[OSx86] I Hope Apple stops these OSX86 installs


Recommended Posts

So now we come to the "I'm only downloading it off Piratebay / Nova because I want to make a backup".

Never heard that one before.

I dunno if you go to Uni or have a job but most of these places have extra licenses and well they can be used for whatever purpose the user sees fit (or you could use the uni's license and the copy you got retail for backing up). Sooo I'm asking a valid question except apparently people can't grasp the concept and have to go on about piracy.... I'm asking for what is legal and what is not and your throwing it back in my face?

OK can you please either read another thread, Answer my question if you know it, or don't talk about it at all if you don't know what your talking about.

STOP TROLLING THOUGH!!!

PS: I have 2 legal copies of 10.5, because I sold a macbook with 10.4 installed instead of 10.5 I so I actually apply to my theory except I don't particularly want a OSx86 system. ARE YOU HAPPY WITH THAT ANSWER TROLL?

But what IS "patching the OS"? Most of the modifications needed to run osx on a PC have to do with the thing communicating to the hardware, that is, on the driver level. I think that you can even install the 'unmodified' thing, if you install EFI on your PC (for which there are specifications available). You'd still need an already working OS X install, but I think this "bridge" installation can be done from an actual mac computer (to an external disc), and then use it from the PC in which we want to install the vanilla OS X.

So it can be done without actually "Modifying" stuff, except kernel extensions and so on, but this things are called "drivers", and if that's illegal, then we're all criminals. You are not "modifying" the OS if the OS is behaving like it should, that is, a modularized UNIX system. On that level I don't think apple holds the intellectual property, since it's all BSD.

Most of the modifications are actually just drivers so really its not doing anything different to what someone does when they install something on their system. So yeah I agree with you on this one.

Edited by offroadaaron
The more I read these the more they follow the same old tired argumentation that every pirate and warez kid repeats on PB or one of the Nova sites:

"I can't afford so it's ok for me to pirate it!"

"I'm just testing, it's not my main platform it's ok for me to pirate it!"

"It doesn't support my hardware it's ok for me to warez it!"

At least you could pretend to be men and just admit you're warezing it because you're too cheap to buy instead of coming up with your lame excuses how Apple is evil, they're trying to force feed you their "overpriced hardware" or how the law in this case twists things in your view.

I especially find the "only a handful".. Just because a small group of people does it doesn't make it acceptable.

OSX86 is not legal. I agree with you on that, however, until the day comes where:

1.) OSX86 can be used on a majority of systems easily and with excellent hardware compatibility and stability

2.) Apple's sales begin to slow down as of a result of OS X piracy

then you simply can't really say it's a big deal.

If it wasn't for OSX86 and playing with the OS, I would not have just bought a Macbook Pro.

You and me also. My next notebook will definitely be a MacBook Pro, and the compatibility problems that I encountered with OSX86 has only made me more determined to get one.

Yes it is. Get it thru your head that it is legal.

Seconded. OSx86 is not inherently illegal. I can go out to my apple store, purchase a copy of OS X 10.5, place the DVD in my drive, start up my computer and install from it. In fact this is what I have done and am certain that I have in no way broken any law on the books in the United States.

I'd say the likelihood that an OSx86 install is illegally obtained (warez'd) is about the same as that of any other operating system. You can download Windows or OS X from any torrent site just as easily as anything else, but this does not innately mean that the users of those systems are breaking the law.

Edited by Arch
Seconded. OSx86 is not inherently illegal. I can go out to my apple store, purchase a copy of OS X 10.5, place the DVD in my drive, start up my computer and install from it.

Please do try it on a vanilla PC without using an emulator or a patched DVD - let me know how it goes.

ARE YOU HAPPY WITH THAT ANSWER TROLL?

I thought calling someone a troll was a violation of Neowin rules.

On that note after spending hundreds of thousands of euros in Macs, I'm entitled to be a little miffed because kiddies are pirating things we've paid for in full, in both hardware and software - all with the pretense of "just testing", not seeing the value in buying the hardware or hiding behind quasi-legal maneuvers.

