Neowin Digital Gallery - Yearly Edition 2011


Recommended Posts

Ehh...First time posting in here...I haven't managed to get the vibrant colours the lot of you have as I'm learning but I'll get there!

I just got my T2i (first SLR) on Friday of last week. I love the camera and I especially love the detail of the shots when the image is enhanced.

So here's a shot I took of a leaf hanging over our balcony:

post-45347-0-85251800-1308028688.jpg

This is another one I took.I like the orange look of this phone. I'm on my laptop so I stole it off the facebook upload, so its obviously a compressed to **** version.

It's nice, a bit too orange IMO though (like on the forehead), I probably would have adjusted the WB just a tad.

Ehh...First time posting in here...I haven't managed to get the vibrant colours the lot of you have as I'm learning but I'll get there!

I just got my T2i (first SLR) on Friday of last week. I love the camera and I especially love the detail of the shots when the image is enhanced.

Are you shooting jpg or raw?.. Really, don't be so caught up on colors, at least not while you're shooting... Shoot raw if you aren't already. Because if you are, really there is nothing you can adjust in camera to really affect the colors (in terms of pop) that's all done by editing. (I mean of course different lighting will affect colors slightly different)...

Work more on composition first, to me the focus of the image is the middle leaf holding the largest amount of water, but due to the limitations of your lens the background is not as blurred as it should be, so it's taking away from the image, I want to look at the red vines, since this is the case you need to work on different angles etc. to make it stand out better.

Are you shooting jpg or raw?.. Really, don't be so caught up on colors, at least not while you're shooting... Shoot raw if you aren't already. Because if you are, really there is nothing you can adjust in camera to really affect the colors (in terms of pop) that's all done by editing. (I mean of course different lighting will affect colors slightly different)...

Work more on composition first, to me the focus of the image is the middle leaf holding the largest amount of water, but due to the limitations of your lens the background is not as blurred as it should be, so it's taking away from the image, I want to look at the red vines, since this is the case you need to work on different angles etc. to make it stand out better.

That shot was in jpg. I thought the default format was RAW but later that night I went and changed it to RAW.

I really appreciate the feedback and advice. I'm guessing a different lens aside from the kit lens will offer more of that blur (bokeh, right?). I was thinking of picking up the f1.8 50mm lens but not sure if that's what I should be going with or something else. I'll definitely work on different angles to get more out of the shot. Thanks!

How you like it ?

If you mean how do I like the camera, I love it. If you mean how did someone like the photo....Well...I hope they did for a first attempt lol!

Played around with an old SLR lens I found in my dads old camera bag. Added some post effects to make it feel even older lol :)

5834252317_7e6b847d57.jpg

mmm... by punklefish, on Flickr

5834255189_44f931ea21.jpg

cast your shadows by punklefish, on Flickr

5834258105_6ca66f7189.jpg

the... bronze lantern?... by punklefish, on Flickr

Also just got a shiny new red toy that I will be taking many pictures of when I get some new rims for it :D

Took this last night. Asked her if she wanted to go on a photo shoot for practice.

Lucky man!

Got this boy at the weekend. Damn these guys are quick! It's a little fuzzy, but that's cos he was twitching so much while he was eating!

f/5.6, 1/50, ISO200, 55mm

post-130223-0-20158100-1308121288.jpg

Played around with an old SLR lens I found in my dads old camera bag. Added some post effects to make it feel even older lol :)

First one looks good! - what lens was it?

Got this boy at the weekend. Damn these guys are quick! It's a little fuzzy, but that's cos he was twitching so much while he was eating!

Great photo, it is a LITTLE blurry, should have increased ISO to about 400 (but again, he was quick and I imagine you didn't have much time)... I've personally never got such a close-up of a squirrel, very well done. I love how his color really matches the surroundings.

Really, great image!

My brother and his friend, not sure if I like the color or B&W better:

5838093564_49bcbb6ce8.jpg

DSC_0471 B&W by Paulo Franco, on Flickr

5837542477_f0a5d51407.jpg

DSC_0471 by Paulo Franco, on Flickr

5837543649_445da29ecf.jpg

DSC_0470 by Paulo Franco, on Flickr

5837543869_0877bc1371.jpg

DSC_0478 by Paulo Franco, on Flickr

5837544017_b6ce7128fa.jpg

DSC_0489 by Paulo Franco, on Flickr

5838095924_d3fc368600.jpg

DSC_0492 by Paulo Franco, on Flickr

Kitty ^

Man...Doubt my kit lens can get floral shots as nice as yours :p. Love your pics.

I prefer the black and white personally. It seems to convey more innocence. Perhaps because it reminds me of clean programming such as Little Rascals and Leave it to Beaver.

Exif?

and what i meant was that my kit lens isnt sharp @ 55mm.. even when fully focused. And this image the moon is slightly blurred becoz of the huge exposure time of 15seconds :)

and i calculated for it.

but still i have a composite here look at it..

i took these photos all myself.

and the camera was stationary not held.. but pictures werent so sharp ... first few the AF was able to focus on the moon. But as it got dimmer the focus was lost and as i was shooting other things to i had to go to MF and first focus it to something far away. like 200yards away there were few bright blubs i focused it on them.

heres that edit :)

post-285248-0-42924900-1308215115.jpg

as u can see the first moon image was with AF on the moon.. but its not crisp.. now im assuming its becoz at such distance lens maxes out and this is a 100% crop btw.

@ Bassem ur moon pic looks very very sharp.. what gear did u use? it seems like a 200mm shot.

