents timeouts during long transfers. Remote file editing – Open and edit remote files using local editors. IPv6 support – Compatible with modern networking standards. FileZilla 3.70.6 changelog: New features SFTP: Added compatibility flag to Site Manager to ignore invalid bits in file attributes flags received from non-compliant servers Bugfixes and minor changes SFTP: Updated to fzssh 1.3.0 Updated to libfilezilla 0.56.1 Removed autodetection of FTP server type governing the remote path syntax. Exotic server types now need to be set explicitly on the advanced page in the Site Manager Download page: FileZilla 3.70.6 | ~10.0 MB (Free, paid upgrade available) Links: FileZilla Home page | Documentation | FileZilla Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Browser vendors pen open letter to Microsoft saying "enough is enough" by Usama Jawad We have seen Microsoft resort to questionable tactics in the past to get more customers to use Edge, such as "bribing" people to use Edge, testing new behavior so that Edge loads automatically on startup every time, and pressuring OEMs to exclusively bundle Edge in Windows PCs. However, the company often receives pushback not only from customers but also from the Browser Choice Alliance (BCA). Now, the collective has penned an open letter to the Redmond tech firm to highlight its dissatisfaction with its practices. For those unaware, BCA is a coalition that touts several browser vendors as its members, including Google Chrome, Midori, Opera, Vivaldi, BrowserWorks, and Wavebox. Its latest open letter to Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella emphasizes that "enough is enough" and that user choice on Windows should be respected. It claimed that the company is abusing its dominant position in the PC space to push customers to its first-party browser, even if they don't want to use it. To do this, it resorts to shady tactics, some of which we highlighted at the start of this piece. It says that Microsoft is making it very difficult for users to set their preferred browser across all touchpoints. This is problematic as PCs are becoming even more prevalent in the AI era, so user choice is being restricted across even more devices, further frustrating users (and competing browser vendors). As such, BCA has urged Microsoft to take the following actions to level the playing field: Allow browser suppliers to compete for preinstallation and default deals with Windows PC manufacturers End dark patterns targeted at users seeking to download and effectively use other browsers (including as system-level default) Bring back the ability for users to make switching default browsers simple and transparent with a “single click” change for all relevant file types and apps (including PDFs) Open all web links in the users’ selected system-level browser of choice Eliminate manipulative Microsoft-exclusive banners pushing Edge in Windows, including when users are searching for other browsers Stop using operating system updates to push users back to Edge Remove the restrictive configurations of existing S mode devices that block the usage of third-party browsers. It believes that all browsers should compete on merit, as this will drive innovation and healthy competition. Despite its strong wording and publication of the letter openly, it's unclear if Microsoft will pay any heed to the BCA and if this will result in any tangible downstream benefits. We'll likely find out in due time.
    • Boo! I was excited for this... Stargate SG-1 Star Michael Shanks Rallies Fans After Amazon Axes Revival, Says 'Now Is the Time to Say Something'
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      mobandz earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Apprentice
      fernan99 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      474
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      247
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      77
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!