Zizou Provoked by Serious Taunt?


Recommended Posts

"After an exhaustive study of the match video, and with the help of an Italian translator", the newspaper reported their man "read" Materazzi calling Zidane "the son of a terrorist ######", before adding, "So just f--- off".

now if you come from a minority group anywhere in the world..and hear something like this..you would do the exact same..if not worst.

source:

http://www.heraldsun.news.com.au/common/st...5E23209,00.html

Yes, somethings just cannot be left unpunished from a certain point of view in the world. Sure lots of people trash talk in a north american system but you have to understand...football is mostly a european sport and it has become a sort of religion. Just like every part of the world reacts differently to different things , Zidane reacted to Materazzi's comments. Sure, us north americans might say it was unclassy but maybe , just maybe it was only thing to do...Give him a taste of his own medicine

If you love soccer/football and if you played it already, you can understand the passion and the emotions that run high when games are on their way. What Zidane did was what any player would have done in most circumstances. Why do you think there are many head butts in soccer that result in suspensions? Why do you think there are elbows to players faces and kicks to injure? Emotions run high when you play at the highest level of all and we sometimes forget that those players are humans just like us and they do mistakes.

football is mostly a european sport and it has become a sort of religion.

Its a worldwide sport. Every continent lives and breathes for this sport except a few countries such as the US.

If you love soccer/football and if you played it already, you can understand the passion and the emotions that run high when games are on their way. What Zidane did was what any player would have done in most circumstances. Why do you think there are many head butts in soccer that result in suspensions? Why do you think there are elbows to players faces and kicks to injure? Emotions run high when you play at the highest level of all and we sometimes forget that those players are humans just like us and they do mistakes.

Its a worldwide sport.

Sorry, but I hardly think headbutting a player in retaliation is the first thing that crosses almost anyone's mind, let alone the majority of soccer/football players.

Yes, emotions run high. But it's still a sport, and smack talk is part of all sports. We can all sit here and wish it wasn't and hope and pray for a perfect world, but that is what it'd be -- a perfect world. Zidane made a stupid move, and there's little justifying it for anything that was said. He let his team down by letting emotions take over.

You're trying to defend him, yet in the end you basically admit what it was -- a mistake. He made a mistake. It's his own fault for letting that happen, no one else's.

You tend to contradict yourself a bit.

Ok, so what Materazzi said was unprofessional but yet, you want Zidane to react to Materazzi's unprofessional comments in a professional manner?

It's not a contradiction at all. Both players should be acting in a professional manner. The fact that Materazzi was being an ass does not give Zidane an excuse to react the way he did. Part of being a professional is dealing with crap like that.

Sorry, but I hardly think headbutting a player in retaliation is the first thing that crosses almost anyone's mind, let alone the majority of soccer/football players.

Yes, emotions run high. But it's still a sport, and smack talk is part of all sports. We can all sit here and wish it wasn't and hope and pray for a perfect world, but that is what it'd be -- a perfect world. Zidane made a stupid move, and there's little justifying it for anything that was said. He let his team down by letting emotions take over.

You're trying to defend him, yet in the end you basically admit what it was -- a mistake. He made a mistake. It's his own fault for letting that happen, no one else's.

Mistake? I don't think he mistakingly head-butted him in the sternum, I definitely would of retaliated in some way or another if that italian player said those things to me.

You're trying to defend him, yet in the end you basically admit what it was -- a mistake. He made a mistake. It's his own fault for letting that happen, no one else's.

I'm not trying to defend anyone. I am just stating that emotions run high and when a scum bag taunts you with racist comments of being a terrorist you will lose your cool and retaliate.

"After an exhaustive study of the match video, and with the help of an Italian translator", the newspaper reported their man "read" Materazzi calling Zidane "the son of a terrorist ######", before adding, "So just f--- off".

now if you come from a minority group anywhere in the world..and hear something like this..you would do the exact same..if not worst.

ur moms sick..and ur playing your heart out..and this scum smiles and says something this horrible to you..would you BE THE BIGGER MAN and walk? PLEASEEEEEEEEEEEEE dont say that...i know its not true...im not even a huge France fan (Iran finished last in their group)...but you know...thats not what football is all about...

source:

http://www.heraldsun.news.com.au/common/st...5E23209,00.html

I would be the bigger man and walk. Again, you are a pro athelete. If you can't take some smack, get out. He very well could have cost his team the World Cup with his selfish act. You have to control your temper out there. Period. And to respond to the guy who said they are all friends out there, I don't care. This is in the heat of competition and everything is on the line. People may be friends off the pitch, but on it they are competitors and will do anything for that extra edge that could insure victory. You have to be above any insults and not let your temper control you. Don't do anything to hurt your team.

Also it doesn't matter what he said and what kind of a minority you are. He was obviously just saying it to get a reaction out of him and he did. He won ther personal battle and he won the match. Zidane=loser. Materazzi=winner.

Well I don't follow the WC at all, so I'm unbiased as to France/Italy, but this was what most of the most watched vids on youtube were yesterday. And while I don't think what he did was right, I think that if anyone that came from his background were called a terrorist (or anything racist), they'd probably want to beat the heck out of that person. In times like these where terrorism is all over the media, calling someone a terrorist, especially with his background just isn't right (not to mention insulting both him and his mom in the same line), and I can easily see how that would fuel his reaction.

I'm not gonna lie though, that was an amazing headbutt. I would definitely not want to be on the recieving end of something like that.

-Spenser

I would be the bigger man and walk. Again, you are a pro athelete. If you can't take some smack, get out. He very well could have cost his team the World Cup with his selfish act. You have to control your temper out there. Period. And to respond to the guy who said they are all friends out there, I don't care. This is in the heat of competition and everything is on the line. People may be friends off the pitch, but on it they are competitors and will do anything for that extra edge that could insure victory. You have to be above any insults and not let your temper control you. Don't do anything to hurt your team.

Its easy to say that even though pro athletes perform otherwise. This is just not Zidane that retaliates in ways he shouldn't. If you go to other sports, there are similar and sometimes worse scenarios. For example, in the NBA, Ron Artest and Stephen Jackson ran into the stands and beat the crap out of fans just because they got hit with beer. In the NHL, Bertuzzi deliberately almost paralyzed one of his opponents as payback for what he did to him earlier. In MLB, there were a few scenarios such as the Dodgers bullpen throwing fists against fans down the right field line a year or so ago and not to mention the punch Barrett gave AJ a few months ago. Do I need more examples?

My point is that when you are an athlete, your thirst of victory takes over your mind and you tend to lose your fuse when something doesn't go your way. I just want to make it clear that this happens in every sport and its not just a Zidane thing. Athletes, even though they should set as example, are humans and they do mistakes just like us. While we fist fight our neighbors because they talked trash about your wife, these players fight in the field over similar circumstances, difference being they are athletes.

Its easy to say that even though pro athletes perform otherwise. This is just not Zidane that retaliates in ways he shouldn't. If you go to other sports, there are similar and sometimes worse scenarios. For example, in the NBA, Ron Artest and Stephen Jackson ran into the stands and beat the crap out of fans just because they got hit with beer. In the NHL, Bertuzzi deliberately almost paralyzed one of his opponents as payback for what he did to him earlier. In MLB, there were a few scenarios such as the Dodgers bullpen throwing fists against fans down the right field line a year or so ago and not to mention the punch Barrett gave AJ a few months ago. Do I need more examples?

My point is that when you are an athlete, your thirst of victory takes over your mind and you tend to lose your fuse when something doesn't go your way. I just want to make it clear that this happens in every sport and its not just a Zidane thing. Athletes, even though they should set as example, are humans and they do mistakes just like us. While we fist fight our neighbors because they talked trash about your wife, these players fight in the field over similar circumstances, difference being they are athletes.

It's not accpetable in any sport, by any athelete, except maybe hockey where fighting is tolerated.

The Bertuzzi incident wasn't for what he did to him earlier. It was in retaliation to a dirty hit on his captain Markus Naslund earlier. And there was no intention to break his neck. He was trying to fight him (again, accepted in hockey, happens almost every game) and the guy ran away, so he punched him in the back of the head and jumped him. His team mates then jumped on Bertuzzi, breaking the guys neck.

But, fighting is not tolerated in Soccer. He should have just taken it and dealt with it later, not humiliated himself like that and put his team in that position. As the teams so called leader in the World Cup match, he should have had more control over himself and not let a little smack talk get that kind of reaction out of him.

I think Materazzi must have said something very bad to provoke Zidane. I think that what he did was that he 'snapped' after keeping in for so long. The italian might have deserved what he got, and Zidane a split second satisfaction, but what he sorta took the game into his own hands, because he was pretty much the best player on the field, and let his teammates down in hope of lifting the trophy. It was like a solitary act that condemned his team to losing, which i think he should have thought twice about before commiting the act.

I think Materazzi must have said something very bad to provoke Zidane. I think that what he did was that he 'snapped' after keeping in for so long. The italian might have deserved what he got, and Zidane a split second satisfaction, but what he sorta took the game into his own hands, because he was pretty much the best player on the field, and let his teammates down in hope of lifting the trophy. It was like a solitary act that condemned his team to losing, which i think he should have thought twice about before commiting the act.

Check the link posted earlier...

Why the **** is everybody in here calling it smack talk?

People, what Materazzi said was WAY beyond smack talk. A thing like that is a very deep, personal and emotional offence. Especially when your mother is very ill in the hospital. On times like that, you can't expect a man to be emotionally stable. Man, I personally would've snapped the guy's neck who would say such a thing to me. Regardless of the sport you're playing, regardless of being a captain, a leader. At a time like that, the line is crossed. You can say whatever you want, but Zidane's action was very understandable.

Why the **** is everybody in here calling it smack talk?

People, what Materazzi said was WAY beyond smack talk. A thing like that is a very deep, personal and emotional offence. Especially when your mother is very ill in the hospital. On times like that, you can't expect a man to be emotionally stable. Man, I personally would've snapped the guy's neck who would say such a thing to me. Regardless of the sport you're playing, regardless of being a captain, a leader. At a time like that, the line is crossed. You can say whatever you want, but Zidane's action was very understandable.

How do you know he crossed the line. No one knows what was even said yet. Its all speculation. The BBC have said he supposedly said something about his family and then told him to "f**k off", but he denies both. So why not wait until its confirmed instead? Its innocent until proven guilty, not the other way around.

BBC Article

Edited by ziadoz

Its innocent until proven guilty, not the other way around.

Yeah you're right about that. I'm just very quick at jumping to conclusions.

Anyway, I still think Zidane must've had a good reason. And that he was still emotionally unstable. When you're playing the biggest match of your life, that already puts a lot of pressure on you. And then when you also just found out your mother is very sick, that's even more pressure. Not everyone can handle that. Well actually, I can only think of so little people who can handle it.

It's plausible Materazzi said something to Zidane just to provoke him. This happens often on a football field. Maybe Materazzi hoped in a Zidane reaction to make order off him... and Zidane swallowed the bait like a child. Zidane had a very childish behaviour and his action is totally inexcusable.

If he provoked you..

1) Ignore him: this is the behaviour of a MAN.

2) If you can't ignore him (!!), just answer to the provocation... don't headbutt him! And this isn't the first time Zidane headbutts somebody. He has not even had respect for his own teammates that remained in 10.

It's plausible Materazzi said something to Zidane just to provoke him. This happens often on a football field. Maybe Materazzi hoped in a Zidane reaction to make order off him... and Zidane swallowed the bait like a child. Zidane had a very childish behaviour and his action is totally inexcusable.

If he provoked you..

1) Ignore him: this is the behaviour of a MAN.

2) If you can't ignore him (!!), just answer to the provocation... don't headbutt him! And this isn't the first time Zidane headbutts somebody. He has not even had respect for his own teammates that remained in 10.

On the BBC 10 oclock news just now they had a lip reader interpret what Materzaai said. They reckon he said 'I wish and ugly death to you and your family' and on the same day Zidane found out his mother was ill

No matter how good a player or how cool headed, I don't think anybody would think twice before reacting like that, especially after what was said. Other UK papers were saying different things, like he called his mother a ###### :o , and that he said stuff about his sister.

Seriously, I think Zidane was being provoked from before the incident, with Materazzi twisting his nipple. Zidane took all of that well, until he got personal. :no:

But Zidane's headbutt knocked him onto the grass :woot:, that was one angry headbutt. :D

this is my first year seriously watching the world cup and i must say i thoroughly enjoyed watching france. it seemed they, and zidane were destined to win. i was quite shocked when this happened, and even though i never watched soccer before with any degree of seriousness felt sad when zidane walked by the wc and off the field.

as a laymen, a couple things i noticed that i found strange. 1 the ref didn't see it, and from what i saw was going to let it go but then the other official talked to an italian, called over the main ref and instantly, without discussion he gave zidane a red card, in other sports, if the ref doesn't see it [not if a second official looks at the replay on the jumbotron], it's TS, no call.

2. now i don't know about football, but in other sports there are certain things you just can't say. One example that comes to mind is Sean Avery last year in the NHL; he continually made racist comments and continually got the crap kicked out of him, including in illegal suspendable ways. the NHL didn't suspend the people who attacked avery, because racist comments cross the line and are technically worthy of a large fine. if the italian did say something along the lines of what has been posted, why wasn't he ejected as well, or why wasn't it discussed? since they both (apparently) did something very unsportsmanlike, shouldn't either the two cancel each other out or both should get the punishment? after all he stayed in and scored on the penalty kicks. doesn't football have any rules about unacceptable language?

3. i know this might sound crazy, but why not a yellow card? my reason for thinking this is the ref didnt actually see it, neither ref knew what was said, the guy clearly went down to make it look worse and no actual injury was sustained. i saw atleast 5 times in that game dirty, clearly intent to injure plays (mostly by the italians) that were yellow cards or less. why do the attacks that look the nastiest always get the worst penalty?

