Recommended Posts

http://daemons.net/~clay/index.php/2006/03...-on-intel-macs/

Check that out, it's another guy who wwas working on it. He opened up all his work and code after blanka's code was submitted since it's assumed that their solution will win, now people can check out this guy's code to learn a little more about it, and maybe help out other people who want to work with this.

http://daemons.net/~clay/index.php/2006/03...-on-intel-macs/

Check that out, it's another guy who wwas working on it. He opened up all his work and code after blanka's code was submitted since it's assumed that their solution will win, now people can check out this guy's code to learn a little more about it, and maybe help out other people who want to work with this.

interesting

I don't see why he would fake it, but he could have just got a screenshot of the winXP installer and made it fullscreen :/

Yeah, we've gone over this a thousand times if you keep up with the thread. Also, there is a video now. That would be a lot harder to fake. Just get over it people, it's not fake. He's submitted this solution already. If it was fake the owner of the contest wouldn't have said he's given the code to 9 testers to test.

Also, on a side note following up after my last post, blanka says that the code that that guy posted is "strikingly similar" to his. Of course it lacks one of the most important parts, VGA. Hope to see this money given away by the end of the day :D

Still one question tho: Does this actually replace the iMac's default EFI or does it "disappear" and reset to the default the second you unplug the HD?

Kinda missed that.

If I understand your question correctly, this solution is a BIOS emulation layer for EFI. The iMac still runs EFI, that can't be changed without modifying board logic, however once you chose to access a Windows boot option (however that may be, pressing a key most people are saying has been the common method for Macs before, never owned a mac myself), the BIOS emulation layer will run under Windows, basically translating between Windows and the EFI.

The pictures and video looked fake (e.g. bad and crappy) to me, but if he has done it the way the blog post describes it, he has done it. :| :yes:

The video looks like bad crappy quality? :s What do you need, 1080p before it looks good enough for you? I'm afraid you might have missed that that's what nearly ALL videos on the internet look like ;) (Actually better than a lot of them)

Ah okay so basically the BIOS compatibility layer isn't loaded until you give the order to boot Windows?

From what I understand, yes. I don't claim to be an expert though, just following this casually. I don't even have, or have plans to have, a machine to run this on anytime soon. If someone knows more then feel free to add it and/or correct me.

The video looks like bad crappy quality? :s What do you need, 1080p before it looks good enough for you? I'm afraid you might have missed that that's what nearly ALL videos on the internet look like ;) (Actually better than a lot of them)

...

It was mainly the fact was blurry, out of focus, short, cut to hell, jumpy, etc.

And i wish i could watch 1080p video, this system cant even do 720p

From what I understand, yes. I don't claim to be an expert though, just following this casually. I don't even have, or have plans to have, a machine to run this on anytime soon. If someone knows more then feel free to add it and/or correct me.

That's okay, I won't quote you on it. ;)

It was mainly the fact was blurry, out of focus, short, cut to hell, jumpy, etc.

And i wish i could watch 1080p video, this system cant even do 720p

Look, the guy put up a video because people wanted one. It wasn't that blurry and out of focus for a home made video. The majority of it's bluriness is due to using a high compression codec to keep the file size down. That could have easily been nearly 100MB if it was crystal clear. It's also actually quite a nice length documenting all parts of install then bootup. He's not going to make an entire hour long documentary just to hopefully get a few less people to run around crying that it's a fake. It's hardly cut to hell considering it's only cut 3 times, and that's to jump ahead of the boring parts that no one but a few conspiracy theorists want to see. You're asking for too much to get any more than we already did.

Remember, there is a big difference in YOU not being able to tell if it's real, and it being fake. As I said before, the owner of onmac.net has already stated that he has recieved their solution and has given it to testers who are currnetly testing it out. That should put to sleep nearly all question of it being fake. It wouldn't have been given to people to test if there wasn't anything to give to people.

here is a quote from one of the testers.

