Recommended Posts

Hell no, if I could've sold it for THAT much, I would've sold it without a doubt in my mind. Great boost, sure, but I've still got professions among many other things I still need to work on. :/

Couldn't .. it was a PUG, and everyone was throwing a hissy fit.. even though I won the roll fair and square.

Well if you roll Need (or just roll, if we're talking about a raid) on a BoE item, I can imagine they'd want you to equip it right away. Even if it was an upgrade, people could still roll Need and say it's an upgrade, but go and sell it anyway. It's pretty common practice to equip BoE stuff as soon as you get it.

Don't worry too much about it, you'll get plate pieces from quests and stuff, and once you get to Outlands the greens you get from quests there will be better than the blues you can find in old world anyway.

http://wow-heroes.com/index.php?zone=us&am...ame=Dominatious

14th Ranked Survival Hunter on Maelstrom, Horde side.

Before it's brought up Skill > Gear yadda yadda ect. whatever. Clearly someone with almost all 245 gear has skill.

Not after 3.3 so much, you can get a bunch of 245 pieces now from the vendors, clearly not a ton of skill involved in farming emblems of triumph.

Not after 3.3 so much, you can get a bunch of 245 pieces now from the vendors, clearly not a ton of skill involved in farming emblems of triumph.

Even before 3.3 getting 245 gear was laughably easy, unless you were doing hard modes there wasn't much skill involved and even then the game is still primarily just a time sink with little to do with skill. I was really amazing at how easy they made the tier 9 stuff, the game just keeps getting easier.

http://wow-heroes.com/index.php?zone=us&am...ame=Dominatious

14th Ranked Survival Hunter on Maelstrom, Horde side.

Before it's brought up Skill > Gear yadda yadda ect. whatever. Clearly someone with almost all 245 gear has skill.

My arguament once again, if you are using wow-heroes to check rating, that fails. It uses cached scores and only displays players on the ranked lists that have been searched on wow-heroes before. There are players who have never been searched upon wow-heroes that will not display on the list.

245 Gear Pre 3.3 was easily attainable (VoA25 for the 2PC T9, Ony10/25 for the Neck when u get the head, badge farming from Daily Heroics, VoA, ToC coupled with a few Trophies and ya laughing. Not to mention that ToC25 was extremely easy to pug and farm on a weekly basis. A Few people in my Guild with gearscore (not wh score) of 2800 were getting carried and picking up imba lootz!)

There was a DK tank on my realm fully kitted on with ilvl245 gear had around 43khp unbuffed... absolute nublet got riddiculed in trade and got carried by grps name change and realm transfer saved his @$$ from getting owned in trade lol

There was a DK tank on my realm fully kitted on with ilvl245 gear had around 43khp unbuffed... absolute nublet got riddiculed in trade and got carried by grps name change and realm transfer saved his @$$ from getting owned in trade lol

Likewise, there's a guy on my server that has bought things like the achievement-drakes, titles, and sets of gear from my guild.

You'll often see him in trade chat putting together a pug for 'crumby' content and then getting made to look like a fool by the general populous. "All that gear and you can't break 3,000 DPS on Thaddius?" I'm not sure how widely known it is that he's bought his achievements but there are often snide comments in guild chat whenever he's seen spamming general with "looking for more: Nax25 immortal run - must be geared, pst achievements & spec".

IMO you've got to be some sort of a jerk to demand from others what you can't, or aren't willing to offer.

Unrelated, ran into this druid random pugging on my mage. Great guy - knew how to play, relaxed attitude. I was in a 4-man group with real-life friends and he hopped in via the random dungeon finder. We blew a couple of hours queueing together, banging out achievements, chatting, and generally just having a good time.

It's things like that which make the dungeon finder awesome. It's not all 800 DPS rogues and 19,000 HP tanks.

K.

Talking about the random people, the outliers, who buy gear, get carried and as you said, have no skill, is a pointless thing here.

7462.jpg

Theres a screen shot from Koralon. Yes, a pug. Yes, single target DPS. Not AoE. In the guild runs I've been in (Woe, Forged Fury, Dark Chaos and RI Alt Runs) (the top guilds on Maelstrom), I am still near the top of the meters.

It uses cached scores and only displays players on the ranked lists that have been searched on wow-heroes before. There are players who have never been searched upon wow-heroes that will not display on the list.

It uses data from the Armory, not individual name searches. I'm not sure where you got that from. It gives you (if you click live, or Fresh Armory Data) the latest information from the Armory, nothing more, nothing less. If I log out in my PvP gear my score drops to about 2100.

Talking about the random people, the outliers, who buy gear, get carried and as you said, have no skill, is a pointless thing here.

Theres a screen shot from Koralon. Yes, a pug. Yes, single target DPS. Not AoE. In the guild runs I've been in (Woe, Forged Fury, Dark Chaos and RI Alt Runs) (the top guilds on Maelstrom), I am still near the top of the meters.

I don't think people are saying "you don't have skill" they're taking with the statement "Gear of <quality x> is proof of skill".

Is there some gear that shows that "this person probably has skill"? Maybe. Probably.

But I don't think there are many people sympathetic to the notion that ToC25 or ICC loot fits that criteria.

Regarding the practically free hand outs of every content tier: It, more than anything, has really disappointed me. A primary reason I even started playing the game in BC was the feeling of "wow, I'll really need to work hard to get what those people have". "Those people" being hard core raiders with the awesome looking Warlock T6. I still reminisce that feeling; it probably will never be experienced again in WoW.

Now, with the introduction of this new emblem staging philosophy, everyone can get the same gear that my guild and I worked so hard to get just one patch earlier. Now, everyone looks the same, with the same gear. Tier gear no less!It has happened three times now this expansion. We worked for T7, then 3.1 came out and everyone was able to farm pathetically easy heroics for the same gear. Same thing for 3.2, and now 3.3. ToC was ridiculous. An absolute joke. That place is so straight forward they practically made it for no one but retards.

They say they want to release content quickly so players don't get bored. But the main reason ToC was so agonizing was they had 4 different versions of the same content! 10 man regular/heroic and 25 man regular/heroic. The only difference between regulars and heroics was the massive hits the tanks would receive as well as the huge DPS check. A joke ToC was.

I made an alt Paladin which has almost all 232/T9 gear for both Prot and Holy. He has never once cleared Naxxramas, Ulduar. That, is broken in my eyes.

Yes, this is probably considered a nerdrage, but whatever. I'm sure I'm not alone.

I agree it's easy to get gear now, but it is intentional. It's not only helpful for new players but also for experienced players gearing alts that recently got to 80.

If I knew I had to gear up through heroics, then Naxx, then Uld, then ToC just to run ICC when I got my warrior to 80, I probably wouldn't put the effort in. It's a lot of work and I wouldn't be able to put enough time into it while still raiding on my main. I'll probably do those raids for fun, but I am glad I won't have to spend several weeks hoping for the right gear to drop in each raid.

It has made it easy for bad players to get gear as well, but I honestly think the benefits outweigh the consequences. Luckily, most bad players will become well known on the server anyway, and you likely won't have to deal with them more than once or twice.

I agree it's easy to get gear now, but it is intentional. It's not only helpful for new players but also for experienced players gearing alts that recently got to 80.

If I knew I had to gear up through heroics, then Naxx, then Uld, then ToC just to run ICC when I got my warrior to 80, I probably wouldn't put the effort in. It's a lot of work and I wouldn't be able to put enough time into it while still raiding on my main. I'll probably do those raids for fun, but I am glad I won't have to spend several weeks hoping for the right gear to drop in each raid.

It has made it easy for bad players to get gear as well, but I honestly think the benefits outweigh the consequences. Luckily, most bad players will become well known on the server anyway, and you likely won't have to deal with them more than once or twice.

I can definitely see the other side's point of view. My emphasis is on "tier" gear. In BC you could farm badges but not to buy tier gear. Towards the end of BC, the badge gear was equivalent to T5/T6 content so it was by no means crappy, it just wasn't tier. And as far as farming badges the content was more challenging and DIVERSE which is hugely lacking now.

And to add to this, the concept of "buying" gear sounds so cheap to me. Another example from BC: you couldn't buy almost every piece of gear to match the current content level. It's very effortless now.

Edited by lord_xenos
I can definitely see the other side's point of view. My emphasis is on "tier" gear. In BC you could farm badges but not to buy tier gear. Towards the end of BC, the badge gear was equivalent to T5/T6 content so it was by no means crappy, it just wasn't tier. And as far as farming badges the content was more challenging and DIVERSE which is hugely lacking now.

And to add to this, the concept of "buying" gear sounds so cheap to me. Another example from BC: you couldn't buy almost every piece of gear to match the current content level. It's very effortless now.

I completely agree with you. I wish they would have added higher difficulty modes to the dungeons with the introduction of new emblems.

In BC, someone's gear represented their progression through the PvE raid content (and most likely their skill in their class).

I hate the term effortless. It's far too relative and situational to hold and weight.

I took a break during the summer, 3 months or so. When I came back conquest badges had been switched to heroics and heroism/valor had gone by the way side. So, I skipped the tail end of Ulduar. At the time, the best polearms (2 handed weapons in general) came from Ulduar.. and I never got one of them. I was stuck with the staff from H VH. When H-ToC came out I ran it, literally, every day for 3 and 1/2 weeks (25 days), and never saw Marrowstrike. Marrowstrike is a 219 ilevel piece. Did I put effort in to getting it? Yes. Would anyone have known, if I got it? No.

Gear doesn't come with a "x player spent y days trying to get this piece" tag on it.

What do you constitute as effort?

I hate the term effortless. It's far too relative and situational to hold and weight.

I took a break during the summer, 3 months or so. When I came back conquest badges had been switched to heroics and heroism/valor had gone by the way side. So, I skipped the tail end of Ulduar. At the time, the best polearms (2 handed weapons in general) came from Ulduar.. and I never got one of them. I was stuck with the staff from H VH. When H-ToC came out I ran it, literally, every day for 3 and 1/2 weeks (25 days), and never saw Marrowstrike. Marrowstrike is a 219 ilevel piece. Did I put effort in to getting it? Yes. Would anyone have known, if I got it? No.

Gear doesn't come with a "x player spent y days trying to get this piece" tag on it.

What do you constitute as effort?

That hits exactly another point. The game has equated effort with time spent which is ludicrous in comparison to BC. Each new content release is not much more difficult than the previous when it came out. ie, Ulduar was as hard as Naxxramas was when each was released.

So did you put in effort trying to get Marrowstrike? By my definition, no. All you had to do was be diligent every day to get into ToC. This isn't against you. When I got my Worldcarver from Ignis, I don't consider much effort was required, just patience.

A challenge to get gear.

Getting screwed by RNG isn't a challenge and putting time into a game to run a quick heroic doesn't constitute as a mighty effort.

Exactly! You got this in before I had I chance to, darn you.

It uses data from the Armory, not individual name searches. I'm not sure where you got that from. It gives you (if you click live, or Fresh Armory Data) the latest information from the Armory, nothing more, nothing less. If I log out in my PvP gear my score drops to about 2100.

>< You are missing the point, Totally

When you search for a player it updates the cache with the latest data update from the armory. I hope you get that part

If a player has never been looked up on wow-heroes then there will be no data for that player at all no score, nothing on wow-heroes what so ever.... because he has not been looked up. Again i hope you are following...

Which is why i said there will be players on your server/battlegroup which WoW-heroes does not have data for. If a player does not have any data on wow-heroes then they will not show up on these "ranked" lists you are referring to, and believe me there are quite a few characters out there who have not been looked up by wow-heroes. My previous guild master (the sad git he was) weekly updated the wow-heroes cache by searching for all the raiders in the guild and updating thier scores for them, this was because a few people did not show on the guild search on wow heroes, even though they existed and were real players in the guild, once he searched for them then they showed up in the guild roster on wow-heroes also.

Linking Damage meters is not a show of skill imo, anyone can do it,

i linked my damage meters a while back

https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?show...amp;p=591924448

However since then the logs have expired Here is a screenie, 7.2k dps (on korolarn) in gear i had 2 months ago, gear inferior to yours back then... infact still my gear is inferior after i checked your armory. But does that mean I am a less skill full player than you are?

Link to my Armory (Main) : http://eu.wowarmory.com/character-sheet.xm...mrage&n=nav

I rarely raid now on the hunter due to the guild being very social casual, will throw in a few ToC10/25s here and there but im gearing my Pally and DK in random hcs, i may go back to giving the hunter some time once the guild start making some solid progress in 25 man icc.

Link to Armory (1st Alt): http://eu.wowarmory.com/character-sheet.xm...p;n=Fusi%C3%B3n (Sits at about 36.5k unbuffed, still a work in progress)

Link to Armory (2nd Alt): http://eu.wowarmory.com/character-sheet.xm...ge&n=bobfoc ( Will eventually be Ret and Holy, currently working on Ret gear, once im satisfied then will start working on the holy side )

Got a mage and shammy also coming up in the ranks will be some time before they see the light at the end of the tunnel at level 80.

Feel free to comment/bash.

Edited by Noveed
>< You are missing the point, Totally

When you search for a player it updates the cache with the latest data update from the armory. I hope you get that part

If a player has never been looked up on wow-heroes then there will be no data for that player at all no score, nothing on wow-heroes what so ever.... because he has not been looked up. Again i hope you are following...

Which is why i said there will be players on your server/battlegroup which WoW-heroes does not have data for. If a player does not have any data on wow-heroes then they will not show up on these "ranked" lists you are referring to, and believe me there are quite a few characters out there who have not been looked up by wow-heroes. My previous guild master (the sad git he was) weekly updated the wow-heroes cache by searching for all the raiders in the guild and updating thier scores for them, this was because a few people did not show on the guild search on wow heroes, even though they existed and were real players in the guild, once he searched for them then they showed up in the guild roster on wow-heroes also.

There is a check box when searching a guild on a server to load the roster from WoW Armory. This check box is not currently present and hasn't been for about a week or so, but it did exist. Although, you would then have to manually update this new character for it to be up to date.

There is a check box when searching a guild on a server to load the roster from WoW Armory. This check box is not currently present and hasn't been from about a week or so, but it did exist. Although, you would then have to manually update this new character for it to be up to date.

That's just a single guild though.

If you try to see what rank you are in your server, you could have people who have never checked or haven't checked for months, and therefore have a cached score that you're comparing to or don't even show in the rankings. WoW-Heroes does not cache those scores if people don't actively check and therefore update/add their score. That's the problem with checking your rank... unless you want to go through with a list of every 80 on your server and check them yourself.

There is a check box when searching a guild on a server to load the roster from WoW Armory. This check box is not currently present and hasn't been for about a week or so, but it did exist. Although, you would then have to manually update this new character for it to be up to date.

I have seen it before and wondered myself where it went, in addition to that though I was talking from past experiences, unless wow-heroes is constantly scanning/crawling the armory (which i doubt) it will not have a database for all the players (like every single level 80 who is active) cached. From what i can make out the only time a record is update/created for a character is when someone looks them up on wow-heroes.

That's just a single guild though.

If you try to see what rank you are in your server, you could have people who have never checked or haven't checked for months, and therefore have a cached score that you're comparing to or don't even show in the rankings. WoW-Heroes does not cache those scores if people don't actively check and therefore update/add their score. That's the problem with checking your rank... unless you want to go through with a list of every 80 on your server and check them yourself.

Thankyou, I tried explaining it like that but got confused myself, nice to see someone understands where I am coming from lol.

Just to clarify: WoW-Heroes only knows about players that have actually been checked on WoW-Heroes. It does not crawl the armory once a week to update, or ever, for that matter.

Thankyou, I tried explaining it like that but got confused myself, nice to see someone understands where I am coming from lol.

No worries, it's not easy to explain.

That's just a single guild though.

If you try to see what rank you are in your server, you could have people who have never checked or haven't checked for months, and therefore have a cached score that you're comparing to or don't even show in the rankings. WoW-Heroes does not cache those scores if people don't actively check and therefore update/add their cached score. That's the problem with checking your rank.

Yes, of course. I was just correcting what seemed like an error in the information given. That is, you can search a guild on a server and have the "live" box checked to get an updated roster, not necessarily updated members. If I missed some context here I apologize.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Motrix Next 3.9.6 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.6 changelog: New Features Clipboard management — App-owned copy actions no longer trigger the Add Task auto-detect popup. aria2 input compatibility — Multi-line aria2-style task input is supported for URLs with per-task options such as out=. BitTorrent IPv6 DHT — Added IPv6 DHT support and related configuration. File category URL patterns — File category rules can match URL patterns with validation and localized hints. Task status tags — Added clearer waiting and sharing states for task cards. Download event bridge — Added an aria2 WebSocket event bridge for faster download notifications. Improvements Improved task list transitions and preserved task state during tab switches. Kept RPC origin access enabled for local integrations. Restored AppImage stripping in release builds after beta validation. Added localized preference guidance across supported languages. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Segra 1.6.2 by Razvan Serea Segra is a free, open-source OBS-powered game recorder offering fast gameplay capture, instant clips, AI highlights, deep game integration, and seamless uploads—perfect for gamers, streamers, and content creators. Lightweight, fast, zero bloat. Segra key features: Automatic Game Recording: Begin capturing gameplay the moment your game launches, with zero manual setup. Instant Clipping: Save important moments instantly using a customizable hotkey—perfect for highlights, montages, or quick shares. Segra AI Highlights: Let Segra automatically detect kills, assists, deaths, and key events to generate polished highlight reels without manual editing. Gameplay Uploads: Upload recordings and clips directly to Segra.tv for fast sharing and cloud access. Deep Game Integration: Enjoy advanced game-data tracking across hundreds of supported titles, enabling smart highlight generation and stat-informed clipping. High-Performance Capture: Record up to 4K at 144 FPS using OBS-powered technology with minimal performance impact, supporting NVENC, AMD VCE, and custom quality controls. Segra Editor: Edit recordings easily with timeline controls, segment management, and event-based navigation to build the perfect clip. Customization Options: Adjust hotkeys, output formats, storage paths, codecs, capture quality, and performance settings for a tailored recording experience. Segra 1.6.2 changelog: UI: Improved the transition from the loading skeleton to the real content card. Security: Added Segra.dll code signing and automatic VirusTotal upload. Settings: Fixed the settings header to highlight Account when scrolled to the top. Recording: Updated OBSKit.NET to 1.4.1. Download: Segra 1.6.2 | 74.5 MB (Open Source) View: Segra Homepage | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Hey Google, these are the Gemini features I want in 2026 by Aditya Tiwari Google Gemini has been around for over three years. The AI chatbot started its journey back in 2023 (as Bard) when ChatGPT was already a talk of the town. However, it quickly attracted criticism after misrepresenting facts about the James Webb Space Telescope. The search giant spent a year fine-tuning Bard before rebranding the chatbot and its underlying generative AI model to Gemini, drawing inspiration from NASA's first human spaceflight program. Note that Bard was initially powered by LaMDA and PaLM 2; Google has since added several new features and integrations to Gemini. That said, there is scope for improvement and a gap for new features. I have been using Gemini for a while now and have realized that the chatbot lacks several features, making it harder for me to research across topics. These are mostly function-over-form updates that can improve the overall experience. Delete individual messages from a conversation Image via DepositPhotos.com One good thing about Gemini is that it can maintain context throughout the conversation. But things might get chaotic when you want to ask a related question, but don't want it to be part of your conversation in the long run. You