Recommended Posts

https://mozilla.invisionapp.com/share/ZKBC94BPQ#/screens/229252025

 

This got posted in one of the Photon bugs, the "Show all" button in the bottom right shows the grouping. No work in progress shots, just photoshop mockups (Some show a OS X style window shape on Windows, etc.)

  • Like 1
7 hours ago, The_Decryptor said:

https://mozilla.invisionapp.com/share/ZKBC94BPQ#/screens/229252025

 

This got posted in one of the Photon bugs, the "Show all" button in the bottom right shows the grouping. No work in progress shots, just photoshop mockups (Some show a OS X style window shape on Windows, etc.)

Damn, I want the new UI NOW! :p Is there any possibility that we will see a theme/user style that will make the current Firefox look like Photon?

  • 2 weeks later...
On 20/04/2017 at 8:33 PM, Konstantine said:

Damn, I want the new UI NOW! :p Is there any possibility that we will see a theme/user style that will make the current Firefox look like Photon?

i somehow dont think Mozilla will enable it till Firefox 56 Nightly comes out

31 minutes ago, The_Decryptor said:

None of it has even landed yet, any work is being done in private branches.

it'll be released to Nightly eventually to get User Feedback before its shipped in 57 final

Edited by Demz
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...
54 minutes ago, Demz said:
 

Don't really care if it gets removed completely. It's the first thing to remove on a fresh Firefox installation. I have assigned the letter g for Google and w for Wikipedia if I want to search the internet.

1 minute ago, LimeMaster said:

It exists because you can quickly change the search engine when you need to.

but no other Browser has it an is not needed not in thios Modern era . im sure there are other ways to accom,plish that

6 minutes ago, Zagadka said:

You can add search engine keywords to the address bar...

You can't switch search engines from the address bar though.

 

6 minutes ago, Demz said:

but no other Browser has it an is not needed not in thios Modern era . im sure there are other ways to accom,plish that

Firefox is/was it's own thing. Nowadays it's trying too hard to emulate Chrome. The search bar is more reliable in the sense that it's only purpose is to search the selected search engine.

Just now, LimeMaster said:

You can't switch search engines from the address bar though.

Um, yes you can. I linked "image" to switch to search Google Images, "bing" to search Bing, "imdb" to search... well, IMDB. Etc. It isn't a big deal.

18 minutes ago, Zagadka said:

You can edit them under options > search > one click, just add the keyword. Chrome does it, too, under the settings > search options.

You're right.

 

I wasn't aware that feature existed to be honest. So thanks!

Quote

but no other Browser has it an is not needed not in thios Modern era . im sure there are other ways to accom,plish that

Other browsers DO  have it, do your homework,  also with 32 search engines remembering 'keywords' is a joke.

I barely use that confusing mess better known as the 'awesome bar, me thinks the moz devs don't have a clue how to use the search bar.

Edited by BudChekov
add wo
16 minutes ago, BudChekov said:

Other browsers DO  have it, do your homework,  also with 32 search engines remembering 'keywords' is a joke.

I barely use that confusing mess better known as the 'awesome bar, me thinks the moz devs don't have a clue how to use the search bar.

Who is using 32 search engines?

Currently? Me. :)

 

Using the old dropdown  list, (CTR brings it back), changing is rapid.

 

For instance I have two for AMO; One for Firefox Extensions one for Seamonkey ones. Cuts to the chase.

I'm sure we all have a number of 'major sites' we visit regularly, what better way to search them?

 

Edit: 33 now, I just added one for Neowin Forum.

 

 

 

 

Edited by BudChekov

Correct, they've been talking about this for years.

 

I found this amusing, studying who and where, more Mozilla **, no ones asked me and I've never heard of these (Geolocation and telemetry on results?) 'user studies', anyone else?,

Quote

We’re currently running a series of user studies to make sure we understand how users search

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • I think the car analogy is more this: Left hand drive, basic commands on the left side of the infotainment screen. Right hand drive, basic commands on the right side of the infotainment screen. Granted, you're not swapping between the two often so it's doesn't really work. But it's to do with the proximity of you (your mouse, or the driver) to the controls.
    • I mean, the old one was broken and so stupidly complex for many users, so I don't see that as a feasible option. A context menu needs to be simple to use, and for me the Windows 11 style actually worked really well for me, and many others. I used to have to scroll the damn context menu just to get to "file properties" in Windows 10. That was not a good experience, and I'm sure you'd agree. What they're trying to do is make it the best of both worlds, as clearly you'd prefer the Win10 style. I'm curious how they're going to do this.
    • The "Show more options" has its place, as does the simpler context menu, but it should perhaps be a separate fly-out rather than relaunching the entire, old context menu. The old context menu was getting absurd in Windows 10. Often I'd have to make the context menu scroll just to get to "File properties" on my old laptop. Even without much installed, the amount of items was just too much. It's a context menu, not a "do all" menu. Making it configurable is fraught with challenges too, so I'm interested to see how Microsoft tackles this one.
    • I don't hate the new menus, I am not a fan of the lack of features and how they went live when they clearly are not complete. The menu itself presents much better than the previous - but what's lacking (IMO) is: 1) Any kind of automated manipulation such as: "this goes on the new menu because you use this feature more often on this filetype" "this is rarely used and will fall back to the old menu" 2) Any kind of user manipulation such as: "a UI to add/remove/order items to the new menu"
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      I2D earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Dr Jared Dental Studio earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      RG INVESTMENT GROUP earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Very Popular
      The Norwegian Drone Pilot earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Very Popular
      s0nic69 earned a badge
      Very Popular
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      484
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      260
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      84
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      64
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      63
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!