[OFFICIAL] Xbox Live Latest Demos


Recommended Posts

The Lord of the Rings, The Battle for Middle-earth II demo released. :)

I'm excited! I really wanted to try this one out. :D

Nice...

I do wish it was Single Player though, as I am not really liking the fact I have to play a game online from a genre I hardly ever personally play. Oh well, just going to have to get my ass kicked like I usually do whenever I am on Live. :laugh:

Nice...

I do wish it was Single Player though, as I am not really to jump into playing a game from a genre I hardly ever personally play. Oh well, just going to have to get my ass kicked like I usually do whenever I am on Live. :laugh:

Ahh... thanks for the info DL... I don't want to download it since it's only multiplayer. :cry:

^ Yeah I hate starting playing new games on Live. It does nothing but build frustation as people have to wait for you to learn and when you have mastered it you have to wait for the others to learn, plus this new controller scheme I'm sure is difficult to get used to if you are used to playing RTS with your mouse, not the thing you want to practice while competing. Plus there are far less people who want to play games live than do and that's a fact most people prefere single player on consoles.

Ahh... thanks for the info DL... I don't want to download it since it's only multiplayer. :cry:

No problem man. (Y)

I would say still check it out though.

Even though the more I think about it, the more I am really, really disliking the fact that it is online, I am still going to give it a shot.

^ Yeah I hate starting playing new games on Live. It does nothing but build frustation as people have to wait for you to learn and when you have mastered it you have to wait for the others to learn, plus this new controller scheme I'm sure is difficult to get used to if you are used to playing RTS with your mouse, not the thing you want to practice while competing. Plus there are far less people who want to play games live than do and that's a fact most people prefere single player on consoles.

Exactly how I feel. Very, very well said. :yes:

It has singleplayer everyone... Im playing it now...

Really? Sweet...

Pretty deceiving of them since it is "LOTR, BFME2 Online Demo" for the name of the download...

Then in the description it clearly says "Challenge a friend and play as the Elves or Goblins," so I just assumed it was all online thanks to the name and the description. Sorry for giving out the wrong information everyone. Download away!

Going to check it out at like 11:30, when my GF goes to sleep.

i think ncaa was ok, but i hope that wasn't the finished game. it felt more like the e3 demo to me. the crowd was entirely 2d.

gameplay was pretty good, but either i'm getting too used to 360 games, or the graphics weren't that great to me.

i think ncaa was ok, but i hope that wasn't the finished game. it felt more like the e3 demo to me. the crowd was entirely 2d.

gameplay was pretty good, but either i'm getting too used to 360 games, or the graphics weren't that great to me.

agreed. Madden 06 demo looked much better

i think ncaa was ok, but i hope that wasn't the finished game. it felt more like the e3 demo to me. the crowd was entirely 2d.

gameplay was pretty good, but either i'm getting too used to 360 games, or the graphics weren't that great to me.

Same here. I was utterly unimpressed by the graphics.

Although graphics are never the end all be all to me, I did expect them to look much better than the initial rushed out generation of the EA 360 sports titles. From what I saw, and I cannot believe I am saying this since there is no excuse at all this should be the case, but they actually looked inferior to Madden 06 IMO.

So I would really like to think perhaps the final version will be better looking, but honestly I think what we see is what we will get in the final game considering it comes out next week. Sure, perhaps they dumbed down the graphics to cut down the file size, but the intent of a demo is usually to reel people into buying the full version. Keeping this fact that it is a marketing tool in mind, I would say we are looking at the final product graphically. :no:

In regards to BFME II

I definitely am going to rent the full game now based on this brief experience I have had with the demo.

I am quite impressed by the control scheme from the little bit I have played so far. Overall it seems pretty damn intuitive. Truly much more user friendly than I thought it would be. I tip my hat off to them, as I never thought an RTS would translate well to a console, and they somehow have seemed to pull it off.

In regards to BFME II

I definitely am going to rent the full game now based on this brief experience I have had with the demo.

I am quite impressed by the control scheme from the little bit I have played so far. Overall it seems pretty damn intuitive. Truly much more user friendly than I thought it would be. I tip my hat off to them, as I never thought an RTS would translate well to a console, and they somehow have seemed to pull it off.

Agreed. I truly enjoyed BFME II, an absolute joy to play, and a fantastic XBL game. Unlike DL however, I won't rent this title, I'll end up purchasing it... I liked it that much.

Everyone (everyone who enjoys RTS games anyway) should check out this demo. (Y)

f00k me, BFME II is awesome on console, I hated it, as with all other RTS on the PC, but this is so easy to play and so intuitive. Those that know me will know I am not an advocate of console conversions, but this far surpasses the PC version. Kudos (hint at to where I work) to EA for this conversion!!

DAMN!!!

I really have to say BFME II is just so damn fun to play. I will admit I am not really an RTS player whatsoever, I personally prefer to play First Person Shooters more than any other genre, then just Action Adventures games of whatever type.

I have tried getting into the various RTS's over the years on the PC, mainly as a direct result of my boy jerzdawg pushing and pushing the genre itself and the various games he felt were standouts along the years, but I just would lose interest very, very quickly. The RTS I probably gave the longest chance was Rome: Total War, and even after about 5 days I gave up on that game as well, they just never intrigued me like that...

I can pretty much confidently say it was always the control scheme on the PC. Now although a degree in rocket science was far from ever needed, it was without a doubt more involved than what I was used to with FPS's. I think the fact that the control scheme is so damn intuitive and easy to get into on the 360, it has almost everything to do with why I do enjoy playing this game... It introduces a new ease that I finally feel comfortable with.

So, I have bumped BFME II up to #1 on my GameFly queue. I just sent a game back yesterday so, I should get something shipped out to me around Monday, so as long as things work out, I am hoping it is BFME II that gets shipped. I actually might just choose to Keep It Now through GameFly, as I am liking it that much.

Just a lot of fun. Really impressed overall.

I'm hoping to get BFME II from GameFly soon, too. Doesn't sound likely, but for anybody that owns the game is it possible to play online as allies? That's probably one thing I'll miss from the PC RTS games I've come to love. There's always C&C3 for that, though (whenever it gets here).

Honestly, I really never thought that an RTS on a console would be so fluid, intuitive and easy to use as compared to the accustomed PC Mouse/Keyboard set-up, but I must say, EA did a really great job with the control scheme on BFME II, kudos!

I am having a lot of fun playing this game and I'll probably be adding this to my GameFly que as well :D

There is a Saints Row demo... But not on live. :cry:

100_0433.jpg

(You can get the demo if you preorder @ certain ToysRus and Gamestops)

No! Not on the LIVE marketplace but 2 gamers by the screen names of FireStarta316 and hawkmoon_269 from the IGN.com Xbox 360 general board(You have pay to $19.99 a year to view this message board)have pre-release demos of Saints Row.

Firestarta316 posted what comes on the demo

-Saints Row Demo

-Saints Row Trailer

-Making Of Video

-Art Gallery

-Music Tracks

-Downloads (gamer pics and theme)

And Hawkmoon_269 posted his impressions.

?Some other stuff. Played around with driving and it plays really good. Different cars drive differently, the SUV has some more of a tilt because of the size, the sports car was more responive and faster.

Framerate has been pretty smooth at 30fps or so. There is some stuff popping up in the far backround, but nothing too bad. I noticed it more when I was driving the sports car because of the speed of the car versus the SUV/Jeep. Car models are good for this type of game and I am amazed at the detail in the crash physics and the damage model on not only your car, but all the cars in the world. I must of hit the same car about 10 times just to see if dents would appear where I hit them and sure enough they do, with parts flying off as well.

I just noticed as I was running past other cars on foot, that the drives in the other cars actually turn and look at you as you run by, as if they think they are going to get jacked or something.

If your homie gets hurt (I purposely crashed my car so much that it blew up) you can revive him by hitting the ?Y? button several times.

The game world seems massive, of course there are parts cut off for you, but I have been driving around for a while and so far it is very large.

Overall, I am very impressed with the game and I will be back to post more impressions?

Firestarta316 posted that he got his @ ToysRus-(He works there)

Another Poster by the name of PND posted his impressions.

?Quick impressions:

* Physics, wow the physics own. When you hit people, they ****ing fly through anything and everything in front of them. They don?t slow your car down like you just ran into a ball of blubber. The people get hit and man do they fly lol! The ragdoll is fantastic. This is what GTA was missing. That and the crashes/destruction is awesome! When you hit someone head on, they fly right through the windshield!!! Oh man I have wanted that in a game for soo long. (Flatout doesnt count)

* The in game graphics are pretty good, there is some slowdown and chugging though. I just hope this will be fixed for the full version.

* Graphics during the cut scenes are a bit iffy, with slow down and some screen tearing. Hopefully this will be fixed with the full version. Very good voice over work and lip synchronization.

* When you first start running around, the guy looks like he has pooh in his pants as he runs. Sort of wonky, but we?ll probably have to get used to it, same with jumping.

* Very profane. Lots of cursing and gunfire/gang violence right when you start. It?s cool though. It?s like a movie. ?

SOURCE

You can get the demo if you preorder @ certain ToysRus and Gamestops

The best thing about pre orders is you can cancel them when the game finally comes out. :shiftyninja:

I just night have to go "preorder" the game sometime this week. :rofl:

The best thing about pre orders is you can cancel them when the game finally comes out. :shiftyninja:

I just night have to go "preorder" the game sometime this week. :rofl:

Demo comes out on Aug 1st for free if you can wait that long. I have read reports that you have to pay for the demo like $9.99 in return for pre-ordering it but the fact is that some are just selling it for $9.99 without pre-order. I am pretty sure demos are not for re-sale. Apparently they scan the demo disk bar code on the scanner and it rings up $9.99. Should give it for free !!

Demo comes out on Aug 1st for free if you can wait that long. I have read reports that you have to pay for the demo like $9.99 in return for pre-ordering it but the fact is that some are just selling it for $9.99 without pre-order. I am pretty sure demos are not for re-sale. Apparently they scan the demo disk bar code on the scanner and it rings up $9.99. Should give it for free !!

Thanks for the info. I will wait until August 1st. :yes:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 changelog: Added support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. Improved exception handling and automated bug report upload. Fixed several minor bugs and small memory leaks. Build 26 (June 24) Fixed a rare exception when a transfer completed. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 | 14.5 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Briefly used Turbo Pascal (and Turbo C++) in 97 and soon after that I bought PC magazine that included a full version of Delphi 2. I still use Delphi today, some 29 years later.
    • Age of Empires Mobile comes to PC, here's how to carry over progress from your phone by Ivan Jenic Image: YouTube/Microsoft Microsoft just released Age of Empires Mobile for PC. The game, officially called Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, is available for free on Steam and Microsoft Store, almost two years after its initial release for handheld devices. Age of Empires is one of those franchises that entire generations grew up with. The original came out in 1997, and immediately got people hooked to building civilizations and crushing their enemies on the battlefield. However, the franchise today is a far cry from its roots, as Age of Empires Mobile is, well, a game optimized for handheld devices, and not a classic RTS title we’ve all loved for years. And, of course, it includes in-game purchases. The PC version is still a mobile game at its core, but it’s been optimized for desktop play. There’s mouse control, full keyboard compatibility, and a refined UI. Microsoft also refreshed the visuals with some 4k textures, so the game should look better on larger screens. The game supports Crossplay, so you can switch between your phone, tablet, and PC without losing anything. But linked progress doesn’t come out of the box, as you have to enable it first. Here’s how to link your progress: On your mobile device, open Age of Empires Mobile. Go to Settings (Gear icon) > Account. Select Bind Account and choose a sign-in option. Once you enable account binding, sign in on PC using the same method, and your progress will be accessible across all your devices. Xbox Game Pass subscribers also get a bonus reward pack on PC, which includes: 1 Monthly Pass Token 1 Custom Resource Chest 10 Universal 60-Minute Speed-Ups 1,000 Empire Coins Exclusive Player Portrait Frame You can find more info about Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, as well as download links, on the Age of Empires official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      458
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!