MrXBob Posted May 28, 2004 Share Posted May 28, 2004 Yes because we all know emails written like that sent out to random people are 100% real/true/not scams :rolleyes: Some people are so stupidly gullable it's not even funny :laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThePDW Posted May 28, 2004 Author Share Posted May 28, 2004 Uhhh the text was from a report about the incident. My dad keeps track off this kind of stuff and he sent me the link and the text. .. It wasn't sent to random people.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clonk Posted May 28, 2004 Share Posted May 28, 2004 Since the picture was taken in Chile, and the thing appears to have a striped tail in this picture, it could easily be some kind of small monkey Except monkeys don't walk upright like that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clonk Posted May 28, 2004 Share Posted May 28, 2004 On the subject of why the horses didn't see the creature and why the photographer makes no mention of the little guy as why he took the picture (he just says he figures the horses would be a cool shot). Assuming it is an alien, there have been several instances that I can think of off hand where the creature only shows up in the photograph and not to the naked eye. Invisible, moving super-fast, whatever, I don't have any conclusions drawn as to why this could happen, I'm just telling you what I know from the 'facts.' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toadeater Posted May 28, 2004 Share Posted May 28, 2004 It's a little invisible crackhead. When you smoke too much crack, that's what you will turn into. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
longwilli Posted May 28, 2004 Share Posted May 28, 2004 WaterWings did you really need to make 4 seperate posts in a row you could have just made 1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AOXOMOXOA Posted May 28, 2004 Share Posted May 28, 2004 :alien: its ET :alien: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+s55 Subscriber¹ Posted May 28, 2004 Subscriber¹ Share Posted May 28, 2004 talk about lame have any of u considered that its some sad little ksjgbskjghsbfjs, with a nice alien toy thingy and decided to take a photo of it jus to get popular? or something along those lines? well guess what, i think its lame, sad, and to whoeva took it.... maybe if u stoped trying to seek attention so much people might actually think u were an alright person and giv u there attention! HA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThisSiteHasLostItsCharm Posted May 28, 2004 Share Posted May 28, 2004 I did a little enhancing, clarifying of my own in Paint Shop Pro. Scary :cry: u can make out 2 eyes and a mouth... :ninja: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hankyone Posted May 28, 2004 Share Posted May 28, 2004 On the subject of why the horses didn't see the creature and why the photographer makes no mention of the little guy as why he took the picture (he just says he figures the horses would be a cool shot). Assuming it is an alien, there have been several instances that I can think of off hand where the creature only shows up in the photograph and not to the naked eye. Invisible, moving super-fast, whatever, I don't have any conclusions drawn as to why this could happen, I'm just telling you what I know from the 'facts.' i agree if it was a flying thing like those flying rods it would be more evident Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stunod7 Posted May 28, 2004 Share Posted May 28, 2004 I am a firm believer that the most obvious answer must be the correct answer but this one has left me with 3 different conclusions and they are as follows: #1) It is a dancing poodle #2) It is the morton salt girl #3) It is a mini-howard stern You be the judge! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Athlon7 Posted May 28, 2004 Share Posted May 28, 2004 Any of you who believed this are very gullible! The image has the EXIF data cropped out deliberately to hide the camera settings it was taken with, and it is clear from the last post that most anything is possible with photoshop and a blurry picture. This is such a clear and goofy fake. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dmeags Posted May 28, 2004 Share Posted May 28, 2004 Why is the horse and guy on the right so slanted...? :blink: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Athlon7 Posted May 28, 2004 Share Posted May 28, 2004 By the way, you who believe have been had. Obviously this person is a Harry Potter fan :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Athlon7 Posted May 28, 2004 Share Posted May 28, 2004 And... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThePDW Posted May 28, 2004 Author Share Posted May 28, 2004 The head is not at all the shape of that creepy little thing from Harry Potter. How dare you insult our alien brethren. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Athlon7 Posted May 29, 2004 Share Posted May 29, 2004 Yeah it is, if you look at it sideways it looks the same. Watch the movie :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prince21 Posted May 29, 2004 Share Posted May 29, 2004 ahahahahahahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhaaaaaaaaaaahahaha its fake alright Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Galley Posted May 29, 2004 Share Posted May 29, 2004 It's a shaved adolescent sasquatch! :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xeron Posted May 29, 2004 Share Posted May 29, 2004 Why, when he is trying to let us decide what it is, did he shrink the picture to 806x605 when the smallest that camera goes to is 1200x900? It makes it a bit difficult to determine whether the blur was added to the picture afterwards. Unless you are very clever in how you do it, motion blur on a computer program will blur every object by exactly the same amount. Motion blur in real life will blur closer objects more than farther objects. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
_I am Reptar Posted May 29, 2004 Share Posted May 29, 2004 i think its all fake Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hankyone Posted May 29, 2004 Share Posted May 29, 2004 Why, when he is trying to let us decide what it is, did he shrink the picture to 806x605 when the smallest that camera goes to is 1200x900? It makes it a bit difficult to determine whether the blur was added to the picture afterwards. Unless you are very clever in how you do it, motion blur on a computer program will blur every object by exactly the same amount. Motion blur in real life will blur closer objects more than farther objects. true Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
techquilla Posted May 29, 2004 Share Posted May 29, 2004 for those who wonders why the camera man or anybody didn't see the "alien" while there.... MAYBE we just can't see them with out naked eye, and maybe only for some reason only burry photos under certain circumstances will expose then.... :p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jnr_subz33 Posted May 30, 2004 Share Posted May 30, 2004 OMFG.... im scared.... HUgg me plz.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hankyone Posted May 30, 2004 Share Posted May 30, 2004 OMFG....im scared.... HUgg me plz.... :hug: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts