Recommended Posts

I bought the potato sack because it was a good deal, the games I wanted alone cost more than the entire sack.

Even then, the developers of the games get more money than Valve do. So while it's easy to claim that it's just a way for Valve to make money, remember that Valve isn't the one getting the majority of it.

The only spuds (sorry potatoes) lol, are the ones who paid extra to get this game unlocked early. Not even half baked either :laugh:

What little hope for society just went out the window with this I'm afraid. Still, we move on, we try lol :rolleyes:

I've spoke with Valve, and if I buy another 20 games on their list, they will give me the 8% pre-load I need to finish this download, rather than me waiting. I think its a good deal, and they will give me 2 baked potatoes for my dinner also.....

post-26672-0-16372700-1303094701.jpg

So, affecting the release time means possibly a 'whole' 24hrs earlier? WOOPEEE DOOO lol!!

Was it really worth spending an extra ?28.00 on this money making exercise? lol - your money and its yours to waste I suppose :rolleyes:

I hope Valve releases LATE (they normally do) lol, and I'll laugh and laugh till I laugh :laugh:

24 hours early. Doubtful.

We'll be lucky if it gets released at Midnight PDT Tuesday Morning.

I think each completed game, shaves a hour off.

50 minutes.

How are they exploiting gamers by helping indie developers.. They could have left the prices for the titles at the normal price, but instead, they knocked the prices down.

The two aren't mutually exclusive. Yes they're helping indie devs make sales, but at the same time they've told people: "Buy these games for ?28.99 and get Portal 2 early", when in reality it will be all of a day early. Patience is a trait many gamers don't unfortunately posess, and IMO Valve exploited this to and extent sell games. I mean, it's certainly no crime, but at the same time, they could have knocked the price down all the same without the promise of the "early Portal 2 release" which basically encouraged people to buy games that they wouldn't ordinarily play.

With the game releasing today/tomorrow for the NA folk. Will this thread be full of spoilers? Or is there a spoiler policy in place. I don't mind either way, if things are being discussed I'll stay out of the thread until I have it.

Spoiler tags should always be used. Not everyone will play (and beat) the game at the same time.

The two aren't mutually exclusive. Yes they're helping indie devs make sales, but at the same time they've told people: "Buy these games for ?28.99 and get Portal 2 early", when in reality it will be all of a day early. Patience is a trait many gamers don't unfortunately posess, and IMO Valve exploited this to and extent sell games. I mean, it's certainly no crime, but at the same time, they could have knocked the price down all the same without the promise of the "early Portal 2 release" which basically encouraged people to buy games that they wouldn't ordinarily play.

So what you're saying, is through marketing Valve greatly increased the profile and profits of small, indie developers, while introducing new players to the games who wouldn't have otherwise purchased the games. And at the same time provided the opportunity to get a hugely anticipated game before it's original release date?

So what you're saying, is through marketing Valve greatly increased the profile and profits of small, indie developers, while introducing new players to the games who wouldn't have otherwise purchased the games. And at the same time provided the opportunity to get a hugely anticipated game before it's original release date?

Yeah how dare they....

Though just to play devils advocate if the game is ready then why wait till the release date thats what annoys me about publishers the game is sat on the shelves or digitally on a server and probably has been for a good few days if its ready let people play.

Yeah how dare they....

Though just to play devils advocate if the game is ready then why wait till the release date thats what annoys me about publishers the game is sat on the shelves or digitally on a server and probably has been for a good few days if its ready let people play.

If it was only being released on Steam, they would probably have released it as soon as it was done. But they have to have time to get it to all retailers, and if they release it substantially before them they probably face legal repercussions - retailers really hate what they would see as being cheated out of profits.

So what you're saying, is through marketing Valve greatly increased the profile and profits of small, indie developers, while introducing new players to the games who wouldn't have otherwise purchased the games. And at the same time provided the opportunity to get a hugely anticipated game before it's original release date?

I take no issue with the fact that they're supporting Indie developers, in fact I applaud it, but the fact is that the game was ready on Friday, and Valve could quite easily have said "Buy these extra games, and get Portal 4 days early", instead of making everyone wait and get it a day early... on a school/work day when no-one can play it.

I don't know, I like the fact that it could be coming out early, but to me it just smacks of a social experiment to see how impatient gamers really are, while at the same time making a bit of extra money.

EDIT: Like Someguy said, there would probably be legal ramifications from releasing it on Friday from game retailers, but still, the whole thing is just a farce.

How are they exploiting gamers by helping indie developers.. They could have left the prices for the titles at the normal price, but instead, they knocked the prices down.

By dangling portal 2 in front of them on a stick. At MOST this will release it a few hours early, this glados@home thing never had a chance to have any significant effect on the release date. People did all this work collecting the potatoes and such to essentially not even change the release date.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • VS Code 1.123 introduces massive upgrades for persistent AI developer workflows by Paul Hill Microsoft has just released Visual Studio Code 1.123 alongside its annual developer conference, Build 2026. This release, as always, has a heavy focus on advanced AI agent integration and making the built-in browser more robust. Notably, this update brings big sync changes that keep your AI agents persistent across sessions. With this update, VS Code now supports cross-machine syncing for chat histories, touched files, repository contexts, and related PRs via GitHub accounts, tying users even more into Microsoft’s developer ecosystem. This update also introduces the new /chronicle command that allows you to query past sessions using natural language, generate instant standup reports, and get personal productivity insights. Microsoft has also made some improvements to network-dependent operations, it explains: “When a terminal command that is run by a local agent requires access to domains that are not configured as allowed domains, the command is automatically retried inside the sandbox with unrestricted network access. After that, if it still fails, it falls back to unsandboxed execution. This allows network-dependent operations such as git fetch to finish, while keeping filesystem protections in place.” Microsoft has not stopped there; in this update, it also allows developers to drag, drop, and pin multiple agent sessions side-by-side for easy code comparisons in real-time. It also introduces the Research Agent, accessible via /research. This is a read-only, depth-optimized tool that gets data from the web, local codebase, and GitHub to give you a Markdown report on complex APIs or unfamiliar code. Now, let’s talk about the integrated browser and some security enhancements. VS Code 1.123 features enhanced screenshot capture tools that allow for targeted Area Screenshots and Full Page Screenshots to send layout context instantly to AI chat. The address bar has also been revamped, supporting favorite pages and tab management. Finally, on the security front, this update introduces a safety-first two-hour delay on third-party extension auto-updates to safeguard against compromised or buggy releases. This release is now available for Windows, Mac, and Linux. If you have VS Code, keep an eye out for the update availability notification. If you still don’t have VS Code, you can get it here.
    • I'm hoping with the Surface Pro 12, I can use either USB-C for my Xreal One Pro glasses. With my Surface Pro 11 OLED X Elite, I have to plug them into the top port. The bottom port will power it, but nothing shows on the screen. Maybe it's my setting. When I plug in the glasses, I have it output only to the glasses. So maybe I need to turn on both displays with it in the top port, then switch the glasses to the bottom port and set it to output only to the glasses. And then hopefully Windows remembers the settings for either the top port and bottom port (one of the awesome features of Windows where it remembers the exact configuration when plugging in external monitors.
    • Forgive my ignorance, but the only difference I see here is that a USB-A is now a USB-C, so there are two of them. For the modern age (and I'd argue since 2020), most products would now come with USB-C as an option, if not the default. Display, charging, devices, etc on TWO connectors, sometimes all combined! So having 2 of those powerful ports is great for something this size! Meanwhile my Surface Pro (5) has a single USB-A port which I cannot even get display out to, instead relying on some Surface Connect dock which I don't have. That is a poor experience, not to mention expensive and not compatible with other devices. Thank God USB-C is mainstream!
    • wow. that color finally comes to Surface Pro. was always a little jelly when a friend had the sandstone Surface Laptop. I wonder how different this dune is from the sandstone. I'll be getting the dune version. always thought black and platinum were a little boring. I'll still have access to my blue Surface Pro 11 as it'll be a hand-me-down.
    • Looks a very subjective aren't they!? I like its simple design. I love the way Apple designs their products with function over form, minimalization, and simplicity over cluttered complex designs. Many, not all, of their products follow this trend, and the device becomes a tool rather than dominating the space. I do not however like their OS. I have never bought a Apple product, and while I'd consider the Neo for my wife, I am hoping there are better alternatives out there when her failing MacBook Pro 2017 finally stops. Fischer-Price is famously plastic, garish, and poorly made. Basically you're describing the Window Laptops the Neo competes against! This is how product design should be, and what Apple have often followed in recent years: https://tenprinciples.design/
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      jefred earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Apprentice
      JoeyNeo went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Week One Done
      oliviaexpo earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      485
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      228
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      70
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      58
    5. 5
      Nick H.
      54
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!