Recommended Posts

Hell no, if I could've sold it for THAT much, I would've sold it without a doubt in my mind. Great boost, sure, but I've still got professions among many other things I still need to work on. :/

Couldn't .. it was a PUG, and everyone was throwing a hissy fit.. even though I won the roll fair and square.

Well if you roll Need (or just roll, if we're talking about a raid) on a BoE item, I can imagine they'd want you to equip it right away. Even if it was an upgrade, people could still roll Need and say it's an upgrade, but go and sell it anyway. It's pretty common practice to equip BoE stuff as soon as you get it.

Don't worry too much about it, you'll get plate pieces from quests and stuff, and once you get to Outlands the greens you get from quests there will be better than the blues you can find in old world anyway.

http://wow-heroes.com/index.php?zone=us&am...ame=Dominatious

14th Ranked Survival Hunter on Maelstrom, Horde side.

Before it's brought up Skill > Gear yadda yadda ect. whatever. Clearly someone with almost all 245 gear has skill.

Not after 3.3 so much, you can get a bunch of 245 pieces now from the vendors, clearly not a ton of skill involved in farming emblems of triumph.

Not after 3.3 so much, you can get a bunch of 245 pieces now from the vendors, clearly not a ton of skill involved in farming emblems of triumph.

Even before 3.3 getting 245 gear was laughably easy, unless you were doing hard modes there wasn't much skill involved and even then the game is still primarily just a time sink with little to do with skill. I was really amazing at how easy they made the tier 9 stuff, the game just keeps getting easier.

http://wow-heroes.com/index.php?zone=us&am...ame=Dominatious

14th Ranked Survival Hunter on Maelstrom, Horde side.

Before it's brought up Skill > Gear yadda yadda ect. whatever. Clearly someone with almost all 245 gear has skill.

My arguament once again, if you are using wow-heroes to check rating, that fails. It uses cached scores and only displays players on the ranked lists that have been searched on wow-heroes before. There are players who have never been searched upon wow-heroes that will not display on the list.

245 Gear Pre 3.3 was easily attainable (VoA25 for the 2PC T9, Ony10/25 for the Neck when u get the head, badge farming from Daily Heroics, VoA, ToC coupled with a few Trophies and ya laughing. Not to mention that ToC25 was extremely easy to pug and farm on a weekly basis. A Few people in my Guild with gearscore (not wh score) of 2800 were getting carried and picking up imba lootz!)

There was a DK tank on my realm fully kitted on with ilvl245 gear had around 43khp unbuffed... absolute nublet got riddiculed in trade and got carried by grps name change and realm transfer saved his @$$ from getting owned in trade lol

There was a DK tank on my realm fully kitted on with ilvl245 gear had around 43khp unbuffed... absolute nublet got riddiculed in trade and got carried by grps name change and realm transfer saved his @$$ from getting owned in trade lol

Likewise, there's a guy on my server that has bought things like the achievement-drakes, titles, and sets of gear from my guild.

You'll often see him in trade chat putting together a pug for 'crumby' content and then getting made to look like a fool by the general populous. "All that gear and you can't break 3,000 DPS on Thaddius?" I'm not sure how widely known it is that he's bought his achievements but there are often snide comments in guild chat whenever he's seen spamming general with "looking for more: Nax25 immortal run - must be geared, pst achievements & spec".

IMO you've got to be some sort of a jerk to demand from others what you can't, or aren't willing to offer.

Unrelated, ran into this druid random pugging on my mage. Great guy - knew how to play, relaxed attitude. I was in a 4-man group with real-life friends and he hopped in via the random dungeon finder. We blew a couple of hours queueing together, banging out achievements, chatting, and generally just having a good time.

It's things like that which make the dungeon finder awesome. It's not all 800 DPS rogues and 19,000 HP tanks.

K.

Talking about the random people, the outliers, who buy gear, get carried and as you said, have no skill, is a pointless thing here.

7462.jpg

Theres a screen shot from Koralon. Yes, a pug. Yes, single target DPS. Not AoE. In the guild runs I've been in (Woe, Forged Fury, Dark Chaos and RI Alt Runs) (the top guilds on Maelstrom), I am still near the top of the meters.

It uses cached scores and only displays players on the ranked lists that have been searched on wow-heroes before. There are players who have never been searched upon wow-heroes that will not display on the list.

It uses data from the Armory, not individual name searches. I'm not sure where you got that from. It gives you (if you click live, or Fresh Armory Data) the latest information from the Armory, nothing more, nothing less. If I log out in my PvP gear my score drops to about 2100.

Talking about the random people, the outliers, who buy gear, get carried and as you said, have no skill, is a pointless thing here.

Theres a screen shot from Koralon. Yes, a pug. Yes, single target DPS. Not AoE. In the guild runs I've been in (Woe, Forged Fury, Dark Chaos and RI Alt Runs) (the top guilds on Maelstrom), I am still near the top of the meters.

I don't think people are saying "you don't have skill" they're taking with the statement "Gear of <quality x> is proof of skill".

Is there some gear that shows that "this person probably has skill"? Maybe. Probably.

But I don't think there are many people sympathetic to the notion that ToC25 or ICC loot fits that criteria.

Regarding the practically free hand outs of every content tier: It, more than anything, has really disappointed me. A primary reason I even started playing the game in BC was the feeling of "wow, I'll really need to work hard to get what those people have". "Those people" being hard core raiders with the awesome looking Warlock T6. I still reminisce that feeling; it probably will never be experienced again in WoW.

Now, with the introduction of this new emblem staging philosophy, everyone can get the same gear that my guild and I worked so hard to get just one patch earlier. Now, everyone looks the same, with the same gear. Tier gear no less!It has happened three times now this expansion. We worked for T7, then 3.1 came out and everyone was able to farm pathetically easy heroics for the same gear. Same thing for 3.2, and now 3.3. ToC was ridiculous. An absolute joke. That place is so straight forward they practically made it for no one but retards.

They say they want to release content quickly so players don't get bored. But the main reason ToC was so agonizing was they had 4 different versions of the same content! 10 man regular/heroic and 25 man regular/heroic. The only difference between regulars and heroics was the massive hits the tanks would receive as well as the huge DPS check. A joke ToC was.

I made an alt Paladin which has almost all 232/T9 gear for both Prot and Holy. He has never once cleared Naxxramas, Ulduar. That, is broken in my eyes.

Yes, this is probably considered a nerdrage, but whatever. I'm sure I'm not alone.

I agree it's easy to get gear now, but it is intentional. It's not only helpful for new players but also for experienced players gearing alts that recently got to 80.

If I knew I had to gear up through heroics, then Naxx, then Uld, then ToC just to run ICC when I got my warrior to 80, I probably wouldn't put the effort in. It's a lot of work and I wouldn't be able to put enough time into it while still raiding on my main. I'll probably do those raids for fun, but I am glad I won't have to spend several weeks hoping for the right gear to drop in each raid.

It has made it easy for bad players to get gear as well, but I honestly think the benefits outweigh the consequences. Luckily, most bad players will become well known on the server anyway, and you likely won't have to deal with them more than once or twice.

I agree it's easy to get gear now, but it is intentional. It's not only helpful for new players but also for experienced players gearing alts that recently got to 80.

If I knew I had to gear up through heroics, then Naxx, then Uld, then ToC just to run ICC when I got my warrior to 80, I probably wouldn't put the effort in. It's a lot of work and I wouldn't be able to put enough time into it while still raiding on my main. I'll probably do those raids for fun, but I am glad I won't have to spend several weeks hoping for the right gear to drop in each raid.

It has made it easy for bad players to get gear as well, but I honestly think the benefits outweigh the consequences. Luckily, most bad players will become well known on the server anyway, and you likely won't have to deal with them more than once or twice.

I can definitely see the other side's point of view. My emphasis is on "tier" gear. In BC you could farm badges but not to buy tier gear. Towards the end of BC, the badge gear was equivalent to T5/T6 content so it was by no means crappy, it just wasn't tier. And as far as farming badges the content was more challenging and DIVERSE which is hugely lacking now.

And to add to this, the concept of "buying" gear sounds so cheap to me. Another example from BC: you couldn't buy almost every piece of gear to match the current content level. It's very effortless now.

Edited by lord_xenos
I can definitely see the other side's point of view. My emphasis is on "tier" gear. In BC you could farm badges but not to buy tier gear. Towards the end of BC, the badge gear was equivalent to T5/T6 content so it was by no means crappy, it just wasn't tier. And as far as farming badges the content was more challenging and DIVERSE which is hugely lacking now.

