The 2005 Baseball Thread


Recommended Posts

i thought we'd gone over this already....cubs own the blew-crew ;)

we really are playing you guys a lot lately...

586135795[/snapback]

Not today.  Ben Sheets is pitching against Wood.

586138516[/snapback]

I find this back and forth banter quite amusing. Thanks for spicing up the baseball thread guys :laugh:

For Cameron?! Are they insane?! The last thing we need is to get rid of a good bat in our lineup.

586139989[/snapback]

to be honest, i dont understand why they didnt go after beltran. i mean yeah great u get randy johnson but what has that done for you and does for you for the future?? at least beltran would be your long term solution at center. to be honest a better cf to give up a bat i think would be a wash if u compare the two.

For Cameron?! Are they insane?! The last thing we need is to get rid of a good bat in our lineup.

586139989[/snapback]

Cameron's doing decently well and it would solve the centerfield problem. But I jsut don't get it, nor like it. We all know Sheffield can be tempermental if he doesn't get his way and obviously, for some reason, he doesn't want to join the Mets. He himself said:

"If I have to go somewhere else, a lot of things are going to have to be changed or you're going to have an unhappy player," Sheffield told MLB.com.

"I'll ask for everything. Period. You want to inconvenience me, I'm going to inconvenience every situation there is," he added. "The only reason I'm playing is that I wanted to play for the Yankees. If I don't get that opportunity, things change."

"I would never sit out," Sheffield told MLB.com. "I'd go play, but that doesn't mean I'll be happy playing. If I'm not happy, you don't want me on your team. It's that simple. I'll make that known to anybody."

Source

The Yanks can keep him :p The thought of a Floyd, Beltran, Sheffield outfield looks awesome on paper but the attitude doesn't make me so eager for it.

So, I say good riddance to him. If the Mets are going to trade Cameron they should try to actually fill a need. Maybe get some bullpen help (Graves is a waste of a roster spot), a possible bigger bat at first? I don't seen the sense in an essential trade of players at the same position for the Mets. Save the $4 million or so in salary difference. Go after a REAL need.

http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/recap?gameId=250629127 Craig Biggio is now the all-time leader in HBPs with 268. May seem kind of silly but they said on PTI today that he scored a run 1 out of every 3 times he reached first by those means. Hey if it helps the team good for him.
Cameron's doing decently well and it would solve the centerfield problem. But I jsut don't get it, nor like it. We all know Sheffield can be tempermental if he doesn't get his way and obviously, for some reason, he doesn't want to join the Mets. He himself said:

The Yanks can keep him :p The thought of a Floyd, Beltran, Sheffield outfield looks awesome on paper but the attitude doesn't make me so eager for it.

So, I say good riddance to him. If the Mets are going to trade Cameron they should try to actually fill a need. Maybe get some bullpen help (Graves is a waste of a roster spot), a possible bigger bat at first? I don't seen the sense in an essential trade of players at the same position for the Mets. Save the $4 million or so in salary difference. Go after a REAL need.

586140362[/snapback]

i was just gonna post that....

Sheffield is great. He needs to stay.. The only person who the yankees need to get rid of is Cashman... Buck Showalter and Bob Watson were the ones who put together the 96-01 Yankees... not Cashman and Torre... Torre is a great manager, but Cashman just keeps ****ing **** up... Getting rid of people when they shouldn't....

NY :heart: Sheffield.

Just like

NY :heart: Tino.

i was just gonna post that....

Sheffield is great.  He needs to stay.. The only person who the yankees need to get rid of is Cashman... Buck Showalter and Bob Watson were the ones who put together the 96-01 Yankees

586141352[/snapback]

Interesting point that needs to be made more often. Not knocking Torre but I don't think Cashman has done that well.

Interesting point that needs to be made more often. Not knocking Torre but I don't think Cashman has done that well.

586141362[/snapback]

Same here.... To be perfectly honest I really never thought of it until my father mentioned it to me last night at dinner when we were talking about the whole ordeal. But you have to be quite naieve to think that Torre and Cashman were responsible for those teams. While they were there... they weren't the ones who got Jeter, or Bernie, or Tino, or Brosius, or anyone else who was on those teams. While Torre managed the team, Cashman just looked on and took credit for Watson's work. Now as Watson's team is slowly starting to fall apart one by one, he's trying to fix it and is just screwing things up.

On another note, last night while the Yankee game was in Rain Delay, me and my father were watching Yankeeography's on Mantle, Ruth, and Maris. It is absolutely amazing how much talent each of them had. If I had half the talent either of them had, I would be the best player in baseball. I mean for Christ's sake, Mantle drank and partied after every game, and he played most of his later career injured. Casey Stengal always said that if Mantle took care of himself, he would have been even better than he was. Mantle admitted it himself later on in life too. Same with Ruth... he always partied it up, smoke, drank, and always had to have a hot dog at the 3rd and 7th inning of every game. Not to mention back then the fields were huge. Yankee Stadium's right field was 344ft. Center was in the BLACK (of what's there today). I've been watching Yankee games for a long time and I've only seen a few people hit a ball into the black.

Anyways, sorry to ramble... It just ****es me off that people don't respect the power and talent of the players back then. And to try to compare Bonds, McGuire, and Sosa to Ruth, Mantle and Maris... is just.... it's stupid. They can not be compared. They were saying that if Ruth played the 160+ games they play now, he'd most likely have hit around 100 home runs in a season. There is no player playing today who is comparable to any of the old players.

Looks like the firesale is about to begin. http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=2097637

The Yanks are looking to dump Quantrill and Stanton. Judging by their stats so far this year that's a good idea. Of course, I don't see why anyone else would want them. But, Stanton's a lefty reliever and it seems like there's always at least one team in need who will take a lefty no matter how bad their stats have been recently. I see them simply getting released more likely.

Nemo, I've been saying it all year long that Cashman has to go. He builds these teams like one would build a fantasy baseball team. He aquires people who had huge numbers the year before and overpays them. There's no team, nevermind team chemistry. He definitely has to go.

Watching the Yankee game now, I've come to appreciate Giambi a little more than I have in the past months. He is one of the only Yankee hitters who is still patient at the plate, a staple of those late 90's teams. Tino is the same way and definitely Jeter. The rest of the team swings way too often and too early into the count.

red sox bullpen sucks!!! they cant even get the ball over the friggen plate!!! they walked the bases loaded TWICE tonight.  :no:  bullpen help is way more important than starting pitching right now for them.

586151059[/snapback]

i think our bullpen definitely needs work.

my personal assessment:

timlin: good era on paper, but he always seems to give up a hit or two before he can settle down and get people out. i don't see many 1-2-3 innings from him

embree: never was confident in him. too inconsistent.

mantei: always thought he had great stuff, but his control is in the ****.

halama: meh, didnt expect much from him from the start, but he does impress me once in a while

myers: lefty specialist only...he gave up that grand slam (yesterday?) but he was facing a righty i believe. been good against what he's supposed to do overall i think.

foulke: this is driving me crazy. no idea what the problem is here, first it's mechanics, then shoulder trouble, all rumors since foulke denies everything. too frustrating to talk about. :(

conclusion: lets do something about this theo :p

I can't believe the Padres took Quantrill off the Yanks' hands for two decent young arms.

586154637[/snapback]

Decent is an overstatement. They both have era's over 5 with one of them having a 9.01 or something like it. Young, yes. Their quality is undetermined. I guess it's a freebie, though, since quantrill was gone either way.

Watching the Yankee game now, I've come to appreciate Giambi a little more than I have in the past months. He is one of the only Yankee hitters who is still patient at the plate, a staple of those late 90's teams. Tino is the same way and definitely Jeter. The rest of the team swings way too often and too early into the count.

586150320[/snapback]

yup... Giambi needs to be a DH... and Tino needs to play first base... end of story loll.

yup... Giambi needs to be a DH... and Tino needs to play first base... end of story loll.

