1Frothy Posted February 4, 2008 Share Posted February 4, 2008 (edited) If it really did RTM today, it'll leak today or tomorrow. I think there's some smoke and mirrors rubbish going on MajinDark, Microsoft tells us VistaSP1 is done. Then delays release until March. Seems to me like it's not really RTM at all. ...."Our beta testing identified anissue with a small set of device drivers. These drivers do not follow our guidelines for driver installation and as a result, some beta participants who were using Windows Vista and updated to Service Pack 1 reported issues with these devices. Because the issue was with the way the drivers were installed and not the drivers themselves, the solution was simply to reinstall the drivers. While this worked fine for our more technical beta testers, we want to deliver a better experience for customers as we make the update broadly available." Source: WindowsVistaBlog That statement seems to be to say... 'We're not done yet, Vista SP1 isn't really Final.' :rofl: Just can't get Vista right can they. Once again the release of Windows Vista is based on a shipping schedule not quality. (N) Edited February 4, 2008 by 1Frothy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger H. Veteran Posted February 4, 2008 Veteran Share Posted February 4, 2008 ok well that one that is from Vista forums is total junk and fake. it's the old RC Refresh build. Screenshot: http://winvistaforums.com/downloads/Window...B936330-X86.exe that was downloaded from that link which is from the page earlier. Digital sig: Saturday, January 19, 2008 8:40:35 AM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1Frothy Posted February 4, 2008 Share Posted February 4, 2008 ok well that one that is from Vista forums is total junk and fake. it's the old RC Refresh build. Screenshot: http://winvistaforums.com/downloads/Window...B936330-X86.exe that was downloaded from that link which is from the page earlier. Thanks for testing it KoDeXeRo, I was going to check that download out. :/ I think this is funny, but true... Is there a reason for the waiting time til mid-march?When it's ready - release it. When it's not ready - delay it. I can't see really the benefit of an RTM Version of SP1 when I can't have it. This release is making Vista SP1 look bad right out of the gates... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maximum Error Posted February 4, 2008 Share Posted February 4, 2008 Is this the RTM build? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kiddingguy Posted February 4, 2008 Share Posted February 4, 2008 is this linky the SP1 of Vista?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Argi Posted February 4, 2008 Share Posted February 4, 2008 According to post above 1840 is the RTM build so looks that way. Where's it from? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maximum Error Posted February 4, 2008 Share Posted February 4, 2008 is this linky the SP1 of Vista?? Dont think so but the build name of that file for the automated installations is the same build that i am already running (see my other post)..... Does this mean the rtm really was leaked? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
torrentthief Posted February 4, 2008 Share Posted February 4, 2008 server 2008 iso's have already leaked, the x86 and x64, but they are on connect and technet, only partners have access to vista sp1, could be a few days till it leaks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marc2003 Posted February 4, 2008 Share Posted February 4, 2008 Is this the RTM build? i assume you found and installed the same file that i did last week. that's also the same version mine reports. yet the details/timestamp on the .exe i have are the same as the one that KoDeXeRo posted. :p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phemo Posted February 4, 2008 Share Posted February 4, 2008 is this linky the SP1 of Vista?? Automated Installation Kit (AIK) for Windows Vista SP1 and Windows Server 2008 No, it's the automated installation kit for SP1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maximum Error Posted February 4, 2008 Share Posted February 4, 2008 i assume you found and installed the same file that i did last week. that's also the same version mine reports. yet the details/timestamp on the .exe i have are the same as the one that KoDeXeRo posted. :p Then you have the wrong one! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kiddingguy Posted February 4, 2008 Share Posted February 4, 2008 Automated Installation Kit (AIK) for Windows Vista SP1 and Windows Server 2008No, it's the automated installation kit for SP1. ... and what exactly is an Automated Installation Kit as compared to the 'regular SP1? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
(Spork) Posted February 4, 2008 Share Posted February 4, 2008 this is already debunked, and i doubt anyone is gonna think ur a good source of info on vista with a lame sig like that yea like your sig is any better Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raa Posted February 4, 2008 Share Posted February 4, 2008 If you think you have the final SP1, then do us a favor : forward your clock a year and tell us if you can still boot up. What? Don't want to? But you SAID you had RTM!! Yeah, didn't think so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xendrome Posted February 4, 2008 Share Posted February 4, 2008 yea like your sig is any better oh noe he dint! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThisSiteHasLostItsCharm Posted February 4, 2008 Share Posted February 4, 2008 ok well that one that is from Vista forums is total junk and fake. it's the old RC Refresh build. Screenshot: http://winvistaforums.com/downloads/Window...B936330-X86.exe that was downloaded from that link which is from the page earlier. Digital sig: Saturday, January 19, 2008 8:40:35 AM yea but once unpacked its 6001.longhorn_rtm.080118-1840 and the unpacked setup files are build 6.0.6001.18000, so it's note fake. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xinary Posted February 4, 2008 Share Posted February 4, 2008 yea like your sig is any better Way to answer on something that was discussed a week ago, and since his signature has already changed. /fail Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maximum Error Posted February 4, 2008 Share Posted February 4, 2008 If you think you have the final SP1, then do us a favor : forward your clock a year and tell us if you can still boot up.What? Don't want to? But you SAID you had RTM!! Yeah, didn't think so. works just fine......... i dont see the problem u were expecting. the time bomb was removed from refresh two onwards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marc2003 Posted February 4, 2008 Share Posted February 4, 2008 (edited) Then you have the wrong one! really? like i said, my file details match the one KoDeXeRo posted........ but once it's installed, it matches the build in your screenshot..... Edited February 4, 2008 by marc2003 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phemo Posted February 4, 2008 Share Posted February 4, 2008 Then you have the wrong one! Actually you're comparing two different files. spinstall.exe shows the 18000 version number, but the other poster has shown properties from the standalone installer which shows 17028 in the properties. The standalone installer I have here shows 17028 in properties, but when you launch the installer and check spinstall.exe in the temp files, it shows 18000 :) It's likely that 17028 is totally legit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xendrome Posted February 4, 2008 Share Posted February 4, 2008 If you think you have the final SP1, then do us a favor : forward your clock a year and tell us if you can still boot up.What? Don't want to? But you SAID you had RTM!! Yeah, didn't think so. The timebomb was removed from the last refresh, so if it's fake I bet they used the last refresh. So I don't see what that is going to prove. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maximum Error Posted February 4, 2008 Share Posted February 4, 2008 really? like i said, my file details match the one KoDeXeRo posted........ but once it's installed, it matches the build in your screenshot..... Yeah your right..... but why does the properties of the exe change? I huess ultimately we are all wasting our time here! It doesnt really matter what build we have... no amount of sitting here and speculating will change that we have to wait till march to really find out! Actually you're comparing two different files. spinstall.exe shows the 18000 version number, but the other poster has shown properties from the standalone installer which shows 17028 in the properties. The standalone installer I have here shows 17028 in properties, but when you launch the installer and check spinstall.exe in the temp files, it shows 18000 :) It's likely that 17028 is totally legit. do you think we can assume that because the leaked build matches the server 2008 build number exaclty we can assume we are using SP1 RTM? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
micro Posted February 4, 2008 Share Posted February 4, 2008 I would say its likely that its SP1 since both builds match. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marc2003 Posted February 4, 2008 Share Posted February 4, 2008 do you think we can assume that because the leaked build matches the server 2008 build number exaclty we can assume we are using SP1 RTM? loads of people have posted about this today as if it's a fact...... but with no source to back it up. i guess we'll just have to wait. :p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gaurav Posted February 4, 2008 Share Posted February 4, 2008 really? like i said, my file details match the one KoDeXeRo posted........ but once it's installed, it matches the build in your screenshot..... F*** SP1, I want your wallpaper! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts