A-Patch for Windows Live Messenger (8.5)


Recommended Posts

Thanks for your compliments, but the truth is Mess Patch started out one complete year before A-Patch and was posted on mess.be from day one. Besides, there is no recollection of A-Patch ever being posted on mess.be.

You would never actually post a news arctible about a patch that is better than yours but you are incorrect, as most of mess.be is with news/information is, you have mentioned A-Patch before:

post-36268-1180869780.jpg

Here are some tips for mess.be:

FIX YOUR WEBSITE. Stop using an ugly 4/5 year old degins. Make it so it's like a blog so people can actually LINK to your news articles easily. What do you have to hide...old posts mentioning A-Patch hahahha?

*HOT* Stop being pendantic and calling things HOT and COOL. They are nothing close to being HOT or COOL. It's just stupid to have to read you attempting to call thing HOT and COOL

Patching profiles have been removed. - finally you do something good as that was the most stupid "publicity stunt" you pulled so far. I want to have my Messenger looking like dwergs...or not...

UPDATE: Some messers reported that their Messenger Plus! icons have disappeared from the contact list after patching Messenger. Therefore, a tiny update has been issued to address this problem. If you've already downloaded Mess Patch, then get this update via the auto-update feature, or through on the updated link below.

LOL ROFL? Every single time you guys bother to make a patch you have to do it again because you mess something up...

Apatch = Ahmad and released within 1/2 days and only ever updates..never due to stupid mistakes

Mess Patch = Rolando + too many others to even remember and 4/5 days with 2/3/4/5 "updates" due to stupid mistakes.

^ Simply put A-Patch all the way (Y)

Edited by Larney

man u r so childish.......u talk all tha crap about messpatch but if u check the past days there r 3 builds of apatch to correct bugs and even though i like both patches Apatch for me has bugs it doesnt matter if i wipe out WLM folder and registry entries but did I insult Amhad about his patch? please dint be a fool

simply is a personal preference i use apatdch the first days cause its always the first patch available(well its not the first patch the first patch is always the Universal Patch from Mastaline) then i use messpatch cause have some features that apatch doesnt have

man u r so childish.......u talk all tha crap about messpatch but if u check the past days there r 3 builds of apatch to correct bugs and even though i like both patches Apatch for me has bugs it doesnt matter if i wipe out WLM folder and registry entries but did I insult Amhad about his patch? please dint be a fool

simply is a personal preference i use apatdch the first days cause its always the first patch available(well its not the first patch the first patch is always the Universal Patch from Mastaline) then i use messpatch cause have some features that apatch doesnt have

Ahmad is just updating and refining his patch, not becasue it removes buttons from another program like Mess Patch does, because Messenger is constantly changing. Hardly any program is 100% correct - I never said that. Mess Patch has to be re-done because of some stupid mistake where as A-Patch just has small updates and tells you what they are unlike Mess.be:

in addition to a dozen of other minor bug fixes.

Sorry, WHAT minor bug fixes? You made several things ACTUALLY work?

I am not childish, just defending the best Messenger Patch as people try and talk utter crap about it without and knowledge themselves about what they are talking about. A-Patch all the way(Y))

defending what? please thisis not a stupid competition people use what best suits to them like i said and i need to corect myself: i use 3 patches: the universla patch from mastaline cause its always the firs available, then apatch cause it has more features and last messpatch casue it has the features that i need it like resize DP for example.....all patches are good dont need to brag about one like its ur work depend on it, please

defending what? please thisis not a stupid competition people use what best suits to them like i said and i need to corect myself: i use 3 patches: the universla patch from mastaline cause its always the firs available, then apatch cause it has more features and last messpatch casue it has the features that i need it like resize DP for example.....all patches are good dont need to brag about one like its ur work depend on it, please

We all have a right to choices. I never said anything to the contrary. I have the right to defend something I know is better than other things as you have the right to defend others but please stop trying to discredit my facts. I am not bragging at all.

We all have a right to choices. I never said anything to the contrary. I have the right to defend something I know is better than other things as you have the right to defend others but please stop trying to discredit my facts. I am not bragging at all.

You haven't said anything to the contrary, you just appear to argue every point he makes, which do in fact seem very valid. He likes to use more than one program, stop arguing that.

P.S. Read your posts, they do sound very childish like "Sorry, WHAT minor bug fixes? You made several things ACTUALLY work?"

