Recommended Posts

Religion is a story initially created by ancient men to try and explain the world around them in the absence of scientific understanding. The concept was seized by powerful men to control the masses and form armies whose land and resource conquests were hidden under the veil of "religious righteousness". Today the armies are largely gone, replaced by organised religion, organisations only slightly removed from organised crime whose goal is not to imprison bodies as in the past, but to fill their coffers with money and imprison minds that science would set free.

Religion is nothing more than a prison for free thought and scientific truth. How any rational mind can believe in such childish stories is one of the strange quirks of the modern world.

Say what you will; if you argue on the side of religion in the face of all the proof science has to the contrary then don't expect a reply as I only interact with intelligent people capable of forming rational opinions.

Religion is your link to the past. In fact, that is what the word religion originally means.

Faith is what you beleive in that CAN NOT, Kestrel, be proven or disproven by scientific means. Faith is what connects a person to their spirituallity, religion connects a person to their family and traditions.

Organized religion is becomming more and more of a joke in modern days. American culture is more and more about looking ahead, rather then looking at the past. I mean, where is the respect for the elderly in our culture. There isn't much.

So, in short.

...

In my opinion there is no higher entity, or god, but however if i found indestbutable evidence that all religions were in effect fake, then i would definately think twice about revealing it to the world. As even if it may not be real, a lot more good comes out of being in a religion than bad.

Saying all that i'm still not too keen on heavily religious people, going about their lives with the primary intent of being with the almighty at the end of it ( in most mainsteam religions). I am a very strong athiest and will probably never be swung towards any religion unless some sort of amazing revelation takes place and all of a sudden it is proven against all scientific knowledge at the moment, that God or something like that does exist ( :rolleyes: like that would ever happen) - no offence. But even if some god does exist he is surely very evil, nasty egotisical b******. But then again that is probably challengable by someone who thinks they have a much more educated view on the subject, - and are probably right.

If "he" does exist, then he is a bit of a mother father, as for aliens, that sounds a bit more tangiable... :alien:

In my opinion there is no higher entity, or god, but however if i found indestbutable evidence that all religions were in effect fake, then i would definately think twice about revealing it to the world. As even if it may not be real, a lot more good comes out of being in a religion than bad.

Saying all that i'm still not too keen on heavily religious people, going about their lives with the primary intent of being with the almighty at the end of it ( in most mainsteam religions). I am a very strong athiest and will probably never be swung towards any religion unless some sort of amazing revelation takes place and all of a sudden it is proven against all scientific knowledge at the moment, that God or something like that does exist ( :rolleyes: like that would ever happen) - no offence. But even if some god does exist he is surely very evil, nasty egotisical b******. But then again that is probably challengable by someone who thinks they have a much more educated view on the subject, - and are probably right.

If "he" does exist, then he is a bit of a mother father, as for aliens, that sounds a bit more tangiable... :alien:

I'm going o speak on behalf of Christianity since it is what I'm most familiar with it. While it is true that there is no absolute scientific proof to support religious claims, science fails to dis-proove it either. It's incorrect to dismiss something that cannot be proven simply because it cannot be proven.

But what's more, faith wouldn't be faith if it was completely proovable. What merit is there in believing in something that is undenyable? No, it's believing in the absurd that makes faith meaningfull.

Not even science can be completely trusted. Science is our method of explaining what we can observe. Scientific laws do not govern anything, they merely discribe what we see. In our current laws, we often come across exceptions and dismiss them as the unusual. Sure, we may come across new sets of laws that explain these exceptions, but that still is merely an explaination.

What's more, scientific discoveries are all based on inductive reasoning and presumes that what we see is really what is. Many moden Philosophers from Descartes and onward have confounded people with theories that are not unprovable and are disturbing. Inductive reasoning has been dismissed because it isn't cetrain; I assume that the sun will rise tomorrow because it always has in the past, I can't know for certain if it will or not.

The role of science is limited and biased, it's biased be cause it only takes into account one perspective, ours. It's limited because it only explains what we observe, but there are many things that people would refuse to deny but are unobservable. Intelligence, compassion, justice, hatred, etc. These things themselves are unobservable; sure, we can see the effects of these things, but it's impossoble to see these things themselves. Science has no role that plays in these things. Are we to believe that justice, love, happy and dumbness don't exist because science can't prove them? What role does science have in determining ethics, laws or life value? Indeed, science falls short as a guide for human life, it only address one aspect of it.

