Recommended Posts

I find I like the show myself. Its cheesy in some places but on the whole, I'm going to watch.  Maybe its been said already but it wasn't until I watched the last one that I discovered it Orville is directed by Jonathan Frakes of Next Generation fame. 

1 hour ago, Louisifer said:

Time travel and science fiction go hand in hand, i dont think i've seen any that havent used it. :o 

Yeah but it doesn't have to be used so much is all I'm saying. 

8 hours ago, techbeck said:

Good episode tonight.  

  Reveal hidden contents

Avis jokes were pretty good.

 

Spoiler

There was a hunger games drop to, also the line about humans worshiping Hertz was a nice touch.

 

Orville is one of the best Star Trek series ever!

 

I was really pleasantly surprised by MacFarlane's restraint. I really expected more of his satire, but the jokes have been really restrained and actually well timed and written. Maybe he has learned his lesson?

 

One thing they are doing well with not having is the transporter technology. Yea they're messing with time travel, but the transporter has just always been a huge crutch in ST, at least to me. When they had to make transporters not available to make an episode dramatic was always very cheesy.

 

Don't really like the ship design (exterior), practical or CG. It doesn't look great and it makes absolutely no sense. The docking bay is inside the three spirals of the engine for some reason?

 

And I also don't like Bortus. Some of the character development paths are looking to be kinda difficult; the characters have a thin definition, which gives them more latitude but also makes it harder to find depth. The 6 or so episodes we have so far isn't enough to really tell where they will be going.

 

1 minute ago, Son_Of_Dad said:

Agree. It's quite a good watch. Imagine what it would look like if it also had an 8M budget per episode!!

I hope it never gets that. What works in Orville is mostly the writing, and they aren't hurting for acting.

7 minutes ago, Zagadka said:

Orville is one of the best Star Trek series ever!

 

I was really pleasantly surprised by MacFarlane's restraint. I really expected more of his satire, but the jokes have been really restrained and actually well timed and written. Maybe he has learned his lesson?

I think it's a combination of that, and MacFarlane being a huge Trek fan and wanting to keep his version as true to his love as he can.

 

7 minutes ago, Zagadka said:

 

One thing they are doing well with not having is the transporter technology. Yea they're messing with time travel, but the transporter has just always been a huge crutch in ST, at least to me. When they had to make transporters not available to make an episode dramatic was always very cheesy.

 

 

I agree. Transporters have always been a large crutch in Trek, and that's the main thing I really liked about Enterprise. Transporters were very new and not used a lot for human transport.

 

 

7 minutes ago, Zagadka said:

 

Don't really like the ship design (exterior), practical or CG. It doesn't look great and it makes absolutely no sense. The docking bay is inside the three spirals of the engine for some reason?

 

I dunno. It looks kinda pretty to me, but would definitely look better as a real model instead of CGI.

 

7 minutes ago, Zagadka said:

And I also don't like Bortus. Some of the character development paths are looking to be kinda difficult; the characters have a thin definition, which gives them more latitude but also makes it harder to find depth. The 6 or so episodes we have so far isn't enough to really tell where they will be going.

 

Bortus is just a huge lampooning of Worf from TNG/DS9.

 

7 minutes ago, Zagadka said:

 

I hope it never gets that. What works in Orville is mostly the writing, and they aren't hurting for acting.

A little more cash per ep would be nice, but yeah.  Don't wreck it by giving them TOO much money. They story is more important than the sets.

  • Like 3
18 minutes ago, Zagadka said:

I hope it never gets that. What works in Orville is mostly the writing, and they aren't hurting for acting.

I was referring more to upping the level of the CGI and sets

18 minutes ago, T3X4S said:

I miss Eureka - what a great idea (only watch the 1st 20 or so episodes)

But then you miss James Callis terrible American accent :)

11 minutes ago, FloatingFatMan said:

I dunno. It looks kinda pretty to me, but would definitely look better as a real model instead of CGI.

If it gets a second season (fingers crossed) I'm hoping the ship has to be sacrificed an he gets Orville-A being a much better ship, this one is meant to be a bit of a tub that was in need of a captain but Ed is showing himself I think to be more capable than his superiors might have been expecting.

On 9/20/2017 at 1:29 AM, George P said:

It seems to me, over the years, that trek fans are some of the most annoying high and mighty know it alls out there.   Maybe I'm just old enough to remember, and due to there being no internet at the time, Trek fans were hating on TNG before the show even aired.  They're doing it yet again with STD based off of trailers, because trailers are a perfect indication of how a show/movie is going to turn out, really guys?

 

Cry, moan and overall complain as much as you guys want, the fact is, you so called "die hards" aren't enough to keep a damn trek TV show on the air anymore.  Where were all the fans when Enterprise needed it?  Instead it got canned.   Voyager had to resort to the old trek crutch known as the Borg to keep it going, even introducing Borg v2 and upping the action, the only "exploration" was the fact they were stuck in the delta quadrant just because the writers knew that way when they were starting to run out of ideas, and oh boy did they, they could always just drop the Borg in, boy did that make you guys happy, right?  

 

And for all the praise DS9 gets, what did it end up doing?  We went down the path of war with the dominion, nice action and battles, exploration and peace?  ha!   Something that Paramount and CBS has known for quite some time, and a fact some of you can't seem to come to terms with, the fanbase is small, the core trek fanbase that's been around since close to the start, it's small.  There isn't enough fans out there to support it the way it was back in TNG, scifi costs too much period.  And as far as this show goes, it's another sci-fi show on fox, FOX, of all channels, where scifi goes to die after one season.   Enjoy it while it lasts guys, because with fox's track record on scifi shows, this one, even if it's good, probably won't last long.

Hmm...

 

No, even though I agree with your premise that die hard fans can be annoying, I don't agree with your view that nobody ever watched Star Trek except die hard fans, or nobody watches sc-fi in general except die hard fans...

 

Just starting with Star Trek, Nielsen ratings proved otherwise. The TNG finale, which earned an Emmy nomination, was No. 1 in its time slot, and so was the DS9 series premiere. Most episodes din't reach that mark simply because the shows were in syndication and people relied on watching re-runs. Voyager and Enterprise suffered from quality problems and Trek fatigue. DS9 was weak in the first few seasons so a lot of people stopped watching and many didn't come back when it got better.

 

I think a lot of sci-fi btw suffers from quality problems, and its the quality problems combined with the costs that doom it as "too risky" moreso than public disinterest in the genre as a whole. Sci-fi is actually a huge genre that has included low budget shows that don't require a lot of special effects like X-Files, which also was popular, and really expensive shows like just recently Westworld -- which was both extremely popular and critically acclaimed (which I can't disagree if you would characterize it by saying it cost too much, just that the cost was worth it apparently, because the quality of the show garnered a lot of attention).

 

I don't quite get your pessimism about sci-fi viewership at all.

  • Like 2
5 hours ago, redfish said:

Hmm...

 

No, even though I agree with your premise that die hard fans can be annoying, I don't agree with your view that nobody ever watched Star Trek except die hard fans, or nobody watches sc-fi in general except die hard fans...

 

Just starting with Star Trek, Nielsen ratings proved otherwise. The TNG finale, which earned an Emmy nomination, was No. 1 in its time slot, and so was the DS9 series premiere. Most episodes din't reach that mark simply because the shows were in syndication and people relied on watching re-runs. Voyager and Enterprise suffered from quality problems and Trek fatigue. DS9 was weak in the first few seasons so a lot of people stopped watching and many didn't come back when it got better.

 

I think a lot of sci-fi btw suffers from quality problems, and its the quality problems combined with the costs that doom it as "too risky" moreso than public disinterest in the genre as a whole. Sci-fi is actually a huge genre that has included low budget shows that don't require a lot of special effects like X-Files, which also was popular, and really expensive shows like just recently Westworld -- which was both extremely popular and critically acclaimed (which I can't disagree if you would characterize it by saying it cost too much, just that the cost was worth it apparently, because the quality of the show garnered a lot of attention).

 

I don't quite get your pessimism about sci-fi viewership at all.

It's not pessimism,  I'm bringing up facts,  scifi shows, on primetime TV like FOX have been canned very quickly.  Just look at the past 5 years, if not longer.     Costs is something I bring up as a factor, and the only way you overcome the cost issue is with high ratings, many scifi shows just don't get that.  You talk about quality, sure, but quality in what area?  The look of the show in question?  The CGI?  The writing overall?    You bring up shows like X-files, that's not traditional scifi, it has some scifi mixed in sure, but it's a mix of other things in a procedural, you know, procedurals that everyone seems to like doing now and get most of the big ratings?  I'm a huge X-files fan, don't get me wrong, but scifi is not what made the show great, it was the two leading characters and their chemistry that did.  Also back then FOX was a new network channel and it had nothing else to show, once X-files started to become a hit there was no stopping it, also nothing else on TV at the time but sitcoms.

 

Westworld, well you know, HBO,  they're going to make a good show, the writing and the budget are all there.  While it's a scifi show, it's not in your face scifi like others, it doesn't so much rely on it to move the plot and story along.  You're not scratching your head at technobable in the middle of an episode.  In fact the show just uses some scifi to toss philosophy at you, and what is real/alive and so on, with dabs of moral questions and so on.  

 

My contention and point, when it comes to trek and it's "fans" is that most of you that are complaining are stuck asking for the same old formula from TNG or the later part of DS9 to be given to you yet again, over and over.   Why?  And is it exactly a surprise that trek, until the 2009 reboot movies hit, was on a downward trend?   Each TNG movie after First Contact, which, come on, had to use the Borg yet again (gotta love that Borg story crutch), to make it interesting.   All the others are just bad, making less and less, people, heck even some trek fans, started to ignore it.     Without actually running the numbers I'd say it's safe to assume the newest 3 trek movies have made more than all the TNG movies put together.   All that says to me is that the formula needed to be shaken up or you're not going to bring in new viewers.    The Orvilles been good, don't get me wrong, but it's new, even if it feels like trek to people, the comedy sets it apart, and it's got Seiths name attached to it, so you get viewers interested anyways.   If it gets a 2nd season or not, I don't know, the fact is that right now, FOX is where scifi shows go to get killed after one season.  That's not just my opinion, it's a fact.

I'm really enjoying this show. I was initially afraid that they would overdo the comedy but it's been a pretty nice balance. I especially liked the two of them trying to come up with alien names on the shuttle. Really funny. I really get a TNG feel from this show which is probably why I am so endeared to it already. I think Discovery is some of the best TV on right now, but Orville has it's place for sure.

5 hours ago, George P said:

It's not pessimism,  I'm bringing up facts,  scifi shows, on primetime TV like FOX have been canned very quickly.  Just look at the past 5 years, if not longer.     Costs is something I bring up as a factor, and the only way you overcome the cost issue is with high ratings, many scifi shows just don't get that.  You talk about quality, sure, but quality in what area?  The look of the show in question?  The CGI?  The writing overall?    You bring up shows like X-files, that's not traditional scifi, it has some scifi mixed in sure, but it's a mix of other things in a procedural, you know, procedurals that everyone seems to like doing now and get most of the big ratings?  I'm a huge X-files fan, don't get me wrong, but scifi is not what made the show great, it was the two leading characters and their chemistry that did.  Also back then FOX was a new network channel and it had nothing else to show, once X-files started to become a hit there was no stopping it, also nothing else on TV at the time but sitcoms.

 

Westworld, well you know, HBO,  they're going to make a good show, the writing and the budget are all there.  While it's a scifi show, it's not in your face scifi like others, it doesn't so much rely on it to move the plot and story along.  You're not scratching your head at technobable in the middle of an episode.  In fact the show just uses some scifi to toss philosophy at you, and what is real/alive and so on, with dabs of moral questions and so on.  

 

My contention and point, when it comes to trek and it's "fans" is that most of you that are complaining are stuck asking for the same old formula from TNG or the later part of DS9 to be given to you yet again, over and over.   Why?  And is it exactly a surprise that trek, until the 2009 reboot movies hit, was on a downward trend?   Each TNG movie after First Contact, which, come on, had to use the Borg yet again (gotta love that Borg story crutch), to make it interesting.   All the others are just bad, making less and less, people, heck even some trek fans, started to ignore it.     Without actually running the numbers I'd say it's safe to assume the newest 3 trek movies have made more than all the TNG movies put together.   All that says to me is that the formula needed to be shaken up or you're not going to bring in new viewers.    The Orvilles been good, don't get me wrong, but it's new, even if it feels like trek to people, the comedy sets it apart, and it's got Seiths name attached to it, so you get viewers interested anyways.   If it gets a 2nd season or not, I don't know, the fact is that right now, FOX is where scifi shows go to get killed after one season.  That's not just my opinion, it's a fact.

Sci-fi is not what makes any show great, its always the ability of a show to transcend its genre and create something compelling to watch. But I think people did watch the X-Files for the sci-fi elements; the chemistry between the characters worked as long as they focused on the sci-fi, and when the show got too much into Mulder and Scully's personal life, it got tedious real fast. People also watch Star Trek for the sci-fi, and when writers go overboard in focusing on interpersonal relationships to the expense of great sci-fi storytelling, this harms the shows. It was one of the quality problems with Voyager. I didn't care about the relationship between Torres and Chakotay, or between Paris and Kim, for godsakes. It was dull and uninteresting, and not why anyone would tune in to watch the show. And I would definitely disagree with you that Westworld isn't in your face sci-fi, or that it didn't have what you'd refer to as technobabble in the Star Trek context. References to QA testing, bulk apperception, and other stuff that had meaning to the technical world of the show and were mainly used to deepen the relationship between the show and its fictional sci-fi reality.

 

Don't get me wrong, I think there are things that can be tweaked with the Trek formula, and if I were rebooting Star Trek, I'd tweak things around myself, but a lot of the movies and shows had quality problems that went way beyond just keeping the formula the same. I think "canon" is bunk. You keep things that work, and throw out things that don't work. There's a lot of "canon" in Voyager that I think Trek writers should just pretend never existed. To further prove my point, I don't think JJ Abrams movies were bad and I like a lot of his updates, though in general I also think he also proved that from a sci-fi perspective Trek always worked better on the small screen, because it has more room in serial format to do thoughtful stories.

 

But just as there's some resistance to changing things up by fans, there's also a tendency of some to be overly negative and critical of the original formula in the sense that they'll come up with overreaching theories about why it failed (often blaming the fanbase) and go overboard with changes -- which often end up going against the spirit of the show and not even working out in the end. I see it not only with Star Trek, but other franchises, not just movies and TV shows, but also games. The bottom line is people want to watch quality shows, and you need quality writers and directors with some sort of vision to produce a show and not just lean back on cliches. But completely changing things in a way go against the original spirit of the series is just desperate -- not creative -- and is destined not to work out. I haven't watched Discovery yet, so I'm not judging it, but just looking at what I have seen, there's a combination of this kind of bad change and more general lackluster quality that doesn't draw me in to watch. I think producers can create a Trek series that attracts both die hard fans and a larger audience if they put together a team of writers and set directors who actually have talent, and thread the needle. Its not a zero sum game where you have to pit fans against a mass audience, and have one group lose and one group win.

 

I haven't seem much of The Orville, either, just part of one episode, so I'm not going to get into that too  much either. 

Tonight's episode teaches us the dangers of downvoting. Neowin, take heed. 

 

The thing I like about this show's comedy is the timing. The joke is rarely the center of the scene, it is just some off the cuff comment that people would make in real life. A few are a bit cheesy ("Bustin Jieber") but then, jokes are lame sometimes.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • So size is the ONLY selling point????? People have been plugging in PC's to TV's in living rooms for 20+ years. I would take a bigger box for more peformance. Also lot and lots of SFF/Mini ITX build guides out there.
    • My point is, if you buying this instead of a console for TV purposes, that you need to understand that you will not be able to play the most popular MP games with Steam OS. Now if you are not into those games, and into some of the perputual alpha/beta games on Steam then this is an option. I would argue a gaming PC would be the better route, more expensive but take the 1k -1.4k you are about to spend on this thing and build a better one. Because it is running Linux you can overide its 1080p settings. However The Verge complained about its 1080p cap and how you would have to get around it at the CLI, so someone buying this instead of a PS5 or Xbox might have a challege on their hands.
    • A review of Synology's BeeCamera software for the BeeStation Plus by Christopher White Synology is leaning into the BeeStation and the BeeStation Plus, and it's easy to understand why. While power users will want something more customizable, the BeeStation and its more powerful sibling, the BeeStation Plus, are great for those who want a device they can simply plug in, click a few buttons, and have it work as their own personal cloud. Until recently, the device was mostly used for the storage of files, photos, and videos, and with the Plus model, you could install and stream media through Plex. Synology recently released a new free application for the BeeStation Plus called BeeCamera, which is basically a stripped-down version of Surveillance Station. First, let's get the confusing naming out of the way. While you might initially think that BeeCamera is a physical device, perhaps a camera that Synology created specifically for the BeeStation Plus, that would be incorrect. BeeCamera is simply the name for the application that runs on the NAS and on your mobile device. I think the marketing team missed the mark here, but it does fit the other naming on the device, like BeePhotos and BeeFiles, I guess. Camera Support As of right now, only Synology-branded cameras are supported, which many will see as a callback to the drive locking the company implemented and then backtracked on. That said, while I 100% disagree on drive locking, I agree that camera locking for a device made to simply plug and play is the right decision. The whole point of the BeeStation line is simplicity. There are currently three camera model lines available, a wireless device for indoor use, and two PoE models for external use. CC400W (Wi-Fi): Plug it into power using the included power adapter, and connect it to your wireless network. This camera is rated only for indoor use and is the one I was provided to review the BeeCamera. $198.36, in line with the Unifi G6 Compact. BC510 (PoE): A bullet-style camera. Connect it to an Ethernet cable that is providing Power over Ethernet (PoE). This camera is rated for both indoor and outdoor use. $240. TC510 (PoE): A dome-style camera. Connect it to an Ethernet cable that is providing Power over Ethernet (PoE). This camera is rated for both indoor and outdoor use. $240. Although this isn't a review of the actual Synology camera, I did want to note that a positive for the Synology CC400W is that it uses a magnetic base. This means you can mount it on any magnetic surface, which is pretty handy. However, a downside to the camera is that it's powered by a built-in USB cable that's about six and a half feet (two meters) long. This means that the cable will probably be either too long or too short, but more importantly, if the cable is damaged at all, you'll likely need to buy an entirely new camera because there doesn't appear to be a way to replace it, unlike many competitors, like the Unifi G6 Instant. Hopefully, this is something Synology addresses in a future revision of the hardware. The BeeStation Plus supports up to four cameras. Setup The setup of BeeCamera is, like everything in the BeeStation family, very straightforward. Simply make sure you're on at least version 1.5 of the BeeStation OS, and BeeCamera is automatically installed on the device. BeeCamera Setup Screenshots Setting up the CC400W was just as easy. Plug it in, open up the BeeCamera app, and follow the on-screen steps to add the camera. During this process, you'll configure the camera name and how many days of retention you want to keep. The system will also automatically update the firmware for you. The whole thing took only a couple of minutes, excluding the time it took for the camera to update the firmware. Once the camera is connected to the BeeStation Plus, you can manage the various camera settings within the app, although there aren't many to choose from. You're able to configure whether the microphone will record audio (some privacy laws may preclude you from recording it), select what codec to use (H.264 or H.265), configure the color and exposure of the camera, and determine what data you want to overlay onto the video. Finally, you can set up AI detections so that BeeCamera will alert you if it sees certain things. These are all of the common detections you would expect in a camera system, such as people, pets, and vehicles. Under people and vehicles, you can also add extra monitoring for lingering and congestion detection, although pets are currently in "Lab" and therefore have no extra features yet. Recording in 4K using H.265 for 30 days will take roughly 300 GB of storage, which is very reasonable for most regular households, as the BeeStation Plus has 8TB of native storage. If you want to set up detection zones, you can. These are areas that BeeCamera will look at for the various detections, and are helpful if, for example, there's a tree in your frame and you don't want to be notified each time the wind makes the branches move around in the frame. Finally, you can also schedule when the camera should and should not be recording, which is a very useful feature. For example, you may want to record only at night when you're sleeping, but not during the day when you're up and about the house, so you can easily shut the camera off between 8 am and 10 pm. Each hour of each day can be configured to record continuously, only upon a detection event, or disabled completely. You can't fine-tune to record at a specific time, though, only hourly blocks on the hour. Daily Use The best part of BeeCamera is that it's easy and just works. If you only care about being notified when things happen, the mobile app sends those notifications and lets you click the button to bring up the video and see what's going on. For example, when I went out of town and had the camera pointed at the cat tower in our hallway, it was nice to be able to drop in and check that my furry friends were doing okay without me. Initiating the remote connection to the BeeStation Plus through the app is very responsive, but this will heavily depend on your ISP. In my case, using Xfinity, I'm able to go from starting the app to seeing live video in roughly three seconds, which is about the same amount of time it takes to connect to my Unifi UNVR system that costs much more. If you want to see footage from a specific day and time, you can do so using the calendar icon. You can also scroll through the timeline, looking for detections that are labeled in blue (vs. the normal gray when there's nothing of interest). There are buttons that let you go to the last/next detection on the timeline, which is helpful if you missed the notification on your mobile device. That's where the ease of use stops, though. While you can download clips that are flagged by detection, there's apparently no way to select generic time frames you're interested in, and the only place to download is to your phone. In addition, sharing a video shares the actual video, not just a link back to your BeeStation Plus. While that's good from a security and privacy perspective, it's a little awkward for sharing large videos. Limitations While the ease of implementation is great, there are some things that are lacking from BeeCamera. The most obvious is that there is no way to view the footage on the desktop. You can log in to the BeeStation Plus to see how much storage BeeCamera is using, but unlike BeePhotos and BeeFiles, there is no BeeCamera on the web console to manage or view footage. This means you'll be viewing all of your security footage on your mobile device, which is pretty limiting. In addition, there's no way to download the video to your PC without first using your phone as the intermediary. The one exception to this is that you can use BeeFiles to see the raw MP4 files. They're saved in 5-minute increments, and it's just raw data with no detection information or any other way to identify what any of them are. The lack of a way to interact with BeeCamera on the desktop also makes configuration of the cameras more difficult. For example, trying to set up detection zones using a tiny screen and your finger to draw boxes is more cumbersome than it needs to be. This reinforces the idea that BeeCamera is not made for power users. It's also missing some of the more advanced functionality of Surveillance Station. For example, I couldn't find a way to say, "Alert me if the thing in this zone is no longer there." Another major deficiency with BeeCamera, and a feature I suspect may come out in the future, is that while it can detect generic people, there is no specific facial recognition yet. This is an interesting omission, given the fact that other Synology tools can detect specific individuals, and competitors such as Unifi Protect also do it. This is probably a software limitation, so we will have to wait and see if this feature is added in the future. Conclusion If you need a security guard to monitor surveillance cameras to make sure your property is secure, then BeeCamera is not the solution for you. That said, you probably wouldn't be using a BeeStation Plus as the brains behind the system either. BeeCamera (and BeeStation in general) is clearly aimed at households that want to avoid sending personal data to Google and Amazon, and now want to add some cameras to keep an eye on their home and their pets while they're away. BeeCamera excels at doing this. The target market isn't interested in creating cases, tying multiple views together in a single pane of glass, or the like, and for the intended use case, the system works great. Where it starts to fall apart a bit is with more advanced features. Not being able to use a desktop app is a major compromise in my opinion, and having to do all of the configuration on a mobile device is annoying, but not impossible. If you don't want to have a full-fledged NAS device in your home, but still want control over your data (or maybe want an easy way to backup your data for World Backup Day), and want to add a couple of cameras to keep an eye on your house and your pets, this is a great, cheap, and easy way to go, and I suspect more functionality will come over time. If Synology releases a desktop app or at least a way to configure cameras and view footage on a desktop browser, this would be a near-perfect solution for a general home user. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • I forgot to add on my comment that when robots will take physical jobs, it's when they become more cheaper to manufacture and sell. That will be the starting point of the end to lanscaping, trash pickup, factory jobs, etc.
    • How many people can actually use a 2.5gig ethernet port? Most people do not have more than a 1gig internet connection, heck most have less than that. Most people at home do not have a switch that has multiple 2.5gig ports either.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      477
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      104
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      88
    5. 5
      neufuse
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!