.... Posted June 13, 2005 Share Posted June 13, 2005 He was declaired Not Guilty by reason of Money. Our criminal justice system blows stones. :no: Defense attorneys can lie, cheat, and steal to protect a known guilty defendant. Prosecution, doesn't have that luxury. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
L3thal Veteran Posted June 13, 2005 Veteran Share Posted June 13, 2005 I'm sure he is innocent :rolleyes: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shakey Posted June 13, 2005 Share Posted June 13, 2005 ya, money has never made any difference in the law....... i mean, you only get like 20 years for drugs, but stealing billions of dollars gets you a 3 month stay at some resort and a judge saying, dont do it agian. lets all face it, the government is corrupt, and aslong as it is, nothing will ever be fair or true. sure i dont really know if hes guilty or not, but any man that lets kids sleep in his bed, is messed up in the head somehow, and shouldnt be left alone with them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nightsulpher var Posted June 13, 2005 Share Posted June 13, 2005 :D Well hopefully by the end of this year we will have heard the last of all this stuff. By the way does anyone know what the bleep happened to real news? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sean B. Veteran Posted June 13, 2005 Veteran Share Posted June 13, 2005 He was declaired Not Guilty by reason of Money. 586060245[/snapback] That is a complete lie and you friggin know it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
invisibro Posted June 13, 2005 Share Posted June 13, 2005 He was declaired Not Guilty by reason of Money.Our criminal justice system blows stones. :no: Defense attorneys can lie, cheat, and steal to protect a known guilty defendant. Prosecution, doesn't have that luxury. 586060245[/snapback] My thoughts exactly. :angry: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mAcOdIn Veteran Posted June 13, 2005 Veteran Share Posted June 13, 2005 I don't know if the jury saw any evidence we didn't, but in my opinion these cases are very hard to prove, and personally I'm glad they found him "not guilty". It basically came down to a "he said she said", guess which one was Michael, and I don't think that's really enough to convict someone. I think they should err on the side of caution. That said I think Michael Jackson is a freak, and any real blame should be placed on the parents for allowing thier children to stay over at a weird guys house who had already once been accused of molestation. I would never put my children in that situation and I think the parents should be tried for negligence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Budious Posted June 13, 2005 Share Posted June 13, 2005 Reason of money is ironic, he was in debt of 270 Million U.S. $ last I heard... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sdb815 Posted June 13, 2005 Share Posted June 13, 2005 whacko to the kids of world."now that i am out, all your peepees are belong to me". -_- 586060084[/snapback] Oh gawd that's hilarious. :rofl: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
invisibro Posted June 13, 2005 Share Posted June 13, 2005 Reason of money is ironic, he was in debt of 270 Million U.S. $ last I heard... 586060341[/snapback] And what, you think those lawyers came free.. :laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jolo Posted June 13, 2005 Share Posted June 13, 2005 I'm very happy! Justice has been done and the truth has win! Leave this man in peace! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Budious Posted June 13, 2005 Share Posted June 13, 2005 And what, you think those lawyers came free.. :laugh: 586060353[/snapback] Actually YES, take a look at CNN when any of these guys are on Larry King, they admit they do it for the publicity and media attention. Do you really think Scott Peterson could have afforded to have Mark Geragos to represent him if the case had not held national media frenzy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.... Posted June 13, 2005 Share Posted June 13, 2005 That is a complete lie and you friggin know it. 586060313[/snapback] No, not really, and you are reading into it. I didn't mean he paid off the jurors....I am just saying his star power got him off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scaramonga Posted June 13, 2005 Share Posted June 13, 2005 I'm very happy! Justice has been done and the truth has win!Leave this man in peace! BULL!! :shifty: Money talks!............only thing PROVED again in USA........ :rolleyes: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sean B. Veteran Posted June 13, 2005 Veteran Share Posted June 13, 2005 I don't know if the jury saw any evidence we didn't, but in my opinion these cases are very hard to prove, and personally I'm glad they found him "not guilty".It basically came down to a "he said she said", guess which one was Michael, and I don't think that's really enough to convict someone. I think they should err on the side of caution. That said I think Michael Jackson is a freak, and any real blame should be placed on the parents for allowing thier children to stay over at a weird guys house who had already once been accused of molestation. I would never put my children in that situation and I think the parents should be tried for negligence. 586060340[/snapback] 100% agreed. No, not really, and you are reading into it. I didn't mean he paid off the jurors....I am just saying his star power got him off. 586060370[/snapback] Have any proof? Prove it. Exactly, you can't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
method Posted June 13, 2005 Share Posted June 13, 2005 (edited) He was declaired Not Guilty by reason of Money.Our criminal justice system blows stones. :no: Defense attorneys can lie, cheat, and steal to protect a known guilty defendant. Prosecution, doesn't have that luxury. 586060245[/snapback] No they can't. If they are caught doing any of that they can be brought up on charges. There have been cases of prosecution misconduct. Our justice system is just fine. It is up to the prosecution to prove the guilt of the defendant beyond a reasonable doubt. The jurors have said that the prosecution did not do that. The only thing that Jackson's money brought was better defense lawyers. That doesn't guarantee a victory, see Mike Tyson. Edited June 13, 2005 by method Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
enriq760 Posted June 13, 2005 Share Posted June 13, 2005 Nice I'm very happy with the veredict that family was full of liars... :no: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fuze38 Posted June 13, 2005 Share Posted June 13, 2005 I am just saying his star power got him off. 586060370[/snapback] SPOT FLIPPIN ON. Bloody disguisted at the verdict. :no: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John S. Veteran Posted June 13, 2005 Veteran Share Posted June 13, 2005 I'm glad you believe in that quote, because its a crock of shi*. 586060130[/snapback] Please tell me you're not the moron from Knoxville that threatened the court tv reporter. Forgive him guys, all Tennesseeans aren't blind to the truth. Back to the topic: He was guilty for the first kid he molested and bought off in 1993 (thesmokinggun.com), and I'm pretty certain he was this time as well. Shame the jury didn't see it that way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scaramonga Posted June 13, 2005 Share Posted June 13, 2005 Bloody disguisted at the verdict. I agree! But not surprising in the least........... :no: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
invisibro Posted June 13, 2005 Share Posted June 13, 2005 Actually YES, take a look at CNN when any of these guys are on Larry King, they admit they do it for the publicity and media attention. Do you really think Scott Peterson could have afforded to have Mark Geragos to represent him if the case had not held national media frenzy? 586060360[/snapback] So they can tax the next Joe Scumbag even more... Money talks buddy, Michael Jackson was their investment and you just proved my point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
agt Posted June 13, 2005 Share Posted June 13, 2005 Exactly. As much as I think Jackson is completely messed up in the head, he is not harmful to anyone. This was just a clear case of people out for money - all the evidence shows that the accusing family have consistently lied, even in court before. 586060034[/snapback] :yes: Now for gods sake he should go into psychotherapy, and clear all that **** off his face. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
enriq760 Posted June 13, 2005 Share Posted June 13, 2005 Why the hell you accept a settlement if some1 molested your kid??? If he indeed molested that kid back in 1993 he would be in JAIL but they took a settlement...what does that tell you? \/ :sleep: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
42n81 Posted June 13, 2005 Share Posted June 13, 2005 :woot: SELL-EBRITY POWER !!!! :woot: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vincent Posted June 13, 2005 Share Posted June 13, 2005 100% agreed.Have any proof? Prove it. Exactly, you can't. 586060377[/snapback] prove that it DIDN'T get him free? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts