Sony PSP US launch a failure?


Recommended Posts

DS appeals to younger gamers and gamers interested in revolutionary technology.

585677175[/snapback]

if the touchscreen of the ds is revolutionary then so is the psp. and if u scoff at the notion think of how people interact with their pda when they are playing pocket pc games. revolutionary is not a trait exclusive to the ds.

if the touchscreen of the ds is revolutionary then so is the psp.  and if u scoff at the notion think of how people interact with their pda when they are playing pocket pc games. revolutionary is not a trait exclusive to the ds.

585677391[/snapback]

By revolutionary i mean noone else would have done it and it has never been done before...there hasnt yet been a touch screen on a gaming console nor has there been a gaming console with 2 screens...

By revolutionary i mean noone else would have done it and it has never been done before...there hasnt yet been a touch screen on a gaming console nor has there been a gaming console with 2 screens...

585677405[/snapback]

two screens in a handheld i think is more revolutionary. i cant think of any device period that has two screens much less a gaming one. but the touchscreen thing i just dont see as being new after pda's have proliferated as they have for the past 8-10 years. dont get me wrong its a innovative idea but i don't think revolutionary.

Ok, first off im no nintendo fan boy, im considering buying a PSP just for movie playing capabilities. But you are most definately a sony fan boy. PSP graphics are in no way compareable to PS2 graphics. I've played Ridge Racer and while it looks good, it isnt anywhere near the looks of a PS2 game. Also, you cant compare the DS to the PSP, they are on completely different markets. The DS appeals to younger gamers and gamers interested in revolutionary technology. The PSP appeals to a larger age range and people that like the more western influenced games. Anyways comparing processor speed is just retarded. Go ahead, put 3ghz P4 against a 1.8ghz G5 and see who wins.

Dont go around saying fanboy when you are yourself one.

585677175[/snapback]

RR and all other games are clocked ar 233mhz, the PSP is capable of 333mhz. Lets not say that they are or arent Ps2 graphics until a game that has the PSP running at that clock speed arrives

nor has there been a gaming console with 2 screens...

585677405[/snapback]

game-n-watch.jpg

I don't think the touch screen on the DS is in any way revolutionary - using it to control Mario 64 DS sucks and Wario Ware gets boring after 15 minutes as the same mini-games keep poping up.

Hopefully Sony will get out software soon that'll do the video converting and all the other dirty work on its own, and allow easy integration between PC and PSP. This way it can widely advertise PSP more as a media device than just a gaming device. That should boost sales quite a bit.

RR and all other games are clocked ar 233mhz, the PSP is capable of 333mhz. Lets not say that they are or arent Ps2 graphics until a game that has the PSP running at that clock speed arrives

585677443[/snapback]

The reason it is underclocked is to save battery life quite obviously. The PSP would have its battery life cut by another 2 hours if they enabled the extra speed.

game-n-watch.jpg

I don't think the touch screen on the DS is in any way revolutionary - using it to control Mario 64 DS sucks and Wario Ware gets boring after 15 minutes as the same mini-games keep poping up.

585677774[/snapback]

Ok you are comparing a 20 year old game system that uses LED lights to the DS...cmon. Anyways im not defending the DS's software. I'm only showing the other side of the story because Oneill thinks that the PSP is better for the sole reason that the processor speed is better.

The reason it is underclocked is to save battery life quite obviously. The PSP would have its battery life cut by another 2 hours if they enabled the extra speed.

585678438[/snapback]

Ok that is a vaild point but consider the following..

Wouldnt the PSP have much closer graphics to the PS2 if it was clocked at 333mhz?

Also dont you think that the first games for the PS2 were underclocked, i mean c'mon think if they had been using all the PS2s power at launch or even a few months after. We would be tired of it already. What they do is release games that dont utilize the full spec of the ps2,xbox,etc and then gradually as time passes use more power of the system so it looks like things are improving.

Hell, why doesnt sony let us choose our clock speed? :whistle:

Ok that is a vaild point but consider the following..

Wouldnt the PSP have much closer graphics to the PS2 if it was clocked at 333mhz?

Also dont you think that the first games for the PS2 were underclocked, i mean c'mon think if they had been using all the PS2s power at launch or even a few months after. We would be tired of it already. What they do is release games that dont utilize the full spec of the ps2,xbox,etc and then gradually as time passes use more power of the system so it looks like things are improving.

Hell, why doesnt sony let us choose our clock speed?  :whistle:

585678593[/snapback]

Well, it's not all dependent on the CPU of the system. You have to take into account the amount of memory for textures/etc. and the graphics cores.

