CherryOS: Mac OS X Emulator for PC !


Recommended Posts

Got to their FAQ page...it does run on win 98,2000 too...

Reading their answer to the CD-ROM question makes me wonder why they put firewall and usb ports in their answer??? :wacko:

584723854[/snapback]

I think they meant "FireWire", not "firewall". Maybe a spellcheck fubar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought I heard that the software (CherryOS) is still being tested.

584724438[/snapback]

Well it's out for sale, so I guess it's a complete product, not in any alpha/beta/testing stage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it's fake: Traffic isn't cheap. Especially traffic generated from Slashdot alone (sorry folks, as big as Neowin is, it's very very small to compared to the "slashdot effect.") My guess is, his service provider is not going to be happy, but will happily charge him extra for the extra bandwidth. Meaning, in effect the hoax, if it is one, will cost this person hundreds, if not thousands of dollars. That alone is punishment enough, and I'm sure that's the only reason Slashdot even reported on it, they're well aware the effect they have :D

If it's real: well, yay! Now we have a PowerPC emulator.....

However, if you want my personal opinion, based on his responses, I'd say its fake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it's fake:  Traffic isn't cheap.  Especially traffic generated from Slashdot alone (sorry folks, as big as Neowin is, it's very very small to compared to the "slashdot effect.") My guess is, his service provider is not going to be happy, but will happily charge him extra for the extra bandwidth.  Meaning, in effect the hoax, if it is one, will cost this person hundreds, if not thousands of dollars.  That alone is punishment enough

If it's real: well, yay! Now we have a PowerPC emulator..... 

However, if you want my personal opinion, based on his responses, I'd say its fake.

584724578[/snapback]

If it's real I think he's going to be paying through the nose in fines. :p

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i suggested that already here  ;)

584724478[/snapback]

I had not read your comment when I replied to him, sorry. Was simply reading through the forum and answered the question when I got to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I finally got a good capture of the screen that leads some people to believe that this is a rip-off of PearPC. It is the selection screen for the bootable partitions, and it appears for about 1/2 of a second between the CherryOS logo and the Apple logo screens. It does bear a striking resemblance to the screen from PearPC. Does anyone have a screenshot handy from PearPC to compare it to?

edit: added PearPC boot screenshot for comparison. Unfortunately, when I made this, I didn't have a valid bootable partition defined, but you can see the strong resemblance.

edit 2: changed PearPC boot screenshot. Now showing non-bootable partition information.

Edited by roadwarrior
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I can see the use for this if you are developing cross platform software, but my opinion is, if you love Mac OS so much, go and buy a Mac.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh well.....

We can only hope that Quicktransit isn't fake...

Quicktransit: http://www.transitive.com/features.htm

(although it probably is)

584724979[/snapback]

After reading this on their page, I wonder if that is the technology Microsoft is going to use for the Xbox 2 : Gaming OEM

Note that their example picture shows a Power Processor for the physical hardware, and x86 for the emulated hardware? What game system do we all know of that uses an x86 processor, with reports of using a Power-based processor in the next model?? Xbox, of course!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's another screenshot of the PearPC boot selection screen, compared to the CherryOS boot selection screen from their demo video. If nothing else, they used this part of the code, with only minor text changes. These two screens are too similar to be mere coincidence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's another screenshot of the PearPC boot selection screen, compared to the CherryOS boot selection screen from their demo video.  If nothing else, they used this part of the code, with only minor text changes.  These two screens are too similar to be mere coincidence.

584725022[/snapback]

a simple boot menu convention is no evidence that they copied pearpc. it just means that they took the same idea, of having boot partitions selectable at boot, and came up with a similar solution.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

a simple boot menu convention is no evidence that they copied pearpc. it just means that they took the same idea, of having boot partitions selectable at boot, and came up with a similar solution.

584725071[/snapback]

Look closely at it. That is not merely "the same idea" or "a similar solution", it is the same text, right down to the spacing. That is not something that just happens without being directly copied.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look closely at it.? That is not merely "the same idea" or "a similar solution", it is the same text, right down to the spacing.? That is not something that just happens without being directly copied.

584725157[/snapback]

That's still too little to prove them fake/copiers. Having same/similar text in a boot/parition select screendoesn't imply anything really.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I never said it proved it, but that it was fairly convincing evidence that they might have at least copied some of the code from PearPC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I never said it proved it, but that it was fairly convincing evidence that they might have at least copied some of the code from PearPC.

584725173[/snapback]

Seriously.... how would you else display that. Considering it can only be text.

It proves nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can think of several different ways to do a similar menu, and there is no requirement that it be text at that point (for example, the real boot selection menu on a Mac is graphical, similar to Boot Magic). The fact that much of it is word-for-word the same is at least suspicious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Heh..I dunno but boot options screen is nothing I would base their authenticity upon. Like I said, until I see a review by someone who actually has the software, this software will be as good as Lindow's previous claims of emulating windows on linux.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

emulates a G4 CPU, G5 support is in development

So they are saying they plan to emulate a 64-bit RISC processor on a 32-bit CISC platform? Yeah, sure. The 80% figure was fishy enough but come on. This all sounds like a hoax to me, perhaps using code from PearPC to further it's credibility. I guess we'll all just have to wait and see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will just wait as well for some one to write a review, and a comparison along side PearPC would be good to see the differences between them, like performance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.