Recommended Posts

There is already 64 bit flash and 64 bit java.

yes there's 64-bit java but the 64-bit flash was only a preview build that was never finished or updated from last year

besides the fact that there need to be a lot more 64-bit plugin support than just those two, and the fact that the 64-bit version afaik breaks many extensions as well

There still isn't officially supported 64bit builds, and the cutoff for Firefox 5 is tomorrow (That's when the main dev trunk is branched off for Aurora)

They need to fix all the errors first, then they need to implement support for running 32bit plugins with a 64bit host (Which they did before the 64bit mac builds became official*)

* They were already producing 64bit Mac builds for a while, but they didn't merge them into the single binary until after the plugin stuff landed.

I'd actually prefer if they did something like:

X.0 release

-6 Months- where X.1-.4 are critical bug fixes

X.5 release with bug fixes and optimizations of last X.0 release

-6 months-

new X.0 with new features

Repeat

I really dont get the push form companies lately to get the built numbers up. I feel software should cycle through optimization and feature builds.

(impossible dream) I wonder if Microsoft, Apple, and Mozilla ect. took one year to do NOTHING but take the software they have now and only clean up the code or rewrite parts to make them more optimized with out adding ANY new features, how the outcome would be. I would assume they would be better on memory, perhaps less bugs just due to how more manageable/readable the code would be, better performance, possibly even smaller install sizes.

Maybe I'm just anal about clean code and making it legible and correctly commented, but if I worked at MS or other such company I'd push to have at least part of the code cleaned like that every cycle or two. The network/audio stacks in Windows 7 were rewrote in Vista, I'd want for Windows 8 those teams to clean and optimize that code up as much as they can before adding new features. Same fore the UI and other teams.

Then again for all I know they already do that. So what do I know?

thanx for help but i want an update like people in this forum are stating i also tried whats stated here firefox update

there are users posting images too.how ###### i am not getting update???

Firsts Aurora builds will be available on April 12th !

To run Firefox and Minefield together you have to use the "no-remote" command :

Change the Minefield shortcut target to : X:\Path\To\Minefield Folder\firefox.exe -no-remote -p "Minefield Profile Name"

You can leave de Firefox shortcut like it is if you want to use it as primary webbrowser.

thanx for help but i want an update like people in this forum are stating i also tried whats stated here firefox update

there are users posting images too.how ###### i am not getting update???

Are you using Nightly builds? If so, it should work as stated in your link.

Just wondering, will they release an update that adds the channel switch for the FF4, or will you have to manually download the the nightly to access it?

Edit: lol guess I am not the only one wondering the same thing as the person above posted the same question while I was still typing.

Support for CSS3 Animations has landed, and they made the cutoff for being in 5.0 (of course they could still be disabled if bugs appear)

And the channel switcher wouldn't be backported to 4.0, if you want a newer build you'll have to download it (And switching to stable would downgrade you to 4.0, requiring you to re-download a newer build)

More theme stuff landed for Firefox 5.0 before branching

Bug 640490 - Tab titles seem inconsistently vertically aligned

Bug 465086 - When closing a tab, other tabs should not resize until cursor leaves tab toolbar (w00t!!)

So now we have three visible theme changes for Firefox 5.0 , one is tab bar height (not tab height) is shrunken , giving one more pixel for content in normal mode , two is drop-shadows are dropped for navbar buttons and three , tabs wont resize until cursor is moved (parity chrome) !!! Hell Yeah!!!

and this, idk what its meant for , but seems a big bug :p

btw aurora is live (only hourlies at present , with new icons etc)

Are they working on smooth scrolling? Even with the great Yet Another Smooth Scrolling extension, scrolling is still SOMETIMES a little choppy. A little stutter here and there. Not too bad. I just feel Opera and Chrome definitely have better smoothness when scrolling. Chrome's is perfect when using its great extension, Chromium Wheel Smooth Scroller.

Memory usage and start-up time are obviously very important as well. I hope they improve in those areas for Firefox 5 and beyond. Those are the three main areas that are holding it back from true greatness.

Are they working on smooth scrolling? Even with the great Yet Another Smooth Scrolling extension, scrolling is still SOMETIMES a little choppy. A little stutter here and there. Not too bad. I just feel Opera and Chrome definitely have better smoothness when scrolling. Chrome's is perfect when using its great extension, Chromium Wheel Smooth Scroller.

Memory usage and start-up time are obviously very important as well. I hope they improve in those areas for Firefox 5 and beyond. Those are the three main areas that are holding it back from true greatness.

Chrome doesn't even have a smooth scrolling feature :/

I think firefox's smooth scrolling is great. The only pages I have a problem on is youtube for some reason, It gets terribly choppy. Other flash sites are fine.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I wonder if "put it back the way it was for decades" ever crossed their minds? 🤣
    • Rescind the stupid "Show more options" in context menus and just give us the full menu instead of adding more steps to get to what we want. The "simpler by default" makes me think they'll go in the opposite direction. Every context menu should have a configure button so you can pick and choose what options should be shown, I know you can do that with some registry fu but that shouldn't be required.
    • This is why competition must exist. Finally, pressure is mounting on Microsoft to move in the right direction.
    • Microsoft is making Windows 11's context menus faster, simpler, and configurable by Taras Buria Five years ago, Windows 11 introduced redesigned context menus, offering users a simpler, more modern design. However, customers quickly discovered that the new menus leave a lot to be desired. Many are unhappy with performance (they are really slow), while others dislike the double-layed design, where many options are hidden behind the "Show more options" button. In addition, over the years, menus became cluttered and overloaded. While Microsoft has already fixed plenty of pain points across Windows 11, context menus remain mostly unchanged. Fortunately, Microsoft is finally listening. Marcus Ash, Design and Research Lead for Windows at Microsoft, responded to a tweet on X, confirming that the company is working on fixing Windows 11's context menus. Reworked context menus are supposed to be faster, simpler by default, and "configurable to what you use most." What the latter means is unknown, just like whether Microsoft plans to keep the classic menu alongside the modern one, but according to Marcus, the wait should finally be over soon, as he promised to "share our approach soon." Improved context menus will most likely appear first in Windows 11 preview builds in the Experimental Channel. While we wait for Microsoft to release them, you can try fixing context menus on your PC with a simple tool called Windows 11 Context Menu Manager. It lets you disable entries you do not need, not only cleaning up context menus, but also making them significantly faster. Microsoft has already improved Windows 11's Start menu and taskbar, so hopefully it will address user criticism of the context menu as well. Stay tuned for new Windows 11 preview builds, which usually arrive every Friday.
    • If the drive/memory is soldered to the board, which it probably is, then it's a no from me
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Carru_123 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Dr Jared Dental Studio earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      RG INVESTMENT GROUP earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Very Popular
      The Norwegian Drone Pilot earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Very Popular
      s0nic69 earned a badge
      Very Popular
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      472
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      251
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      67
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!