The clockspeed doesn't affect how the games look. Once the game is programmed, it looks how it was meant to. The clockspeed just affects how well it runs the game.

The games do not/did not come underclocked for the PS2, they have no control over that. Developers of early titles didn't have the experience of developing for the PS2, so as they gained more experience they found more efficient ways of carrying out tasks, allowing their games to be able to pump out more and more (for example, Gran Turismo 4 having 1080i support in-game, something thought impossible until just recently). Not only is it like this for all consoles, it is like this for PCs also.

Sony doesn't let us choose our clockspeed because they know what they're doing, we don't

LOL like we know what were doing when we overclock PCs?

Thanks for that clarification, at leat i was close.

585679013[/snapback]

Haha, but with PCs we (well...most of us :D) know what we're doing

With consoles its a hole different ball game :p.

*edited*

Edited by ViciousX
game-n-watch.jpg

I don't think the touch screen on the DS is in any way revolutionary - using it to control Mario 64 DS sucks and Wario Ware gets boring after 15 minutes as the same mini-games keep poping up.

585677774[/snapback]

Not quite the same is it now :) It's just 1 screen cut in half & joined by a ribbon cable ;)

People are ClueLess about PSP's capabilities.

I mean, same here in our city. Not many people is buying it!

They mindlessly think "OH Another Gaming system", but look it's BETTER than PS2, it's a Handheld PS2, and it can also view pictures, play Music and movies.

It's like this Device iPAQ but $100 Cheaper!!!

$250 for a PSP is Totally Justified!!! People just have to find out, and I am not sure what went wrong at Sony's advertisement dept, but something Apparently went wrong!

Nintendo DS, on the other hand, while $100 cheap COULD NOT do all these

Failure? I work at a Best Buy. I got in at 730am that morning and there was a line more than half as long as the line that was outside for Black Friday (aka the largest retail day of the year).

585677871[/snapback]

it all depends on the location i guess. i just happened to be at best buy the day it was released and they had stacks and stacks of them left with 2 guys standing there asking everyone who walked past if they want to buy one. it was actually funny at how badly it was selling.

Hopefully Sony will get out software soon that'll do the video converting and all the other dirty work on its own, and allow easy integration between PC and PSP. This way it can widely advertise PSP more as a media device than just a gaming device. That should boost sales quite a bit.

585678362[/snapback]

www.pspvideo9.com

But you are exactly right, I think the Advertisement shouldn't focus just on games, but ALL these extra features as well.

It's a Video player, a Mp3 player. A FULL handheld MultiMedia system!

Why shouldn't it be $100 more than DS?

I am not surprised a bit.  The price is little bit tooo high and many of us are just waiting for the price to drop which it will in a month or two.

585679620[/snapback]

A month or two?