And to add to this, the concept of "buying" gear sounds so cheap to me. Another example from BC: you couldn't buy almost every piece of gear to match the current content level. It's very effortless now.

I completely agree with you. I wish they would have added higher difficulty modes to the dungeons with the introduction of new emblems.

In BC, someone's gear represented their progression through the PvE raid content (and most likely their skill in their class).

I hate the term effortless. It's far too relative and situational to hold and weight.

I took a break during the summer, 3 months or so. When I came back conquest badges had been switched to heroics and heroism/valor had gone by the way side. So, I skipped the tail end of Ulduar. At the time, the best polearms (2 handed weapons in general) came from Ulduar.. and I never got one of them. I was stuck with the staff from H VH. When H-ToC came out I ran it, literally, every day for 3 and 1/2 weeks (25 days), and never saw Marrowstrike. Marrowstrike is a 219 ilevel piece. Did I put effort in to getting it? Yes. Would anyone have known, if I got it? No.

Gear doesn't come with a "x player spent y days trying to get this piece" tag on it.

What do you constitute as effort?

I hate the term effortless. It's far too relative and situational to hold and weight.

I took a break during the summer, 3 months or so. When I came back conquest badges had been switched to heroics and heroism/valor had gone by the way side. So, I skipped the tail end of Ulduar. At the time, the best polearms (2 handed weapons in general) came from Ulduar.. and I never got one of them. I was stuck with the staff from H VH. When H-ToC came out I ran it, literally, every day for 3 and 1/2 weeks (25 days), and never saw Marrowstrike. Marrowstrike is a 219 ilevel piece. Did I put effort in to getting it? Yes. Would anyone have known, if I got it? No.

Gear doesn't come with a "x player spent y days trying to get this piece" tag on it.

What do you constitute as effort?

That hits exactly another point. The game has equated effort with time spent which is ludicrous in comparison to BC. Each new content release is not much more difficult than the previous when it came out. ie, Ulduar was as hard as Naxxramas was when each was released.

So did you put in effort trying to get Marrowstrike? By my definition, no. All you had to do was be diligent every day to get into ToC. This isn't against you. When I got my Worldcarver from Ignis, I don't consider much effort was required, just patience.

A challenge to get gear.

Getting screwed by RNG isn't a challenge and putting time into a game to run a quick heroic doesn't constitute as a mighty effort.

Exactly! You got this in before I had I chance to, darn you.

It uses data from the Armory, not individual name searches. I'm not sure where you got that from. It gives you (if you click live, or Fresh Armory Data) the latest information from the Armory, nothing more, nothing less. If I log out in my PvP gear my score drops to about 2100.

>< You are missing the point, Totally

When you search for a player it updates the cache with the latest data update from the armory. I hope you get that part

If a player has never been looked up on wow-heroes then there will be no data for that player at all no score, nothing on wow-heroes what so ever.... because he has not been looked up. Again i hope you are following...

Which is why i said there will be players on your server/battlegroup which WoW-heroes does not have data for. If a player does not have any data on wow-heroes then they will not show up on these "ranked" lists you are referring to, and believe me there are quite a few characters out there who have not been looked up by wow-heroes. My previous guild master (the sad git he was) weekly updated the wow-heroes cache by searching for all the raiders in the guild and updating thier scores for them, this was because a few people did not show on the guild search on wow heroes, even though they existed and were real players in the guild, once he searched for them then they showed up in the guild roster on wow-heroes also.

Linking Damage meters is not a show of skill imo, anyone can do it,

i linked my damage meters a while back

https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?show...amp;p=591924448

However since then the logs have expired Here is a screenie, 7.2k dps (on korolarn) in gear i had 2 months ago, gear inferior to yours back then... infact still my gear is inferior after i checked your armory. But does that mean I am a less skill full player than you are?

Link to my Armory (Main) : http://eu.wowarmory.com/character-sheet.xm...mrage&n=nav

I rarely raid now on the hunter due to the guild being very social casual, will throw in a few ToC10/25s here and there but im gearing my Pally and DK in random hcs, i may go back to giving the hunter some time once the guild start making some solid progress in 25 man icc.

Link to Armory (1st Alt): http://eu.wowarmory.com/character-sheet.xm...p;n=Fusi%C3%B3n (Sits at about 36.5k unbuffed, still a work in progress)

Link to Armory (2nd Alt): http://eu.wowarmory.com/character-sheet.xm...ge&n=bobfoc ( Will eventually be Ret and Holy, currently working on Ret gear, once im satisfied then will start working on the holy side )

Got a mage and shammy also coming up in the ranks will be some time before they see the light at the end of the tunnel at level 80.

Feel free to comment/bash.

Edited by Noveed
>< You are missing the point, Totally

When you search for a player it updates the cache with the latest data update from the armory. I hope you get that part

If a player has never been looked up on wow-heroes then there will be no data for that player at all no score, nothing on wow-heroes what so ever.... because he has not been looked up. Again i hope you are following...

Which is why i said there will be players on your server/battlegroup which WoW-heroes does not have data for. If a player does not have any data on wow-heroes then they will not show up on these "ranked" lists you are referring to, and believe me there are quite a few characters out there who have not been looked up by wow-heroes. My previous guild master (the sad git he was) weekly updated the wow-heroes cache by searching for all the raiders in the guild and updating thier scores for them, this was because a few people did not show on the guild search on wow heroes, even though they existed and were real players in the guild, once he searched for them then they showed up in the guild roster on wow-heroes also.

There is a check box when searching a guild on a server to load the roster from WoW Armory. This check box is not currently present and hasn't been for about a week or so, but it did exist. Although, you would then have to manually update this new character for it to be up to date.

There is a check box when searching a guild on a server to load the roster from WoW Armory. This check box is not currently present and hasn't been from about a week or so, but it did exist. Although, you would then have to manually update this new character for it to be up to date.

That's just a single guild though.

If you try to see what rank you are in your server, you could have people who have never checked or haven't checked for months, and therefore have a cached score that you're comparing to or don't even show in the rankings. WoW-Heroes does not cache those scores if people don't actively check and therefore update/add their score. That's the problem with checking your rank... unless you want to go through with a list of every 80 on your server and check them yourself.

There is a check box when searching a guild on a server to load the roster from WoW Armory. This check box is not currently present and hasn't been for about a week or so, but it did exist. Although, you would then have to manually update this new character for it to be up to date.

I have seen it before and wondered myself where it went, in addition to that though I was talking from past experiences, unless wow-heroes is constantly scanning/crawling the armory (which i doubt) it will not have a database for all the players (like every single level 80 who is active) cached. From what i can make out the only time a record is update/created for a character is when someone looks them up on wow-heroes.

That's just a single guild though.

If you try to see what rank you are in your server, you could have people who have never checked or haven't checked for months, and therefore have a cached score that you're comparing to or don't even show in the rankings. WoW-Heroes does not cache those scores if people don't actively check and therefore update/add their score. That's the problem with checking your rank... unless you want to go through with a list of every 80 on your server and check them yourself.

Thankyou, I tried explaining it like that but got confused myself, nice to see someone understands where I am coming from lol.

Just to clarify: WoW-Heroes only knows about players that have actually been checked on WoW-Heroes. It does not crawl the armory once a week to update, or ever, for that matter.

Thankyou, I tried explaining it like that but got confused myself, nice to see someone understands where I am coming from lol.

No worries, it's not easy to explain.

That's just a single guild though.

If you try to see what rank you are in your server, you could have people who have never checked or haven't checked for months, and therefore have a cached score that you're comparing to or don't even show in the rankings. WoW-Heroes does not cache those scores if people don't actively check and therefore update/add their cached score. That's the problem with checking your rank.