can't ask that related question in a fresh chat because Gemini will lose the active conversation context of what you're trying to research. If Google allowed you to delete individual question/answer pairs, you could simply ask about a sub-topic and remove it from the conversation to create a smooth flow of important stuff. Offline mode Image via DepositPhotos.com A big pain of using Gemini daily is that everything loads from the cloud. It takes time for your chats to appear, and you can't view your conversation history while offline. To get a better idea, you can open the Gemini app and see how it looks without an internet connection. While Gemini models run in the cloud, it wouldn't hurt if Google could store chats (at least the text part) on the device so we can refer to them when offline. Google can also offer a lightweight version of its AI model to help with basic drafting, summarization, and other tasks. It has the Gemini Nano model, which can perform on-device processing on Google Pixel, Samsung, and some other Android brands, but it's a system feature and not related to the cloud-based Gemini app. Make temporary chats permanent I can't thank Google enough for taking the time and effort to add incognito mode or temporary chat mode to the Gemini app. It lets you have conversations without worrying that the topics will end up in your chat history or used for model training (at least on paper). Google claims that it doesn't use your temporary chats to "personalize your Gemini experience or train Google’s AI models." However, the data is stored "up to 72 hours to respond to you and to process any feedback you choose to provide." That said, I often start researching something in a temporary chat, only to realize the chatbot's answer is good enough to refer to later. Sadly, Gemini doesn't have an option to make such temporary chats permanent. In other words, I won't be able to follow up on it if I close the temporary chat. I'm left with alternatives like copying the answers into notes or another app. My digital life will get a lot better if Gemini gets a button to make temporary chats permanent. Collapse answers for a cleaner view You're heavily invested in your research game and suddenly feel the need to go up in the chat to recall something. This is when the conversation thread starts to feel like an overwhelming, unending wall of questions and answers. What if Google added a way to collapse Q&A pairs in the Gemini chat thread? It would look quite clean and easy to navigate. You'll quickly get an overview of everything you have discussed with the chatbot. Add buttons to jump between messages Suggested mockup of the feature. This reminds me of a small but useful Gemini feature that Google could add to its chatbot: the ability to hop between prompts in a conversation. Just add simple up- and down-arrow buttons, similar to YouTube Shorts, so people can quickly scroll through the messages. A table of contents or Chat Overview It's hard to get a bird's-eye view of everything you have discussed with the chatbot during a lengthy conversation. This is where a table of contents, or Chat Overview, displayed at the top of the screen, possibly in a drop-down button, might come in handy. You'll be able to get an overview of the chat and jump between messages, serving as an alternative to the up/down arrow buttons. Temporary mode for Gemini Live Image: Google You can use Gemini Live to have real-time conversations with the chatbot, which feels like you're talking to someone in the same room. However, a downside is that Gemini Live doesn't work in Temporary Chat mode, so all your conversations end up in the chat history. Google should consider expanding the temporary chat mode to include Gemini Live. Default to a specific chat One thing that feels somewhat annoying to me is that Gemini always opens in a new chat, whether on web or mobile. Sometimes, you want to return to your last chat. Google can take cues from web browsers, which let you choose whether you want to go to a new tab or a specific web page(s). Gemini can also have options to default to a specific chat when reopened. That said, generative AI chatbots have endless possibilities given the vagueness of their work. You can mold them the way you want by attaching different connectors, adding custom instructions, and including source files. It remains to be seen what Google has in store for future updates and whether anything from this wishlist gets the green light. The search giant released a stream of new Gemini updates in recent months, including Gemini 3.5 Flash and Gemini Omni Spark, adding that it now has 13 products with more than a billion users each. What do you want to see in the Gemini app? Tell us in the comments.
    • Thank you for the post. Just a FYI that links to an outside site or promoting specific software is considered spamming here. Asking general questions is fine.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      507
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      181
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      86
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!