Before I got the system, I hear everybody say it won't happen for at least a Year!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • GitHub removes manual model selection from Copilot free and student plans by Karthik Mudaliar GitHub is removing the ability to manually select an AI model from its Copilot Free and Student plans, making its automatic routing system the default and only way to choose a model. This means users on these tiers will no longer be able to deliberately select a particular OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or Microsoft model for a task. In its announcement, GitHub said Copilot Auto will dynamically choose what it considers the best model for each request. Free and Student accounts will retain access to models from multiple families, although the available selection will continue to depend on the restrictions attached to each plan. GitHub did not identify a fixed pool of models that Auto will always use, and its documentation warns that model availability can change over time. GitHub describes Auto as more than a random fallback system. On supported surfaces, its task-optimization technology evaluates the complexity of a request alongside real-time information about model health and availability. Straightforward prompts can be routed to faster and less expensive models, while more demanding coding tasks may be sent to higher-cost reasoning models. The company says this approach should reduce rate limiting, latency, and failed requests. Auto generally selects one model along natural prompt-caching boundaries rather than repeatedly switching models during a session, as GitHub found that mid-session changes increased costs without producing sufficient improvements in output quality. Users can still check which model generated a response. In Copilot Chat, the information appears when hovering over an answer, while Copilot CLI and the Copilot cloud agent display the selected model alongside their output. Auto is available in Copilot Chat, Copilot CLI, and the cloud agent, with the exact implementation and release status varying between supported development environments. The latest restriction follows several months of adjustments to Copilot’s individual plans. GitHub temporarily halted new Pro, Pro+, and Student subscriptions in April as it sought to manage demand and service reliability. It later introduced token-based billing and began gradually reopening individual-plan registrations on June 17. Alongside the picker change, GitHub is retiring the “Preview” label from Microsoft-developed models. It argues that the label is no longer necessary because Auto handles model routing and models are continuously updated behind the scenes.
    • Look up 'inflation' kid. Ask an AI for the numbers between both games.
    • Google reportedly set to lose two key Gemini and DeepMind researchers to Anthropic by Karthik Mudaliar Google is reportedly preparing to lose two more prominent artificial intelligence researchers, with Gemini contributors Jonas Adler and Alexander Pritzel planning to join rival AI developer Anthropic. According to a report from Bloomberg, both researchers are viewed internally as important contributors to Google’s flagship Gemini model family. Adler worked on Google’s AI coding efforts, while Pritzel was involved in the process used to train AI systems. Neither company has publicly confirmed the moves. The report also does not say when the researchers will formally leave Google or what positions they will hold at Anthropic. Training a large AI model requires decisions covering its architecture, data preparation, distributed computing infrastructure, and post-training methods that shape how the finished system behaves. Researchers with experience operating at the scale of Gemini are consequently difficult to replace quickly. Both Adler and Pritzel have previously contributed to Google DeepMind’s scientific research as well. They are listed among the authors of the company’s work on expanding AlphaFold protein-structure predictions across entire proteomes, alongside AlphaFold researchers including John Jumper. The reported departures arrive shortly after another important change within Google’s Gemini organization. Gemini co-lead Noam Shazeer is leaving Google for OpenAI, after returning to the search company in 2024 through its deal with Character.AI. Shazeer is particularly well known as one of the authors of the Transformer paper, whose architecture became the foundation for most modern large language models. Anthropic, meanwhile, has been recruiting recognizable figures from other leading laboratories. OpenAI co-founder and former Tesla AI director Andrej Karpathy joined Anthropic’s pre-training team in May. His move, followed by the reported recruitment of several Google researchers, suggests Anthropic is strengthening the research teams responsible for the core capabilities of future Claude models rather than concentrating solely on product and enterprise sales. The competition is complicated by the companies’ extensive commercial relationships. Anthropic competes directly with Google’s Gemini models, but it also relies on Google as an infrastructure partner. In April, Anthropic announced an expanded agreement with Google and Broadcom covering multiple gigawatts of next-generation Tensor Processing Unit capacity. TPUs are Google-designed accelerators used to train and run large AI models. via Bloomberg
    • This article makes my head hurt. Lots of confusing words
    • Google adds built-in computer control to Gemini 3.5 flash by Karthik Mudaliar Google has added Computer Use as a built-in tool in Gemini 3.5 Flash, giving developers a single model that can reason about a task and operate graphical interfaces across browsers, mobile devices, and desktop environments. The feature is available through the Gemini API and Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform, although it remains a preview feature for now. Computer Use enables an AI agent to examine screenshots and return actions such as mouse clicks, scrolling, and keyboard input. A developer’s application must execute those actions, capture the resulting screen, and send it back to Gemini, creating a continuous loop until the task is completed. Google says the integration can be used for activities including repetitive form filling, application testing, research across multiple websites, and longer enterprise workflows. Gemini 3.5 Flash can work with browser, mobile, and desktop environments, whereas Google’s earlier standalone Computer Use model was primarily positioned around browser interaction. The main change is consolidation. Computer control was previously offered through the separate Gemini 2.5 Computer Use preview model. As Neowin reported when that model was introduced, it was designed to interpret a visual interface and generate actions without requiring a website-specific API. Google later brought Computer Use to preview versions of Gemini 3 Pro and Gemini 3 Flash in January 2026. The latest release now incorporates the tool into the stable Gemini 3.5 Flash model rather than requiring developers to select a specialized model solely for interface automation. Gemini 3.5 Flash itself was announced in May as Google’s latest fast model for coding and multi-step agent workflows. It supports a one-million-token input context window and up to 65,000 output tokens, along with adjustable thinking levels that let developers trade additional reasoning for lower latency and cost. Google also added that Gemini 3.5 Flash received targeted adversarial training for computer-use scenarios. The company is also offering safeguards that can require user confirmation before sensitive or irreversible actions and automatically stop a workflow when suspected prompt injection is detected. Its developer documentation describes configurable protections for areas such as financial transactions and changes to sensitive records. Google isn't the first to bring Computer Use to its platform. Anthropic has made computer control available through Claude, while OpenAI has continued improving computer-use performance in its recent models. Microsoft has also applied the concept to business workflows, including a Computer Use capability for the Researcher agent in Microsoft 365 Copilot.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      463
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!