Official WWDC 2005 Keynote Discussion


Recommended Posts

haha...Apple sold out?.....if you would stick that onto Apple, than you should have sticked that on since when Apple got together with IBM...

read your history books, watch a movie and you'd understand IBM was the company that squeezed Apple off the market in the beginning with the introduction of "industry-standered" PCs....don't even start that man..it won't work

Xcode Tools 2.1 is available for download.

@divertom - I paid a good price for my powerbook, and i'm not the least bit fazed by Apple moving to Intel. I still think Apple will have better quality in their hardware than do other PC manufacturers. I didn't buy my powerbook because of what processor it has. I bought it for the features(wireless, firewire, etc) and that it was comparable to any Intel-based laptop, but it had OS X. The OS was the differentiator for me, not the processor.

@hanxu - The processor will more than likely be the same as everyother Intel processor. Intel would have to make a new fab for a new pinout, and that would lower volume, which is one piece of why Apple is going to Intel.

hehe....I don't think any of us say this one coming...

Change is good...but this....this is....different...

586025355[/snapback]

Think Different :D

I always thought Apple's "think different" saying was silly when everyone on that platform was using the same hardware, same look, same everything. Where in the PC world people were building their own rigs independently and customizing them with thousands of different types of hardware. In my mind that was less uniform and more along the lines of thinking differently. Being independent.

I think this is great. So long as you can run OSX on non Apple machines like the AMD I have sitting in front of me. If that's the case Apple is going to make a killing. I've got friends who dislike macs (only because they think they're pretentious) but they'd even drop $100 on OSX if they didn't have to buy new hardware. I would in a heartbeat.

Hopefully Apple is smart and doesn't lock the OS to only their x86 hardware. If they go head to head with Windows we all win, including people who only use windows cause it wil just get better to compete.

I guess (my own guess) apple's pentium 4 will have different pin than normal intel pentiums. and the pentium was given to developer will be those specilised cpus

586025917[/snapback]

Possible, but I doubt it. The whole idea for them is to have economy of scale, hence cheaper price. Having a custom job defeats this.

Anyways, if this was the protection to prevent OSx from running on a normal PC, god help them. There are convertors now that allow Pent M to be installed on the older intel desktop mobo's. I'm pretty sure the same would happen with this chip if your guess were true.

@hanxu - The processor will more than likely be the same as everyother Intel processor. Intel would have to make a new fab for a new pinout, and that would lower volume, which is one piece of why Apple is going to Intel.

586025994[/snapback]

Yes, then ppl can just open up the powermac box and upgrade cpu themselves....

One good thing about this from a Neowinian "Point of View" is that we wont have threads like "How does Apple MHz compare with Intel MHz" anymore :D

586026038[/snapback]

lol yea good for the new switchers :huh:

now we need (ppc users) some sort of comparing :ninja:

i am crying on the inside right now... i know this means that apple will most likely get bigger but thats the thing. i liked being part of a small community. it was like fighting the man, lol. but oh well as long as they dont short us using ppc macs in support and such then im okay.

Yeah, Intel Macs will probably use OpenFirmware... (snip.)

586025866[/snapback]

Um, no. There's no OpenFirmware in the intel macs. My guess is that they're make something new for the new macs (not the regular BIOS)

Source. Universal Binary Programming Guidelines, page 47

Macintosh computers using Intel microprocessors do not use Open Firmware. Although many parts of the IO registry are present and work as expected, information that is provided by Open Firmware on a Macintosh using a PowerPC microprocessor (such as a complete device tree) is not available in the IO registry on a Macintosh using an Intel microprocessor. You can obtain some of the information from IODeviceTree by using the sysctlbyname or sysctl commands.
WHAT?!?!?? People don't care what's inside.? Once you boot it up, you won't even know what processor is running.? It's still a Macintosh

Who buys a Mac for the hardware anyway?

586025836[/snapback]

Two and a half years ago I bought an iBook for OS X, but now I am going to be buying an iMac because of how good the hardware is. I dont know if you work around PCs, but they are so cheap and ugly these days I cant stand it.

I could do everything I want on linux and a cheap PC, but I prefer macs for their quality hardware and software integration.

Two and a half years ago I bought an iBook for OS X, but now I am going to be buying an iMac because of how good the hardware is. I dont know if you work around PCs, but they are so cheap and ugly these days I cant stand it.

I could do everything I want on linux and a cheap PC, but I prefer macs for their quality hardware and software integration.