586155957[/snapback]

The problem is, yesterday showed why we still need Bernie. He needs to be out of center field, but we need his bat. That ONLY leaves the DH spot.

Appealing the 2 game suspsension he received from when he got thrown out of the game for arguing an out at first call.

586157490[/snapback]

I heard this morning on the radio (at like 6:00 in the morning) that he was actually suspended because of the comments he made about dogging it and causing problems if he was traded to a team he didn't want to play for.

And today was the first time this season the Yanks won a game in which they scored less than three runs. Took pretty much half the season but eh better late than never, right?

I heard this morning on the radio (at like 6:00 in the morning) that he was actually suspended because of the comments he made about dogging it and causing problems if he was traded to a team he didn't want to play for.

And today was the first time this season the Yanks won a game in which they scored less than three runs. Took pretty much half the season but eh better late than never, right?

586158465[/snapback]

ESPN and YES both reported his suspension as being a result of screaming at the ump and pointing his finger in the ump's face. Kline was ****ed because his outburst was similar and he got 4 days.

Anyone hear about Brett Boone? Was released. I honestly think a team like Tampa should pick him up and use his veteran knwoledge to help their team along, even if he won't be much a presence at the plate.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Cuktech 10 Ultra charger review: big display, four ports, 110W total power by Taras Buria Cuktech recently announced a couple of Ultra-branded chargers, including a desktop 300W charger, which I reviewed a few weeks ago. For those who do need that much (or who do not want to spend that much on a charger), Cuktech also offers the 10 Ultra, a traditional wall charger with similar features. Four ports, a big display, and up to 110W of power output. After using it for a few weeks, here are my impressions. Disclaimer: Cuktech provided the review unit without any editorial input or pre-approval. Like the 30 Ultra, the 10 Ultra arrived in a box made of nice cardboard with quality print all over it. Inside, besides the charger, you will find a 240W 6A charger, which, this time, is fully braided. While Cuktech always bundles high-power cables with its chargers and power banks, they are usually regular and unassuming. This time, the cable is much nicer, matching the charger's $59.99 price tag. The charger itself measures 67 x 76 x 33 mm or 2.6 x 3.0 x 1.3 inches and weighs about 250 grams. Considering the charger has four ports and a big display, I would say the compact size is quite impressive, albeit a little hefty. The overall design is similar to other chargers from the manufacturer, minus the chrome Cuktech logo next to the four ports. The Cuktech 10 Ultra has retractable prongs for better portability. Its front side is covered with piano black plastic housing two elements: a capacitive button with backlight and a quite large display for various charging stats. Ports are downward-facing, and I have mixed feelings about such a design. It is not the most convenient when you frequently connect and disconnect cables. It makes you bend over to find the right port to connect, and it is a no-go with outlets mounted closer to the floor. On the bright side, design like this eliminates clutter and sagging, especially when using four cables at once. Plus, you get plenty of space for a big display. Ports include two high-speed USB Type-C ports, one Type-C for less demanding devices, and one classic USB Type-A. The first two ports deliver full 100W, while the third is capped at 45W. As for the Type-A port, its maximum output is 18W. In total, the charger delivers 110W of power, but in my testing, I managed to squeeze 117W when charging two power banks and a tablet. Quite impressive. Type-C1 Type-C2 Type-C3 Type-A Single-port 100W 100W 45W 18W Two ports 80W 20W - - Three ports 65W 20W 20W - Four ports 65W 20W 10W 10W The charger can detect handshake protocols and balance power across all four ports according to each device's needs. As such, power is not limited to the values in the table above. You can have two ports charging at 55W, three ports at 45W + 20W, and more. For some reason, Cuktech is not listing the supported protocols, but a quick test showed that it is compatible with PD3.0, PPS, QC5, DCP, and UFCS. When you connect a compatible device, the charger automatically detects its charging standard and displays it on the screen, for example, Apple 6A or Samsung 3A. Speaking of the screen. The main highlight of the 10 Ultra is its 1.57-inch display with a maximum brightness of 700 nits and 160-degree viewing angles. The display takes up most of the front, and it shows various charging-related information, including total output power, current temperature, power distribution across ports with watts, volts, and amps, a screensaver, and more. You can toggle between the different views by tapping