The solution is confirmed working on the 17in iMac and the MacBook Pro. It needs to be tweaked for the Mac Mini, and the 20in iMac. Once these tweaks are done then it will be released. We want to make sure that there arent 200 messages from angry 20in iMac users who cant get it to work. It will save a lot of time later by verifying it working on all systems now!
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • No news articles about the Arch Linux repo being majorly infected with malware?!?
    • Waymo recalls self-driving software after cars enter closed freeway work zones by Paul Hill Waymo, the self-driving car maker owned by Alphabet – the parent company of Google –, has recalled some of its fifth-generation Automated Driving Systems (ADS). It did so after some of its cars drove through closed construction zones. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), the affected vehicles were capable of driving through a closed freeway construction zone and continuing to drive at speed. The listing on the NHTSA website says that Waymo is currently developing a solution to fix this issue, but in the meantime, freeway driving is being restricted. Waymo will update its ADS software so that vehicles can detect when they can avoid entering construction zones. According to the Safety Recall Report, on April 20, 2026, Waymo’s Field Safety Committee began meetings reviewing an event from April 11, 2026, and five events from April 19, 2026, where Waymo’s autonomous vehicles didn’t recognize and drove past ramp closure signs into the pre-planned freeway construction zones. This took place in Phoenix, Arizona. Separately, on May 18, 2026, seven Waymo vehicles entered freeway lanes with active construction in the San Francisco Bay Area by driving between cones that were placed to show the lane was closed. On the back of both of these events, Waymo restricted freeway driving until it could address the issue. In June, Waymo’s Safety Board reviewed the issue and additional information related to ADS performances around construction zones; then, as a result, it decided to conduct a recall. This development is not good for Waymo as it adds to a growing list of technical hiccups its cars have experienced. Ultimately, it will lead to more scrutiny from lawmakers around the world who will be more cautious about letting autonomous vehicles on their roads without tighter regulation. For readers in areas where Waymo operates, does this news make you more wary about stepping into one of these vehicles?
    • I'm still on Windows 10 22H2 because I didn't want to deal with all the issues in Windows 11, so I waited almost a week before installing the latest Patch Tuesday update (KB5094127), I went ahead and did it, and it was a huge mistake—ever since then, my File Explorer has seen a performance drop of about 30% when transferring large files... Once again, Microsoft has outdone itself! This update cannot be uninstalled, either through the Control Panel (via Settings) or by accessing Advanced Startup Options. The only possible alternative would be to use system restore points, but I’d have to reinstall all app and driver updates (and there’s no guarantee it would work). Or there’s the “nuclear option” of a in-place repair without losing files or apps, but even then, all my customizations would be lost! Microsoft just can’t help but mess everything up! Way to go, Microsoft! But I still don’t want your c****y Windows 11!
    • Microsoft: Windows 11 could finally solve a major issue across AMD, Nvidia, and Intel GPUs by Sayan Sen While Microsoft has been trying to improve it, Windows 11 is definitely not flawless, as even today some issues are taking a year to publicly acknowledge. However, one area of trouble that may finally see much better results soon is graphics driver crashes. Work on graphics driver timeouts, also called Timeout and Detection Recovery (TDR), is not new as the latest WDDM 3.2 also has specific improvements regarding it. Windows Display Driver Model (WDDM) version 3.2 is supported on Windows 11 24H2 and 25H2. However, with the upcoming version 26H2, TDR crash diagnosis could go to the next level as Microsoft is introducing a new DirectX 12 API feature called "DirectX Dump Files". Similar to how system memory dump files work when a system crashes or freezes or encounters any such major issue, DirectX Dump Files (DDF) will essentially record a snapshot of the GPU execution right at the moment a graphics-related crash or hang or freeze occurs, so that developers can better understand and diagnoze these TDR and timeout detection errors. The dump will be available as a .dxdmp file for analysis and it will be a comprehensive dump file generated with detailed insights about the hardware, drivers, Windows, as well as the affected application. This should be another welcome change in this department. Earlier at GDC 2026, when the technology was first debuted, Microsoft had shared more details regarding it. The company had explained how DDF is designed to gather data from every layer of the graphics stack into a single file, eliminating the need for developers to manually correlate logs from multiple tools. As mentioned above, the dump can contain a lot of useful details like GPU hardware state information such as register values, shader program counters, page fault virtual addresses, shader memory data, and command buffers. Alongside that, it also captures DirectX runtime and kernel information, including D3D objects, pipeline state objects, device error data, adapter details, and CPU call stacks. Microsoft says the feature has been built around two primary use cases: retail device removals and local device removals. The former allows developers to collect crash information from end users' systems in the field, while the latter helps QA teams and developers investigate issues on test machines. Developers will also be able to include up to 2 MB of custom application data through new D3D12 APIs, providing additional context for troubleshooting. In addition, Microsoft is introducing three dump collection modes ranging from zero-overhead capture, which has no runtime performance impact on supported hardware, to higher-detail modes that collect more vendor-specific debugging data. On compatible Tier 2 hardware, zero-overhead dumps will be enabled by default, meaning developers may begin receiving useful crash diagnostics without making any code changes. The table below explains the three tiers: Tier Description NO_OVERHEAD Enables crash capture with no runtime cost and is suitable for broad deployment MEDIUM_OVERHEAD Provides a balance, capturing additional diagnostic data with moderate impact HIGH_OVERHEAD Collects the most detailed GPU and driver state available, enabling deeper investigation at the cost of higher runtime overhead In terms of availability, the company expects broader release to be around the fall of 2026, which should be right around the time when Windows 11 version 26H2 lands. Right now, DirectX Dump Files are available as a preview and currently, only AMD has the compatible AgilitySDK Developer Preview driver version 26.10.07.02. You can find the official announcement post here on Microsoft's website.
    • And with SO much better perf than the laggy mess that is Files.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      BizSAR earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Jordan Smith earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      598
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      190
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      79
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      76
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!