Recommended Posts

In other words, he's wrong.

Strictly speaking, I guess so. ;)

But like I said, Metro Snap doesn't get you very far.

And his original point still stands:

If they released Windows 9 and ONLY allowed to have one application open at a time NO MATTER WHAT, we are just supposed to deal with it because it is a new version?

EDIT: Excuse me, that was actually xWhiplash's point.

There were plenty of ways to bring elements of Metro's design philosophy to the desktop. Immersive isn't the right way. In an all-touch future, maybe, but when we have keyboards and mice and 27" screens with 3,686,400 logical pixels, Immersive just doesn't make sense. And even on smaller screens where Immersive starts to become more practical, it's still wildly disjointed from the multitasking paradigm of the Windows desktop.

Strictly speaking, I guess so. ;)

But like I said, Metro Snap doesn't get you very far.

And his original point still stands:

EDIT: Excuse me, that was actually xWhiplash's point.

For desktops you still have the appropriately named "desktop" tough, and the start menu as your launcher. Multi task like a champ

For desktops you still have the appropriately named "desktop" tough

Indeed. And it is still very much needed and will be for quite some time. Which is why it is curious to see people arguing for the Desktop to die, and how Metro is superior to it, and then when anyone brings up criticism against Metro, the same people refer one to the desktop side that is still there. :wacko:

Indeed. And it is still very much needed and will be for quite some time. Which is why it is curious to see people arguing for the Desktop to die, and how Metro is superior to it, and then when anyone brings up criticism against Metro, the same people refer one to the desktop side that is still there. :wacko:

My money is still on the death of the Win32 desktop. Metro just needs time to mature.

So the user interface has evolved to the point where it is no longer intuitive :(

No start menu? tutorials? MS truly are listening to what their customers want!!

Id laugh if I didn't use Windows all the time, I cant see me upgrading to this tho, I just dont have the time to go through the whole thing. Its like someone coming in and moving everything around in your house.

Keep the UI the same and just improve the features Windows has - it really is that simple!!!!

The tutorials are only needed for those who haven't used the OS before. Look at what XP had.

I just hope that you can easily get out of that, I don't want to sit through it.

But it'd be nice for people to learn.

The tutorials are only needed for those who haven't used the OS before. Look at what XP had.

I just hope that you can easily get out of that, I don't want to sit through it.

But it'd be nice for people to learn.

I'm putting my money on the tutorials being similar to how they were in windows 95

Whatever you want, without getting in the way.

Give Metro time to mature and develop, and you'll forget all about Win32. You just have to be open to the possibilities a metro-like UI brings to the PC.

While I don't agree Live Tiles are the be all end all on the desktop yet, there is great potential. We'll see. On a phone, where all you want is bits of data quickly, it's perfect. On a desktop where you consumer more info, not so much. But the creative potential is there. I do think Live tiles on a desktop (i.e. gadget) is more functional. Small bits of data while you're doing something else. On the Start Page, you have to be basically doing nothing except staring at a start page on the desktop. On a tablet or phone, you're doing whatever you're doing and just want to glance at your device and get meaningful infomration.

Live tiles have dashboard like potential but there are better solutions for that. Still, if you're going to have Metro, Live Tiles are great.

BTW, gadgets failed because x86 platform has crappy designers. The best designers are on Mac platform and Mac, even Google, and Konfabulator had better designed gadgets. Wintel platform too techhy, not much style. MS should go after these designers for Live Tiles/Gadgets.

sigh.. roll on win7 sp2 then win9

Let's hope MS does not shortchange us on Win 7 SP2 to try and force Windows 8 adoption. If you think they're beyond stooping that low you're naive and have no MS shares.

Yep and they will end with same problem they started with when Metro gets busy. Just going in Circle.

Metro quickly outgrows even the HTC Titan. It is not built for large amounts of tiles/data. It will be interesting to see how it evolves, it will have to. Right now the Start Page quickly becomes a blocky mess.

I don't think the desktop/Explorer UI is going away any time soon. File management, etc. will never be as efficient or effective full screen single-tasking.

I'm going to ignore the whole mess (for personal use) until there is a compelling reason to upgrade. That's on the desktop. Can't wait to get a tablet and my Lumia is on the way!

My prediciton: Before or in Windows 8 SP1, MS will be forced to make compromises, either returning Start Button as option and/or allowing direct boot to desktop. At that time, several executives will take the blame and be dismissed. Ballmer will be under the gun to step aside. Windows Phone will obtain 10-15% market share by end of next year, and Windows 8 Tablets will quickly take over the market (1 year). Bill Gates will return to MS in the next 3 years in some official capacity ... ok, scratch the last one, he's done. Enjoy life Bill.

Let's hope MS does not shortchange us on Win 7 SP2 to try and force Windows 8 adoption. If you think they're beyond stooping that low you're naive and have no MS Shares.

If your machine is up to date, than service packs are useless to you. If you're looking for a massive, "XP SP2" style rollup, than I wouldn't hold my breath.

So, say a company has 1000 workers, and 500 workstations. before upgrading to Windows 8 the company is going to retrain all its workers, yea right. From XP to 7 (which most still use) It will require training let alone the amount of retraining for Windows 8. I can just see it.

whoooooooosssshhhhhh....

Yes, iOS only allows for one window at a time, while Metro allows for "one and a half", if one is being generous. Same difference. Metro Snap is a nice feature to have on a tablet. But both iOS 's and Metro's window management features are inadequate for a desktop operating system.

14p0o.png

Yes, iOS only allows for one window at a time, while Metro allows for "one and a half", if one is being generous. Same difference. Metro Snap is a nice feature to have on a tablet. But both iOS 's and Metro's window management features are inadequate for a desktop operating system.

14p0o.png

You're just being silly now. You can continue to run all your applications as you always have on the desktop - the immersive apps aren't compulsory and don't replace the functionality of the desktop. Stop spreading FUD.

So the user interface has evolved to the point where it is no longer intuitive :(

No start menu? tutorials? MS truly are listening to what their customers want!!

Id laugh if I didn't use Windows all the time, I cant see me upgrading to this tho, I just dont have the time to go through the whole thing. Its like someone coming in and moving everything around in your house.

Keep the UI the same and just improve the features Windows has - it really is that simple!!!!

Windows is only easy to use because you've used it since win95. That doesn't make it intuitive. Metro is easier to user for someone completely blank than previous windows.

And they did just p improve what's there, they improved the start menu based on how people use it. People only use the pinned items, which windows 7 can fit about 7 to 8 of. The start screen can fit 40 pinned items on just the first page without scrolling, and that's with grouping them into organized groups and having some of them big. More I tuition, faster access to more pinned favorites and easier to find and click. With muscle memory, meaning in general faster usage.

  • Like 2
You can continue to run all your applications as you always have on the desktop - the immersive apps aren't compulsory and don't replace the functionality of the desktop.

I'm well aware. I'm not arguing against Windows 8, but against the hopes for a Metro-only future. As I see it, Metro and the desktop will have to coexist for a long time yet, meaning there's no escape from the schizophrenic personality on display with Windows 8. Do you disagree?

To be fair, earlier versions of Windows came with a tutorial also. The older ones of us will remember this:

Back then computers were new tech. People did not know how to use them.

Someone who is able to do simple tasks on Windows 7 should not need a tutorial to do the same tasks on Windows 8.

If your machine is up to date, than service packs are useless to you. If you're looking for a massive, "XP SP2" style rollup, than I wouldn't hold my breath.

Wrong.

Service packs include fixes that are not on windows update also with SP2 for Win7 I am hoping MS will back port some of the new things in Windows 8 to Windows 7 like WDDM 1.2 and xHCI

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • It's nearly time to replace my aging Founders Edition 3080, it doesn't OC as nicely as it used to and it's running around 10c warmer than it did when I first bought it.  I don't have budget for much more than what I spent on the 3080 and locally, that means the best GPU I can manage is a 9070XT. On this basis I have a few questions: 1. At present I don't use ray tracing, if this was to change, would this GPU be an issue? 2. How does it compare on a performance basis? 3. Are the drivers worse or better than those for nVidia? 4. Linux support, is it there? 5. Anything else I should be aware of if I were to make this change? 6. Is it a good idea or shall I try and keep the 3080 a little longer.
    • What OS is that? It looks a bit like Mac OS but the command line suggests it isn't, either way I like it!
    • Outlook classic is inherently better than new outlook, for a number of reasons. That said, if the only reason people need office is to read email, they should just use thunderbird.
    • Windows 11 is a big thumbs down from me. I used for a period of a few days while it was in insider and windows 10 was the main OS, and realised it wasn't for me. I am still waiting for Windows to be tolerable again, a shame as at one point I was very pro Microsoft.  
    • Classic outlook, not only does it have a much fuller feature set, it doesn't include Microsoft attempting to sync my emails from my servers to theirs. If classic outlook is ever removed from office, and the version I paid for in 2021 stops working for some reason, I'll use Thunderbird.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Rising Star
      olavinto went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      250
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      74
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      69
    5. 5
      +Edouard
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!