Recommended Posts

Is it possible to disable the "Hide http" feature?

There's an about:config entry to disable it. I read it from mozillazine. I will post it if I find it again.

To disable "hiding of http" feature , use this about config value and toggle it to false

browser.urlbar.trimURLs

There is a new landing in the UX branch

Expect TI in mc by 1st week of july

Firefox 6 to beta and Firefox 7 to aurora branch would happen on 5th July

I have updated the first page with many links to track the development , also , now that firefox has opted for faster release cycle , i dont think we would be creating more of these threads every quarter! Just like opera and chrome threads are there , i think firefox should follow the same. So henceforth all firefox discussion about PRERELEASE versions would go here, as it was decided at advent of the release mechanism

Azure (Implement Direct2D Azure Backend) landed in mozilla-inbound

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=651858#c101

Soon in mozilla-central.........Yuppeee!!!!!!!

very good! (Y)

i'm really amazed with nightly memory usage; once when i randomly opened the task manager to check the usage, it usually showed about 250 - 300 mb usage; but now it's usually around 140 - 170 mb, great work mozilla! :laugh:

So Azure has landed, and is enabled by default. On some things it gives massive gains, while on other things it barely helps. But more performance is always welcome.

Edit: Well, D2D backed <canvas>, there's still work to be done for general page compositing and cross-process stuff.

Starting with Today's Nightly build , when I hover over the icon in the taskbar, I can't see a preview. All I see is a busy Aero mouse pointer. Anyone else see this? Using Win 7 x 64

working fine here, also Win 7 x64

Switch on the setting of "Show tab preview in windows taskbar"(in tab options) and then look.

Edit: There's more people experiencing the same problem over here. http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=2236367&start=30

Edit: There's more people experiencing the same problem over here. http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=2236367&start=30

That was for Brando212, as he said he does not see the busy aero mouse pointer and you won't if that is NOT checked.

I hope electrolysis project will help Firefox in performance.

I am not super-optimistic though.

Currently there are a few major issues:

1. Firefox tab animations are very laggy compared to Chrome.

Loading new tab pages in a separate process (or at least separating the FF GUI process...) will help here.

Although, part of the issue seems just to stem from expensive repainting in general (new tab animation laggs opening a blank).

From visual analysis, Chrome tabs seem more simple.

2. Firefox expensively loads background tabs.

Firefox repaints the content in background tabs (correct me if I am wrong).

This is painfully seen loading a 2-3MB image in a background tab (while foreground tab is idle),

simply downloading something is not CPU intensive but Firefox uses 30% to load an img in background tab.

3. All loading tabs and foreground tab are required to share on virtual core.

The main component! The slower each virtual core is, the worse Firefox performance is.

This will not benefit single core systems, but will HT and better CPUs.

I have been using Firefox 7a for some time now, but it is painful because of the above.

Azure and TI are not as important. They are simple improvements to something that "works well", whereas process separation is an improvement to something that "works poorly"...

Edited by Udedenkz

i'm really amazed with nightly memory usage; once when i randomly opened the task manager to check the usage, it usually showed about 250 - 300 mb usage; but now it's usually around 140 - 170 mb, great work mozilla! :laugh:

Same here! So far ok but not yet convinced. Need to give it a good week before I am happy maybe two.

I hope electrolysis project will help Firefox in performance.

I am not super-optimistic though.

Currently there are a few major issues:

1. Firefox tab animations are very laggy compared to Chrome.

Loading new tab pages in a separate process (or at least separating the FF GUI process...) will help here.

Although, part of the issue seems just to stem from expensive repainting in general (new tab animation laggs opening a blank).

From visual analysis, Chrome tabs seem more simple.

2. Firefox expensively loads background tabs.

Firefox repaints the content in background tabs (correct me if I am wrong).

This is painfully seen loading a 2-3MB image in a background tab (while foreground tab is idle),

simply downloading something is not CPU intensive but Firefox uses 30% to load an img in background tab.

3. All loading tabs and foreground tab are required to share on virtual core.

The main component! The slower each virtual core is, the worse Firefox performance is.

This will not benefit single core systems, but will HT and better CPUs.

I have been using Firefox 7a for some time now, but it is painful because of the above.

Azure and TI are not as important. They are simple improvements to something that "works well", whereas process separation is an improvement to something that "works poorly"...

I highly disagree.

Though the improvements are fine by me but I am in no rush. Runs smooth as butter for me.

I hope electrolysis project will help Firefox in performance.

I am not super-optimistic though.

Currently there are a few major issues:

1. Firefox tab animations are very laggy compared to Chrome.

Loading new tab pages in a separate process (or at least separating the FF GUI process...) will help here.

Although, part of the issue seems just to stem from expensive repainting in general (new tab animation laggs opening a blank).

From visual analysis, Chrome tabs seem more simple.

2. Firefox expensively loads background tabs.

Firefox repaints the content in background tabs (correct me if I am wrong).

This is painfully seen loading a 2-3MB image in a background tab (while foreground tab is idle),

simply downloading something is not CPU intensive but Firefox uses 30% to load an img in background tab.

3. All loading tabs and foreground tab are required to share on virtual core.

The main component! The slower each virtual core is, the worse Firefox performance is.

This will not benefit single core systems, but will HT and better CPUs.

I have been using Firefox 7a for some time now, but it is painful because of the above.

Azure and TI are not as important. They are simple improvements to something that "works well", whereas process separation is an improvement to something that "works poorly"...

True , or just taking chrome out as a separate process would do enough to keep the UI fast

I'd definitely agree that the UI is sluggish. Hell, even running your cursor up and down the Firefox menu isn't as responsive as it should be.

Boot times are still pretty trashy for me, even on an SSD. :/

The UI on firefox 7.0a is fine for me but firefox still crashes sort of often for me. Maybe once a day, chrome just seems to glide. I use both of them anyway but mostly chrome. The tests are catching up with Chrome.

unled2nt.png

Palemoon hmm, they should make nightly builds too :p

I'd definitely agree that the UI is sluggish. Hell, even running your cursor up and down the Firefox menu isn't as responsive as it should be.

Boot times are still pretty trashy for me, even on an SSD. :/

Opens instantly on my ssd. I do agree the UI is sluggish compared to other browsers though.

I'd definitely agree that the UI is sluggish. Hell, even running your cursor up and down the Firefox menu isn't as responsive as it should be.

Boot times are still pretty trashy for me, even on an SSD. :/

What are your boot times ?

The UI on firefox 7.0a is fine for me but firefox still crashes sort of often for me. Maybe once a day, chrome just seems to glide. I use both of them anyway but mostly chrome. The tests are catching up with Chrome.

unled2nt.png

I never had Firefox 7.0a crash on me ever. It has had the occasional annoying bug or problem but no crashes. That is to be expected with a alpha build of a program though. It glides for me just like my friend's Chrome on his pc. Actually Firefox feels faster than Chrome now.

Never had 7.0a crash on me, either. In fact, I just checked and I've only had 7 crashes this year and I've been using Nightly/Minefield as my main browser the whole time (except for a week of trying Aurora).