as for the guy posting about bertuzzi, thats not correct. steve moore was quite possibly called up from the minors for the soul purpose of taking a run at naslund. naslund got hurt from a very dirty check, no suspension no call. Bertuzzi did what basically all hockey players do and stood up for his teammate, moore refused to fight, bertuzzi drilled him and he fell down. steve moore is not paralyzed or 'close to it' if such thing even exists.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • 007 First Light review: Satisfying spy adventure that James Bond needed by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe I have fond memories of classic James Bond games from the Electronic Arts era. Using high-tech gadgets, sneaking into parties, and dispatching bad guys were wildly exciting activities for my younger self. In recent years, Bond games have entirely disappeared, alongside the super spy genre. Fast forward to 2020, imagine my surprise when IO Interactive announced it had secured the Bond IP to make a game. Considering the studio’s Hitman history, this project is one I keenly kept an eye on. Six years later, 007 First Light is finally here, and after spending time inside this globe-trotting adventure, I can safely say that my excitement for this developer’s take on this universe was not unfounded. IO has taken lessons it has learned from Hitman and combined them with what I would expect from a directed cinematic experience like James Bond. I have refrained from mentioning major plot points to save you from story spoilers in this review. This is an original story that doesn’t tie into any movies, so there isn’t an expectation of knowing the backstory or the decades of movies either. Bond, James Bond When 007 First Light begins, Bond is just Bond. There isn’t a spy angle, fancy gadgets, or even a secret mission. The introductory mission is framed to show how James Bond handled himself and how he does not care about the odds when it comes to saving lives. It’s a gorgeous level as well, showing off an island scattered with cliffs in the middle of a storm. Looking back, this is probably the best-looking level in the game, with IO showing off all its abilities with its custom engine, Glacier. But my favorite ended up being the follow-up to this level. Once the United Kingdom's foreign intelligence agency, MI6, recruits our daring youngster into its super-spy “00” program, training begins. However, instead of treading through the same tutorial missions where the game teaches you to run and jump and drive, IO opted for a montage, and it’s amazing. The scenes cut between Bond practicing and improving his marksmanship, parkour, hand-to-hand combat, and driving as weeks go by in his training. What impressed me here was the lack of any loading screens or stutters as scenes instantly switched to different locations entirely, as if I was watching a movie. This creativity is a trend I noticed in most levels, where there is some sort of gameplay or choreography mechanic being introduced to keep things interesting. Soon, the rest of the cast is introduced, bringing other agents that our favorite secret agent will be working with, the scientists and engineers that build MI6’s spy gadgets, as well as higher-ranking officers that either appreciate or (at best) tolerate Bond’s rebellious attitude. It’s a tight cast, all with incredibly good voice acting and personalities that quickly grew on me. The casting for Bond himself is also an excellent one. From showing his iconic soft spot for women to the condescending smiles that get a rise out of enemies, I had no issues getting immersed into this universe as this new face of James Bond. The missions take place in a wide range of locations as MI6 sends Bond to tackle dangers that are growing everywhere from the UK to Africa. These aren’t unrelated adventures where MI6 is sending secret agents, which is an angle I would love to see in another game, but a part of a bigger conspiracy affecting the entire world. Some of the twists and turns were all too predictable, and the character that Lenny Kravitz played made me cringe a little too much. But all in all, I enjoyed the campaign’s storyline that sets the stage for this new agent joining the illustrious “00” program. Plenty of Possibilities The third-person style of IO Interactive fits this role quite well. Bond is presented as a master at hand-to-hand combat as well as firearms, while also having a knack for being stealthy when required. Most sections of missions have a lot of freedom. This means I could beat up every goon and security guard on the way to an objective, slip past them without sounding a single alarm, or do a mix of both. My sessions usually end up with the third option because I tend to be impatient about waiting for a patrol to move. Drawing from its Hitman genes, the developer almost always gives multiple routes for going through missions. Levels can be massive, sometimes sporting hundreds of NPCs going their own ways and having conversations. If my objective is to break into a security room on the third floor, I could look around for roof access, eavesdrop on conversations to find out where someone lost a key, create a distraction and pickpocket a guard for a keycard, sneak in through the vents, or simply kick down the offending door. I enjoyed the variety on offer, especially because the same solutions didn’t usually show up in different missions. Before heading out into a secret MI6 escapade, the gadget specialist of the branch walks Bond through the organization's latest and greatest achievements. This can be cool little devices like a laser built into the watch, a phone that fires poison darts, or a camera that emits a powerful shockwave. The choice of what can be taken into the mission is up to the player. I could usually find fresh routes or get out of tough situations with a punch or two, so I never had the feeling of missing out by not choosing the right equipment. It’s still a fun practice. Choosing the armaments before a mission enhanced the super spy feeling quite a bit. As I mentioned, stealth comes in as a very viable option for most of the