Yes, of course. I was just correcting what seemed like an error in the information given. That is, you can search a guild on a server and have the "live" box checked to get an updated roster, not necessarily updated members. If I missed some context here I apologize.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Why you need to take back control of your synced passwords and how to go about doing that by Paul Hill Credit: Pixabay Last month, when Google decided to introduce daily and weekly caps for Gemini, it reignited an anxiety of mine, that you can’t really depend on service providers to maintain features forever, and it got me looking into free software (as in freedom) in other areas too. One app I quickly came across was KeePassXC on desktop and KeePassDX on Android as an alternative to password manager lock-in within the Chrome or Firefox ecosystems. I personally like to switch around with browsers, and using either password manager is inconvenient, so something like KeePassXC was interesting to me. The main issue with it now is syncing; I was not sure how to do that. After a bit of research, I came across Syncthing, a tool I was vaguely familiar with but had never used because it seemed complicated. However, I was completely wrong, and honestly, I think everyone should use it if they use multiple devices. It essentially lets you share folders peer to peer across all of your devices, no cloud services that you don’t control necessary! And it was fairly simple to set up, if not a bit clunky. Since setting it up, I’ve also started using Syncthing to back up other apps too, so don’t think it’s limited to just saving password databases. You can use it for pretty much anything you use Dropbox or Google Drive for. Before continuing to talk about those apps a bit more, let’s walk back a bit and talk about browser sync. Ever since the late 2000s and early 2010s, really, since we have been using smartphones, browser sync has been a necessity of life. I don’t know about you, but I have hundreds of passwords saved. For the most part, they’re all unique, so I don’t remember them and rely on software to manage them for me. Until recently, I’ve relied on password managers in Chrome and Firefox, but what I always found annoying was that it can be hard to transfer them between browsers. Sure, on Windows it is simple enough, but on Linux, exporting bookmarks has been temperamental. It works OK nowadays, but not too long ago, Chrome required you to enable exporting passwords in chrome://flags. The situation is even worse on mobile; there is no exporting or importing of passwords of any kind. You literally have to do it on a desktop, which is incredibly annoying in our mobile-first world. Sync also lets us take out bookmarks, history, tabs, and autofill data easily. To enable sync, it’s just a matter of signing into the browser once, and it handles the rest. It’s nice and easy. Obviously, all this has some issues, including those I’ve outlined above about it being hard to transfer data between browsers, but also things such as account suspension, lost account passwords, and other lock-in mechanisms, such as passkeys, being tied to a specific browser. On a sidenote, I have just removed all of my passkeys because they can make it harder to move browsers. I think the biggest threat to your synced passwords, especially if doing this with Google, is having your account suspended. I don’t ever expect mine to be suspended, but you do hear horror stories on Reddit where people lose access to their Google accounts. Imagine if you have hundreds of passwords, then suddenly lose access to them because Google froze your account, what would you do? So yes, it can be nice to use these syncing services for their convenience, but they also have risks. You may have seen me going on about free software quite a bit in my editorials. It’s essentially a concept championed by the Free Software Foundation. It’s software under particular licenses that grant you four freedoms: run the program for any purpose (0), study and change the source code (1), redistribute copies to others (2), and the freedom to distribute modified copies to others (3). For example, if there is an app I use and one day it gets abandoned by the developer, I can keep running it or even clone the software and continue developing it. Look at the myriad of cool services Google has run over the years before killing them. You can’t take the source code for those because they are proprietary, for the most part. Both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so I get the freedoms listed above. In my use case where I’m syncing a database full of my passwords, I also get proper ownership over my data, there is no losing access to the database due to a frozen account, I can access the code of the tools I’m using, and I can get support from real people online if I run into issues, rather than having to consult a vague help page from an opaque company. With the KeePassXC password manager, you create a .kdbx file, which is what will be synced between devices. KeePassXC has cross-platform apps and also has browser extensions so that the browser can fetch passwords from the database once it is unlocked. Meanwhile, Syncthing is a peer-to-peer file sync tool where you can select folders to sync between your devices. Just pop files in the folders you choose, and then they will be available across your other devices whenever they come online. Syncthing is resilient as it works over both LAN and the internet and only ever sends content between your devices, never to a third-party server somewhere else. By combining these two pieces of software, you can essentially replicate the browser sync functionality. I have had a weird, conflicting issue where a new file is appearing, but it doesn’t seem to be impacting my main password database, which is updating between devices just fine. If you want to get a setup similar to what I have, you will need to go here to download KeePassXC for your computer. Once you have that, you will need to download your passwords from your web browser to a CSV file. In Chrome, you can type chrome://password-manager/settings into the URL bar, and you should see an option to download your passwords under Export Passwords. This will give you the CSV file you need for importing into KeePassXC. If you use a different browser, just use a search engine and type “browser-name export passwords” and muddle along. In KeePassXC, you’ll want to press Import File from the home screen, select the CSV file, and create a new database from it. On one of the screens of the wizard, there will be a Title field with a drop-down selected to none. Change this to Title and continue. You’ll select a name for the database, the encryption level (the defaults are fine), and then you will pick a password. I would choose four unrelated words that are easy for you to remember, as you’ll be typing them fairly often to access your passwords. When you have all your passwords in your new database, you will want to set up the browser extension so that your browser can fetch passwords from KeePassXC. Rather than explain how to do that here, refer to KeePassXC’s guide on how to set it up properly. Once you’ve got that set up, you want to install KeePassDX on Android. You can grab it on the F-Droid store and the Google Play Store. For iPhone users, there are other .kdbx-supporting apps, but I haven’t tried any of them, so have a look around and use what suits you. Once you have that done, you will want to install Syncthing on your computer and find a third-party app for your mobile device. On Android, I use an app called BasicSync; there are also options for iOS, but again, I’ve not tried these. Once you’ve got SyncThing, you’ll want to set it up and connect all of your devices together and share a folder between your gadgets. PCWorld has a good tutorial on setting up a synchronized file between your devices using SyncThing. Once you’ve set it up, congrats, you’ll never have to touch that stuff again except for adding or removing devices. I’ll be honest, I didn’t particularly like setting up Syncthing. It didn’t take me a massive amount of time, but I think I had to check online because I found it a bit confusing. That said, I’ve had it running for several weeks now and never need to touch the Syncthing settings, so that’s very nice. I also mentioned a conflicting file. I’m not sure why this is appearing, but the main .kdbx file seems to be updating and syncing just fine. What’s nice is that both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so they won’t just vanish one day; you can take the code and fork the project or use a range of alternative implementations that others have made. It’s also nice that it works over LAN, so even if your ISP is having problems, your passwords will still sync. One area where you will want to be a bit more careful with this setup is if you only have one device. I am OK because I have a computer and two phones, all synced up. If you just have one device, you will probably want to store a backup of your .kdbx file somewhere else. Obviously, you’ll also want to remember your password really well, too. If you get locked out, it's game over. Overall, if you want to take back control of your computing from big tech, taking control of your passwords is an important part of this. You don’t need to immediately clear out your browser’s password manager; try running KeePassXC and the password manager concurrently for a while to see if you run into any problems. If you do try this out, let us know some other creative ways to use Syncthing. I haven’t really come up with a solution about what to do with my bookmarks, for example.
    • If the price was a dollar, someone would complain "Why isn't it free?" If it was free, someone would complain they weren't being paid to play it.
    • That lens of history will burn if you hold it at the right angle... Warn users too late: Shame, Microsoft! That extremely minor update to an obscure Control Panel widget required 2 years of warning. Warn users too early: Shame, Microsoft! We've got better things to do. Pipeline and process be damned, we'll just always be disappointed, eh?
    • Microsoft Paint used to be my favorite Windows app as a kid, and it's still pretty good by Usama Jawad I have been using Windows since the early 2000s, when I was around 10 years old or so. I vaguely remember playing around with Windows 98 and Windows 2000, but that may have been on school PCs which had old operating systems installed. My main OS on the home PC, and the one I recall spending most time with, was Windows XP. At that time, I used the home PC to create Word and PowerPoint documents for school, but a lot of the time, I simply used it to play games. My dad would bring game discs which we would try and install on the PC, sometimes unsuccessfully, and sometimes, we would rely on flash games in the browser, like Bubble Trouble on Miniclip. However, the problem with the latter approach was the internet speed. On a good day, our dial-up internet would offer us speeds of 56 kbps, but on most days, it was closer to 33 kbps. This did not facilitate online gaming as I would often have to wait minutes for a game to load or "draw" on the screen, and trying to download pirated games wasn't simple either. I remember getting tired of waiting for online games to load and just downloading simulator games from the Big Fish Games website instead, only to be disappointed after finding out that I was just being given access to trial versions of the title, and I needed to fork out money to pay for the full version. All of this is to say that it wasn't very easy to find entertainment options on the home PC when I was a kid, due to a number of reasons, mostly outside of my control. This situation pushed me towards a rather unconventional ally: Microsoft Paint. Whenever the internet wasn't working as good as I expected, I would simply spin up Paint and draw complete rubbish on the canvas. Of course, that wasn't always the intention, but it usually happened when I messed up drawing a straight line or something, and then I would give up on that particular piece and simply draw a random collection of objects. Microsoft Paint was extremely accessible and easy to use. Even if you weren't an artist, you could quickly understand the tools at your disposal and how to leverage them on a canvas. The absolute breadth on offer ensured that each painting was truly unique, as you could utilize various combinations of tools like the pencil, paint, spray paint, and more to truly personalize your creation. Since I wasn't particularly good at drawing both on digital screen or a physical screen, I remember that my main style of art would be to insert a bunch of randomly intersecting lines and then fill them with random colors through the paint can. I have trying to replicate that art style in the latest version of Paint below, and as you can see, it's truly Pablo Picasso-esque. The human imagination truly knows no bounds Microsoft Paint kept me occupied for hours and was my best friend when video games on the home PC were inaccessible for one reason or the other. There was no academic or professional reason for which I would need to use Paint, but I still loved using it in my personal time, even if what I created wasn't worth being shown to anyone. It was simply fun. Fast-forward to today, and the situation is mostly the same. Now that I am almost 29 years old, and I still have no reason to use Microsoft Paint in a professional capacity. In fact, I don't even use it in a personal capacity, except to dabble with it from time to time, just to see if core functionalities are still intact. And I'm happy to say that I think Microsoft Paint still offers the same accessibility and inviting experience that it did to me a couple of decades ago, even though its UX has been refreshed and it's been integrated with Copilot features. Interestingly, things could have been a lot different, had Microsoft had its way. Microsoft Paint was marked for deprecation with the Windows 10 Fall Creators Update in 2017, and even began displaying a product retirement alert, urging customers to shift to Paint 3D instead. Fortunately, after consumer backlash, Microsoft reversed course on this decision, and Paint continues to be a native app inside Windows installations that can also be updated quite frequently through the Microsoft Store. Instead, Paint 3D ended up on the chopping block, which is for the better, I think. I have intermittently played around with Microsoft's refreshed Paint experience in the past few years, and I do think it has received worthwhile upgrades. the UI and the UX has been modernized while retaining core functionality, and the app is still fairly easy to use. It doesn't meet any of my use-cases, but I've never really had any use-cases ever, as described previously. Of course, the elephant in the room is the Copilot integration. Personally, I believe that this is one place where Copilot does make sense, environmental concerns aside. I know that a lot of creatives use AI to generate images, and while some may be using professional alternatives, Paint still offers a decent casual experience, with the power of Copilot. Of course, you do need to have a valid Microsoft 365 Copilot license and available credits to use it, but even if you don't, you still get the big Copilot button in the toolbar, unfortunately. All in all, I am glad that Microsoft Paint continues to be a native feature in Windows 11, and a piece of software that has evolved to meet modern needs without cutting off its own roots. It's just an iconic piece of Windows history that was an essential part of my childhood, and while I don't use it anymore, I'm just glad it is still there.
    • 2TB WD_Black SN7100 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD drops to its lowest price in over three months by Fiza Ali Amazon is currently offering the 2TB WD_Black SN7100 internal solid-state drive at its lowest price in over three months, so you may want to check it out, if you have been considering a storage upgrade, before the deal dries up (purchase link is toward the end of the article). Featuring a PCIe Gen 4.0 interface and M.2 2280 form factor, the SN7100 promises to deliver sequential read speeds of up to 7,250MB/s and sequential write speeds reaching 6,900MB/s, offering as much as a 35% improvement in performance compared with the previous generation. It also achieves random read speeds of 1,000,000 IOPS and random write speeds of 1,400,000 IOPS. The drive uses Western Digital’s TLC 3D NAND technology for reliable performance and is further supported by a five-year limited warranty. It also offers strong endurance, rated at up to 1,200TBW, making it suitable for demanding workloads such as gaming, content creation, and high-speed recording. Moreover, its DRAM-less architecture claims to improve power efficiency (the SSD relies on system memory for caching via HMB), while the WD_Black Dashboard software enables users to monitor drive health, install firmware updates, and activate Game Mode for potentially better performance. Finally, it operates within an operating temperature range of 0°C to 85°C, and can withstand storage temperatures from -40°C to 85°C. 2TB WD_Black SN7100 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD: $242.96 (Amazon US) Check this deal out if you want a 4TB option. Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      514
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!