I don't understand how it crashes so much on other people's systems.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • 10 games join Xbox Free Play Days this weekend by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe Another Free Play Days offer has just landed, and this one is a unique one. On top of offering 10 games to jump into for Xbox players, all the titles are from a single publisher: No More Robots. The promotion has games like Little Rocket Lab, Spirittea, Descenders Next, Let's Build a Zoo, and much more. Almost every game in the selection does need an Xbox Game Pass Ultimate, Premium, or Essential subscription, so keep this in mind when browsing. Many of the titles are Xbox Play Anywhere titles though, so both Xbox console and PC players can jump in. Here's how the announcement blog post described some of the available titles: There is one game that's available to all Xbox players without the need for any subscriptions, which is Descenders. Here are the announced games and the platforms they are available to play on: Little Rocket Lab (Xbox Series X|S, Xbox One, PC) Spirittea (Xbox Series X|S, Xbox One, PC) Soccer Story (Xbox Series X|S, Xbox One, PC) Descenders Next (Game Preview) (Xbox Series X|S, Xbox One, PC) Let's Build a Zoo (Xbox Series X|S, Xbox One, PC) Hypnospace Outlaw (Xbox Series X|S, Xbox One, PC) Slayers X: Terminal Aftermath: Vengance of the Slayer (Xbox Series X|S, Xbox One, PC) Nowhere Prophet (Xbox Series X|S, Xbox One, PC) Family Man (Xbox Series X|S, Xbox One) Descenders (Xbox Series X|S, Xbox One, PC) To easily find the titles on Xbox consoles, first head to the Store, then in the sidebar, find the Home section. In there, open the Subscriptions tab. The Free Play Days collection will show up in this area. This week's Free Play Days promotions will end on Sunday, June 7, at 11:59 pm PT.
    • It STILL has horrid theme support. Hard to look at for me. The white is too bright, and the black too dark. I'm using classic outlook for the Dark Grey theme. It's just right for me.
    • inb4 someone leaves the usual "what an unfortunate name" comment
    • Cuktech 10 Ultra charger review: big display, four ports, 110W total power by Taras Buria Cuktech recently announced a couple of Ultra-branded chargers, including a desktop 300W charger, which I reviewed a few weeks ago. For those who do need that much (or who do not want to spend that much on a charger), Cuktech also offers the 10 Ultra, a traditional wall charger with similar features. Four ports, a big display, and up to 110W of power output. After using it for a few weeks, here are my impressions. Disclaimer: Cuktech provided the review unit without any editorial input or pre-approval. Like the 30 Ultra, the 10 Ultra arrived in a box made of nice cardboard with quality print all over it. Inside, besides the charger, you will find a 240W 6A charger, which, this time, is fully braided. While Cuktech always bundles high-power cables with its chargers and power banks, they are usually regular and unassuming. This time, the cable is much nicer, matching the charger's $59.99 price tag. The charger itself measures 67 x 76 x 33 mm or 2.6 x 3.0 x 1.3 inches and weighs about 250 grams. Considering the charger has four ports and a big display, I would say the compact size is quite impressive, albeit a little hefty. The overall design is similar to other chargers from the manufacturer, minus the chrome Cuktech logo next to the four ports. The Cuktech 10 Ultra has retractable prongs for better portability. Its front side is covered with piano black plastic housing two elements: a capacitive button with backlight and a quite large display for various charging stats. Ports are downward-facing, and I have mixed feelings about such a design. It is not the most convenient when you frequently connect and disconnect cables. It makes you bend over to find the right port to connect, and it is a no-go with outlets mounted closer to the floor. On the bright side, design like this eliminates clutter and sagging, especially when using four cables at once. Plus, you get plenty of space for a big display. Ports include two high-speed USB Type-C ports, one Type-C for less demanding devices, and one classic USB Type-A. The first two ports deliver full 100W, while the third is capped at 45W. As for the Type-A port, its maximum output is 18W. In total, the charger delivers 110W of power, but in my testing, I managed to squeeze 117W when charging two power banks and a tablet. Quite impressive. Type-C1 Type-C2 Type-C3 Type-A Single-port 100W 100W 45W 18W Two ports 80W 20W - - Three ports 65W 20W 20W - Four ports 65W 20W 10W 10W The charger can detect handshake protocols and balance power across all four ports according to each device's needs. As such, power is not limited to the values in the table above. You can have two ports charging at 55W, three ports at 45W + 20W, and more. For some reason, Cuktech is not listing the supported protocols, but a quick test showed that it is compatible with PD3.0, PPS, QC5, DCP, and UFCS. When you connect a compatible device, the charger automatically detects its charging standard and displays it on the screen, for example, Apple 6A or Samsung 3A. Speaking of the screen. The main highlight of the 10 Ultra is its 1.57-inch display with a maximum brightness of 700 nits and 160-degree viewing angles. The display takes up most of the front, and it shows various charging-related information, including total output power, current temperature, power distribution across ports with watts, volts, and amps, a screensaver, and more. You can toggle between the different views by tapping the button, and holding it changes the screen orientation (portrait or horizontal, plus flipped) according to your socket position. The screen is very nice. It is sharp, vivid, and the fonts are easy to read. As for settings, you can change the following: Keep the screen on or off Lock the screen orientation (hold the button to change the screen orientation) Keep the USB Type-A port on Toggle power modes The charger has three power modes: AI: standard mode that automatically allocates power to each connected device. Power Priority: prioritizes power for high-demand devices, such as laptops or power banks. Balanced: splits power evenly across connected devices according to their needs I was skeptical at first, but after testing a few devices in different modes, I can see the benefit of these three modes. The most useful is power priority, which gives the first Type-C port more power. When I was charging a 100W power bank (port 1) alongside a 140W power bank (port 2), Power Priority split the total output about 75-30. Balanced mode, as the name suggests, splits the total output between the two ports more or less equally. As for AI mode, the charger uses its brain to detect which device needs more power. In my testing, it figured out that the 140W power needs a bit more juice. As I said, I expected this to be more of a gimmick, but the three built-in modes turned out quite useful. For example, you can prioritize your laptop while giving other ports a little less power, but still enough to charge at acceptable speeds. Unfortunately, unlike the 30 Ultra, this charger cannot display the battery level of the device being charged. This small feature turned out to be very useful when I was testing the 30 Ultra, as it allowed me to see my phone's battery level without picking it up. Like other Cuktech chargers I tested, the 10 Ultra one proved itself reliable and well-made. It uses Gallium nitride semiconductor technology to reduce the charger's size and improve efficiency. It is also better at dissipating heat, but I have to say that when charging two power banks at 117W total, the charger got hotter than what I would call comfortable (hold it for a few seconds, and you start feeling a burning sensation at your fingertips). However, the built-in thermal indicator remained below the temperature threshold, with the screen reassuring that the device operated at "High performance" (I tested it in a 21 °C / 69 °F room). Overall, the Cuktech 10 Ultra is a solid choice. If you need four ports and you like to nerd out on various stats, it is a very easy recommendation. It will take care of your laptop, phone, tablet, and power bank without breaking a sweat, plus the build, material, and cable quality are top-notch. The mode switcher is handy when charging different devices with different power needs, too. I cannot say a display is a must-have in a charger, especially when it makes you more conscious about where to plug it, but it is a neat addition if you have a socket at your table or bed level, so that you can actually use the display and its features. The more important fact is that despite its size and quality, the display does not make the charger that much more expensive than similarly powerful chargers from competitors. Plus, you can save 10% on the 10 Ultra with a promo code on Amazon. Buy Cuktech 10 Ultra charger - $53.99 on Amazon with a promo code As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Last week I was investigating an issue with contacts and tried using the new Outlook. In the real (Classic) Outlook, you can easily go to any Outlook folder and present it in a Table View, then customize the columns to show/sort any field, which was exactly what I needed. But of course, the new Outlook doesn't have this feature at all. I gave up. Oh, and can we possibly stop claiming the new Outlook has PST support? What it really has is the ability to use the real Outlook in the background to pretend to have PST support. There is no PST support without the real Outlook installed.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      mobandz earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Apprentice
      fernan99 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      477
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      247
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!