You haven't said anything to the contrary, you just appear to argue every point he makes, which do in fact seem very valid. He likes to use more than one program, stop arguing that.

P.S. Read your posts, they do sound very childish

I'm not having an argument. I am defending something I know is better. Whether people think the same as me is not a worry to me but I do not disregard opinions from anybody I am just doing what is my right to post and have an opinion.

PS. No they do not. I read my own posts as I type them out :)

Daeron Tin?viel, you can have your own personal best I am not taking that away from anybody. I am just defending the best patch so stop trying to argue/take away my opinion:))

You haven't said anything to the contrary, you just appear to argue every point he makes, which do in fact seem very valid. He likes to use more than one program, stop arguing that.

P.S. Read your posts, they do sound very childish like "Sorry, WHAT minor bug fixes? You made several things ACTUALLY work?"

thank u!!!

Larney,

defending something u think is the best doesnt actually made it the best and excuseme your post sounds childish

thank u!!!

Larney,

defending something u think is the best doesnt actually made it the best and excuseme your post sounds childish

Sorry, but this thread is about A-Patch and not about other patches. It's amazingly stupid how these threads turn into childish people posting stuff about other patches. I don't go and spam threads about Mess Patch about how crap it is so stop doing that right here. Please stay ontopic and talk about A-Patch or click the friendly X at the top of your screen as this is really getting annoying.

If you have a request feature post it.

If you think Mess Patch is better GO AND POST SOMEWHERE ELSE ABOUT IT.

Calm down guys, both patches are great :)

But I agree with Larney about the point that mess.be site feels like you're in prison, you can't even bookmark anything, really bad structure from a usability prospective.

I tried mess patch once and it worked great, I just like and stick to A-Patch more because it does what I need and for how fast it's updates, and how clean is its website and interface.

Sorry, but this thread is about A-Patch and not about other patches. It's amazingly stupid how these threads turn into childish people posting stuff about other patches. I don't go and spam threads about Mess Patch about how crap it is so stop doing that right here. Please stay ontopic and talk about A-Patch or click the friendly X at the top of your screen as this is really getting annoying.

If you have a request feature post it.

If you think Mess Patch is better GO AND POST SOMEWHERE ELSE ABOUT IT.

No need to sit there flexing your e-penis, everyone has the right to their own opinion. The simple fact is, that you cannot just say it is simply better, because people will use whatever they feel comfortable with at the end of the day.

I personally use A-Patch, and would recommend it to everyone else, but each to their own and whatnot

No need to sit there flexing your e-penis, everyone has the right to their own opinion. The simple fact is, that you cannot just say it is simply better, because people will use whatever they feel comfortable with at the end of the day.

I personally use A-Patch, and would recommend it to everyone else, but each to their own and whatnot

I am not "flexing my e-penis" but here you are again thinking you know it all..some things never chance. I can say what I like, thanks for trying to tell me what I can and can't say, as that is my opinion :)!

How many times do I have to say this? This thread is about A-Patch. People can think what they like, I really don't care, but stop spamming this thread with comments about other patches..this thread is not for that purpose.

I used to use MessPatch all the time, then changed over to using A-Patch, then i got wise and stopped using MSN ;)

Calm down guys, both patches are great :)

But I agree with Larney about the point that mess.be site feels like you're in prison, you can't even bookmark anything, really bad structure from a usability prospective.

...

Oh god yeah, the site is horrible, an absolute mess.

I like A-Patch. Love the preview when selecting the options you want. Like Daeron says I use Mess simply because it has a few things A doesn't have.

I'd love to see A-Patch add a few features. The options to put the users status next to their name (Away, Online, Busy, etc.), Resize display picture in the contact list, Center standard & format bar icons, icon to quickly access msn options, make the conversation window look like the main window.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I grew up a Star Trek fan and never watched Star Wars movies. To this days I've not watched most Star Wras movies. As a result I rarely get these references, I have no idea what this post means. Given the popular reactions these get I have to accept I missed out.  
    • Spotify really have turned in to a butthole of a company. Assuming this isn't a bug then this is a low act for Premium users. Honestly, YT Premium which includes YT Music is a genuine alternative. In any event, the internet enshitification continues unabated...next up, the banning of VPN's.
    • This is why science is the only path to truth. It isn't rigid in its beliefs, rather it changes its views based on scientific discoveries.
    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      92
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!