I believe in justice because I can see the effects of justice. I believe in religion because I see the effects of religion. Look for yourselves. Sure the big bang may have been the start of the universe, but what caused that to happen? Is the big bang the creator of justice and love? There is definately something to religion, it explains something about life that science never can. In this way, religion has less limits than science has.

Religion is a story initially created by ancient men to try and explain the world around them in the absence of scientific understanding. The concept was seized by powerful men to control the masses and form armies whose land and resource conquests were hidden under the veil of "religious righteousness". Today the armies are largely gone, replaced by organised religion, organisations only slightly removed from organised crime whose goal is not to imprison bodies as in the past, but to fill their coffers with money and imprison minds that science would set free.

Religion is nothing more than a prison for free thought and scientific truth. How any rational mind can believe in such childish stories is one of the strange quirks of the modern world.

Say what you will; if you argue on the side of religion in the face of all the proof science has to the contrary then don't expect a reply as I only interact with intelligent people capable of forming rational opinions.

if that is true, then how come there are still 5(.5)/6 of the worlds population that believes in God?

and you can only believe in God truely if you are in a religion, if you aint, what good will it do ya to believe?

if that is true, then how come there are still 5(.5)/6 of the worlds population that believes in God?

and you can only believe in God truely if you are in a religion, if you aint, what good will it do ya to believe?

hmm been a long time since I went in here

so, the village idiot/fanatic is still around?

Religion is a belief system. To say that religion is only for Christians, Muslims, Buddhist etc. is flawed, since religion is the morality and ethics we live by. If you don't believe in God, thats your religion. If you believe in God, thats your religion. Religion is unique to the indivisual, since each person as a different view as to what is right for them.

So am i right from what all you religious folk are saying, that your faith is only truely a meaningful faith bla bla because the existence of a 'god' cannot be proven nor disproved? If this is so then would the proof that a 'god' does exist take away the meaningfullness and your spiritual link to your religion - after all you would no longer be having faith in it, rather just standing by fact. Moreover, though it has been said that it is incorrect and unfair to dismiss something that cannot be proven simply because it cannot be proven, however is it not absolutely insane to devote your life to something that you have absolutely no proof of and wouldnt even know about if someone hadnt told you about?

So am i right from what all you religious folk are saying, that your faith is only truely a meaningful faith bla bla because the existence of a 'god' cannot be proven nor disproved? If this is so then would the proof that a 'god' does exist take away the meaningfullness and your spiritual link to your religion - after all you would no longer be having faith in it, rather just standing by fact. Moreover, though it has been said that it is incorrect and unfair to dismiss something that cannot be proven simply because it cannot be proven, however is it not absolutely insane to devote your life to something that you have absolutely no proof of and wouldnt even know about if someone hadnt told you about?

Isn't is absolutely insane that you believe that such a thing as hatred or selfishness exists if there is no certain proof of it? I would like you to show me a pile of hatred, because I can't find any. Sure, I can see lots of the effects of hatred, but I can't really find a pile of hatred anywhere... Perhaps I shouldn't believe in it...

Come on, this is rediculious, If people only know about religion because someone has told them who told the first person? It's been through development and revelation that religion has developed, otherwise religion would be the same now as it was 2000 years ago, and it's not.

And we all have beliefs in something. If you are American, do you not believein american values? Do you not believe that western ethics are better than the ethics of terrorists? If there is no set of laws perscribed by God, then american values are only popular opinion in one area of the world and terrorists are completely justified in what they do. Obviously there must be some sort of minimum ethics and this must come from somewhere.

Yes, in the unlikley even that the existance of God was proven beyond doubt, then faith would be unnecessary just as you say. However, meaning for life can be drawn from more than just faith. You know this.

I have no certain proof that God does not exist, but I believe because I have seen His work in my life. If you ask for what I have experienced this is impossible for me to answer as it's impossible for one person to completely tell another person what an experience is like. It may seem insane or absurd, and logically it is. However, it is just as absurd to believe in anything for which there is absolutly no proof for then too... There is absolutly no proof that mercy exists, just what people think it is, and yet people do believe in this because we can see the effects of mercy. If you say that you see no effects of God, then take a really serious look. The effects of God are not hard to find if you look and religious teachings and scripture are unnecessary for finding these effects, teaching and scripture take youe experience to a new level.

