[Official] Star Trek: Discovery Thread


Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Ash said:

I'm all for it as long as there are no episodes where they get trapped in a broken Holodeck!

things that happened a lot;

 

transporter malfunction

holodeck malfunction

something else breaks on the enterprise

shuttle crash lands and someone is hurt

some alien tries to take over crewmen / ship / station

time travel of some sort

 

:p

 

honestly, i'd rather see less time travel.

  • 2 weeks later...
On 11/1/2015 at 8:53 AM, xendrome said:

Streaming only? I hope it fails miserably and costs them millions of dollars.

this just smacks of pay to watch. which will end up in epic fail. people on Hulu already pay for a monthly subscription , they expect the people to pay more? yeah right.

1 hour ago, DocM said:

First people complain about the cost of cable bundles and want ala carte, then they get ala carte and complain about paying for the exclusive content which makes it viable to offer. 

I'll pay to see it, gladly!

I didn't read the whole thread, but I have what I believe may be a unique view on this. It may also not be something that anyone else would be interested in, but I personally would love to see.

 

Something of a "Star Trek - Beginnings". A bit like the "Fear the walking dead" series, where we see earth just before the 3rd world, nuclear war begins. We see Zefram Cochrane as a teen or young adult before he develops the first warp drive and first flight. Build up the series to what the viewer knows will ultimately be interstellar, warp flight.

 

Would be an interesting twist to see the tech that they have in the star ships being developed and somehow introduced during the series. Possibly coming from the tech used during the war as weapons, becoming used for other purposes. War usually brings a lot of new tech, because each country begins working on weapons and defenses that are more powerful than the enemy, so it could be easily introduced in to a series like this.

 

They could introduce other known characters over time, but obviously in their younger years etc. and give us insight to their early life on a war torn planet that has yet to have a Star Fleet.

 

The whole thing could end with the more "modern" Star Trek as we know it and the introduction of Star Fleet.

 

Obviously a lot would depend on how well the series is received, so how much they could fit in to a series etc.

10 minutes ago, restroom said:

I didn't read the whole thread, but I have what I believe may be a unique view on this. It may also not be something that anyone else would be interested in, but I personally would love to see.

 

Something of a "Star Trek - Beginnings". A bit like the "Fear the walking dead" series, where we see earth just before the 3rd world, nuclear war begins. We see Zefram Cochrane as a teen or young adult before he develops the first warp drive and first flight. Build up the series to what the viewer knows will ultimately be interstellar, warp flight.

 

Would be an interesting twist to see the tech that they have in the star ships being developed and somehow introduced during the series. Possibly coming from the tech used during the war as weapons, becoming used for other purposes. War usually brings a lot of new tech, because each country begins working on weapons and defenses that are more powerful than the enemy, so it could be easily introduced in to a series like this.

 

They could introduce other known characters over time, but obviously in their younger years etc. and give us insight to their early life on a war torn planet that has yet to have a Star Fleet.

 

The whole thing could end with the more "modern" Star Trek as we know it and the introduction of Star Fleet.

 

Obviously a lot would depend on how well the series is received, so how much they could fit in to a series etc.

With a few exceptions what you have described is Star Trek:  Enterprise

 

lets push into the future, put the Star Fleet at war with someone.  But full fledged war, not some nice war, full scale brutality, death, destruction, and touch on the human side of dealing with shooting a spaceship with 1000 crew members full of holes.

  • Like 2
12 minutes ago, restroom said:

...

Please, no more prequels.  We had Enterprise and I'm not suggesting that it's failure was entirely due to it being a prequel, but it didn't help.  We had First Contact and that told us all we needed to know about first-warp, first-contact.

 

Start Trek at it's best was never about the technology

11 minutes ago, Mud W1ggle said:

With a few exceptions what you have described is Star Trek:  Enterprise

 

lets push into the future, put the Star Fleet at war with someone.  But full fledged war, not some nice war, full scale brutality, death, destruction, and touch on the human side of dealing with shooting a spaceship with 1000 crew members full of holes.

No, I'm thinking before Enterprise. I'm talking before Star Fleet or space exploration even.

11 minutes ago, Nik L said:

Please, no more prequels.  We had Enterprise and I'm not suggesting that it's failure was entirely due to it being a prequel, but it didn't help.  We had First Contact and that told us all we needed to know about first-warp, first-contact.

 

Start Trek at it's best was never about the technology

Each to their own and all that. I'm talking about pre-enterprise days even. Showing how the whole concept of space exploration came about to form the whole star fleet idea. No aliens in there at all -  at least not at the beginning. Done right, it could be great.

 

Personally, I loved smallville, the suspense of "is he about to fly" and knowing what will happen to him in the future, but it not being there yet. Fear the walking dead, although I think they could have drawn out the infection a bit longer and had a more story line explaining how the infection began and spread, was also a great concept that worked. I think this too could be great, if done right.

1 hour ago, Nik L said:

Please, no more prequels.  We had Enterprise and I'm not suggesting that it's failure was entirely due to it being a prequel, but it didn't help.  We had First Contact and that told us all we needed to know about first-warp, first-contact.

 

Start Trek at it's best was never about the technology

I enjoyed Enterprise, especially after the third season when it found its footing. The show felt more relatable. 

On 5/11/2016 at 4:12 AM, brpsycho said:

Meh.

Patrick Stewart is almost too old now.

It's been almost 30 years and the man has barely aged.  Plus it's not like if there was another one with Picard that Star Trek is usually the most physically demanding roles ever, with the exception of the new movies.

7 minutes ago, kjordan2001 said:

It's been almost 30 years and the man has barely aged.  Plus it's not like if there was another one with Picard that Star Trek is usually the most physically demanding roles ever, with the exception of the new movies.

Very good points. You renewed all my hopes for the future of Star Trek.

The only prequel concept I'd go for would be a Romulan war, Enterprise was about to test the waters with it before it got canned.

 

Other than that, it needs to take place after Nemesis. It'd be great to see cameos of past Trek characters make an appearance once and awhile and the only way they'd be able to do so is a sequel. But all in all it needs to be a fresh take on Trek, continuing the timeline that left off with in Nemesis, the same old klingon/borg/dominion species won't work. Hell, I was probably in the minority when they destroyed Vulcan. Something to really shake things up. Too bad the movies continue to lack substance and only focus on action (still fun though).

Edited by shockz
Just now, shockz said:

The only prequel concept I'd go for would be a Romulan war, Enterprise was about to test the waters with it before it got canned.

Great opportunity to show Doug Drexler's NX Refit:

 

Round+2+Models+Polar+Lights+Enterprise+N

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • That lens of history will burn if you hold it at the right angle... Warn users too late: Shame, Microsoft! That extremely minor update to an obscure Control Panel widget required 2 years of warning. Warn users too early: Shame, Microsoft! We've got better things to do. Pipeline and process be damned, we'll just always be disappointed, eh?
    • Microsoft Paint used to be my favorite Windows app as a kid, and it's still pretty good by Usama Jawad I have been using Windows since the early 2000s, when I was around 10 years old or so. I vaguely remember playing around with Windows 98 and Windows 2000, but that may have been on school PCs which had old operating systems installed. My main OS on the home PC, and the one I recall spending most time with, was Windows XP. At that time, I used the home PC to create Word and PowerPoint documents for school, but a lot of the time, I simply used it to play games. My dad would bring game discs which we would try and install on the PC, sometimes unsuccessfully, and sometimes, we would rely on flash games in the browser, like Bubble Trouble on Miniclip. However, the problem with the latter approach was the internet speed. On a good day, our dial-up internet would offer us speeds of 56 kbps, but on most days, it was closer to 33 kbps. This did not facilitate online gaming as I would often have to wait minutes for a game to load or "draw" on the screen, and trying to download pirated games wasn't simple either. I remember getting tired of waiting for online games to load and just downloading simulator games from the Big Fish Games website instead, only to be disappointed after finding out that I was just being given access to trial versions of the title, and I needed to fork out money to pay for the full version. All of this is to say that it wasn't very easy to find entertainment options on the home PC when I was a kid, due to a number of reasons, mostly outside of my control. This situation pushed me towards a rather unconventional ally: Microsoft Paint. Whenever the internet wasn't working as good as I expected, I would simply spin up Paint and draw complete rubbish on the canvas. Of course, that wasn't always the intention, but it usually happened when I messed up drawing a straight line or something, and then I would give up on that particular piece and simply draw a random collection of objects. Microsoft Paint was extremely accessible and easy to use. Even if you weren't an artist, you could quickly understand the tools at your disposal and how to leverage them on a canvas. The absolute breadth on offer ensured that each painting was truly unique, as you could utilize various combinations of tools like the pencil, paint, spray paint, and more to truly personalize your creation. Since I wasn't particularly good at drawing both on digital screen or a physical screen, I remember that my main style of art would be to insert a bunch of randomly intersecting lines and then fill them with random colors through the paint can. I have trying to replicate that art style in the latest version of Paint below, and as you can see, it's truly Pablo Picasso-esque. The human imagination truly knows no bounds Microsoft Paint kept me occupied for hours and was my best friend when video games on the home PC were inaccessible for one reason or the other. There was no academic or professional reason for which I would need to use Paint, but I still loved using it in my personal time, even if what I created wasn't worth being shown to anyone. It was simply fun. Fast-forward to today, and the situation is mostly the same. Now that I am almost 29 years old, and I still have no reason to use Microsoft Paint in a professional capacity. In fact, I don't even use it in a personal capacity, except to dabble with it from time to time, just to see if core functionalities are still intact. And I'm happy to say that I think Microsoft Paint still offers the same accessibility and inviting experience that it did to me a couple of decades ago, even though its UX has been refreshed and it's been integrated with Copilot features. Interestingly, things could have been a lot different, had Microsoft had its way. Microsoft Paint was marked for deprecation with the Windows 10 Fall Creators Update in 2017, and even began displaying a product retirement alert, urging customers to shift to Paint 3D instead. Fortunately, after consumer backlash, Microsoft reversed course on this decision, and Paint continues to be a native app inside Windows installations that can also be updated quite frequently through the Microsoft Store. Instead, Paint 3D ended up on the chopping block, which is for the better, I think. I have intermittently played around with Microsoft's refreshed Paint experience in the past few years, and I do think it has received worthwhile upgrades. the UI and the UX has been modernized while retaining core functionality, and the app is still fairly easy to use. It doesn't meet any of my use-cases, but I've never really had any use-cases ever, as described previously. Of course, the elephant in the room is the Copilot integration. Personally, I believe that this is one place where Copilot does make sense, environmental concerns aside. I know that a lot of creatives use AI to generate images, and while some may be using professional alternatives, Paint still offers a decent casual experience, with the power of Copilot. Of course, you do need to have a valid Microsoft 365 Copilot license and available credits to use it, but even if you don't, you still get the big Copilot button in the toolbar, unfortunately. All in all, I am glad that Microsoft Paint continues to be a native feature in Windows 11, and a piece of software that has evolved to meet modern needs without cutting off its own roots. It's just an iconic piece of Windows history that was an essential part of my childhood, and while I don't use it anymore, I'm just glad it is still there.
    • 2TB WD_Black SN7100 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD drops to its lowest price in over three months by Fiza Ali Amazon is currently offering the 2TB WD_Black SN7100 internal solid-state drive at its lowest price in over three months, so you may want to check it out, if you have been considering a storage upgrade, before the deal dries up (purchase link is toward the end of the article). Featuring a PCIe Gen 4.0 interface and M.2 2280 form factor, the SN7100 promises to deliver sequential read speeds of up to 7,250MB/s and sequential write speeds reaching 6,900MB/s, offering as much as a 35% improvement in performance compared with the previous generation. It also achieves random read speeds of 1,000,000 IOPS and random write speeds of 1,400,000 IOPS. The drive uses Western Digital’s TLC 3D NAND technology for reliable performance and is further supported by a five-year limited warranty. It also offers strong endurance, rated at up to 1,200TBW, making it suitable for demanding workloads such as gaming, content creation, and high-speed recording. Moreover, its DRAM-less architecture claims to improve power efficiency (the SSD relies on system memory for caching via HMB), while the WD_Black Dashboard software enables users to monitor drive health, install firmware updates, and activate Game Mode for potentially better performance. Finally, it operates within an operating temperature range of 0°C to 85°C, and can withstand storage temperatures from -40°C to 85°C. 2TB WD_Black SN7100 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD: $242.96 (Amazon US) Check this deal out if you want a 4TB option. Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Hopefully this will fix the issue of no sound I have since last months stupid, and non-removable, Microsoft Corporation AudioProcessingObject Driver Update (1.0.3.56670)
    • It IS confusing! What channel are you in on each device? I'm guessing your 16GB device is on Experimental (formerly known as Dev) and your 128GB is on Beta.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      514
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!