Recommended Posts

religion is fake. pure and simple. It gives people with weak wills and weak constitutions and minds something to believe in, somethign to blame bad things in life on, and something to hope for during troubled times. Thats it.

This thread is getting boring, people going over the same things again and again, and nothing coming of it. The fact is not one religious person here can prove the existence of their god(s).

Also the whole point of religion is having faith, yet the christian God, and I'm sure many other's had to actually show they existed to people to get them to believe, which pretty much makes having faith a moot point. :x

Anyways, the bible is just a book written by normal people then spin doctors come in to make the stories seem more exciting, but the fact is more and more of the stories are being proven to be false or highly inaccurate such as the story of David. :x

P.S Who ever said religion has caused more good than bad is mistaken in many ways :z

I knew someone would come up with a comment like that, but no your wrong, no one can prove the existence of their god, and if they think they can, they are more than likely insane.

Also all God's are there to explain what we can't, which shows that they were just made up by us. Come back when you actually have proof of your god, or have something important to say instead of just trying to turn comments back on people because you know you can't prove anything ;x.

yeah, and that was the Big Bang

I think religion is the biggest pile of bullsh!t ever thought of. back in the old days, when people were dumb, people thought of religion and god to direct their stupid questions to

My exact thoughts!. I listened to this audio program online from this guy in canada, and he feels the same way. he said that stuff like moses seeing the burning bush, and yadda yadda yadda were the people actually on drugs and hallucinating. Also dont you find it dumb and interesting how people believe something that ONE person saw, or ONE person was told? moses supposedly was alone, so who can back up his stories? NOBODY. everyone was just gullable and nieve back then. They didn't know what was above the clouds, let alone beyond their little towns. They simply didn't know anything back then. Now we do, and we're wiser, so religion doesnt have any bearing anymore.

Yet again ZAnwar your trying to turn what I've said back on me because you can't think of anything else to say. You've not come up with one fact in this thread, so why don't you prove the bible or text you believe in was actually written by god, and that god exists, then come back to me and ask for me to prove what I say, ty.

it's not some little experiment by aliens.. it was a way of governments to control the people by making this thing up called religion and we have so many of them because people were unhappy with it and created their own versions so that it better suits their lifestyles. Perfect example of that are the mormons and all those other religions that were made up in the new world (america) back 300 - 400 years ago... and it just got out of hand.. i belive religion is fake. everything proves it, i just don't have the time to discuss it right now. just my 2 cents.

Is anyone even reading my past posts in this thread? ... Doesn't matter, too much ignorance going on for me to continue participating in this thread...

Lol... I feel the same way... no one is reading the msgs written in the last couple of pages, which is why this thread seems to be repeating itself!

i belive religion is fake. everything proves it, i just don't have the time to discuss it right now. just my 2 cents.

lol... you can't just make a claim like that without substantiating it :)

People, in order to contribute to the discussion, please substantiate your claims/beliefs, otherwise nothing is added to the discussion.

Peace!

Okay, at the risk of being flamed for my opinions I will put in my 2 pennies. I am a religious person. I go to church. I believe in God (of which I have never seen). I haven't been mind controlled, forced into, or bought to believe in this. I did it on my own. I am almost 40 years old and these are my beliefs and opinions. Those who believe any religion is fake, that is their opion and that is alright. If you want me to prove my religion is right, I won't, because I dont have to. If you want to prove me wrong go right ahead. One thing that living in the USA provides me with is my constituitional right to believe in whatever I want. You can do the same.

if religion was thought up by ancient people, why hasn't it died down now? surely in this modern society, we dont need God :rolleyes:

way to support the other side! why hasnt it died down? well, maybe after all these years there is still truth and meaning to be found in it. i guess it wasnt just to control people. this modern society? they could have said that thousands of years ago, and people can say that in the future. the present is always so "modern."

Okay, at the risk of being flamed for my opinions I will put in my 2 pennies. I am a religious person. I go to church. I believe in God (of which I have never seen). I haven't been mind controlled, forced into, or bought to believe in this. I did it on my own. I am almost 40 years old and these are my beliefs and opinions. Those who believe any religion is fake, that is their opion and that is alright. If you want me to prove my religion is right, I won't, because I dont have to. If you want to prove me wrong go right ahead. One thing that living in the USA provides me with is my constituitional right to believe in whatever I want. You can do the same.

Playing Devil's advocate here for sec (pardon the obvious pun)

No one who has been in some form of mind control would know about it, hence mind control. Although I am an athiest, how I feel is JUST a belief (or in my case a non-belief) as is all religious idologies. One cannot prove or disprove the existance of a god.

As for religion being around for thousands of years... well, there are religions that were around for thosands of years that are now gone. Are those Gods dead? Are they any less real than the current religions? <shrug> I haven't the foggiest idea.

If someone feel comfortable with religion that TERRIFIC, if it brings them hope and guideness, then FANTASTIC. I have no issues here. The only issue anyone should be concerned about is if person A tries to use their religion to restrict person B. Other than that... have a nice day.

