Windows Technical Preview  

1031 members have voted

  1. 1. On a scale of 1-5, 1 being worst, 5 being best. What do you think of Windows 10 from the leaks so far?

    • 5.Great, best OS ever
      156
    • 4. Pretty Good, needs a lot of minor tweaks
      409
    • 3. OK, Needs a few major improvements, some minor ones
      168
    • 2. Fine, Needs a lot of major improvements
      79
    • 1.Poor, Needs too many improvements, all hope is lost, never going to use it
      41
  2. 2. Based on the recent leaks by Neowin and Winfuture.de, my next OS upgrade will be?

    • Windows 10
      720
    • Windows 8
      20
    • Windows 7
      48
    • Sticking with XP
      3
    • OSX Yosemite
      35
    • Linux
      24
    • Sticking with OSX Mavericks
      3
  3. 3. Should Microsoft give away Windows 10 for free?

    • Yes for Windows 8.1 Users
      305
    • Yes for Windows 7 and above users
      227
    • Yes for Vista and above users
      31
    • Yes for XP and above users
      27
    • Yes for all Windows users
      192
    • No
      71


Recommended Posts

Who renamed my thread? This is before it was called Windows 10, and I liked the name the way it was. Since you know I chose how to name it... didn't know threads are renamed now. Anyways the tech preview would not incorporate just windows 10 if the insider program continues. Just my pet peeve...... 

Nothing seen or heard today of 'Metro 2.0', interactive tiles or any API/feature enhacements for Modern apps then?

 

Seems there was a lot not covered - when is the next 'discussion' event?

 

They said the features they have showed here are earlier builds and will be coming in the next months. Plus, they have Build in April, so they'll probably show newer stuff there as well. We haven't seen all of the new icons yet, they just quickly showed the universal settings app, and many others. Exciting stuff.

Yes, you're right, it also has a screen-wide transparent texture overlay to give a glass effect which is still utterly infinitesimal in terms of computational power.

 

Are we done with the pathetically flimsy excuses to try and justify your aesthetic tastes now?

And no, there are other effects that increase the demand on lower end devices. I don't believe anyone said aero glass is stressful on a gaming PC.

Ok, and what is vastly superior about Aero glass? How does it help you do anything better?

It's not just tradition for tradition's sake. I've been using W8 for half a year and still, clicking an icon on the taskbar to open up file explorer and then opening my documents from there seems completely unnatural compared to clicking start + Documents...

 

To me it seems unnatural and cumbersome to lock opening Documents into the Menu like that. But then for me the Menu was unnecessarily slow for everything.

And no, there are other effects that increase the demand on lower end devices. I don't believe anyone said aero glass is stressful on a gaming PC.

Ok, and what is vastly superior about Aero glass? How does it help you do anything better?

 

"Other effects" Heh, how dishonestly vague of you.

 

But I digress, nothing Aero utilises is stressful even on a low-end device. You could most likely run it on a SIMD-based software renderer and not notice any difference.

 

Lastly, I'm not going to debate my aesthetic opinion with you, as suffice to say in my opinion, my opinion is better than your opinion in every conceivable way. People have different tastes, get over it.

Some people just need to keep in mind that UI comes last in Microsoft's development cycle. The default stark white theme etc in Windows 8 was only available in RTM.

Things are going to change.

Glass is gone guys, nothing is going to bring it back either. As far as transparency goes, you'll have options to make parts like that, taskbar, start menu/screen, live tiles and so on. They're going for a new look, all it is. Those who don't like it you can go the theme route like people have since Windows XP if not older. 

Non sequitur - the limited amount of information any screen element contains should always be legible at all resolutions - that's a scaling issue.

 

My experience of 8.1 at 4K was awful (messy, fuzzy fonts etc.) - did the TP change anything?

And the original Start menu did indeed have scaling issues - the issues started merely at 1280x720.

 

If you have to modify the defaults to retain legibility (and a lot of folks do) at a particular resolution, that is indeed a scaling issue.  The fuzzy-font issue is a dead giveaway.

You mean start menu transparency? In was in the demo yesterday, not just in a mockup picture.

Show me a video of it because I did not see a version that looked like that picture. Look carefully at the picture. You can tell it was made in PS

Show me a video of it because I did not see a version that looked like that picture. Look carefully at the picture. You can tell it was made in PS

http://news.microsoft.com/windows10story/

 

At 1.11 hour mark showing off xbox app using the spartan build, Looks exactly like the "Photoshop" pictures. Don't think transparency will be in next week builds, since we're getting an older build.

 

Untitled_1.jpg

Maybe transparency will be customizable, like it is WIndows 7? 

I wouldnt doubt that and im sure they will be  a scale to change it. All I was pointing out that image above wasnt from an actually build. Just a mock up they usually do when they advertise. Lets move on please. I really want a gallery of pictures.. 

Maybe transparency will be customizable, like it is WIndows 7? 

It should be. The lack of brain-dead customization in Win8 was laughable. No way to toggle transparency on and off. No way to change the title bar text color. No way to change the fonts that are used system-wide. You know, simple customization options that were possible on Windows 95 through Windows 7. And I know some of these things were technically possible through registry tweaks or high-contrast themes, but that is unacceptable. Win10 needs to allow us to, you know, be in control of our computer, which Microsoft likes to make a big deal of.

Limited customization is acceptable. Font switching bugs the hell out of me, because not all fonts scale the same, which makes users computers look awful, and function worse.

They could limit the amount of fonts that are available to use for system-wide purposes. But not being able to change the font color was completely unacceptable in Windows 8. You simply couldn't use black or dark window chrome since it made windows unreadable.

MS have removed the download links from the insider page in preparation for the new builds coming soon, they've also called the new builds "Technical Preview" still, not "Consumer Preview" or anything like that.  I need to re-install on a laptop now, but need the ISO again.  Anybody got the current 9879 x64 ISO URL I could have please?

MS have removed the download links from the insider page in preparation for the new builds coming soon, they've also called the new builds "Technical Preview" still, not "Consumer Preview" or anything like that.  I need to re-install on a laptop now, but need the ISO again.  Anybody got the current 9879 x64 ISO URL I could have please?

 

Google for it. It's there.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft launches Godot Sample to streamline Xbox PC game development on the engine by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe Microsoft today announced a new endeavor that aims to make it simpler for Godot developers to get their products into the Xbox PC ecosystem. Dubbed the "XBOX Godot Sample," this is a new public reference for developers using the open-source engine. This is set to serve as an example of how Microsoft GDK, Xbox Services, and PlayFab can be integrated into their projects. The sample is available now on GitHub as a working example. This covers key features in gaming projects that developers may need to release their projects on Xbox PC, with everything from matchmaking and game sign-in to gamepad compatibility with Godot being covered. This release is being called the first step in giving Godot developers the tools to bring their games over to Xbox PC, with more changes to come based on feedback and issue reports. However, the company was clear that this is not related to bringing Godot projects to Xbox consoles. The engine's open development model stops it from accessing console SDKs due to the requirement of NDAs and legal contracts. Here's how it explained this Godot sample project's focus: This is a source-only sample, not a product. It's MIT-licensed at the wrapper layer; the GDK and PlayFab dependencies still require their own installs and license acceptance, consistent with our other XBOX samples. There is no set update cadence for support or maintenance. We’ll watch the repo, monitor issues, and iterate where it makes sense, but this isn't a commercial release. That said, we’re excited to hear your feedback and see any community PRs, as we evolve this together. This is the first step in bringing Godot for XBOX on PC. We plan to evolve it over time based on what the community tells us is most valuable. This sample is built specifically for XBOX on PC. It doesn’t include support for XBOX Series X|S or XBOX One. If you’re already building for XBOX Series X|S or XBOX One, please talk with your XBOX representative. If not, you can get started by signing up here. Game developers can find the XBOX Godot Sample by heading to GitHub over here. Documentation on how to get started with Godot for building an Xbox PC project can be seen here.
    • I don't understand the vision. Do people really want to buy a new computer from Dell with 6 browsers installed? We all keep asking for Microsoft to stop having so much junk on their OS, and adding a bunch of browsers seems to go against that. Ideally, we would just be asked what browser we want during OOBE but Google is just going to pay Dell a bunch of money to include Chrome. Additionally, would you want your phones to start including all the browsers too when you get them? The only thing I ever wanted was to be able to uninstall IE or edge and I believe you are now able to. I do agree that microsoft needs to chill with their "are you sure you don't want to try edge before you install chrome" ads when going to download chrome.
    • It is notable that around 70% of web browser users choose Google Chrome. However, it is puzzling why anyone on Windows would opt for Chrome when Microsoft Edge is often superior in many aspects and comes pre-installed. Edge collects less data, uses less RAM, and is more optimized for Windows as a native Microsoft product. While some may point to bloat in Edge, much of it can be removed with simple tools, requiring no more effort than installing Chrome. Meanwhile, Chrome reportedly downloads large amounts of AI data (4 GB) without explicit consent. I'm sure you Chrome users love that, or? Here is one example of a tool that doesn't even need to be installed to be able to use: https://github.com/TheBobPony/MSEdgeTweaker Although Microsoft’s aggressive promotion of Edge may be questionable, the browser’s current advantages make it a preferable choice over Chrome today, even if Chrome may have been better in the past.
    • JetBrains rolls out IntelliJ IDEA update with Markdown preview fixes and more by David Uzondu Image via JetBrains IntelliJ 2026.1.3 from JetBrains has landed, bringing several highly requested bug fixes that target common UI glitches and terminal rendering issues. If you run tmux inside the integrated terminal, the IDE no longer renders the cursor above the active line. The Markdown preview bug, which was fixed in this release, had annoyed developers for quite some time, as the preview pane failed to render images saved outside the project directory. Instead of displaying the actual image, the IDE simply showed a broken image icon, a problem that stuck around for two years before this update. Over on Windows, developers running WSL can now use wsl.exe to spin up their environments without losing terminal functionality. In previous builds, launching a terminal shell with something like wsl.exe -d ubuntu inside a Windows-based project broke both shell integration and active process detection. Other bug fixes in this release include: An issue where Gradle sync incorrectly reported success as a failure on WSL when using Gradle 9.5.0. A syntax highlighting bug that flagged valid Java for-loop initialization blocks with multiple statements as incorrect. A warning bug that triggered a false non-null local variable alert when using JSpecify annotations. A database generation bug that hid the option to use a DELETE statement instead of a TRUNCATE checkbox. A Kotlin highlighting failure where an assertion error in the Gradle redundant library inspection broke error highlighting. A UI bug where the ComboBox popup lacked a maximum height restriction. A Snowflake syntax error where DataGrip failed to support the "create temp" command. A Svelte syntax parsing failure that incorrectly flagged quotes inside inline expressions. A VCS repository manager deadlock that triggered thread pool exhaustion. A memory leak where the LazyTree component kept all previous versions of a tree in memory. IntelliJ 2026.1.3 is the third bug fix release for the IntelliJ 2026.1 series. The first one landed back in April with a fix for the WSL Python interpreter freeze, another fix for guest participants using Emmet abbreviations, and corrected WildFly server deployment errors.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      Asgardi earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Conversation Starter
      mobandz earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Apprentice
      fernan99 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      469
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      243
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      73
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!