Windows Vista Service Pack 1 RTM x86 leaked


Recommended Posts

I just got an email from one of Microsoft people in Norway. She said SP1 likely will hit MSDN in early march.

Which isn't really news, as we already knew mid March as the WU release date.

If that's true though, and MSDN is being set to that date as well, then MS have to be doing some sort of build changes....

Sorry Lenin, just corrected that post, was sidetracked :)

Edited by Raa
Which isn't really news, as we already knew mid March as the WU release date.

If that's true though, and MSDN are being pushed back, then MS have to be doing some sort of build changes....

MSDN pushed back from what date?

Post your source!

It is NOT the final. The final has not been released. End of story.

While the code *has* gone gold, it won't be released from *shipping* until March 20th (per announcement from MS) due ot issues with certain drivers from certain companies (for some reason, the problematical driver manufacturers have not been named or leaked). Oddly enough, I'm running the last public version of Vista SP1 (RC Refresh) and I'm having no such issues with it or drivers I'm using with it.

i've been lurking on this thread here since feb 3rd. i dont understand how come some of you spend so much time speculating about things that have been made clear. just read what freaking MS said:

SP1 is done and it was released to OEMs (RTM) on the 4th. 99.9% of the code will remain the same as the RTW (release to web, consumer release). it has been released as is to OEMs as is because all of the OEMs can know if the 0.1% will affect them, and most importantly they can fix the problem if it arises . these issues, BTW, are related to some drivers breaking after SP1 is installed, which can be fixed simply by reinstalling the driver.

consumers, for the most part (obviously not the folks here) would have problems with those drivers breaking, so in order to ensure that as many consumers as possible will have a smooth experience, they wont let them grab a hold of sp1 until that 0.1% has been corrected.

even IF the code was 100% ok, they might have still done it the same way because they want sp1 to be available for download on the same day that the very first new pc running sp1 hits the shelves of your nearest circuit city. would you have done it this way if you were billy? no. is it understandable? completely.

in a few words, RC (refresh 2) IS the final SP1, as it was correctly speculated on technet in late january. if that release is working for you, it means that the 0.1% involves drivers which your system does not use, and therefore, in your case, that version is effectively the same as the RTW. what will the version # be? i have no clue, but it will probably not be the january 28 18:40 build.

want the final sp1? install refresh 2, any drivers break, reinstall those drivers, you're done. then go back to doing something useful.

EDIT: basically i'm just putting into more words what PGHammer said above.

Greetings, all.

I've been lurking around here for quite some time.

After using the registry hack posted earlier in the thread, I downloaded the "Release Candidate 1" version of Vista SP1 off of Windows Update. However, unlike the previous test versions I had installed this version did not contain a version number for this service pack, or an expiration date, as shown in the attached screencap.

I did not install Refresh 2 when it came out, so I didn't actually catch whether or not it had a version number/expiration attached to it (though I assume it did). So I'm wondering if, while everything on WU is still labelled RC1, whether Microsoft has quietly slipped the RTM code in place behind it.

Not sure. At any rate, it installed fine and if, for some reason, this isn't the RTM, then I simply re-install it in a month's time.

Just thought I'd make this observation.

post-146089-1202317452_thumb.jpg

:D No. But I'm angry at Microsoft, they just can't seem to stop monkeying about with Vista. If the final slipstreamed iso isn't on connect in the next 24 hours. I'm abandoning this ship.

no dont do that! without you microsoft will collapse!

While the code *has* gone gold, it won't be released from *shipping* until March 20th (per announcement from MS) due ot issues with certain drivers from certain companies (for some reason, the problematical driver manufacturers have not been named or leaked). Oddly enough, I'm running the last public version of Vista SP1 (RC Refresh) and I'm having no such issues with it or drivers I'm using with it.

could be nvidia

i dunno but i had major probs with my network card with 18000

well, winsupersite is a good enough source of windows info but imho unless the iso shows up on msdn its not 100% confirmed.. just what I think

I've heard in another group that the copy of sp1 that was from january is indeed the rtm

"Windows Vista SP1 build 18000 is indeed the RTM build. We were hoping build

18000 we released to you (WU only) was the final build and as it happens we

didn't have to break the glass, the build didn't change at all from the time

we released it to you and our final sign-off on Monday morning this week.

What you got is what we're all running our Vista machines here internally -

we definitely RTM'd :)

You've probably all read that we are targeting mid-March to release SP1

standalone on the download center and push SP1 out via WU. We've seen a lot

of requests from our tech beta for bits on Connect before hand we're still

trying to get approval for that, so stay tuned.

We apologize for the confusion over the final build - build 18000, Vista SP1

RTM.

Regards,

Jeff"

Greetings, all.

I've been lurking around here for quite some time.

After using the registry hack posted earlier in the thread, I downloaded the "Release Candidate 1" version of Vista SP1 off of Windows Update. However, unlike the previous test versions I had installed this version did not contain a version number for this service pack, or an expiration date, as shown in the attached screencap.

I did not install Refresh 2 when it came out, so I didn't actually catch whether or not it had a version number/expiration attached to it (though I assume it did). So I'm wondering if, while everything on WU is still labelled RC1, whether Microsoft has quietly slipped the RTM code in place behind it.

Not sure. At any rate, it installed fine and if, for some reason, this isn't the RTM, then I simply re-install it in a month's time.

Just thought I'd make this observation.

That is the RTM bits. Even though it is labeled as RC1 something on Windows Update it is RTM. You have the final version. Enjoy!

I've read reports of Vista SP1 discs (holographic) being sent out already and SP1 RTM is the build thats been on the web the last few days.

I took the 32BIT SP1 RTM full iso, Vlited it and installed and it's working great! :D

Glad the integrated package exists as I refuse to install Vista with all the bloat. My install DVD is down to around 600MB from a couple of GB.

I've read reports of Vista SP1 discs (holographic) being sent out already and SP1 RTM is the build thats been on the web the last few days.

I took the 32BIT SP1 RTM full iso, Vlited it and installed and it's working great! :D

Glad the integrated package exists as I refuse to install Vista with all the bloat. My install DVD is down to around 600MB from a couple of GB.

Yeh same, I also never install Vista with all of the bloat.

I've seen a definite performance increase on my laptop with single processor, it seems everything is much more responsive than what it used to be.

off-topic question

does windows 2008 server have Directx10? Does it have superfetch?

anyone know if their will ever be a pro version

Win2k8 server I believe doesn't have DirectX10 as its not meant for gaming but not 100% sure if it has it or not, doesn't make sense to me if it did tho. As for superfetech no idea if it does.

there's no switch to install the service pack without an uninstall method...

Does anyone know how to install it without creating an uninstall folder with a bunch of crap in it?

thanks!

you can clean up afterwards by running

vsp1cln.exe

I've heard in another group that the copy of sp1 that was from january is indeed the rtm

"Windows Vista SP1 build 18000 is indeed the RTM build. We were hoping build

18000 we released to you (WU only) was the final build and as it happens we

didn't have to break the glass, the build didn't change at all from the time

we released it to you and our final sign-off on Monday morning this week.

What you got is what we're all running our Vista machines here internally -

we definitely RTM'd :)

You've probably all read that we are targeting mid-March to release SP1

standalone on the download center and push SP1 out via WU. We've seen a lot

of requests from our tech beta for bits on Connect before hand we're still

trying to get approval for that, so stay tuned.

We apologize for the confusion over the final build - build 18000, Vista SP1

RTM.

Regards,

Jeff"

This was posted on the Connect newsgroups for the SP1 beta program and is 100% correct. Rest assured: Windows Vista SP1 RC Refresh 2 is indeed the RTM build.

off-topic question

does windows 2008 server have Directx10? Does it have superfetch?

anyone know if their will ever be a pro version

It should have DX10.1 if you install the desktop experience.

Superfetch should be on by default, but tuned to a server environment.

No, there will not be a Windows 2008 Pro, Vista SP1 is Windows 2008 Pro. (Turn off the themes service in Vista, it will look like Windows 2008)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Why Delta Chat is the best decentralized messenger you have probably never tried by Paul Hill There is no shortage of messaging apps out there; we have WhatsApp, Messenger, and Telegram, just to name a few. While Meta has taken steps to incorporate encryption into Messenger and WhatsApp, they still leave a lot to be desired. If you are in the market for a messaging app that promotes security, privacy, and optional anonymity, you'll want to read what I have to say about Delta Chat. For those not familiar with Delta Chat, rather than relying on centralized servers as you do with Facebook Messenger, it relies on email. Essentially, it is a chat interface that feels like a messaging app, but secretly in the background, it is firing off emails. In the past, you used to have to sign in with your email account. When you sent messages to people, it would just be sending encrypted messages to their inbox, which their Delta Chat client would decrypt. When I first learned about Delta Chat, it required users to sign in with an email account, but I was pleasantly surprised upon trying it in 2026 that this is no longer a requirement, or the preferred method was to use the app. Recently, I’ve tried UAD-ng on my old Nokia 3.4 to disable most of the Google apps because the bootloader is locked, and this is the next best option. While finding replacement apps in F-Droid, I came across Delta Chat again, and it has undergone quite a big change since I last used it, with its new chatmail relays, which no longer require you to sign in to your own email account, providing anonymity, and they offer greater security. Android and Desktop Delta Chat apps. Not only does it run on my de-googled phone, but it also works on desktop computers and iOS, making it truly ubiquitous. For me, Delta Chat is a wonderful alternative messenger because it gives you more control. It supports switching between different profiles, which you can set up super quickly; you don’t register a username, you don’t register a password. The only thing you do have is a random string email address on a chatmail relay (which you don’t have to memorize). To maintain access to your profile, you just need to add a second device to your account via QR code or make a backup of your account, which you can restore later. Fail to do these, your account is gone - as it should be if you don’t want to leave accounts that could get hacked later on. My decision to block Google stuff on my Nokia was done for practical reasons; the device sucked when it launched, and it sucks even more now. The nice thing about F-Droid and the apps within is that they’re usually lightweight, free of bloat, and work well on that device. What was inconvenient for me was that it was hard to send messages from that device, say if I wanted to copy a code over to my main phone or send family members a link from that device. That’s when I decided to look at the available chat apps and saw Delta Chat. Another nice thing about Delta Chat is its notifications. Some messaging apps rely on Google’s ecosystem for notification transport on Android; however, with Delta Chat, it can use Google’s solutions if you have Play Services or MicroG installed. Otherwise, it is able to keep a background connection to the chatmail relay server so that you can get notified when you receive a message. As free software, the code of Delta Chat is open for all who want to take it and build upon it. In the future, if the developers of Delta Chat make a catastrophically bad decision and take the app in an undesirable direction, users can take the code and fork the project. This contrasts with closed-source apps from corporations that can take their products in any direction they like. By relying on free software instead of closed-source programs, you actually control your computing. I’ve spoken at length about how running this type of software is like owning your own home rather than renting it. The same applies here; if you use Delta Chat, you don’t need to worry about it going away in the future. Whether it is Telegram, WhatsApp, or Messenger, you are required to register a username and password to use these services. A major flaw in this design is that anyone can try various passwords and potentially break into your account with your complete chat history intact. Sure, there is encryption in Messenger, where you need a second PIN and two-factor authentication in Telegram, but breaches happen all the time. Unlike before, when you used to sign in to your email account to send and receive messages, the primary way to do it now is to create an account on a chatmail relay. The resulting email address is a random string followed by the name of the relay you pick. This means you can start and begin adding contacts Without a username and password, you either need to ensure you have a backup or at least one device running your Delta Chat profile. The primary way to log in on another device is to go to the settings and add a second device. Then, you’ll just scan a QR code with your new device, and it’ll log in to your account and sync all your chat history and contacts. To end users, Delta Chat just looks like any instant messenger; however, it is really sending your messages as encrypted emails to your contact. This is pretty cool from a censorship perspective, as it makes the service more difficult to block. Previously, the main way to use the app was by logging in with email, but nowadays, it’s recommended that you use chatmail relays. Chatmail relays temporarily hold messages in case your device is offline. They are cheap, simple servers that don’t store data as group states. Other information, like your name and avatar, only exists on your device and the devices of those you share your contact information with. The relays are also decentralized and operated by various groups and individuals. It is even possible to set up your own chatmail relay, but most people will want to use one hosted elsewhere. To keep your messages secure, Delta Chat uses a secure subset of the OpenPGP standard that gives you automatic end-to-end encryption. It also uses Secure-Join to exchange encryption setup information through QR-code scanning or invite links. Autocrypt is also used to automatically establish end-to-end encryption between contacts and all members of group chat, but sometime this year Autocrypt v2 will be rolled out, bringing post-quantum resistant encryption and forward secrecy. The Delta Chat FAQ is an interesting read that explains many more details about the app. Credit: Pexels Delta Chat is unique among messaging apps because it is built on email, a technology that’s decades old and isn’t going anywhere soon. What’s more is that email is not centralized either, so it’s far more difficult for any authoritarian regime to disrupt the Delta Chat app. I haven’t spoken too much about features yet, so I will do that now. Delta Chat allows you to do one-on-one chats, group chats, and create channels. It also supports file sharing and making audio and video calls when chatting one-to-one, but it’s not available for group chats right now. At the time of writing, the calling functionality is disabled and can be enabled in Settings > Advanced > Debug Calls. I have used the video calling feature, and the quality is excellent. It works over WebRTC, another open standard. The app also lets you send voice notes, enables disappearing messages, and has its own app ecosystem. I did try playing chess one time there, but it was a bit spotty; though, we did manage to complete the game with a victory for me. To add people to Delta Chat, you can either give them your Delta Chat link or your QR code to scan. These are the only ways to add users, so you won't have any spam bots bothering you. If the people you want to chat with don't have the app yet, just send them your link, and it will take them to a webpage where they can install the app and then add you. It's really quick for them to install it and get started, which is nice. Credit: Microsoft. The Majorana 2 quantum chip unveiled in 2026. I do not think quantum computers are too far out now, and I do hope that Delta Chat is able to push out Autocrypt v2 sooner, rather than later, so bad actors do not attempt to collect encrypted communications and then decrypt them in the future using quantum computers. By getting people’s messages post-quantum-safe now, users won’t have to worry when quantum computers start cracking legacy encryption. Overall, I would recommend this app to people who are already past WhatsApp and Messenger and have perhaps begun using apps like Telegram or Session. It shares a lot of characteristics with these apps and goes a lot further than Telegram in terms of security. By being based on email, it is also resistant to censorship, and the lack of a username and password makes you anonymous (if you want to be) and safe from brute force password cracking attempts. Let me know in the comments if you’ve tried Delta Chat recently. Do you think it's a good bulwark against governments that are tightening their grip on the internet?
    • Putin was behind Farage/Brexit and behind Trump/MAGA. Different idiot lying beasts, same fascist master. Same screwed up results for both nations.
    • For me the Final Fantasy games, Langrisser I & II, Hardspace: Shipbreaker, Horizon Forbidden West Complete Edition, Metaphor: ReFantazio and LUNAR Remastered Collection
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      465
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      217
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      155
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!