Religion is a story initially created by ancient men to try and explain the world around them in the absence of scientific understanding. The concept was seized by powerful men to control the masses and form armies whose land and resource conquests were hidden under the veil of "religious righteousness". Today the armies are largely gone, replaced by organised religion, organisations only slightly removed from organised crime whose goal is not to imprison bodies as in the past, but to fill their coffers with money and imprison minds that science would set free.

Religion is nothing more than a prison for free thought and scientific truth. How any rational mind can believe in such childish stories is one of the strange quirks of the modern world.

Say what you will; if you argue on the side of religion in the face of all the proof science has to the contrary then don't expect a reply as I only interact with intelligent people capable of forming rational opinions.

Grogg and Trugg sat in a cave and thought up religion to explain stuff, eh? Hmm, and powerful men using religion to seize control? Imprisoning minds and ridding them of free thought and scientific truth? Science contradictory to religion?

Oh my... that's quite a number of leaps you've made there! Outside of popular Christian history (which covers only a minute fraction of the religious history of the world), I'd love to see you demonstrate how religion imprisons minds and especially how science contradicts religion!

Errr.. before you reply though, you may want to consider *all* religions, since your comments originally were directed towards all religions.

Thanks :)

if that is true, then how come there are still 5(.5)/6 of the worlds population that believes in God?

and you can only believe in God truely if you are in a religion, if you aint, what good will it do ya to believe?

have you heard about agnosticism? dont think so... :sleep:

Agnosticism has been around for just as long and hasn't been able to make much impact except in North America and Europe.

who is discussing the impact? I was debating his facts about organized religions, not impact, I couldnt care less if Im the only agnostic in the world

Well, i haven't been in this topic for a while, but, interesting thing my Pastor preached yesterday when I was at church. He was talking about the major religions in the world. He said some of them are Islam, Buddhism, etc. (Keep in mind this is a Christian Church.) and then he went on saying there are even folks that have there religion of believing in not believing. He compared it to him closing his eyes and saying someone that is there, is not there because he cannot see them. Just because you cannot see something does not mean that it is not there. Anyways, just something to think about.

What I find remarkable is that people come by, opine about religion and God being human constructs that were created by an uneducated and stone-age civlization out of fear, and then leave without providing any evidence for their theories or even being able to prove that there exists science or fact that contradicts religion (again, I can only defend Islam).

Of course, everyone has a right to their own opinion though :)

What I find remarkable is that people come by, opine about religion and God being human constructs that were created by an uneducated and stone-age civlization out of fear, and then leave without providing any evidence for their theories or even being able to prove that there exists science or fact that contradicts religion (again, I can only defend Islam).

Of course, everyone has a right to their own opinion though :)

Now, your onto some fairy tales? I'm not gonna get into who's right and who's wrong because that shouldn't be what its about in religion. Religion should be about belief whether or not its right or wrong is irrelevant. I will talk to you about your so called thought of thinking of ?stone-age? people as you refer to them?

For you thinking they "are so dumb... and just made up religion because of fear." Just think of things they made that we still use and you will find that they are and were very smart. Math was made by ancient "stone-age" people.

Just something to think abo:D... :D

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • AI is the beginning, wait until real robots replace more jobs, specifically jobs that require physical work.
    • AI is indeed eliminating jobs, and Oracle just proved it by Hamid Ganji There’s no question that AI has become the hottest trend in workplaces, and every company is trying to adopt AI-driven solutions across its operations. While some industry leaders repeatedly say AI won’t lead to massive layoffs, recent data suggest that AI is actually one of the main reasons some companies are reducing their workforce. According to Oracle’s annual regulatory filing, the company has laid off about 21,000 employees, or 13% of its workforce, amid increasing AI adoption. “The adoption and deployment of AI technologies across our operations have resulted, and may continue to result, in reductions to our workforce,” Oracle said in the filing. The software giant now has approximately 141,000 full-time employees, a notable decrease from 162,000 during the same period last year. Restructuring expenses, including severance payments, cost Oracle $1.84 billion in fiscal 2026. Additionally, around 49,000 Oracle employees were based in the U.S., while approximately 92,000 were employed internationally. Like many other companies, Oracle has fully embraced AI and concentrated much of its efforts on the technology. The company is also a key participant in the United States’ $500 billion Stargate Project, which aims to build multiple AI data centers across the country. When it comes to AI adoption and its impact on the workforce, opinions remain divided. NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang, whose company has been one of the biggest beneficiaries of the AI boom, recently said in an interview that attributing job cuts to AI is a “lazy” narrative. “The narrative that connects AI to job loss, for many of the CEOs that are doing it – it is just too lazy. AI has just arrived, how is it possible they're already losing jobs?” Huang said. However, statistics and recent reports tell a different story. According to Layoffs.fyi, 196 tech companies have laid off about 119,800 employees so far this year. Reducing staff and replacing roles with AI agents could become one of the most significant trends in the job market in the years ahead.
    • Zoom Workplace 7.1.0.41345 by Razvan Serea Zoom Workplace for Windows is a reliable video conferencing tool that makes it easy to connect and collaborate. With features like messaging, file sharing, and app integrations, it’s designed to streamline teamwork. You’ll get high-quality audio and video, strong security with end-to-end encryption, and an intuitive interface—all of which help remote teams and businesses stay productive and connected. Zoom Workplace key features: High-Definition Video & Audio: Provides clear, reliable communication for virtual meetings. End-to-End Encryption: Ensures secure communication with strong data protection. Multi-Factor Authentication: Adds an extra layer of security for user accounts. Integration with Productivity Apps: Supports seamless integration with Microsoft Office, Google Workspace, and more. File Sharing: Easily share files during meetings for efficient collaboration. Real-Time Messaging: Enables team chat for ongoing communication. Collaborative Whiteboarding: Allows teams to brainstorm and collaborate visually. Webinar Support: Host large webinars with interactive features. Administrative Controls: Manage user permissions, meeting settings, and security features. Cloud Storage: Automatically stores meetings and files in the cloud for easy access. Cross-Platform Support: Available on Windows, macOS, and mobile devices. Meeting features: Virtual Backgrounds: Customize your background for meetings to maintain privacy or enhance professionalism. Touch Up My Appearance: Automatically smoothens skin tone for a more polished video appearance. Breakout Rooms: Divide meetings into smaller sessions for group discussions or workshops. Live Transcription: Automatically generate real-time captions during meetings for accessibility. Zoom Apps: Integrate third-party applications directly into Zoom for enhanced functionality. Meeting Reactions: Participants can use emojis for quick, non-verbal feedback during meetings. Polling: Conduct live polls during meetings to gather instant feedback from participants. Attention Tracking: Monitors participant attention during meetings to ensure engagement. Closed Captioning: Enable manual or automatic captions for a more inclusive experience. Webinar Replay: Record and share webinars with analytics for audience engagement. Download: Zoom 64-bit | 145.0 MB (Free, paid upgrade available) Links: Zoom Website | Zoom ARM64 | Zoom Installers | Release Notes Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • UK funds £60M AI labs to challenge US tech dominance with open-source models by Paul Hill The UK government has awarded £60 million to Oxford University and University College London to help keep the country in the AI race by focusing on open-source, low-hardware alternatives. This is in stark contrast to the expensive, closed-source, and high-hardware-requirement models being created in the United States and elsewhere. The money will be shared among two new academic research labs over six years to help them redesign the fundamental mathematics and architectures of AI to help the UK reduce its reliance on a handful of US tech firms. Commenting on the development, AI Minister Kanishka Narayan said: Initially, the government planned to fund just one lab with a £40 million investment, but with this update, two labs will now get access to a larger pool of funds. The labs are expected to invest in the top AI researchers at every career stage, with £2 million per lab being set aside for hiring at least ten doctoral students. The government hopes that this will grow the UK’s talent in the field of AI. The labs are also expected to work closely with the leaders in British AI research, such as the Alan Turing Institute and UKRI’s AI research hubs. This will allow the various teams to collaborate and create new solutions faster than they could alone. This development is pretty interesting for a number of reasons, chiefly that it could create a long-term challenge for US tech firms if these labs successfully scale these open-source architectures that bypass the proprietary ecosystems. It could also give British businesses and public sector organizations access to AI features without paying high licensing fees to foreign providers or needing to invest in specialized server infrastructure.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      464
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      97
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      89
    5. 5
      neufuse
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!