missions, letting Bond sneak past foes or knock them out silently. While it is satisfying to clear entire areas of goons and walk away without any alarms, the way of accomplishing this could have been done better. Bond can lure enemies, sneak up and knock them out, or use a gadget to disorient them before dealing a nasty blow. Bodies cannot be moved or hidden afterward either. It’s a very simple system, which I wish were more exciting to pull off. Perhaps more stealth-orientated gadgets, distraction options, or multi-takedowns could have helped here, I think. Getting caught while attempting to be in stealth does not mean a game over. Other than getting into a fist fight, an interesting twist of 007 First Light is the bluffing option. While an enemy is confused as to what you are doing in a restricted location, Bond has the option to improvise and persuade them that you are exactly where you’re supposed to be. These are fun little dynamic interactions with unique dialog depending on the mission and location, giving a few extra moments for Bond to go past suspicious guards smoothly. It’s the first time I’ve witnessed this system in a game, and I hope to see more. License to Kill Bond isn’t just dealing with security guards or civilians. From time to time, entire gangs of gun-toting mercenaries show up in levels looking to take down our protagonist. It is then that License to Kill mode is activated for Bond, letting him use firearms with no restrictions. I was surprised by just how tight gunplay is in 007 First Light. The weapons feel powerful and satisfying to fire, with single bullets capable of taking down an enemy with a headshot. Ammo is scarce, and enemies don’t drop weapons with full magazines most of the time. This forces a hectic kind of gameplay where I am always advancing towards enemies to take their weapons after they are downed. Things like shooting legs to immobilize, aiming at the hands to make their weapon go flying, blowing up nearby fire extinguishers for cover, and using gadgets to halt a goon in their tracks while I reload, make up enjoyable levels. I had to hold back my disappointment when the enemy count in these action sequences dropped to zero and I had to go non-lethal again. Speaking of action sequences, First Light isn’t just offering sandbox levels to complete at the player’s own leisure either. Each level comes with specific linear and directed scenes to move the story forward and put Bond in tight situations. These usually end up with high-octane chases or driving sections, offering the chance to witness chaining explosions, hails of gunfire, and scripted parkour scenes that remind me of Mission Impossible movies more than Bond. Elements like seeing James Bond jump out of a plane without a parachute or drive through buildings in London inside a trash truck were fantastic and always left me at a high point when finishing a mission. The classic James Bond theme is sprinkled in here too, which only happens a handful of times in the game, but at just the right moments. Visuals and Performance Compared to Unreal Engine 5 games we are seeing nowadays, 007 First Light isn’t flexing a huge amount of realism when it comes to graphics. The models, textures, and effects all feel a little dated, with the starting mission that I mentioned being the most visually striking. However, the complete lack of stutters, the hundreds of NPCs that can be on screen without a single hitch, massive sandbox levels, and smooth transitions between them all play a part in making this an immensely immersive and complex experience. The in-engine cutscenes are gorgeous as well, offering an upgraded visual style and model detail over the gameplay sections. Animations are one aspect that jumps out at me about any new game, and First Light has nailed what a third-person action game should feel like. Walking, sneaking, and running all have a heaviness to them that I appreciate. Whenever Bond moves past a wall or a ledge, his arms reach out to lightly hold those structures until he moves away. NPCs actually react to my character and move out of the way. Even during melee combat or takedown animations, the fists impacting a body or a head hitting a wall all have that same weight. Even the more frivolous animations, like catching a gun in midair or chucking an empty one at a goon (yes, you can do that), are satisfying to pull off. Of course, the in-engine cutscene animations are remarkably well done too, with facial animations and the upgraded model details improving my engagement with the characters. I have an AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT 16GB paired with an eight-core Ryzen 7 3700X and 32GB of RAM, with the game running at 1440p resolution. Deciding to completely max out all the graphics options gave me a range of frame rates between 60 and 100 depending on the scene and level. While I did try to enable AMD FSR, which bumped up the frame rates by a good 20% at Quality mode, IO Interactive’s implementation of the technology wasn’t that great. Every corner and edge in levels began shimmering, and I was also seeing smearing issues in fast-moving sections. The title seemingly uses the older generation FSR 3.1 and not the machine learning-assisted FSR 4, leading to these artifacts. Unfortunately, there isn't a way to manually upgrade this right now either. I opted to turn off the upscaling and play the game in native 1440p to avoid problems. I would say the FPS range I was getting was an acceptable one for a single-player action game for my setup. I do wish there were an FOV slider option in the settings. While the camera is far enough back for my tastes in most situations in this third-person adventure, at times the perspective is far too close. When trying to look around quickly and spot targets, I realized I was getting a slight headache at times due to the use of an almost over-the-shoulder close-up camera. Conclusion Being James Bond in 007 First Light is a treat. Traveling around the world chasing conspiracies, using high-tech gadgets disguised as everyday accessories, and improvising on the spot to fool foes all give a fantastic feeling of being a super spy. For an origin story, IO Interactive has done a great job at introducing the character and his motives for doing what he does. The satisfying combat animation and fantastic voice acting are definitely high points, with the License to Kill moments being my favorite. Not being able to move bodies and the simplistic stealth of mechanics does hurt its presentation a little. The NPC logic and intelligence is easy to manipulate and trick, repeating the same actions over and over again if I keep making distractions. The lack of an FOV slider was also a pain (quite literally) at times, and the FSR implementation is quite poor. These are things I hope the studio will improve upon with updates. Even with its faults, IO Interactive and James Bond are a match made in heaven. The studio knows how to make a main character that oozes charm and competency while also leaning heavily into its Hitman experience to make gigantic levels with what looks like hundreds of NPCs roaming around. Being an origin story, IO’s Bond has a way to go before he becomes the highly effective agent we see in the movie world. I am hoping the studio will continue this series alongside its Hitman ventures going forward, just so we get to experience the journey for longer. 007 First Light is available on PC (Steam, Epic Games Store, and Xbox PC), Xbox Series X|S, and PlayStation 5 for $69.99. This review was conducted on the PC version of the game provided by IO Interactive.
    • [Price Drop] PDF Expert for Mac v3 is still half off by Steven Parker Today's highlighted deal comes via our Apps + Software section of the Neowin Deals store, where for only a limited time you can save 42% on PDF Expert One-Time Purchase. PDFs remain the best way to transmit documents, but editing them isn't possible with standard Mac software. PDF Expert changes that, allowing you to edit PDF text, images, links, and outlines quickly and easily. Typo in a contract? Easy fix. Need to rework a complete section of a document? No problem. PDF Expert provides a series of essential functions that will transform the way you work with documents on your Mac. It recognizes text and OCR, makes edits, and fills out forms. And with the “Enhance” feature powered by AI, it will fix distortions, remove shadows and improve contrast so that even difficult-to-read documents look great. EDIT Change the text. Easily fix typos, update numbers, or add entire paragraphs Insert images. Update logos in a contract or add a new graph to a report Add links. Enrich your PDFs by linking to other pages or external websites ANNOTATE Highlight the important. Make the most valuable content stand out at a glance Comment on PDFs. Add text to PDFs, insert pop-up notes & write your thoughts in the margins Add stamps. Review documents with our set of stamps or create custom stamps for any workflow ORGANIZE Merge PDFs. Combine multiple files into one PDF document Manage pages. Add, delete, rearrange, or rotate PDF pages with ease Split PDFs. Extract pages from PDFs & save them as separate files CONVERT Convert to PDF. Turn JPG, PNG, Word, PPT, and Excel to PDF PDF to Word. Convert PDFs into editable Word documents PDF to image. Turn PDFs into JPG or PNG images PDF to Excel. Convert PDFs into Excel spreadsheets PDF to PPT. Save PDFs as PowerPoint presentations PDF to text. Convert PDFs into editable TXT files FILL OUT Fill out PDF forms. Easily fill out PDF forms by just clicking on them Sign documents. Add your signature to a PDF in a few clicks. Let customers sign documents with handy one-time signatures Redact PDFs. Blackout or erase confidential information from your documents RECOGNIZE TEXT OCR text in PDF. Recognize the text, so you can search, highlight & copy it Enhance scans. Fix distortions, remove shadows & improve contrast Crop & split pages. Split double-page scans into separate pages & remove undesired margins Good to know: Length of access: Lifetime Redemption deadline: redeem your code within 30 days of purchase Access options: Mac Max number of device(s): Unlimited usage on personal macOS devices Version: PDF Expert 3 for Mac (macOS) Updates: Get continuous support and bug fixes. Additional new features may come at an extra cost. PDF Expert One-Time Purchase normally costs $139.99, but you can pick it up for just $69.97 for a limited time, that represents a saving of $70 (50% off). For a full description, specs, and license info, click the link below. Deal Price One time cost now only $69.97 (was $139.99) Although priced in U.S. dollars, this deal is available for digital purchase worldwide. Support queries If you have queries or need support for any of the Neowin Deals, please use the contact form here. Neowin Deals are managed and sold by StackCommerce who represent Neowin on an affiliate basis. We post these because we earn commission on each sale so as not to rely solely on advertising, which many of our readers block. It all helps toward paying staff reporters, servers and hosting costs. Other ways to support Neowin Whitelist Neowin by not blocking our ads Create a free member account to see fewer ads Make a donation to support our day to day running costs Subscribe to Neowin - for $14 a year, or $28 a year for an ad-free experience Disclosure: Neowin benefits from revenue of each sale made through our branded deals site powered by StackCommerce.
    • Indeed - drives me mad - usually because Refresh is hidden in the full menu.
    • Firefox has had rounded corners for many years. I take it you're not a fan of modern browsers?
    • The problem is in the fundamentals of how businesses are allowed to operate and the change should happen in the basics and certain consumer friendly and moral practices should be enforced by law. This would fix so many things, not just this ages old default browser issue which is a tiny drop in the backut that includes a flood of privacy and other issues.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Rising Star
      olavinto went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      271
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      75
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!