586026196[/snapback]

Their hardware is mostly the same under the hood save the processor,and with that about to change, you cant really say that anymore.

Since when was cheap a bad thing?

Two and a half years ago I bought an iBook for OS X, but now I am going to be buying an iMac because of how good the hardware is. I dont know if you work around PCs, but they are so cheap and ugly these days I cant stand it.

I could do everything I want on linux and a cheap PC, but I prefer macs for their quality hardware and software integration.

586026196[/snapback]

i would say it depends how much you spend on a pc, hardware quality wize, and i would also say that you could buy a better quality pc for the same price that you could buy a dual g5 or what ever. IMhumbleO

I could do everything I want on linux and a cheap PC, but I prefer macs for their quality hardware and software integration.

586026196[/snapback]

What's saying that'll change now?

They'll just provide custom Intel-based solutions now instead, of course with good integration. That'll stay as long as Apple distribute both the hardware and software.

You rebel.  :rolleyes:

586026166[/snapback]

hehe, i know i know, the thing i worry about the most is getting a new powerbook in the future and having a damn intel sticker on it. then apple has lost its appeal to me, its just llike the others out there. but as someone said, if they continue to control the hardware, then hopfully it will be a custom processor and nothing u can replace and such. i will say though, it will be nice to play games on a mac now (if its going to be possible or easier with the arch. switch)

hehe, i know i know, the thing i worry about the most is getting a new powerbook in the future and having a damn intel sticker on it.  then apple has lost its appeal to me, its just llike the others out there.  but as someone said, if they continue to control the hardware, then hopfully it will be a custom processor and nothing u can replace and such.  i will say though, it will be nice to play games on a mac now (if its going to be possible or easier with the arch. switch)

586026250[/snapback]

There wont be an "Intel Inside" sticker on Intel based Macs. ;)

Two and a half years ago I bought an iBook for OS X, but now I am going to be buying an iMac because of how good the hardware is. I dont know if you work around PCs, but they are so cheap and ugly these days I cant stand it.

I could do everything I want on linux and a cheap PC, but I prefer macs for their quality hardware and software integration.

586026196[/snapback]

umm aside from their powerpc processors and shiny outter casing everything in a mac you could get in the PC world. infact i personally feel that aside from the G5 processors those same components you can get in the PC world, are lower end components. the only reason (i feel) that OSX runs so smooth on this lower powered hardware is because of both optimization of mac software to work on these components and the fact that there are very few things u can customize inside a mac and thus most of the different 'packages' are the same under the hood.

well the people spending close to $2000 on a powemac or powerbook certianly are considering more then just the os.  :laugh: honestly unless your rich your not going to consider just the os and not care abouyt the hardware. also it is NOT a mac. its a pc with a mac case mac has officialy died today. half of the mac fandom was about being different which from this point on is never going to be.

Its really just a "ibm-compatable" (as the term goes) pc with a apple computer co. case, and an apple os, with the inability to run normal x86 dos-pc software.

also to the guy who said theres a lot of mac fans talking about trashing their ibooks i would be p**ed too if i owned a mac now your support is slowly going to go down the toilet as apple concentrates on the newer machines.

586025908[/snapback]

First, Macintosh is a brand, not an idea. If it's a computer and Apple sells it...it's a Macintosh.

And yes...they buy 2000 dollars worth of hardware for the OS. There's a reason they don't spend that on a Dell. They have essentially the same parts. it's certainly not for the performance. We've known for some time that a highend Mac cannot keep up with a highend Dell/HP. Your looking way too much into this

Two and a half years ago I bought an iBook for OS X, but now I am going to be buying an iMac because of how good the hardware is. I dont know if you work around PCs, but they are so cheap and ugly these days I cant stand it.

I could do everything I want on linux and a cheap PC, but I prefer macs for their quality hardware and software integration.

586026196[/snapback]

So you bought the iMac for the appearance...not the parts inside. Because the hardware is the exact same. Processor, ram, hd, cards

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The sweet release of death has never looked more appealing.
    • Meh, just another dongle-haven downgrade compared to my Surface Pro 7+. Whenever I decide to upgrade in the next decade or so, it certainly won't be another microslop Surface with this enshitification trend they've been having after the Surface Pro 7+. Hopefully a future generation of the Framework 12 will be a real upgrade...
    • This could exactly be how our Sun ends but it's not as simple by Sayan Sen Image by Drew Rae via Pexels An international team led by Université de Montréal (University of Montreal) PhD student Érika Le Bourdais has found that the ancient white dwarf star LSPM J0207+3331 is still pulling in planetary debris, even though it has been cooling for about three billion years. White dwarfs are dense, Earth-sized stellar remnants left behind when Sun-like stars exhaust their nuclear fuel and shed their outer layers. The star, located 145 light-years away in the constellation Triangulum, is the oldest and coldest white dwarf known to have a surrounding disk of dust. The star was first spotted in 2019 by a citizen scientist through the Backyard Worlds: Planet 9 project. Its cool temperature immediately suggested that it was very old, since white dwarfs gradually lose heat over time. Using the W. M. Keck telescopes in Hawaii, astronomers later confirmed that the star shows infrared signals consistent with dust rings formed by asteroids breaking apart under its strong gravity. Such infrared excesses occur when a star emits more infrared light than expected, often because warm dust surrounding it absorbs and re-radiates energy. “This discovery challenges our understanding of planetary system evolution,” said Le Bourdais. “The fact that we still see planetary debris being accreted three billion years after the star became a white dwarf suggests that asteroids, comets, and even planets can remain in orbit around these stars for a very long time.” Spectroscopic analysis—a technique that studies light to identify the chemical elements present in an object—revealed thirteen heavy elements in the star’s atmosphere: sodium, magnesium, aluminium, silicon, calcium, titanium, chromium, manganese, iron, cobalt, nickel, copper, and strontium. Normally, heavy elements sink quickly in hydrogen-rich white dwarfs, making them hard to detect. “We expected to see only a few elements, but we found dozens!” explained Le Bourdais. The research paper adds more detail. The absence of carbon features suggests the debris came from a carbon-volatile-depleted source. The abundance pattern shows slight deficits of magnesium and silicon compared to iron but otherwise resembles Earth-like material. This points to a differentiated rocky body—one whose materials have separated into distinct layers such as a metallic core and rocky mantle—with a metallic core fraction higher than Earth’s. In other words, the star is accreting the remains of a large rocky object, similar in structure to Earth or the asteroid Vesta. “White dwarfs offer one of the only ways we can directly measure the composition of exoplanets,” said Patrick Dufour, co-author and professor at Université de Montréal. “When planetary debris come too close, they are torn apart by the star’s gravity and end up polluting its atmosphere, leaving a detailed chemical fingerprint of its composition.” The team also detected weak Ca II H & K line core emission, making this only the second known isolated polluted white dwarf to show this feature. These are specific spectral signatures produced by ionised calcium and can indicate unusual physical activity in a star’s upper atmosphere. The finding suggests that extra physical processes may be happening in or above the star’s upper atmosphere. The study stresses the importance of including heavy elements in model atmosphere calculations, since leaving them out can distort the inferred structure and lead to inaccurate stellar parameters. Earlier work suggested the star’s infrared excess came from two dust rings. The new analysis shows that a single silicate dust disk—a ring composed largely of rock-forming minerals rich in silicon and oxygen—can explain the observed signal at 11.6 μm, simplifying the picture of the system’s structure. The question of how debris ended up falling into the star so late remains open. One idea is that giant planets in the system slowly destabilised smaller bodies over billions of years. Another possibility is that a passing star disturbed the orbits of debris. “Future observations with the James Webb Space Telescope or archival data found in the European Space Agency’s Gaia mission could help distinguish between a planetary rearrangement and the gravitational effect of a close stellar encounter,” said John Debes, co-author and researcher at the Space Telescope Science Institute. Dufour noted that hydrogen-rich white dwarfs are the most common type, and the coolest among them are the oldest stars in the galaxy. “We didn't have the habit of looking for signs of accretion in them. This unique case motivates us to expand our search to more of these stars.” The findings show that even after billions of years, planetary systems can remain active and complex. Substantial accretion events—the gradual accumulation of surrounding material onto a celestial object—can still occur long after a star’s death, offering a rare window into the composition and fate of distant worlds. Source: University of Montreal, IOPScience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Doesn't DDG mainly use Bing?
    • Given the hefty price tag this thing will likely have I doubt many everyday home users will be in the market for one especially given the current climate.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      jefred earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Apprentice
      JoeyNeo went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Week One Done
      oliviaexpo earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      475
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      228
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      65
    4. 4
      monterxz
      56
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      56
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!