Recommended Posts

On 08/03/2024 at 18:27, DocM said:

Another thing many observers are missing  is the industry move to lithium iron phosphate (LFP, LMFP, etc) batteries instead of lithium nicke\cobalt. The lithium iron chemistries can be charged to 100% all of the time without causing degradation, they are much longer lived (they can endure more charge\discharge cycles), and  they are far less expensive.

Also of interest is Stellantis exploring lithium sulfur batteries, which are also inexpensive and have a higher energy density than current battery chemistries.

There is also what looks like an industry-wide acceptance of Tesla's 4680 cell and extensions (4695 and 46120), which can use any chemistry and has numerous other  advantages. 

Yes, the lithium iron phosphate batteries is a big deal.  I have them in some expensive portable solar power generators that I can run most of my house on and that is a big deal for Tesla or any manufacturer that uses them.  I should have brought that up because that is certainly a factor in the life of these battery packs.  Last Monday, I even noticed that this was mentioned in Jay Leno's video on the updated Model 3 (see below).

Without getting into the details, when I was referring to Tesla leading in the industry, this is happening in many areas such as the industry-wide acceptance of Tesla's 4680 cells and extensions, more players moving to the large casts, adoption or adapters to use Tesla's NACS connectors, etc.
 

 

On 08/03/2024 at 20:13, wakjak said:

another *shocker* Cybertruck failure: $3000 for a $0.15 alibaba tent.

new-cyber-truck-tent-v0-jk3y43l646nc1.jp

 

Not quite. 

Stowed

Screenshot_20240309-135954.thumb.jpg.2f26e25cad8e8faa3820999f5ab49e75.jpg

Deployed and inflated (dual layer, pump included). Includes mattress, awning, etc. Mounts to the side L brackets.

Screenshot_20240309-140014.thumb.jpg.a2279ddc23549b7a827c306952afc3dc.jpg

Screenshot_20240309-140001.thumb.jpg.a7872f0169d04c86a014f99bd7e4a169.jpg

Side

Screenshot_20240309-140023.thumb.jpg.16a37aba4bfa6b8723a80db9daddfbe6.jpg

Edited by DocM
On 09/03/2024 at 16:05, DocM said:

 

Screenshot from their video, fully deployed. Both 120 and 240 volt outlets are accessible 

Screenshot_20240309-145743.thumb.png.3af3e86066764936795583420c0877a9.png

 

 

 MARKETING VIDEOS.

The photo I showed, is an actual CUSTOMER owned "tent".

https://electrek.co/2024/03/08/tesla-shipping-cybertruck-tent/

 

I live in reality, you live in looney tunes land.

 

On 09/03/2024 at 12:11, DocM said:

 

Not quite. 

Stowed

Screenshot_20240309-135954.thumb.jpg.2f26e25cad8e8faa3820999f5ab49e75.jpg

Deployed and inflated (dual layer, pump included). Includes mattress, awning, etc. Mounts to the side L brackets.

Screenshot_20240309-140014.thumb.jpg.a2279ddc23549b7a827c306952afc3dc.jpg

Screenshot_20240309-140001.thumb.jpg.a7872f0169d04c86a014f99bd7e4a169.jpg

Side

Screenshot_20240309-140023.thumb.jpg.16a37aba4bfa6b8723a80db9daddfbe6.jpg

I'm not sure why you are saying "not quite", the customer photo vs your  images are essentially the same thing, except the customer doesn't have a dressed up image and the awning isn't installed. To each their own, but this seems pretty expensive for what it is. At the end of the day, it's nothing like the original marketing material, which was the point @wakjak was showing.

  • Like 2

You could buy a "house" for that $3k

https://www.basspro.com/shop/en/white-duck-outdoors-avalon-optimus-23-fire-water-repellent-bell-tent

Though to be fair .. just about every truck bed tent is pretty ugly.  The implementation by Tesla isn't bad in comparison (though the truck itself is damn fugly).

This thing is $3500...

https://realtruck.com/p/thule-basin-wedge-hardshell-rooftop-tent/

  • Like 3

Aaaahahahahah!!!

Once again, a bunch of dipsticks do their level best to prove the American stereotype!  I especially love the part where he shows that the baseball Musk used for the second window test is very probably made of foam... :p

 

  • Haha 3
On 10/01/2024 at 08:39, Jim K said:

A F-150 or Tundra should be included when you buy one of these things...

Those wont do better if they don't have proper tires. It's a tire problem you see there more than a truck problem. My Mazda 3 with normal ordinary winter tires sold in Canada would have absolutely no problem climbing this.

On 10/03/2024 at 01:36, adrynalyne said:

I'm not sure why you are saying "not quite", the customer photo vs your  images are essentially the same thing, except the customer doesn't have a dressed up image and the awning isn't installed. To each their own, but this seems pretty expensive for what it is. At the end of the day, it's nothing like the original marketing material, which was the point @wakjak was showing.

The awning was not extended, therefore the structural support poles not installed, but most of all it was not inflated which is a major part of the structural strength. In short, it was only half assembled.

On 12/03/2024 at 15:10, DocM said:

The awning was not extended, therefore the structural support poles not installed, but most of all it was not inflated which is a major part of the structural strength. In short, it was only half assembled.

So what I said? Not sure why you needed to reiterate that part. 

On 12/03/2024 at 18:59, adrynalyne said:

So what I said? Not sure why you needed to reiterate that part. 

@adrynalyne, be fair.  @DocM elaborated more specifically as to what wasn't done.  You only said "... the awning isn't installed."  I think he was actually correcting you.  The awning was installed, but not extended, structural support poles not installed, etc.  He went into more detail and also called out that it wasn't inflated, which is a key factor in the structural strength.  Doc did not just reiterate what you said. 

But to another one of your points and many others, unless I thought I was going to use it quite a bit, "BaseCamp" probably isn't worth ~$3,000.

 

On 12/03/2024 at 19:13, JayZJay said:

@adrynalyne, be fair.  @DocM elaborated more specifically as to what wasn't done.  You only said "... the awning isn't installed."  I think he was actually correcting you.  The awning was installed, but not extended, structural support poles not installed, etc.  He went into more detail and also called out that it wasn't inflated, which is a key factor in the structural strength.  Doc did not just reiterate what you said. 

But to another one of your points and many others, unless I thought I was going to use it quite a bit, "BaseCamp" probably isn't worth ~$3,000.

 

Per the article:

https://electrek.co/2024/03/08/tesla-shipping-cybertruck-tent/
 

“To be fair, it should look better with the awning out, but they haven’t installed it in this case.”

Looking at the additional images, I’m not seeing the awning anywhere.

 

Edit: found the original post:

https://www.cybertruckownersclub.com/basecamp-tent-first-review-︎/
 

Note that I didn’t setup the awning yet, so the pics only show the main tent.”

Im not sure what inflating means (the mattress isn’t inflatable), this is an actual owner giving experiences and the only thing not setup was the awning. Well that and the lack of “tent mode” software. I  be doubt @DocM is more authoritative than a firsthand experience. The post is not even a super negative review. But it definitely does not look like the original renders which is why @wakjak was poking fun at it. Thats fair play, don’t present one thing and deliver something radically different and not expect some criticism for it. 
 

Page 5 of the post has the awning installed and it looks better. 

Edited by adrynalyne
On 12/03/2024 at 22:19, adrynalyne said:

Per the article:

https://electrek.co/2024/03/08/tesla-shipping-cybertruck-tent/
 

“To be fair, it should look better with the awning out, but they haven’t installed it in this case.”

Looking at the additional images, I’m not seeing the awning anywhere.

 

Edit: found the original post:

https://www.cybertruckownersclub.com/basecamp-tent-first-review-︎/
 

Note that I didn’t setup the awning yet, so the pics only show the main tent.”

Im not sure what inflating means (the mattress isn’t inflatable), this is an actual owner giving experiences and the only thing not setup was the awning.

Inflatable in that it's an inflatable air frame tent, no need for a metal or fiberglass frame except for the awning poles. Comes with a pump.

Inflatable tents are not new, but did you have pretty good weather performance.

 

On 12/03/2024 at 22:19, adrynalyne said:

Well that and the lack of “tent mode” software. I  be doubt @DocM is more authoritative than a firsthand experience.

 

Everything I've read says Tent Mode levels the vehicle when on uneven terrain (active air suspension). It would come in a software OTA update, possibly in the same one it will enable the locking differentials.

To a large degree, Tesla's are software-defined cars, similar to a software defined radio. The behavior of almost every system; performance, driveline, braking & regeneration, steering, etc. can be programmed and updated. 

Sometimes you get up in the morning and there's a screen informing you of new features. 

 

On 12/03/2024 at 22:19, adrynalyne said:

 

 

On 12/03/2024 at 21:35, DocM said:

Inflatable in that it's an inflatable air frame tent, no need for a metal or fiberglass frame except for the awning poles. Comes with a pump.

Inflatable tents are not new, but did you have pretty good weather performance.

 

 

Everything I've read says Tent Mode levels the vehicle when on uneven terrain (active air suspension). It would come in a software OTA update, possibly in the same one it will enable the locking differentials.

To a large degree, Tesla's are software-defined cars, similar to a software defined radio. The behavior of almost every system; performance, driveline, braking & regeneration, steering, etc. can be programmed and updated. 

Sometimes you get up in the morning and there's a screen informing you of new features. 

 

 

Can you point us to where the customer did not “inflate” it? The main structure looks the same with the awning installed as it does on his driveway without it installed.


Tent Mode isn’t live and doesn’t exist for consumers at this point so to say it will come as an ota update is a given. But so is it not currently existing for consumers. 

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

https://nypost.com/2024/04/08/business/teslas-cybertrucks-were-rushed-out-are-malfunctioning-at-astounding-rate/


Because OF COURSE THEY DID..

 

Quote

Tesla’s long-delayed — and pricey — Cybertrucks are getting panned by furious owners for malfunctioning at an alarming rate just months after Elon Musk’s futuristic vehicle hit the road.

Tales of the stainless steel Cybertrucks dying after traveling just 1 mile, randomly hard-braking on a wide-open road and already showing rust spots, among other gripes, were shared in the Tesla Owners’ Club forum.

In a thread titled “Worst delivery in my life (truck died in 5 minutes),” a Southern California-based owner wrote that after taking his truck for a spin the same day it was delivered last month, the vehicle “made it 1 mile down road, started getting steering error, flashing red screen, pulled off side of highway now the truck is dead and I’m waiting for a tow truck.”

Imagine simping for that idiot named Elon, just for your truck to die after 1 mile.

Simps. Nothing but SIMPS. 

 

I think Elon's penis has turned into a nub from all the action he's getting from his simps.

  • Like 3
On 15/04/2024 at 16:41, primortal said:

The inside looks just as fugly as the outside.

 

 

https://arstechnica.com/cars/2024/04/tesla-stops-cybertruck-deliveries-accelerator-pedal-may-be-to-blame/

 

Quote

Cybertruck owners allege pedal problem as Tesla suspends deliveries

Tesla's troubled Cybertruck appears to have hit yet another speed bump. Over the weekend, dozens of waiting customers reported that their impending deliveries had been canceled due to "an unexpected delay regarding the preparation of your vehicle."

Tesla has not announced an official stop sale or recall, and as of now, the reason for the suspended deliveries is unknown. But it's possible the electric pickup truck has a problem with its accelerator.

Tesla has been accused of making cars that have sudden unintended acceleration problems. In 2017, the company was the subject of a class-action lawsuit based on at least 23 accounts of Tesla Models S and X suffering from this problem. Tesla vehemently denied any such problem, and in 2020, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration declined to investigate.

But in 2023, a safety researcher in Minnesota published a white paper with a potential mechanism, showing how a voltage spike in Tesla's inverter could cause a car to experience an acceleration event. That same year, a leaked trove of Tesla documents to the German publication Handelsblatt included more than 2,400 customer complaints alleging sudden unintended brake problems. By July 2023, NHTSA decided it was time to investigate the problem.


 

 

Louder for the people in the back...


THE TESLA CYBERTRUCK IS A FAILURE.

AHEM***

 

Quote

Tesla will lay off more than 10% of global workforce: Read the Elon Musk memo

 

Tesla will lay off more than 10% of its global workforce, according to a memo sent to employees by CEO Elon Musk.

The company’s shares closed down more than 5% on Monday.

 

“As we prepare the company for our next phase of growth, it is extremely important to look at every aspect of the cohttps://www.cnbc.com/2024/04/15/tesla-shares-dip-in-premarket-trade-on-global-layoff-reports.htmlmpany for cost reductions and increasing productivity,” Musk said in the memo obtained by CNBC.

“As part of this effort, we have done a thorough review of the organization and made the difficult decision to reduce our headcount by more than 10% globally,” the memo said.

The memo was first reported by Electrek.

Tesla had 140,473 employees as of December 2023.

Tesla shares have taken a bruising in recent months, falling 31% year to date. While electric vehicle sales are still gaining popularity worldwide, their sales growth rate has slowed especially for Tesla. The company now faces more competition than ever.