My exact thoughts!. I listened to this audio program online from this guy in canada, and he feels the same way. he said that stuff like moses seeing the burning bush, and yadda yadda yadda were the people actually on drugs and hallucinating. Also dont you find it dumb and interesting how people believe something that ONE person saw, or ONE person was told? moses supposedly was alone, so who can back up his stories? NOBODY. everyone was just gullable and nieve back then. They didn't know what was above the clouds, let alone beyond their little towns. They simply didn't know anything back then. Now we do, and we're wiser, so religion doesnt have any bearing anymore.

The problem with your comments though is that you don't take into account any historical evidence of the people involved in propogating those religions, nor are you even correct in your presentation of evidence.

Take the example of Moses and the burning bush. Now, I disagree that that was the way it happened, but let's say it did happen that way. Who was going to believe him? The people there were not idiots... in fact, other prophets were treated as mad men. But all prophets had some followers, and for one simple reason: they had a history of being truthful, honest, good people before making their claim to prophethood. Take modern religious history (for the reason being that it is more accurately and comprehensively documented)... the Prophet Muhammad lived amongst his people for 40 years before his claim to prophethood and was widely known as being always truthful and honest. No one had any reason to doubt him. Initially, after the Islamic movement started, his opponents offered him wealth and prosperity if he promised to stop preaching Islam, but he refused. That is an example of high morality that convinces people of a person's sincerety.

Also in recent history, you can take the example of a number of religious saints, etc... be it Mother Teresa, Guru Nanak Dev Ji, or whomsoever, and you'll find that in their history is an example of honesty, righteousness and goodwill... moreso than you and I. That is why you cannot compare them to you and I... they were not drugged up lunatics, they were people with reputations that preceded them, and that is why they were believed at all, otherwise no religious movement would have ever succeeded, because none of the real ones strove to achieve material prosperity.

You cannot confuse the conception of religion with selfish motives and the oft-misused principles of religion. The conception happens by Divine will and is propogated by righteous people (even their opponents often concede their honesty and truthfulness)... but religion used for power-gain has nothing to do with that Divine origin.

It is important to study the history of these religious movements so that we don't make base statements like "religion is the opiate of the masses, man", or "religion was founded by ancient people that were afraid of stuff and needed explanations". Usually anyone who makes those types of remarks has never opened a holy book of any sort to study what explanations are actually in there.

err.... riiiiiiiiight. :rolleyes: If ya ask me, it's a whole helluva lot easier to believe in some kind of religion than in aliens.

true,i have been a catolic since birth,although i dont go to church sundays, i prefer to believe in god and all that instead of aliens and all those stupid things.if you see some things in life,like how we are so intelligent,how everything is so perfect(flora and fauna not the world status) etc. there must be a superior force controlling all this.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • "Claude, is our CEO a compete and utter fool by wasting money on AI in this already worthless Teams chat?"
    • Endless Wars  Endless Shrimp!!! 🦐    
    • How can it beat a Steam machine without a serious GPU? The two CU iGPU only provides about 5fps in gaming. That's not going to make any gamer happy.
    • Anthropic introduces Claude Tag, a new AI teammate for Slack by Fiza Ali Anthropic has announced Claude Tag, a new feature that lets teams work with Claude directly inside Slack. The idea is simple: once Claude is added to a Slack workspace and given access to selected channels, users can tag @Claude in conversations and assign tasks. Claude can then work through those requests using connected tools and data sources before posting its results back into a Slack thread. What makes Claude Tag different from a typical chatbot is that it's designed to operate as a shared assistant for an entire team rather than a single user. Everyone in a channel interacts with the same Claude instance. This allows the team members to see ongoing work and continue tasks started by others. Furthermore, Anthropic says the AI can build context over time by following conversations in channels where it has permission to operate. This means users don't have to repeatedly provide the same background information for every request. The system is also designed for asynchronous work. Instead of waiting for responses in a chat window, users can assign a task to Claude and return later once the work is complete. Anthropic says Claude can break larger requests into multiple steps and use connected tools to complete them. Moreover, the system can also schedule follow-up tasks and continue working on projects over extended periods. Another feature allows Claude to keep the users updated and follow up on unresolved tasks when its optional "ambient" mode is enabled. The company says the tool is already being used internally for software development, data analysis, support workflows, and debugging. According to Anthropic, around 65% of its product team's code is now generated through its internal version of Claude Tag. For organisations concerned about security, administrators can control which channels, tools, and data sources Claude can access. Separate Claude instances can also be configured for different departments, helping keep information isolated between teams. Administrators can also monitor activity logs, review completed tasks, and set spending limits at both the organisation and channel level. Claude Tag is now available in beta for Claude Enterprise and Claude Team customers and runs on Claude Opus 4.8 that was announced this May. The feature will also replace Anthropic's existing Claude in Slack application, with current users able to migrate within a 30-day migration window. Lastly, eligible customers will receive introductory credits to help teams evaluate the new experience.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      DaviKar went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      462
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      110
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      83
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!