Neowin's NHL 2004 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread


Recommended Posts

No. I don't think they can. They are having some injuries and just beat up players. Toronto doesn't have that great of team speed, and I think that will hurt them in the long run. They are having solid goaltending, but I don't think that they have enough firepower down the stretch. I'd like to see them win, and I hope they do, but I just dont see it.

Not enough firepower? You mean Sundin, Mogilny, Roberts, Nieuwendyk, Leetch, McCabe, Kaberle and Reichel doesn't do it for you?

No. I don't think they can. They are having some injuries and just beat up players. Toronto doesn't have that great of team speed, and I think that will hurt them in the long run. They are having solid goaltending, but I don't think that they have enough firepower down the stretch. I'd like to see them win, and I hope they do, but I just dont see it.

Tru dat. (leaf hater here)

:p

I agree with Matrix about Leafs not winning it all this year. Belfour is good, but I don't think he can last all playoffs. But its nice to see Leetch back in the playoffs.

To start a good discussion, who is coming out of the east? why?

The Wings have an experienced team and that's why I don't see the Preds taking that series.

As for Bruins/Leafs I think that the Leafs could take the Bruins. I don't beleave that Raycroft is ready for the finals.

Raycroft is phenominal! Rookies don't get this good!

:happy:

Leafs. :p No one else can run with them. Experience, goaltending, toughness and skill.

@ Stu: He'll choke just wait.

just for that choke comment: the bruins will match everything the leafs can bring to the ice. although i'd probably take eddie over raycroft. eddie = savage.

Not enough firepower? You mean Sundin, Mogilny, Roberts, Nieuwendyk, Leetch, McCabe, Kaberle and Reichel doesn't do it for you?

Quite frankly. No.

The players that you have listed there are good players, but I don't think they have what it takes to win down the stretch. The leafs have relatively the same team for the last couple of years and have gotten severely outworked in the second round of the playoffs. The veterans don't seem to have enough gas, and the younger players wont step up. Kaberle, Leetch, and McCabe are all defensemen, you cant rely on them to score GWG and if you do, your club has some serious problems. I only have faith in Sundin and Roberts to score goals out of that bunch. Mogilny doesn't have enough heart, and hasn't been the playoff performer that the leafs have needed the past few years. The leafs need something more than Domi and Tucker mucking it up. Roberts scored two the other game, but before that, Sundin's line only had a collective 1 shot the previous game. That is not going to win playoff games. If the leafs want to win, they will have to stay injury free, and get lots of contribution from Sundin and Roberts, maybe a few goals by Niewendyk, but he is old as well. I'm not saying old is bad, but it can hurt you in the long run.

I also agree, Toronto will probably, factoring in history, choke in the playoffs. Ottawa and Toronto, two bitter rivalries, Ottawa has been upset and likes to upset teams, I think Ottawa can win easily. For one, Toronto getting Tucker back is good and bad. Tucker takes dumb penalties, bad idea when Ottawa is the #1 power play in the league, but Tucker does antagonize and has some skill. Two, all these players you mentioned, I only see two real scorers. Sundin, Mogilny, Roberts, Nieuwendyk, Leetch, McCabe, Kaberle and Reichel, you say? Sundin is the only real player outta the bunch that can explode into huge numbers in the series. Mogilny hasn't seen his skill return like he had in Vancouver with Bure, although, he's gotten back to some of that. Roberts, I love him, he's gritty, a scorer, but not big numbers, same with Nieuwendyk, and he's fragile. Leetch, McCabe, Kaberle - all defensemen, not gonna provide tons of offense, but they are pretty good defensemen, but the main person to think about is Belfour in net, he's the real stopper.

Toronto has some massive size to throw around, but Ottawa is showing it can bite back. I think this series will go 6 or 7. Toronto should win it though.

With Cloutier out, the Canucks don't have a chance. Hedberg is not playoff caliber. You Canucks fan's had better hope his injury isn't serious.

Personally, I hate the Canucks. Now maybe the Flames have a chance.

Go Avalanche and Bruins!

For a team to win these days they need production from their defence. Kaberle, Leetch and Mccabe provide it. The Leafs had one of the highest production ratings from their D core that is butter in the playoffs. As for the vets, it's all about coming through in the clutch. Nieuwendyk and Roberts have been here before and know what it takes to win. This experience will come in handy in a game 7 situation. For sure the Leafs have to say healthy but as LRoling said Belfour can steal games for you. Overall, with Lalime in his current health position I don't think the Sens can take us and other than them who else is going to bring it?

With Cloutier out, the Canucks don't have a chance. Hedberg is not playoff caliber. You Canucks fan's had better hope his injury isn't serious.

Personally, I hate the Canucks. Now maybe the Flames have a chance.

Go Avalanche and Bruins!

Take a look at Hedberg's run in the playoffs in '01 with the Pens. He played unbelievable, they just didn't have the bodies to go all the way. I'm quite sad that Clouts is out, but Hedberg can carry us too.. He's real good out of the net which helps us out on the PK.

I think the Leafs will win that series, but I'm not so sure about the second round for them...

The avs are looking strong, it's going to be very tough to take them out this year with any team.

The avs are looking strong, it's going to be very tough to take them out this year with any team.

the stars still have a chance to knock the avs out. all it takes is one bounce of a puck, one penaty, or one injury and the avs will out of the playoffs.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • It's amazing that anyone still uses this bloated trash.
    • @Sayan...I have defended you at various points as I hope you know. This headline however is utter trash...shame on you sir!
    • An actual cosmic "Eye of Sauron" had been looking straight at us all along by Sayan Sen Image by Kovin P. Vasquez via Pexels | Not representative An international team of researchers has solved a long-standing mystery surrounding a distant blazar known as PKS 1424+240, helping explain why it produces some of the brightest high-energy gamma rays and cosmic neutrinos ever observed despite appearing to have a relatively slow-moving jet. The findings were published on June 6 in Astronomy & Astrophysics Letters. The study addresses a broader challenge in astrophysics: understanding how extreme cosmic objects accelerate particles to very high energies and produce very high-energy (VHE) photons and neutrinos. PKS 1424+240 is located billions of light-years from Earth. It has attracted attention for years because it is both a powerful source of VHE gamma rays and the brightest known neutrino-emitting blazar in the sky, according to observations by the IceCube Neutrino Observatory. It is also associated with one of the strongest peaks in IceCube's nine-year neutrino sky map A blazar is a type of active galactic nucleus powered by a supermassive black hole that pulls in surrounding matter and launches jets of plasma moving close to the speed of light. What makes blazars unique is their orientation. One of their jets points almost directly toward Earth, making them appear exceptionally bright across the electromagnetic spectrum and allowing scientists to study some of the most extreme physical processes in the Universe. The scientists exclaimed it's like the 'Eye of Sauron' in deep space. Usually, the brightest gamma-ray-emitting blazars are expected to have jets that appear to move very quickly. However, radio observations of PKS 1424+240 suggested that its jet was moving much more slowly, creating a contradiction that became part of a long-running problem known as the "Doppler factor crisis." To investigate, researchers analyzed 15 years of observations from the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA), a network of 10 radio antennas spread across the continental United States, Hawaii and St. Croix. Using a technique called Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI), astronomers combine signals from widely separated radio telescopes to create a virtual Earth-sized telescope capable of revealing extremely fine details. The team combined 42 polarization-sensitive radio images collected between 2009 and 2025, creating a much deeper and more detailed view of the jet than had previously been possible. The observations were carried out as part of MOJAVE (Monitoring Of Jets in Active galactic nuclei with VLBA Experiments), a long-running program that studies the brightness, polarization and magnetic field structures of jets produced by active galaxies. The project aims to better understand how activity near supermassive black holes is linked to high-energy radiation and neutrino emission. “When we reconstructed the image, it looked absolutely stunning,” said Yuri Kovalev, lead author of the study and Principal Investigator of the European Research Council-funded MuSES project at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “We have never seen anything quite like it — a near-perfect toroidal magnetic field with a jet, pointing straight at us.” The image revealed an unusual geometry. The researchers found that Earth lies almost directly in line with the jet, with a viewing angle of less than 0.6 degrees. In simple terms, astronomers are looking almost straight down the jet. This turned out to be the key to the mystery. Because the jet is aimed almost directly at Earth, a relativistic effect called Doppler boosting dramatically increases its apparent brightness. The study found that this effect boosts the emission by a factor of about 30 while also making the jet appear slower than it actually is. “This alignment causes a boost in brightness by a factor of 30 or more,” said Jack Livingston, a co-author at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “At the same time, the jet appears to move slowly due to projection effects — a classic optical illusion.” The nearly head-on view also gave scientists a rare look at the jet's magnetic field. Using polarized radio signals, they detected a clear toroidal, or doughnut-shaped, magnetic field component. The observations suggest the jet carries an electric current and that its magnetic field helps launch, shape and stabilize the flow of plasma. Researchers believe this magnetic structure may also play a key role in accelerating particles to energies high enough to produce both gamma rays and neutrinos. “Solving this puzzle confirms that active galactic nuclei with supermassive black holes are not only powerful accelerators of electrons, but also of protons — the origin of the observed high-energy neutrinos,” Kovalev said. The research was conducted under the MuSES (Multi-messenger Studies of Energetic Sources) project, which investigates how active galactic nuclei accelerate particles and generate different cosmic signals, including light and neutrinos. Scientists say understanding how protons are accelerated and linked to neutrino production remains one of the major unanswered questions in astrophysics. The findings help explain why some blazars can appear to have slow jets while still producing extremely bright high-energy emissions. More broadly, the study strengthens the link between relativistic jets, magnetic fields, gamma rays and high-energy neutrinos. Researchers say the results provide new clues about how some of the Universe's most powerful natural particle accelerators work and offer important insights for multimessenger astronomy, which combines different types of cosmic signals to study extreme events in space. Source: European Research Council, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Gotenks98 is right... Outlook (new) is absolute trash. Doesn't Mozilla have an Enterprise Version of Firebird?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      511
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      273
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!