• Sign in to Neowin Faster!

    Create an account on Neowin to contribute and support the site.

Sign in to follow this  

{Breaking News}Michael Jackson verdict

Is he Guilty  

404 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

....    0

He was declaired Not Guilty by reason of Money.

Our criminal justice system blows stones. :no: Defense attorneys can lie, cheat, and steal to protect a known guilty defendant. Prosecution, doesn't have that luxury.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
L3thal    2

I'm sure he is innocent :rolleyes:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
shakey    1,127

ya, money has never made any difference in the law....... i mean, you only get like 20 years for drugs, but stealing billions of dollars gets you a 3 month stay at some resort and a judge saying, dont do it agian.

lets all face it, the government is corrupt, and aslong as it is, nothing will ever be fair or true.

sure i dont really know if hes guilty or not, but any man that lets kids sleep in his bed, is messed up in the head somehow, and shouldnt be left alone with them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
nightsulpher var    0

:D Well hopefully by the end of this year we will have heard the last of all this stuff.

By the way does anyone know what the bleep happened to real news?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sean B.    175
He was declaired Not Guilty by reason of Money.

586060245[/snapback]

That is a complete lie and you friggin know it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
invisibro    0
He was declaired Not Guilty by reason of Money.

Our criminal justice system blows stones.  :no:  Defense attorneys can lie, cheat, and steal to protect a known guilty defendant.  Prosecution, doesn't have that luxury.

586060245[/snapback]

My thoughts exactly. :angry:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
mAcOdIn    1

I don't know if the jury saw any evidence we didn't, but in my opinion these cases are very hard to prove, and personally I'm glad they found him "not guilty".

It basically came down to a "he said she said", guess which one was Michael, and I don't think that's really enough to convict someone. I think they should err on the side of caution.

That said I think Michael Jackson is a freak, and any real blame should be placed on the parents for allowing thier children to stay over at a weird guys house who had already once been accused of molestation. I would never put my children in that situation and I think the parents should be tried for negligence.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Budious    0

Reason of money is ironic, he was in debt of 270 Million U.S. $ last I heard...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
sdb815    0
whacko to the kids of world.

"now that i am out, all your peepees are belong to me".

-_-

586060084[/snapback]

Oh gawd that's hilarious. :rofl:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
invisibro    0
Reason of money is ironic, he was in debt of 270 Million U.S. $ last I heard...

586060341[/snapback]

And what, you think those lawyers came free.. :laugh:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Jolo    19

I'm very happy! Justice has been done and the truth has win!

Leave this man in peace!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Budious    0
And what, you think those lawyers came free..  :laugh:

586060353[/snapback]

Actually YES, take a look at CNN when any of these guys are on Larry King, they admit they do it for the publicity and media attention. Do you really think Scott Peterson could have afforded to have Mark Geragos to represent him if the case had not held national media frenzy?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
....    0
That is a complete lie and you friggin know it.

586060313[/snapback]

No, not really, and you are reading into it. I didn't mean he paid off the jurors....I am just saying his star power got him off.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
scaramonga    202
I'm very happy! Justice has been done and the truth has win!

Leave this man in peace!

BULL!! :shifty:

Money talks!............only thing PROVED again in USA........ :rolleyes:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sean B.    175
I don't know if the jury saw any evidence we didn't, but in my opinion these cases are very hard to prove, and personally I'm glad they found him "not guilty".

It basically came down to a "he said she said", guess which one was Michael, and I don't think that's really enough to convict someone.  I think they should err on the side of caution.

That said I think Michael Jackson is a freak, and any real blame should be placed on the parents for allowing thier children to stay over at a weird guys house who had already once been accused of molestation.  I would never put my children in that situation and I think the parents should be tried for negligence.

586060340[/snapback]

100% agreed.

No, not really, and you are reading into it.  I didn't mean he paid off the jurors....I am just saying his star power got him off.

586060370[/snapback]

Have any proof? Prove it. Exactly, you can't.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
method    0
He was declaired Not Guilty by reason of Money.

Our criminal justice system blows stones.  :no:  Defense attorneys can lie, cheat, and steal to protect a known guilty defendant.  Prosecution, doesn't have that luxury.

586060245[/snapback]

No they can't. If they are caught doing any of that they can be brought up on charges. There have been cases of prosecution misconduct. Our justice system is just fine. It is up to the prosecution to prove the guilt of the defendant beyond a reasonable doubt. The jurors have said that the prosecution did not do that. The only thing that Jackson's money brought was better defense lawyers. That doesn't guarantee a victory, see Mike Tyson.

Edited by method

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
enriq760    0

Nice I'm very happy with the veredict that family was full of liars... :no:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Fuze38    0
I am just saying his star power got him off.

586060370[/snapback]

SPOT FLIPPIN ON. Bloody disguisted at the verdict. :no:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
John S.    359
I'm glad you believe in that quote, because its a crock of shi*.

586060130[/snapback]

Please tell me you're not the moron from Knoxville that threatened the court tv reporter.

Forgive him guys, all Tennesseeans aren't blind to the truth.

Back to the topic: He was guilty for the first kid he molested and bought off in 1993 (thesmokinggun.com), and I'm pretty certain he was this time as well. Shame the jury didn't see it that way.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
scaramonga    202
Bloody disguisted at the verdict.

I agree!

But not surprising in the least........... :no:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
invisibro    0
Actually YES, take a look at CNN when any of these guys are on Larry King, they admit they do it for the publicity and media attention. Do you really think Scott Peterson could have afforded to have Mark Geragos to represent him if the case had not held national media frenzy?

586060360[/snapback]

So they can tax the next Joe Scumbag even more... Money talks buddy, Michael Jackson was their investment and you just proved my point.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
agt    1
Exactly. As much as I think Jackson is completely messed up in the head, he is not harmful to anyone. This was just a clear case of people out for money - all the evidence shows that the accusing family have consistently lied, even in court before.

586060034[/snapback]

:yes:

Now for gods sake he should go into psychotherapy, and clear all that **** off his face.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
enriq760    0

Why the hell you accept a settlement if some1 molested your kid???

If he indeed molested that kid back in 1993 he would be in JAIL but they took a settlement...what does that tell you?

\/ :sleep:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
42n81    0

:woot: SELL-EBRITY POWER !!!! :woot:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
vincent    155
100% agreed.

Have any proof? Prove it. Exactly, you can't.

586060377[/snapback]

prove that it DIDN'T get him free?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.