Exif?

and what i meant was that my kit lens isnt sharp @ 55mm.. even when fully focused. And this image the moon is slightly blurred becoz of the huge exposure time of 15seconds :)

and i calculated for it.

but still i have a composite here look at it..

i took these photos all myself.

and the camera was stationary not held.. but pictures werent so sharp ... first few the AF was able to focus on the moon. But as it got dimmer the focus was lost and as i was shooting other things to i had to go to MF and first focus it to something far away. like 200yards away there were few bright blubs i focused it on them.

heres that edit :)

post-285248-0-42924900-1308215115.jpg

as u can see the first moon image was with AF on the moon.. but its not crisp.. now im assuming its becoz at such distance lens maxes out and this is a 100% crop btw.

@ Bassem ur moon pic looks very very sharp.. what gear did u use? it seems like a 200mm shot.

Yes, the 50mm f/1.8 is sharper but you won't see that much of a difference. Mine was shot at 250mm, then cropped. Plus, 15 seconds is definitely too long considering the moon is moving.

I'm using a crappy tele lens, the 55-250mm f/4-5.6. I set it to manual focus, turned on LiveView, zoomed in and focused. I tried different settings, from slow shutter speeds to bumping up the ISO. The one I posted was shot at 3200 (cropped, of course), the noise wasn't as bad as I thought it would be.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I sort of agree with you on that. I had a telescope - a real hefty thing, although only around 500CHF - that got me so fascinated about the stars and planets. I would stare for hours, amazed that I could see the craters of the moon or the rings of Saturn in "realtime" (quotations because, y'know, speed of light and whatnot). A friend of mine has a telescope like the one mentioned in the review, and the pictures are amazing to look at. But there is something missing for me. I may as well just go to NASA's website and look through their gallery.
    • As opposed to catching bad press because it's the engine's fault? You didn't really think this through did you? lol. The engine has all the tools a dev needs to optimize their game, Epic isn't gonna hold their hand to make sure they use them. Also, Epic isn't forcing anyone to use Lumen, Nanite or super high resolution meshes and textures. Just because Nanite can render meshes with millions of polygons doesn't mean you should use it like that, in fact, Epic recommends you avoid doing that. Most of the stuttering can easily be fixed by cutting down on unique shaders by using master materials and generating a PSO cache and compiling every shader before loading the game and managing what must be loaded and unloaded at runtime, it's up to the developer to set all that up properly.
    • I think it depends on what you're looking for to do, and the time you have to spare. With my Dwarf 3, I easily spend 3-4 hour sessions; half an hour driving to an un-light polluted place, another half hour unpacking and setting up the smart scope + tripod for equatorial tracking, then 15 more minutes mucking around with settings and shooting calibration frames, spending a few hours shooting, merging with past photo sessions, etc. It's crazy how time flies and I often get home later than I expected. It's something I still need to set aside a good part of an evening to do, all in all. For one session, where you often need like four for best results when it comes to deep space objects. Even with a smart scope like Dwarf 3, regular non-astro photography is still way more approachable to people getting into photography. I find this is a time consuming niche no matter how I go about it. With practice, I can probably begin cutting time here but I think where smart scopes find their home is among people who love to shoot the night sky but don't have the spare time to go deep with the "navigator level" attunement to the night sky itself in addition to everything else. Having said this, _if_ you have even more time to spend on this hobby, it will probably be even more rewarding to do it more by hand and learn the skies and the details of how it all works.
    • I misread the title and thought Teams itself would be redesigned. Imagine having this one as a native WinUI app.
    • Dell, HP PCs ran into endless reboot, BitLocker recovery loops but Windows 11 isn't to blame by Sayan Sen Last month Neowin reported on a major issue on Dell systems wherein a bug in its official support tool was leading to endless blue screen of death (BSOD) and restarts. Following our report, Dell officially acknowledged its SupportAssist-related crash issue, confirming that the culprit is not Microsoft's operating system but rather a faulty version of its own remediation software. In a newly published support advisory, Dell stated that version 5.5.16.0 of Dell SupportAssist Remediation and Alienware SupportAssist Remediation can trigger blue screen errors and unexpected system restarts. The company notes that the problematic component operates independently of the main SupportAssist application, meaning users should not remove the primary SupportAssist software when troubleshooting the issue. According to Dell, the crashes are linked specifically to the SupportAssist Remediation service, which is bundled with SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools, and as such it has since released an updated version, 5.5.16.1, which is said to resolve the problem. Affected users are advised to first verify whether version 5.5.16.0 is installed by checking the Installed Apps section in Windows Settings. If so, Dell recommends updating SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools through either SupportAssist's "Update Software" feature or Dell Command Update. Dell also advises users to back up important data before performing the update and to ensure systems remain connected to power throughout the installation process. If you are still having issues though make sure to report to the Dell support forum. As it turns out though Dell is not the only PC maker currently dealing with update-related headaches as HP is also facing a separate but probably equally frustrating issue involving recent Windows Secure Boot updates that were released with recent Windows 11 Patch Tuesdays. Similar to Dell, HP also put up its own support article where it explains the issue. The company says that affected devices could hit a brick wall when booting as they run into a BitLocker recovery loop after the April 2026 updates. The problem appears to affect systems wherein the new UEFI Secure Boot CA 2023 certificates fail to apply properly. As such affected users will find themselves entering their recovery key over and over again despite the system otherwise functioning normally. HP says such PCs should be updated to the latest available BIOS version and configured with the necessary Secure Boot certificates before installing Microsoft's Windows 11 Patch Tuesday updates. Systems that are already experiencing the problem may require BIOS configuration changes to restore normal boot behavior. Admins can find information regarding that in the support article here on HP's official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      246
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!