I'm never going back to the woods...


Recommended Posts

Man.. I can't believe how gullible you people are..

Just remember, for every scenario, there are infinite lies and only one truth. Now what is most likely the truth? The thread-starter edited the images, and posted them on here for fun, which negates the need for:

1) Multiple kinds of bizarre creatures in the woods.

2) The appearance of these creatures all at once, to a single person, who happens to have a camera.

3) The existance of ghosts and gremlins.

4) A steady enough hand to take high quality, unblurred pictures of gremlins and ghosts while being hunted by said creatures.

I could go on....

He's pulling your leg ppl...

you guys aint got nothing on creeped out. where i am right now its 23:55. I'm alone., in a 35,000sq.ft datacentre.

stuff is clicking and flapping and creaking, and then KIm shown thee photos...

I'm about to go home....

L8r

Luckily, the Sun is rising here in Singapore.

Sun! I love you!

:rofl:

OK, back on topic. Did you guys notice that there was no mist of any sort in the first two photographs?

psgamer0921, was there any mist around where you picked up the camera?

Man.. I can't believe how gullible you people are..

Just remember, for every scenario, there are infinite lies and only one truth. Now what is most likely the truth? The thread-starter edited the images, and posted them on here for fun, which negates the need for:

1) Multiple kinds of bizarre creatures in the woods.

2) The appearance of these creatures all at once, to a single person, who happens to have a camera.

3) The existance of ghosts and gremlins.

4) A steady enough hand to take high quality, unblurred pictures of gremlins and ghosts while being hunted by said creatures.

I could go on....

He's pulling your leg ppl...

Sssssh!

We're having fun playing detective here!

:p

wow..

checked those pic and yeah - creapy.

If those pics are not real, then they have to be photoshop'd - an din taht case: whoever did it, did a very good job! Try to apply for a job at a gaming company or at a movie-studio!

Wonder what teh original resolution and EXIF-information on those pictures says.

If itr is not real, but very very well done. Maybe a college project aimed to be liek 'Blair witch project' only done with a camera.

Same storyline .... (found camera equipment reveals scary things).

Again: Good work, veru good work.

To everybody who said they can't be photoshop'd: You can go throught he woods and take pictures. 5MP is perfect. then resize the pictures to a handier size, add your efects (cats, spiders - realized - all those creatures looked exactly the same like just CTRL-V'd) and remove the exif information :-) If u work with layers in Photoshop: lots of work, but easy to do.

The body on the tower - very freaky, looks real.

My final thougth about those pics: pics liek those can be faked, but those must be real.... :whistle:

look a stick of gum on the ground  :happy:

look at the center of the picture is the red symbol on the rock. that means that the person who took the picture found it odd to and is probably not just some random graphity..

I agree. And those signs look like the Pentagram to me. And what's with a stick of gum lying on the ground deep in the woods, on an abandoned building? They look like they have never been chewed on before.

OMG TWF LOL!!!11 if you look at all the pictures at ones you would see a loch ness monster!!111 lollers AND OMG !111 that grain on some random photo looks suspecious.. thou shalt crap his pants tonite...

ffs.. you can take any picture with a scary atmosphere and find anything that looks scary or un-explainable while it's just something natural and the way it displays on the photo is unnatural if you will..

nice try.. try again later

on the last picture, how come the ground is so dry and looks like its all broken up?? that doesnt usually happen in the middle of a green forrest

edit: ok maybe cuz they are rocks haha ive been looking at these pix for too long im starting to see things

pshot04 has photoshop CS exif data in it, the rest are missing it.

Yes, that's strange. So, I assume he was using Adobe Photoshop CS to resize those pictures. The only way you can loose the EXIF data is by adding any elements into the original photo. Even when you resize or change the contrast/brightness or use any filters, the original EXIF should still embedded in the pictures.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I think the car analogy is more this: Left hand drive, basic commands on the left side of the infotainment screen. Right hand drive, basic commands on the right side of the infotainment screen. Granted, you're not swapping between the two often so it's doesn't really work. But it's to do with the proximity of you (your mouse, or the driver) to the controls.
    • I mean, the old one was broken and so stupidly complex for many users, so I don't see that as a feasible option. A context menu needs to be simple to use, and for me the Windows 11 style actually worked really well for me, and many others. I used to have to scroll the damn context menu just to get to "file properties" in Windows 10. That was not a good experience, and I'm sure you'd agree. What they're trying to do is make it the best of both worlds, as clearly you'd prefer the Win10 style. I'm curious how they're going to do this.
    • The "Show more options" has its place, as does the simpler context menu, but it should perhaps be a separate fly-out rather than relaunching the entire, old context menu. The old context menu was getting absurd in Windows 10. Often I'd have to make the context menu scroll just to get to "File properties" on my old laptop. Even without much installed, the amount of items was just too much. It's a context menu, not a "do all" menu. Making it configurable is fraught with challenges too, so I'm interested to see how Microsoft tackles this one.
    • I don't hate the new menus, I am not a fan of the lack of features and how they went live when they clearly are not complete. The menu itself presents much better than the previous - but what's lacking (IMO) is: 1) Any kind of automated manipulation such as: "this goes on the new menu because you use this feature more often on this filetype" "this is rarely used and will fall back to the old menu" 2) Any kind of user manipulation such as: "a UI to add/remove/order items to the new menu"
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      I2D earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Dr Jared Dental Studio earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      RG INVESTMENT GROUP earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Very Popular
      The Norwegian Drone Pilot earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Very Popular
      s0nic69 earned a badge
      Very Popular
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      484
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      258
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      84
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      64
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      63
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!