Hurmoth Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9b5pre) Gecko/2008030607 Minefield/3.0b5pre 68/100 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shakey_snake Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 (edited) Mozilla's progress can be tracked at this spread sheet: http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pNg...yRTT2JeiZn4B2Yw and this tracking bug: http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=410460 ...for those who care. :) Edited March 6, 2008 by shakey_snake Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bryan000 Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 in the latest hourly build of Fx3 beta 5 it scores a 68. Slowly working its way up there!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ACTIONpack Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 Getting a 86 out of 100 is pretty good but the real story is your tabs. Would like to see whats under your tabs. :blush: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tokar Posted March 8, 2008 Share Posted March 8, 2008 So basically what we are looking at is: Safari (Mac) - 85ish Firefox3 - 70ish Safari (Win) - 60ish Firefox2 - 55ish IE7 - 15ish IE6 - 10ish How does IE8 perform? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bryan000 Posted March 8, 2008 Share Posted March 8, 2008 webkit nightly builds get 90/100. looks like safari 3.1 final could be the first browser to ship with full acid3 compliance. just a hunch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bryan000 Posted March 8, 2008 Share Posted March 8, 2008 latest hourly of firefox 3 gets a 69 (steadily increasing... ) very good progress Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Decryptor Veteran Posted March 8, 2008 Veteran Share Posted March 8, 2008 To pass Acid3 you need SMIL support, WebKit does have support for that, but it was turned off because it was buggy. If they can get it working and stable for the 3.1 release, then great, but I'd rather Safari fail the test than have a buggy implementation in a shipping release. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+M2Ys4U Subscriber¹ Posted March 8, 2008 Subscriber¹ Share Posted March 8, 2008 So basically what we are looking at is:Safari (Mac) - 85ish Firefox3 - 70ish Safari (Win) - 60ish Firefox2 - 55ish IE7 - 15ish IE6 - 10ish How does IE8 perform? 17/100 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iwod Posted March 8, 2008 Share Posted March 8, 2008 Looks like they need to start making another test to try and make webkit dev work :D I hope IE8 get anywhere between 50 - 60 when its release..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azmodan Posted March 8, 2008 Share Posted March 8, 2008 17/100 hahaha couldn't help it :laugh: http://failblog.wordpress.com/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theyarecomingforyou Posted March 8, 2008 Share Posted March 8, 2008 I hope IE8 get anywhere between 50 - 60 when its release..... I hope it gets with the times and goes for 100% on release. We're talking about Microsoft, a company with huge resources and with the dominant market position - they need to lead the web development, not hold it back. It's all very well having Opera, Firefox and Safari all passing Acid3 but if IE doesn't then it's of little use. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danrarbc Posted March 8, 2008 Share Posted March 8, 2008 So basically what we are looking at is:Safari (Mac) - 85ish Firefox3 - 70ish Safari (Win) - 60ish Firefox2 - 55ish IE7 - 15ish IE6 - 10ish How does IE8 perform? Safari (Win) gets the same score if you test the same versions. What you should be saying is Safari 3.0.5 is 60ish, and the nightlies (pre3.1) are up to 85-90. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
APH-Alex Posted March 8, 2008 Share Posted March 8, 2008 Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9b5pre) Gecko/2008030806 Minefield/3.0b5pre 69/100 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mathachew Veteran Posted March 8, 2008 Veteran Share Posted March 8, 2008 Safari (Vista Ultimate x64) - 39 Version 3.0.4 (523.15), downloaded it a few minutes ago and surprisingly... it ran (unlike the first five times I tried it) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marcel T Posted March 8, 2008 Share Posted March 8, 2008 Here's a couple from MobileSafari The higher score (39/100) took a while but it eventually got there. This is MobileSafari on an iPod but I assume it's the same as the iPhone version. Wonder what sort of nightly options are out there for Mobile err, WebKit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MGS4-SS Posted March 8, 2008 Share Posted March 8, 2008 The web browser on the iPhone outscored the web browser of the dominant company in the software business. IE = PHAIL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Decryptor Veteran Posted March 9, 2008 Veteran Share Posted March 9, 2008 Here's a couple from MobileSafari... The higher score (39/100) took a while but it eventually got there. This is MobileSafari on an iPod but I assume it's the same as the iPhone version. Wonder what sort of nightly options are out there for Mobile err, WebKit. When the 2.0 firmware starts getting installed somebody should do the test again, it's synced back with the desktop version. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crazysah Posted March 9, 2008 Share Posted March 9, 2008 Safari for Windows with latest nightlies installed scores an impressive 90/100! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LOC Veteran Posted March 9, 2008 Veteran Share Posted March 9, 2008 Safari for Windows with latest nightlies installed scores an impressive 90/100! I have the 3.1 (525.6) build right now, which build do you have, and can I get a link to it? I've heard that newer builds have problems with cookies though, :| Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tiagosilva29 Posted March 9, 2008 Share Posted March 9, 2008 When the 2.0 firmware starts getting installed somebody should do the test again, it's synced back with the desktop version. Awesome. :punk: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Decryptor Veteran Posted March 9, 2008 Veteran Share Posted March 9, 2008 I have the 3.1 (525.6) build right now, which build do you have, and can I get a link to it? I've heard that newer builds have problems with cookies though, :| http://nightly.webkit.org/ WebKit's a separate component, so as long as a API's the same, you can swap out different versions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crazysah Posted March 9, 2008 Share Posted March 9, 2008 (edited) I have the 3.1 (525.6) build right now, which build do you have, and can I get a link to it? I've heard that newer builds have problems with cookies though, :| EDIT1: I will update you with what version I have. EDIT2: Getting 90 with Version 3.0.4 (523.15) Seems it is an older version than yours. How do you get version 3.1? Edited March 9, 2008 by Crazysah Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LOC Veteran Posted March 9, 2008 Veteran Share Posted March 9, 2008 http://nightly.webkit.org/WebKit's a separate component, so as long as a API's the same, you can swap out different versions. So how does one update a nightly build of Safari Win32 with the WebKit, just throw everything into the Safari folder or? EDIT: I will update you with what version I have. Alright :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crazysah Posted March 9, 2008 Share Posted March 9, 2008 So how does one update a nightly build of Safari Win32 with the WebKit, just throw everything into the Safari folder or? What you do is unzip the webkit nightly and then open the run-nightly-webkit application. It will update automatically then! Anyways... I updated you with my version and I am getting 90/100! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts