[Official] The Orville

By FloatingFatMan
in The Media Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

Grand Master

Jazmac

Posted
Posted

I find I like the show myself. Its cheesy in some places but on the whole, I'm going to watch.  Maybe its been said already but it wasn't until I watched the last one that I discovered it Orville is directed by Jonathan Frakes of Next Generation fame. 

Grand Master

George P Global Moderator

Posted
  • Global Moderator
Posted
1 hour ago, Louisifer said:

Time travel and science fiction go hand in hand, i dont think i've seen any that havent used it. :o 

Yeah but it doesn't have to be used so much is all I'm saying. 

Grand Master

George P Global Moderator

Posted
  • Global Moderator
Posted
8 hours ago, techbeck said:

Good episode tonight.  

  Reveal hidden contents

Avis jokes were pretty good.

 

Spoiler

There was a hunger games drop to, also the line about humans worshiping Hertz was a nice touch.

 

Grand Master

+Zagadka Subscriber²

Posted
  • Subscriber²
Posted

Orville is one of the best Star Trek series ever!

 

I was really pleasantly surprised by MacFarlane's restraint. I really expected more of his satire, but the jokes have been really restrained and actually well timed and written. Maybe he has learned his lesson?

 

One thing they are doing well with not having is the transporter technology. Yea they're messing with time travel, but the transporter has just always been a huge crutch in ST, at least to me. When they had to make transporters not available to make an episode dramatic was always very cheesy.

 

Don't really like the ship design (exterior), practical or CG. It doesn't look great and it makes absolutely no sense. The docking bay is inside the three spirals of the engine for some reason?

 

And I also don't like Bortus. Some of the character development paths are looking to be kinda difficult; the characters have a thin definition, which gives them more latitude but also makes it harder to find depth. The 6 or so episodes we have so far isn't enough to really tell where they will be going.

 

1 minute ago, Son_Of_Dad said:

Agree. It's quite a good watch. Imagine what it would look like if it also had an 8M budget per episode!!

I hope it never gets that. What works in Orville is mostly the writing, and they aren't hurting for acting.

Grand Master

FloatingFatMan

Posted
  • Author
Posted
7 minutes ago, Zagadka said:

Orville is one of the best Star Trek series ever!

 

I was really pleasantly surprised by MacFarlane's restraint. I really expected more of his satire, but the jokes have been really restrained and actually well timed and written. Maybe he has learned his lesson?

I think it's a combination of that, and MacFarlane being a huge Trek fan and wanting to keep his version as true to his love as he can.

 

7 minutes ago, Zagadka said:

 

One thing they are doing well with not having is the transporter technology. Yea they're messing with time travel, but the transporter has just always been a huge crutch in ST, at least to me. When they had to make transporters not available to make an episode dramatic was always very cheesy.

 

 

I agree. Transporters have always been a large crutch in Trek, and that's the main thing I really liked about Enterprise. Transporters were very new and not used a lot for human transport.

 

 

7 minutes ago, Zagadka said:

 

Don't really like the ship design (exterior), practical or CG. It doesn't look great and it makes absolutely no sense. The docking bay is inside the three spirals of the engine for some reason?

 

I dunno. It looks kinda pretty to me, but would definitely look better as a real model instead of CGI.

 

7 minutes ago, Zagadka said:

And I also don't like Bortus. Some of the character development paths are looking to be kinda difficult; the characters have a thin definition, which gives them more latitude but also makes it harder to find depth. The 6 or so episodes we have so far isn't enough to really tell where they will be going.

 

Bortus is just a huge lampooning of Worf from TNG/DS9.

 

7 minutes ago, Zagadka said:

 

I hope it never gets that. What works in Orville is mostly the writing, and they aren't hurting for acting.

A little more cash per ep would be nice, but yeah.  Don't wreck it by giving them TOO much money. They story is more important than the sets.

  • +primortal, DConnell and +Raze
  • Like 3
Grand Master

Son_Of_Dad

Posted
Posted
18 minutes ago, Zagadka said:

I hope it never gets that. What works in Orville is mostly the writing, and they aren't hurting for acting.

I was referring more to upping the level of the CGI and sets

18 minutes ago, T3X4S said:

I miss Eureka - what a great idea (only watch the 1st 20 or so episodes)

But then you miss James Callis terrible American accent :)

Grand Master

Son_Of_Dad

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, FloatingFatMan said:

I dunno. It looks kinda pretty to me, but would definitely look better as a real model instead of CGI.

If it gets a second season (fingers crossed) I'm hoping the ship has to be sacrificed an he gets Orville-A being a much better ship, this one is meant to be a bit of a tub that was in need of a captain but Ed is showing himself I think to be more capable than his superiors might have been expecting.

Grand Master

redfish

Posted
Posted (edited)
On 9/20/2017 at 1:29 AM, George P said:

It seems to me, over the years, that trek fans are some of the most annoying high and mighty know it alls out there.   Maybe I'm just old enough to remember, and due to there being no internet at the time, Trek fans were hating on TNG before the show even aired.  They're doing it yet again with STD based off of trailers, because trailers are a perfect indication of how a show/movie is going to turn out, really guys?

 

Cry, moan and overall complain as much as you guys want, the fact is, you so called "die hards" aren't enough to keep a damn trek TV show on the air anymore.  Where were all the fans when Enterprise needed it?  Instead it got canned.   Voyager had to resort to the old trek crutch known as the Borg to keep it going, even introducing Borg v2 and upping the action, the only "exploration" was the fact they were stuck in the delta quadrant just because the writers knew that way when they were starting to run out of ideas, and oh boy did they, they could always just drop the Borg in, boy did that make you guys happy, right?  

 

And for all the praise DS9 gets, what did it end up doing?  We went down the path of war with the dominion, nice action and battles, exploration and peace?  ha!   Something that Paramount and CBS has known for quite some time, and a fact some of you can't seem to come to terms with, the fanbase is small, the core trek fanbase that's been around since close to the start, it's small.  There isn't enough fans out there to support it the way it was back in TNG, scifi costs too much period.  And as far as this show goes, it's another sci-fi show on fox, FOX, of all channels, where scifi goes to die after one season.   Enjoy it while it lasts guys, because with fox's track record on scifi shows, this one, even if it's good, probably won't last long.

Hmm...

 

No, even though I agree with your premise that die hard fans can be annoying, I don't agree with your view that nobody ever watched Star Trek except die hard fans, or nobody watches sc-fi in general except die hard fans...

 

Just starting with Star Trek, Nielsen ratings proved otherwise. The TNG finale, which earned an Emmy nomination, was No. 1 in its time slot, and so was the DS9 series premiere. Most episodes din't reach that mark simply because the shows were in syndication and people relied on watching re-runs. Voyager and Enterprise suffered from quality problems and Trek fatigue. DS9 was weak in the first few seasons so a lot of people stopped watching and many didn't come back when it got better.

 

I think a lot of sci-fi btw suffers from quality problems, and its the quality problems combined with the costs that doom it as "too risky" moreso than public disinterest in the genre as a whole. Sci-fi is actually a huge genre that has included low budget shows that don't require a lot of special effects like X-Files, which also was popular, and really expensive shows like just recently Westworld -- which was both extremely popular and critically acclaimed (which I can't disagree if you would characterize it by saying it cost too much, just that the cost was worth it apparently, because the quality of the show garnered a lot of attention).

 

I don't quite get your pessimism about sci-fi viewership at all.

  • Son_Of_Dad and DConnell
  • Like 2
Grand Master

George P Global Moderator

Posted
  • Global Moderator
Posted
5 hours ago, redfish said:

Hmm...

 

No, even though I agree with your premise that die hard fans can be annoying, I don't agree with your view that nobody ever watched Star Trek except die hard fans, or nobody watches sc-fi in general except die hard fans...

 

Just starting with Star Trek, Nielsen ratings proved otherwise. The TNG finale, which earned an Emmy nomination, was No. 1 in its time slot, and so was the DS9 series premiere. Most episodes din't reach that mark simply because the shows were in syndication and people relied on watching re-runs. Voyager and Enterprise suffered from quality problems and Trek fatigue. DS9 was weak in the first few seasons so a lot of people stopped watching and many didn't come back when it got better.

 

I think a lot of sci-fi btw suffers from quality problems, and its the quality problems combined with the costs that doom it as "too risky" moreso than public disinterest in the genre as a whole. Sci-fi is actually a huge genre that has included low budget shows that don't require a lot of special effects like X-Files, which also was popular, and really expensive shows like just recently Westworld -- which was both extremely popular and critically acclaimed (which I can't disagree if you would characterize it by saying it cost too much, just that the cost was worth it apparently, because the quality of the show garnered a lot of attention).

 

I don't quite get your pessimism about sci-fi viewership at all.

It's not pessimism,  I'm bringing up facts,  scifi shows, on primetime TV like FOX have been canned very quickly.  Just look at the past 5 years, if not longer.     Costs is something I bring up as a factor, and the only way you overcome the cost issue is with high ratings, many scifi shows just don't get that.  You talk about quality, sure, but quality in what area?  The look of the show in question?  The CGI?  The writing overall?    You bring up shows like X-files, that's not traditional scifi, it has some scifi mixed in sure, but it's a mix of other things in a procedural, you know, procedurals that everyone seems to like doing now and get most of the big ratings?  I'm a huge X-files fan, don't get me wrong, but scifi is not what made the show great, it was the two leading characters and their chemistry that did.  Also back then FOX was a new network channel and it had nothing else to show, once X-files started to become a hit there was no stopping it, also nothing else on TV at the time but sitcoms.

 

Westworld, well you know, HBO,  they're going to make a good show, the writing and the budget are all there.  While it's a scifi show, it's not in your face scifi like others, it doesn't so much rely on it to move the plot and story along.  You're not scratching your head at technobable in the middle of an episode.  In fact the show just uses some scifi to toss philosophy at you, and what is real/alive and so on, with dabs of moral questions and so on.  

 

My contention and point, when it comes to trek and it's "fans" is that most of you that are complaining are stuck asking for the same old formula from TNG or the later part of DS9 to be given to you yet again, over and over.   Why?  And is it exactly a surprise that trek, until the 2009 reboot movies hit, was on a downward trend?   Each TNG movie after First Contact, which, come on, had to use the Borg yet again (gotta love that Borg story crutch), to make it interesting.   All the others are just bad, making less and less, people, heck even some trek fans, started to ignore it.     Without actually running the numbers I'd say it's safe to assume the newest 3 trek movies have made more than all the TNG movies put together.   All that says to me is that the formula needed to be shaken up or you're not going to bring in new viewers.    The Orvilles been good, don't get me wrong, but it's new, even if it feels like trek to people, the comedy sets it apart, and it's got Seiths name attached to it, so you get viewers interested anyways.   If it gets a 2nd season or not, I don't know, the fact is that right now, FOX is where scifi shows go to get killed after one season.  That's not just my opinion, it's a fact.

Grand Master

patseguin Global Moderator

Posted
  • Global Moderator
Posted

I'm really enjoying this show. I was initially afraid that they would overdo the comedy but it's been a pretty nice balance. I especially liked the two of them trying to come up with alien names on the shuttle. Really funny. I really get a TNG feel from this show which is probably why I am so endeared to it already. I think Discovery is some of the best TV on right now, but Orville has it's place for sure.

Grand Master

redfish

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, George P said:

It's not pessimism,  I'm bringing up facts,  scifi shows, on primetime TV like FOX have been canned very quickly.  Just look at the past 5 years, if not longer.     Costs is something I bring up as a factor, and the only way you overcome the cost issue is with high ratings, many scifi shows just don't get that.  You talk about quality, sure, but quality in what area?  The look of the show in question?  The CGI?  The writing overall?    You bring up shows like X-files, that's not traditional scifi, it has some scifi mixed in sure, but it's a mix of other things in a procedural, you know, procedurals that everyone seems to like doing now and get most of the big ratings?  I'm a huge X-files fan, don't get me wrong, but scifi is not what made the show great, it was the two leading characters and their chemistry that did.  Also back then FOX was a new network channel and it had nothing else to show, once X-files started to become a hit there was no stopping it, also nothing else on TV at the time but sitcoms.

 

Westworld, well you know, HBO,  they're going to make a good show, the writing and the budget are all there.  While it's a scifi show, it's not in your face scifi like others, it doesn't so much rely on it to move the plot and story along.  You're not scratching your head at technobable in the middle of an episode.  In fact the show just uses some scifi to toss philosophy at you, and what is real/alive and so on, with dabs of moral questions and so on.  

 

My contention and point, when it comes to trek and it's "fans" is that most of you that are complaining are stuck asking for the same old formula from TNG or the later part of DS9 to be given to you yet again, over and over.   Why?  And is it exactly a surprise that trek, until the 2009 reboot movies hit, was on a downward trend?   Each TNG movie after First Contact, which, come on, had to use the Borg yet again (gotta love that Borg story crutch), to make it interesting.   All the others are just bad, making less and less, people, heck even some trek fans, started to ignore it.     Without actually running the numbers I'd say it's safe to assume the newest 3 trek movies have made more than all the TNG movies put together.   All that says to me is that the formula needed to be shaken up or you're not going to bring in new viewers.    The Orvilles been good, don't get me wrong, but it's new, even if it feels like trek to people, the comedy sets it apart, and it's got Seiths name attached to it, so you get viewers interested anyways.   If it gets a 2nd season or not, I don't know, the fact is that right now, FOX is where scifi shows go to get killed after one season.  That's not just my opinion, it's a fact.

Sci-fi is not what makes any show great, its always the ability of a show to transcend its genre and create something compelling to watch. But I think people did watch the X-Files for the sci-fi elements; the chemistry between the characters worked as long as they focused on the sci-fi, and when the show got too much into Mulder and Scully's personal life, it got tedious real fast. People also watch Star Trek for the sci-fi, and when writers go overboard in focusing on interpersonal relationships to the expense of great sci-fi storytelling, this harms the shows. It was one of the quality problems with Voyager. I didn't care about the relationship between Torres and Chakotay, or between Paris and Kim, for godsakes. It was dull and uninteresting, and not why anyone would tune in to watch the show. And I would definitely disagree with you that Westworld isn't in your face sci-fi, or that it didn't have what you'd refer to as technobabble in the Star Trek context. References to QA testing, bulk apperception, and other stuff that had meaning to the technical world of the show and were mainly used to deepen the relationship between the show and its fictional sci-fi reality.

 

Don't get me wrong, I think there are things that can be tweaked with the Trek formula, and if I were rebooting Star Trek, I'd tweak things around myself, but a lot of the movies and shows had quality problems that went way beyond just keeping the formula the same. I think "canon" is bunk. You keep things that work, and throw out things that don't work. There's a lot of "canon" in Voyager that I think Trek writers should just pretend never existed. To further prove my point, I don't think JJ Abrams movies were bad and I like a lot of his updates, though in general I also think he also proved that from a sci-fi perspective Trek always worked better on the small screen, because it has more room in serial format to do thoughtful stories.

 

But just as there's some resistance to changing things up by fans, there's also a tendency of some to be overly negative and critical of the original formula in the sense that they'll come up with overreaching theories about why it failed (often blaming the fanbase) and go overboard with changes -- which often end up going against the spirit of the show and not even working out in the end. I see it not only with Star Trek, but other franchises, not just movies and TV shows, but also games. The bottom line is people want to watch quality shows, and you need quality writers and directors with some sort of vision to produce a show and not just lean back on cliches. But completely changing things in a way go against the original spirit of the series is just desperate -- not creative -- and is destined not to work out. I haven't watched Discovery yet, so I'm not judging it, but just looking at what I have seen, there's a combination of this kind of bad change and more general lackluster quality that doesn't draw me in to watch. I think producers can create a Trek series that attracts both die hard fans and a larger audience if they put together a team of writers and set directors who actually have talent, and thread the needle. Its not a zero sum game where you have to pit fans against a mass audience, and have one group lose and one group win.

 

I haven't seem much of The Orville, either, just part of one episode, so I'm not going to get into that too  much either. 

Grand Master

+Zagadka Subscriber²

Posted
  • Subscriber²
Posted

Tonight's episode teaches us the dangers of downvoting. Neowin, take heed. 

 

The thing I like about this show's comedy is the timing. The joke is rarely the center of the scene, it is just some off the cuff comment that people would make in real life. A few are a bit cheesy ("Bustin Jieber") but then, jokes are lame sometimes.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Posts

    • Waymo recalls self-driving software after cars enter closed freeway work zones

      By MrElectrifyer · Posted

      Likely nothing will be done in corporate America, there have been countless Tesla self-driving incidents. Then again, there have also been countless human operated incidents. It's literally daily news here in Canada, to the extent that it's now odd if we get a day where a collision doesn't get announced on the radio throughout the day...
    • SKG Hand Massager with Heat OS500 hands on

      By Steven P. · Posted

      SKG Hand Massager with Heat OS500 hands on by Steven Parker I was offered the chance to test out the SKG Hand Massager with Heat OS500, and full disclosure, they let me keep it regardless of my findings. Anyway, I jumped at the chance due to my long hours sitting at my desk, mousing around. Apologies for the knife cut across the top of the box; that was my doing, being a bit too heavy-handed with opening up the outer packaging. First up, what's in the box: SKG Hand Massager with Heat OS500 1x Type-C charging cable User Manual 1-Year Warranty (card) In short, everything you need to get started. According to the official Amazon listing, here are the key features: Full-Hand Air Compression: OS500 wraps your fingers, palm, and wrist with multi-chamber air compression for a complete hand relaxation experience. The extended massage chamber helps cover more of the hand and wrist area than standard palm-only hand massagers Palm Kneading with 6 Modes & 6 Intensities: Built-in palm kneading rollers add a hands-on massage feel, while 6 preset modes and 6 pressure levels let you choose the comfort level that fits your day—from gentle relaxation to a firmer full-hand massage 3 Heat Levels with Cooling Fan: Choose from 104°F, 113°F or 122°F warmth to suit different seasons and comfort preferences. The built-in cooling fan helps reduce stuffiness during heated sessions, keeping your hand feeling fresh and comfortable Easy Visual Display & Smart Timer: The digital image display clearly shows massage area, mode, intensity, heat level, and remaining time at a glance. Select 10, 15, or 20-minute sessions for quick office breaks, evening relaxation, or everyday hand care Rechargeable, Cordless & Comfortable: A 3000mAh battery supports over 90 minutes of full-function use on a full charge, with convenient USB-C charging. The soft inner lining, smooth ABS/PU finish, and premium black-gold design make OS500 ideal for home, office, or gifting With all that out of the way, here are my own findings. I gave it a try on both left and right hands, and as you can maybe see from the above YouTube Short, (sorry for the shaky video), my whole hand fits in, but my wrist barely enters the Hand Massager. I was able to push through a bit more with my fingertips extending out the other end to get a bit of massaging on the start of my wrist. Usage For some reason, there is a strap that is very difficult to fasten to my wrist with one hand. I am not sure what function it has, and it isn't mentioned in the user manual. The only thing I could find was in the product images that claimed "wrist precision". Unlike the Bob and Brad Hand Massager, this device does not massage the wrist anyway, even though a "wrist mode" is mentioned, which must be for smaller hands than I have, as it is mainly intended for the hand and fingers. In addition, for its steeper price, there are no disposable gloves provided in the box, which is a bit of an issue considering the internal cover (which appears to be elasticated nylon) cannot be removed for washing; so you are left with only one choice: always thoroughly wash your hands before using it. I can imagine this thing getting a bit grimy after a period of use, and that is a bit of a shame. With that said, the buttons on the device, from left to right, do the following: Heat button: 3-level heat control at 104°F, 113°F, or 122°F Mode button: Auto mode Circular mode Soothing mode Relax mode Palm and fingers mode Palm and wrist mode Intensity button: from (First-time users) 15Ka, 25Ka, 35Ka, 45Ka, 55Ka, 60Ka (Intensive relief) Knead button: on or off (6 pressure levels) Power button: Long-press to turn on or off Cooling button: turn on or off the cooling fan Also, in the product imagery, it states there are 36 "custom modes," but nowhere is it listed what these modes are. I can only imagine that they mean a combination of all of the above settings in different intensity levels. The device itself seems to rely on a single "kneading" mechanism located at the palm area of the hand, which spins when in use, and the other massage features are mainly utilized through the air sacs, increasing and decreasing at various levels on the hand and fingers. I am not sure it offered too much relief for someone who is typing and operating a mouse for hours at a time; further testing may be required. It does feel nice, though. Finally, you may be wondering how this fits into the scope of a tech website? Well, let me tell you something: sometimes I sit for up to 15 hours working on Neowin, and although I take breaks in between, it takes a toll on my body. I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief, a good massager like this Hand Massager can shed the strains of the day in just a couple of 15-minute bursts. On the official website, this has an MSRP of $99.99, but luckily for our readers, it is selling at $10 off for just $89.99 right now on Amazon. SKG Hand Massager with Heat OS500 for $89.99 (with $10 off coupon), $99.99 MSRP For me, this gets a thumbs hands(?) down. However, it could be improved by making it so that the protective covering could be removed and thrown into the washing machine, or get yourself some disposable gloves to use with it. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Creative Sound Blaster AE-X PCIe review: your headphones will love it

      By Taliseian · Posted

      Thanks for the info, but I'm still not sure if I need this....
    • We check out the SKG PS700 Neck Massager

      By Steven P. · Posted

      We check out the SKG PS700 Neck Massager by Steven Parker I was offered the chance to test out the SKG PS700 Neck Massager, and full disclosure, they let me keep it regardless of my findings. Anyway, I jumped at the chance due to my long hours sitting at my desk; I figured it could offer some neck pain relief. What's in the box: SKG PS700-2 Neck Massager Rechargeable Battery (inside massager) Type-C USB cable User Manual Quick Start guide 1-Year Warranty In short, everything you need to get started. According to the official listing, here are the key features: Biomimetic Kneading & High Torque Motor: Designed with innovative biomimetic kneading heads that perfectly simulate the touch of human hands. Powered by a high-torque motor, this massager delivers powerful and precise deep tissue relief to effectively target stiff neck muscles and release built-up tension Soothing Heat & Integrated Sound Relaxation: Experience the ultimate Relaxationation with our dual-action approach. The soothing heat function gently warms your neck, while the built-in sound Relaxation provides calming audio tracks, helping you achieve a state of mindfulness and mental tranquility during your physical massage Cordless Convenience & Travel-Ready & Father's Day Gifts: Crafted for maximum portability and ease of use. Its lightweight, cordless design allows you to enjoy a premium massage anywhere without the hassle of tangled wires-whether you're taking a quick break at your desk or winding down at home Versatile Relief for Home & Office: An essential wellness companion for office workers, gamers, frequent travelers, or anyone looking to integrate mindfulness into their daily routine. It seamlessly fits into your lifestyle, providing instant neck relief whenever and wherever you need it Safe & Premium Materials: Manufactured with high-quality, skin-friendly materials to ensure a safe and comfortable experience without irritation. SKG backs this device with dedicated customer service, making it a thoughtful tech-health gift for family and friends App & Bluetooth Music Control: Connect via Bluetooth to control your massage settings through the dedicated app and enjoy your favorite music during your massage session for a fully customizable and immersive relaxation experience Red Light Warmth Technology: Features advanced red light warmth technology that penetrates deep into neck muscles to enhance blood circulation and provide soothing comfort while relieving muscle tension and stiffness Design With all that out of the way, here are my own findings. SKG does not say what materials are used to make the neck massager. However, on the product website, it mentions "soft-touch silicone" with what looks like PU leather cushioning, with the rest being mostly made up of plastics. On the inside of the massager, there are two "biomimetic kneading heads" that are motorized for the different styles of massage, which are not actually listed at all in the paper user manual, but the standard included modes are: De-stress mode, Mediation mode, Relax mode, Shiatsu mode. The massager looks quite premium and is actually very comfortable to wear. This massager is small and light enough to go anywhere, as it doesn't get in the way of anything, so I was able to use it in the chair while writing this review. Unlike the back massager, SKG does not warn in the user guide not to use it for more than 30 minutes a day (or two 15-minute sessions). However, there is a long laundry list of important safeguards to consider before and during the use of the device, and it is warned that the neck massager is not waterproof. It also includes a 1,400mAh battery with a rated power of 14W and input of 5V, which is the standard for up to USB 3.0 power (although the Amperage is not mentioned at all). SKG does not say how long it takes to charge, but a quick calculation at 2A (if that is what it is) would mean it would take roughly 1.5 hrs to charge from empty. In any case, the light around the button changes from orange to green on a full charge. In addition, it is not possible to use the device while it is charging. On the right of the neck massager is the On/Off and modes button, which also acts as a joystick. You can operate all the modes directly from the power button, as well as the app, which I'll get into a bit later: Push up: Short press to adjust Heat levels On/Off button: long press Mode Switching: Short press (while in operation) ➕ Push left: increase Music volume ➖ push right: decrease Music volume Push down: Short-press to turn Music on or off The massager defaults to De-stress mode, and it is not stated anywhere if the neck massager has overheat protection. This time around, regarding heat, the only detail I could find is that it has "triple action soothing heat." The temperature stages are not listed anywhere in the paper manual, Amazon listing, or official website. The heat levels can be adjusted through the app or directly on the device using the joystick button. Usage There's also the SKG Health app, which makes using the massager far easier than feeling around for the button on the side of your neck. If the app is stopped, you are required to log in with a verification code over email, which I am not too pleased with, as this means it will only work that way for however long SKG decides to support it through said app. However, I was not able to get the app to connect to the OS500, which I have reported back to my contact. Bluetooth appeared to be working on the neck massager as it became available to pair with my phone, but the SKG app failed to discover it. Before I forget, there's also a switch next to the USB charging port to deactivate and activate the Voice Prompt, which, when enabled, audibly tells the user when switching intensities, modes, or connecting to the app and informs when the massages start and are completed. That said, on to my likes and dislikes, which are listed below. What I didn't like Unable to connect the Neck Massager to the app Use through the mobile app relies on continued support from SKG What I liked Can be used without the app Cordless use Light and comfortable to wear Heat is also quite comfortable Where to buy: According to the official website, this has an MSRP of $249.99, but is currently $50 (on Amazon). To sweeten the deal a bit more, there's also an in-page coupon that knocks a further $20 off the price. SKG PS700-2 Neck Massager for $179.99 on Amazon (was $199.99) Apply the in-page $20 off coupon for the final price of $179.99 Just like the back massager, this gets a confused thumbs up (due to the cost). However, I cannot rate it through app usage as it failed to connect. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • This Samsung T7 external SSD deal lasts less than a day

      By hellowalkman · Posted

      This Samsung T7 external SSD deal lasts less than a day by Sayan Sen Recently we had covered some nice deals of internal NVMe SSDs which include the 4TB TeamGroup G50 for only $400, the WD_BLACK SN7100 2TB for just $243, as well as the Samsung 990 PRO 1TB for $370. If however you require an external SSD for portability and quick data transfers and have a budget of less than $200 the Samsung T7 1TB model is currently on a limited time deal at just $190, it's lowest price in nearly three months. The deal ends today so you better hurry if you need one (purchase link below). The T7 weighs in at just 72 grams meaning it should be fairly easy to carry around helping in the portability department. Via its USB 3.2 Gen 2 interface the T7 promises sequential read speeds of up to 1050 MB/s and writes of 1000 MB/s. It is also fairly robust with a drop protection of up to 2 meters, though bear in mind that this is not waterproof. For that you will have to choose the rugged T7 Shield. The technical specifications of the Samsung T7 1TB are given in the table below: Specification Value Model Code (1TB) MU-PC1T0T / MU-PC1T0H Interface USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 Gbps) Dimensions (W × H × D) 85 × 57 × 8 mm Weight 72 g Sequential Read Speed Up to 1,050 MB/s Sequential Write Speed Up to 1,000 MB/s Drop Resistance Up to 2 m (6.6 ft) Encryption AES 256-bit hardware encryption Operating Temperature 0°C to 60°C Non-Operating Temperature -40°C to 85°C Humidity 5% to 95% (non-condensing) Shock Resistance 1,500 G, duration 0.5 ms, 3-axis (non-operating) Vibration Resistance 20–2,000 Hz, 20 G (non-operating) Get it at the link below: Samsung T7 Portable SSD, 1TB External Solid State Drive, MU-PC1T0T/AM, Gray: $189.98 (Sold and Shipped by Amazon US) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      505
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      184
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      85
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      76
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!