the button, and holding it changes the screen orientation (portrait or horizontal, plus flipped) according to your socket position. The screen is very nice. It is sharp, vivid, and the fonts are easy to read. As for settings, you can change the following: Keep the screen on or off Lock the screen orientation (hold the button to change the screen orientation) Keep the USB Type-A port on Toggle power modes The charger has three power modes: AI: standard mode that automatically allocates power to each connected device. Power Priority: prioritizes power for high-demand devices, such as laptops or power banks. Balanced: splits power evenly across connected devices according to their needs I was skeptical at first, but after testing a few devices in different modes, I can see the benefit of these three modes. The most useful is power priority, which gives the first Type-C port more power. When I was charging a 100W power bank (port 1) alongside a 140W power bank (port 2), Power Priority split the total output about 75-30. Balanced mode, as the name suggests, splits the total output between the two ports more or less equally. As for AI mode, the charger uses its brain to detect which device needs more power. In my testing, it figured out that the 140W power needs a bit more juice. As I said, I expected this to be more of a gimmick, but the three built-in modes turned out quite useful. For example, you can prioritize your laptop while giving other ports a little less power, but still enough to charge at acceptable speeds. Unfortunately, unlike the 30 Ultra, this charger cannot display the battery level of the device being charged. This small feature turned out to be very useful when I was testing the 30 Ultra, as it allowed me to see my phone's battery level without picking it up. Like other Cuktech chargers I tested, the 10 Ultra one proved itself reliable and well-made. It uses Gallium nitride semiconductor technology to reduce the charger's size and improve efficiency. It is also better at dissipating heat, but I have to say that when charging two power banks at 117W total, the charger got hotter than what I would call comfortable (hold it for a few seconds, and you start feeling a burning sensation at your fingertips). However, the built-in thermal indicator remained below the temperature threshold, with the screen reassuring that the device operated at "High performance" (I tested it in a 21 °C / 69 °F room). Overall, the Cuktech 10 Ultra is a solid choice. If you need four ports and you like to nerd out on various stats, it is a very easy recommendation. It will take care of your laptop, phone, tablet, and power bank without breaking a sweat, plus the build, material, and cable quality are top-notch. The mode switcher is handy when charging different devices with different power needs, too. I cannot say a display is a must-have in a charger, especially when it makes you more conscious about where to plug it, but it is a neat addition if you have a socket at your table or bed level, so that you can actually use the display and its features. The more important fact is that despite its size and quality, the display does not make the charger that much more expensive than similarly powerful chargers from competitors. Plus, you can save 10% on the 10 Ultra with a promo code on Amazon. Buy Cuktech 10 Ultra charger - $53.99 on Amazon with a promo code As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Last week I was investigating an issue with contacts and tried using the new Outlook. In the real (Classic) Outlook, you can easily go to any Outlook folder and present it in a Table View, then customize the columns to show/sort any field, which was exactly what I needed. But of course, the new Outlook doesn't have this feature at all. I gave up. Oh, and can we possibly stop claiming the new Outlook has PST support? What it really has is the ability to use the real Outlook in the background to pretend to have PST support. There is no PST support without the real Outlook installed.
    • Honestly just before Panos left it started to feel like MS just wasnt interested in them so they were being less innovative with them, and then when he DID leave for Amazon its kind of clear the direction is gone. It felt like Panos had both goals and drive, and a vision, but it felt like no matter what his title/department was the Surface devices never had the full interest of the rest of management and he was just pushing a bolder up a hill that MS was adding dirt to as he went.
    • A roguelike and a 4X strategy game are free to claim on the Epic Games Store by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe The final leg of the Epic Games Store's mystery giveaways promotion just landed, and it brought along two more games to keep. Last week's Lonestar and Calico giveaways have now been replaced with copies of Rogue Waters and Songs of Conquest to claim for PC gamers. As always, the game is yours to add permanently to your Epic Games Store library within the next seven days. Diving into the games, Songs of Conquest is developed by Lavapotion. This is a turn-based 4X strategy experience that has players making tough decisions and participating in tactical combat while also managing their kingdom. "Songs of Conquest is a turn-based strategy game inspired by 90s classics. Lead powerful magicians called Wielders and venture to lands unknown," explains the developer. "Wage battles against armies that dare oppose you, hunt for powerful artifacts and expand your territory. The world is ripe for the taking – seize it." Meanwhile, Rogue Waters comes from developer Ice Code Games. This rogue-lite experience has you taking the role of Captain Cutter as he commands his ship and crew through procedurally generated encounters. You'll be recruiting and training crew, use sea creatures, and battle with other ships and pirates. "Set sail as Captain Cutter, a pirate caught in a deadly struggle for power and vengeance," adds the developer. "Navigate dangerous waters, unleash mythical sea creatures, and outwit enemies as you chase legendary treasure and confront dark secrets." The newly available Rogue Waters and Songs of Conquest giveaways on the Epic Games Store are set to run until June 11, giving PC gamers seven days to claim the latest offer. Once this closes out, a new freebie will take its place on the same day, which is slated to be Warhammer 40K Speed Freeks. Don't forget that mobile gamers can check out the Epic Game Store's weekly giveaways on Android and iOS to grab a freebie there as well.
    • Still using Classic Outlook? Microsoft highlights 15 reasons to switch to New Outlook by Usama Jawad As many of you may know, Microsoft has been trying to get customers to ditch Classic Outlook in favor of New Outlook for quite some time now. To that end, it has added numerous capabilities to the latter, including PST features, and it is working on several more, such as a unified inbox. However, customer response has been a bit lukewarm so far, with many considering the New Outlook to be "hot garbage". Now, Microsoft has highlighted 15 features that users can leverage in New Outlook in yet another attempt to get customers to migrate. Although not all of the 15 capabilities are exclusive to New Outlook, in fact, most of them are available in Classic Outlook as well. But Microsoft hopes that this combination of familiar and fresh features will be able to attract existing users as well as new ones. For ease of readability, we have summarized the 15 features below: Pin an email: This makes it easier to track important emails Snooze an email: You can temporarily snooze an email thread for a specific time frame until it becomes relevant again. This can be very useful in scenarios where you don't feel like actively following a thread or simply want to follow up on a later date Add multiple categories at the same time: You can assign multiple categories to an email through a single, simplified interface Sweep: As the name implies, you can define automated move processes on your inbox to declutter it, rather than cleaning it up manually Schedule send: Does exactly what it says on the tin, and can be useful when accommodating recipients in different timezones Simplified folder sharing: The sharing process has been simplified so permissions are automatically applied on parent folders Follow a meeting: This is an RSVP option that lets people know that you won't be able to join the meeting but would still like to access a recap Save calendar views: You can save different views for the calendar based on different workflows Improved meeting tracking: Organizers have more controls in viewing meeting responses, such as the ability to sort and download them. Typically useful when there is a large audience Meeting recap: The Outlook Calendar surfaces a meeting recap with recordings, transcripts, and shared files Filtered views: Allows you to declutter your Calendar so that it's easier to scan and schedule Change a recurring event: Users can modify future events of a series of meetings while preserving the configuration of previous ones Rename your email account: This labeling makes it easier to identify multiple accounts in Outlook Modern themes: Exactly what the name says, plus Dark Mode Keyboard shortcuts: This facilitates flexible user behavior as customers can choose between Outlook for Windows shortcuts, Outlook for the web, or turn them off completely There you have it. It's a decent list, but it remains to be seen if it will move the needle in a meaningful way for users who are attached to Classic Outlook. Again, a lot of the aforementioned features are already available in Outlook Classic, but for some, native functionality is not present, and people typically resort to workarounds. Microsoft will be hoping that it's primarily those capabilities that get people to finally switch.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      mobandz earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Apprentice
      fernan99 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      478
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      247
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!