 

To end 2023, China’s BYD temporarily dethroned Tesla as the world’s top EV maker. Chinese smartphone company Xiaomi in March said it would sell its first electric car for far less than Tesla’s Model 3.

Musk has previously recognized that China, home to a large Tesla factory, may also house the company’s strongest competition. “There’s a lot of people who are out there who think that the top 10 car companies are going to be Tesla followed by nine Chinese car companies. I think they might not be wrong,” Musk said in November.

Some would-be Tesla customers are now skipping the brand owing to Musk’s incendiary rhetoric

https://www.cnbc.com/2024/04/15/tesla-shares-dip-in-premarket-trade-on-global-layoff-reports.html

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • AMD RX 9070 GRE AI, Blender benchmarks vs 9070 XT, 7800XT, Nvidia RTX 5070, 4070 by Sayan Sen Earlier this week, we shared the first part of our review of AMD's new RX 9070 GRE. It was about the gaming performance of the GPU, and we gave it an 8 out of 10. As a follow-up, similar to how we did with the 9070 XT and non-XT, we are doing a dedicated productivity review for the RX 9070 GRE as well, where we compare it against the 9070 XT, 9070, 7800 XT, as well as Nvidia's 5070 and 4070. This will include AI, rendering, compute, and more benchmarks. AI performance, especially, is a very important metric in today's world, and AMD also promised big improvements thanks to its underlying architectural improvements. We will be pitching it against the data we already have for the RX 9070, and RX 9070 XT, but also the Nvidia 5070 FE, MSI GeForce RTX 4070 VENTUS 2X 12G, and Gigabyte Radeon RX 7800 XT GAMING OC 16G as they are in a similar price class, but also because we do not have a comparable 5060 Ti card lying around here that we can compare it against. Before we get underway, this is a collaboration between Sayan Sen and Steven Parker, who lent me his test bed. Also, there was no editorial input from AMD. First up, the specs of the RX 9070, 9070 XT, and 9070 GRE, which were given to us by AMD: Radeon RX 9070 GRE Radeon RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070 XT Boost Clock: Game Clock: up to 2.79GHz up to 2.20GHz up to 2.52GHz up to 2.07GHz up to 2.97GHz up to 2.40GHz Stream Processors 3,072 (48 CU) 3,584 (56 CU) 4,096 (64 CU) Ray Accelerator 48 56 64 AI Accelerator 96 112 128 ROPs 96 128 Texture Mapping Units 192 224 256 Memory 12 GB GDDR6, 18Gbps Clock, 192-bit Bus 432 GB/s 16 GB GDDR6, 20Gbps Clock, 256-bit Bus Effective Memory Bandwidth: 640 GB/s Infinity Cache 48 MB (3rd Gen) 64 MB (3rd Gen) Card Bus PCI-E 5.0 X16 Output 2x HDMI 2.1b 2x DisplayPort 2.1a Power consumption 220W 304W Recommended PSU 650W 750W Slot width 2x 3x Price (SEP) $549 $599 As you can see from the specs above, it is less than the standard RX 9070 in every way that counts, except for slightly higher Boost and Game clock speed. Design Moving on, the RX 9070 GRE we were given is an XFX Swift triple-fan, dual-slot design with two 8-pin connectors. At 30cm (self-measured), it will fit in most systems easily. There is no RGB either. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by XFX from all angles. Test system Our test system consists of the following: Lian Li O11 Dynamic Mini V2 Flow (Amazon|Newegg) ASUS Z890 ProArt Creator WiFi (Amazon|Newegg) Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus (Amazon|Newegg) Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet - 44x37 (Amazon|Newegg) 2x 16GB G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB (7200 MT/s in XMP) (Amazon|Newegg) Sabrent Rocket4 Plus 2TB SSD (Amazon) Windows 11 25H2 (Build 26200.8246) AMD shared a press driver based on the recently released Adrenaline 26.5.2 that we were required to use. We now move on to our benchmarks. First up, we have Geekbench AI running on ONNX. For some reason, the 9070 GRE does exceptionally well here in both half-precision (FP16) and single-precision (FP32). It manages to beat the RTX 5070 and RX 9070 non-XT, and is only behind the 9070 XT. Since Geekbench runs in short bursts instead of continuously hammering the graphics card, it seems the GRE's faster boost clocks are helping here. Next up, we move to the UL Procyon AI test suite, starting with the image generation benchmark. We chose the Stable Diffusion XL FP16 test since it is the most intense workload available on Procyon. The Nvidia cards do very well here, as even the 4070 out-muscles AMD's best fairy easily. The positive thing about the GRE is that it gets quite close to the 9070 non-XT in this test; this indicates that the VRAM does not play a very big role here, as SD XL relies on float16 (FP16). So this is something to keep in mind again. If you wish to work with float32 AI workloads, graphics cards with larger than 12 GB buffers would likely emerge as victors. Regardless, the gains are still massive on AMD's 9000 series compared to the 7000 series. Following image generation, we move to the text generation benchmark. This is one test where the 9070 GRE struggled, quite a lot. It seems that the 12 GB VRAM and lower memory bandwidth of the new Radeon 9070 GRE are hurting it quite a bit; the split is massive, especially in a test like Llama2, which packs 13 billion parameters. As such, in all the tests, the 9070 GRE is the slowest of the lot. Next, we tried Blender, and here the AMD GPUs were beaten by Nvidia. Rendering is something the Green team has always had a lead over the Red side, and it has not changed so far. On the positive side, though, the 9070 GRE shows significantly better results than the 7800 XT, which means AMD is on the right path. Catching up to Nvidia, though, will require a lot more effort. And we hope HIP and ROCm can keep improving. Wrapping up AI testing, we measured OpenCL throughput in the Geekbench compute benchmark. The RX 9070 GRE alongside the 9070 did not fare well here at all, even falling behind the 7800 XT. Interestingly, even the RTX 5070 could not beat the 4070 on OpenCL, so perhaps this suggests that OpenCL optimization may not have been a priority for either AMD or Nvidia in the modern era. Conclusion We reached the end of our productivity performance review of the 9070 GRE, and we have to say it's a mixed bag. Unlike the 9070 and 9070 XT, the GRE excels in some areas while losing ground fairly easily in others. Similar to how it happened in gaming, any time the card's memory subsystem gets hammered, it tends to fall behind the others. This was the case with text generation, wherein we saw the VRAM sometimes hit its maximum available 12 GB of usage with larger model sizes. So what do we make of the RX 9070 as a productivity hardware? It can certainly be used, but you have to know it has its limitations. For those looking for a GPU that can deal with more, AMD recently unveiled the Radeon AI PRO R9700, which is essentially a 32 GB refresh of the 9070 XT with some additional workstation-based optimizations. On a similar note, the new Ryzen AI Halo platform is something you can consider if you want to set up a local AI processing station. Considering everything, we rate AMD's Radeon RX 9070 GRE a 7.5 out of 10 for its productivity performance. Price is less of a factor for those looking at productivity cases compared to those considering the GPU for gaming, and as such, we felt it did quite decently on many occasions and can be handy if you need a 12 GB GPU and, for some reason, don't want to get Nvidia. Purchase links: RX 9070 / XT / GRE (Amazon US) As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Does anyone here know if these updates are integrated into the UUP dump isos?
    • Motrix Next 3.9.4 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.4 changelog: Motrix Next 3.9.4 promotes the 3.9.4 beta cycle to stable. This release refreshes bundled engine binaries, improves task detail readability and copy actions, expands link handling for magnet and ED2K workflows, polishes responsive navigation and text wrapping, updates browser extension documentation, and refines network preference controls. New Features Task Detail copy actions — Added copyable values for task metadata and reusable render functions for long text fields. Magnet and ED2K lifecycle support — Added task lifecycle handling for magnet and ED2K links. History cleanup for deleted tasks — Deleted tasks can now remove matching history records. User-Agent management — Added user-agent management and improved related network preference controls. Browser extension documentation — Added the Firefox Add-ons link for the Motrix Next extension. Improvements Engine binaries — Updated bundled binaries for supported architectures. Task Detail readability — Long task names, URLs, tracker values, and copyable metadata now render more clearly. Deletion messaging — Refined localized task deletion text for clarity and consistency. Text wrapping — Improved URI input wrapping and task name multiline display. Navigation layout — Improved sub-navigation responsiveness. Disk allocation default — Changed the default file allocation method to trunc. Proxy controls — Improved proxy button styling in network preferences. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NVIDIA officially supports Ubuntu, as linked above with the GeForce NOW Hands on I did in collaboration with Paul Hill.
    • TO be clear I am not running linux today, however I keep thinking about it. And I want to make sure there are minimal obstacles if I decide to make that switch in the coming months.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      244
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      66
    5. 5
      +Edouard
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!