Since this thread or the complaints won't change a thing - I'll take the issue forward via the "right channels" as encouraged by the Neowin admins - shame it has come to this.

On that note after spending hundreds of thousands of euros in Macs, I'm entitled to be a little miffed because kiddies are pirating things we've paid for in full, in both hardware and software

No, you are not entitled to anything. Only Steve and people who work at Apple can get upset about it.

Please do try it on a vanilla PC without using an emulator or a patched DVD - let me know how it goes.

It goes fine, I promise. You can actually use a true Macintosh to install OS X on any hard drive that you want, such as the drive to your PC, then use Grub to boot it on your Vanilla PC. On what grounds do you consider emulation or a modified DVD to be illegal?

On that note after spending hundreds of thousands of euros in Macs, I'm entitled to be a little miffed because kiddies are pirating things we've paid for in full, in both hardware and software - all with the pretense of "just testing", not seeing the value in buying the hardware or hiding behind quasi-legal maneuvers.

Since this thread or the complaints won't change a thing - I'll take the issue forward via the "right channels" as encouraged by the Neowin admins - shame it has come to this.

I can certainly understand why you would be a little miffed at this, however I have pirated nothing and there is no proof that anyone who runs OSx86 has pirated anything. That is the point people are trying to get across. I am an avid Mac user and have purchased quite a few of their products and will continue to do so.

It is possible to install using a vanilla disc, it's NOT easy, but it's do-able. Also, I've had a mac for years, and have no issue with OSX86, furthermore I plan on installing it on a system in the future. Frankly I think people here are taking this too seriously. OSX86 and any kind of Mods/Hax are pretty rare, The average user knows of no such thing, let alone comprehend the procedure. Honestly, is OSX86 going to ruin Apple? Not in a million years. Has modding a console ruined a company? Never, if anything, it's made them more popular, and I whole heartedly think that Apple only has everything to gain. It may not necessarily lead to a new computer purchase, but It will benefit them in at least some way.

Actually legally they can't... says so right in their EULA

Actually, legally they can. EULAs aren't a law. You wont be punished in a court if found guilty of breaking a EULA. Unless you breaking it goes against any actual laws. A EULA is only an agreement in relation to Warranty. Break the EULA and you have no right to service under warranty.

It's why Apple hasn't done anything about OSx86 and Psystar. They would lose the case and then everyone and their grandmother would know about OSx86.

Edited by osirisX
Actually legally they can't... says so right in their EULA

not having read the topic im guessing this has been posted multiple times all ready but look at https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=639781

1984 Federal Court ruling specifically makes it illegal for a company to force their users to install the OS on specific hardware
Actually, legally they can. EULAs aren't a law. You wont be punished in a court if found guilty of breaking a EULA. Unless you breaking it goes against any actual laws. A EULA is only an agreement in relation to Warranty. Break the EULA and you have no right to service under warranty.

I've been looking around tonight and there does seem to be president in the U.S. that the EULA is enforceable under law and for the clicking of a button to be considered entering into a binding contract, provisionally. You see, if a certain part of an EULA is considered unlawful then it can not be enforced. Read here for an example of a court invalidating a section of an EULA under current law.

This is where the case of DATA GENERAL CORP. v. DIGIDYNE CORP. (linked to here) comes into play. This case sets the precedent that tying a piece of software to a piece of hardware is not legal. And in my opinion this case holds startling similarities to the current situation, where one company was selling clones of another's hardware. Of course, I am not legal council and by reading this post you agree that I am not responsible for any actions you may take, physically or mentally, no matter their relation to what I have written. Herein you agree, by clicking reply, to unequivocally endorse my statements.

Crikey, I was beaten to it.

Please do try it on a vanilla PC without using an emulator or a patched DVD - let me know how it goes.

I thought calling someone a troll was a violation of Neowin rules.

On that note after spending hundreds of thousands of euros in Macs, I'm entitled to be a little miffed because kiddies are pirating things we've paid for in full, in both hardware and software - all with the pretense of "just testing", not seeing the value in buying the hardware or hiding behind quasi-legal maneuvers.

Since this thread or the complaints won't change a thing - I'll take the issue forward via the "right channels" as encouraged by the Neowin admins - shame it has come to this.

You paid for your operating system, OSx86 users paid for theirs. You paid for your hardware. OSx86 users paid for theirs.

I mean, you do realise the hardware inside a Mac is...identical to PC hardware? There is no difference.

You paid for your operating system, OSx86 users paid for theirs. You paid for your hardware. OSx86 users paid for theirs.

I mean, you do realise the hardware inside a Mac is...identical to PC hardware? There is no difference.

Which is why it's so easy to run OS X on generic PCs. Just pop the DVD into the drive and you're all set, updates and everything.

WTF are the rest of us Mac users thinking!! :rolleyes:

Which is why it's so easy to run OS X on generic PCs. Just pop the DVD into the drive and you're all set, updates and everything.

WTF are the rest of us Mac users thinking!! :rolleyes:

Well, the hardware IS the same, save for the BIOS. Provide an EFI to OS X on a PC, and it will run.

1984 Federal Court ruling specifically makes it illegal for a company to force their users to install the OS on specific hardware

Interesting. I never knew that. So, if I make an OS and specific hardware, I cannot tell my consumers that you can only run my OS on my hardware? That's kind of dumb. Also, what if my hardware is specific, and the OS can really only run on my hardware? In essence, by doing that, I am forcing users to use my hardware to run the OS.

I always thought that a EULA is a legally binding contract, and by installing OSX86 on non-Apple hardware, you are breaking that legally binding EULA. However, if that is a federal law, then that EULA doesn't matter. So long as you legally purchase OS X, and don't use any software cracking utilities, then you are golden.

Interesting. I never knew that. So, if I make an OS and specific hardware, I cannot tell my consumers that you can only run my OS on my hardware? That's kind of dumb. Also, what if my hardware is specific, and the OS can really only run on my hardware? In essence, by doing that, I am forcing users to use my hardware to run the OS.

I always thought that a EULA is a legally binding contract, and by installing OSX86 on non-Apple hardware, you are breaking that legally binding EULA. However, if that is a federal law, then that EULA doesn't matter. So long as you legally purchase OS X, and don't use any software cracking utilities, then you are golden.

There's a difference. It never says you have to assist the user in getting it to run on multiple systems, only that you can't force the user to keep your OS on your hardware. If they somehow get it running via an emulation layer, provided they didn't obtain your OS illegally, then there's not really much you can do about it.

Anyway, Macs are just PCs anyway (save for the BIOS, like others have said). The only reason why games don't run on a Mac is because of the Operating System, not the hardware. Throw Windows on a Mac and you'll be running the games in no time (provided the hardware spec matches the reccomendations).

People that are installing OSX on unsupported platforms are going to have alot of issues, then turn around and blame the OS

i can see alot of " OSX sux because it keeps crashing on my AMD64 w/512 DDR "

only saying this because there are already what 3 or 4 threads of people not beign able to get stuff installed properly or askign how to work the OSX86 project ( even though there are probably tutorials on the site

I use the custom installers like the AMD Software Update program that patches all the updates before installing. Im running 10.5.3 with no issues at all.

  • 2 weeks later...
Interesting. I never knew that. So, if I make an OS and specific hardware, I cannot tell my consumers that you can only run my OS on my hardware? That's kind of dumb. Also, what if my hardware is specific, and the OS can really only run on my hardware? In essence, by doing that, I am forcing users to use my hardware to run the OS.

I always thought that a EULA is a legally binding contract, and by installing OSX86 on non-Apple hardware, you are breaking that legally binding EULA. However, if that is a federal law, then that EULA doesn't matter. So long as you legally purchase OS X, and don't use any software cracking utilities, then you are golden.

The First-sale doctrine trumps the EULA. Basically, if it gets bought in a store, it's a sale and some of the license restrictions are tossed out, especially if you can just walk in and buy it without proving you have a mac.

Of course, the district courts are not all in agreement on this, so until the supreme court rules, YMMV.

As for cracking utilities, unless you're circumventing a copyright protection measure, they're legal. So, if you want to modify your purchased copy of OSX to run on your microwave oven you can. If you want to bypass something that prevents you from copying the CD, you can't.

(I am not a lawyer, this is not legal advice, you can look this information up as well)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Amazon may use OpenAI and Nova models after Anthropic reportedly raises costs by Karthik Mudaliar Amazon is reportedly considering to use OpenAI models and even its own Nova family of AI models after Anthropic raised the cost of using Claude inside Amazon services. According to a report from The Information, Amazon is weighing its options to reduce costs under a new arrangement with Anthropic. But back in April, Amazon said it would invest $5 billion more in Anthropic, with the possibility of adding up to another $20 billion if certain commercial milestones are met. That investment actually came on top of another $8 billion Amazon had already put into the Claude maker. Anthropic, meanwhile, committed to spend more than $100 billion over 10 years on AWS technologies, including Amazon’s Trainium chips. Amazon isn't just a customer of Anthropic but also one of the most important backers and cloud partners. This is why it makes it interesting that Amazon is considering other alternatives to handle its internal workloads. Although Amazon has been building its own options for a while now. Its Nova family of AI models was announced in late 2024 for Amazon Bedrock, with models aimed at text, image, and video tasks. Amazon pitched the model around cost and latency at that time. With that said, OpenAI has also become a more realistic option recently for AWS customers as well as for Amazon itself. Earlier this year, OpenAI brought its latest models and Codex coding agent to Amazon Bedrock, after changes to its previously more restrictive Microsoft cloud arrangement. This allowed AWS to serve even those customers who wanted other alternatives from Claude, without having to move workloads out of Amazon's cloud. Evaluating alternatives could also be due to commercial pressure and not necessarily a sign of a damaged partnership between Amazon and Anthropic. Whether or not Amazon is actually considering switching entirely to OpenAI's models or its own Nova models remains unknown at this moment.
    • Samsung introduces new AI classroom tools and interactive displays at ISTELive 2026 by Fiza Ali Samsung has announced several new education-focused software features and interactive displays for schools during ISTELive 2026, taking place in Orlando, Florida, from 28 June to 1 July. The focus of these updates is on making shared classroom displays easier to use for teachers while giving IT administrators more control over managing devices. One of the key additions is the Samsung Account Management Solution (AMS). In many schools, multiple teachers share the same interactive display throughout the day, which means signing in and setting everything up can become repetitive. With AMS, teachers can log in by scanning a QR code or tapping an NFC-enabled ID card. Once signed in, their personalised workspace, including wallpapers, bookmarks, app shortcuts, and files, can be instantly accessed through Home Personalisation. Samsung has also included a screen lock feature, allowing teachers to lock the display if they need to step away briefly. Furthermore, the company is also updating its Education Portal with new tools designed for school IT administrators. The portal will allow IT administrators to register teachers, enrol devices, and manage user access from a central dashboard. Administrators can also link NFC cards to teacher accounts, making sign-ins quicker across shared displays. Another addition is a Tags feature that lets schools organise displays by building or classroom. Those tags can also be used to send emergency notifications to selected Samsung Interactive Displays through compatible platforms such as InformaCast and Raptor. Moreover, the tech giant's AI Assistant is gaining several new features aimed at supporting everyday classroom tasks such as lesson planning and classroom engagement. One of the features is Circle to Search, which lets teachers circle text or images on the display to quickly find related information, videos, or web results without interrupting the lesson. The content can then be brought into Samsung Whiteboard. Another feature, Live Transcript, converts spoken lessons into real-time captions, which could be useful for students with hearing impairments or those in multilingual classrooms. The AI Assistant also introduces AI Summary and AI Quiz. The summary tool creates summaries of recorded lessons, while AI Quiz generates questions based on lesson content so teachers can quickly check how well students are following along. Teachers signed in through Samsung AMS can also return to their previous AI-generated lesson materials without logging in again. Alongside the software updates, Samsung has expanded its Android-based Interactive Display range with three new models: the WAF-S, WAFX-PS, and WAHX-M. The WAF-S and WAFX-PS ship with Android 16, bringing updates to security, accessibility, and overall usability while maintaining compatibility with Google's education services including Google Classroom and Google Drive through EDLA certification. Meanwhile, the new WAHX-M is the biggest addition to the lineup, introducing a 98-inch display for larger spaces such as lecture halls and conference rooms. It will also be available in 65-inch, 75-inch and 86-inch sizes. Samsung says the WAHX-M further includes on-device AI features such as voice commands, text-to-speech, and an AI calculator, alongside support for Samsung AMS and AI Assistant. Samsung AI Assistant has been available since April, while Samsung AMS and the updated Education Portal will begin rolling out in July.
    • It's been $24 (single) or $89 (4-pack) for many days on both Amazon and Walmart as far as I know. That isn't a big discount. If these end up like the 1st gen, the 4-pack will routinely get down around $80, give or take a dollar. I think they have even hit $69 at times.
    • Microsoft brings Claude to its own Azure infrastructure, powered by Nvidia GB300 Blackwell by Karthik Mudaliar Anthropic's Claude models are now generally available in Microsoft Foundry on Azure and are running on Nvidia's GB300 Blackwell Ultra systems. Nvidia wrote in its announcement that the models are hosted on Microsoft Azure and accelerated by GB300 Blackwell Ultra GPUs, with Quantum-X800 InfiniBand networking used to support larger agentic systems and specialized sub-agents that can operate across business domains. This is great for customers and enterprises that want to build autonomous and domain-specific AI agents using Claude without moving outside Microsoft’s cloud platform. Microsoft currently offers Claude models in Foundry in two forms: “Hosted on Azure,” which runs end-to-end on Azure infrastructure and is generally available, and “Hosted on Anthropic infrastructure,” which remains in preview. This separation is quite important for organizations that have procurement, compliance, data processing, or internal governance requirements tied to Azure. Anthropic currently has 11 Claude models listed in Microsoft Foundry, including Opus 4.8, Sonnet 4.6, and even the unavailable Mythos and Fable models. Billing is handled through Claude Consumption Units (CCUs). Microsoft says CCU is an invoicing unit for Claude models in Foundry, with token usage converted using Anthropic’s published per-model token rates. The usage is billed through Azure Marketplace just like models from other distributors and appears on the customer's Azure invoice, while eligible spend can count against a Microsoft Azure Consumption Commitment. For starters, GB300 NVL72 is a rack-scale, fully liquid-cooled system that combines 72 Blackwell Ultra GPUs and 36 Grace CPUs. Nvidia has listed 37TB of fast memory, 130TB/s of NVLink bandwidth, and FP4 Tensor Core performance of up to 1,440 petaflops with sparsity. The deal is also part of a three-way partnership between Microsoft, Nvidia, and Anthropic. Under the deal, Anthropic has committed to buying $30 billion in Azure compute capacity and contracting additional capacity up to one gigawatt. Nvidia and Microsoft also said they would invest up to $10 billion and $5 billion in Anthropic, respectively.
    • WhatsApp is getting usernames, and you can reserve your preferred one now by Fiza Ali Sharing your phone number isn't always something you want to do, especially with people you've just met. Whether it's someone from a class, a local community group, or a sports team chat, handing over your number can feel like giving away more personal information than necessary. That's exactly the problem WhatsApp is trying to solve with its upcoming usernames feature. The company has announced that users can now reserve a unique WhatsApp username ahead of the feature's wider rollout later this year. Once usernames become available, they'll let people connect without revealing their phone numbers. It's a change that makes a lot of sense for group chats. Right now, everyone in the group can see your phone number. With usernames enabled, that won't necessarily be the case when someone contacts you for the first time. WhatsApp says it's opening username reservations early because more than three billion people use the app, meaning plenty of people are likely to want the same usernames. Reserving one now gives users a better chance of securing the name they actually want before the feature launches more broadly. If your preferred username is already taken, WhatsApp will also offer a built-in username generator to suggest available alternatives. The feature isn't only aimed at individual users. Creators, businesses, and organisations will be able to claim the same username they already use on Instagram or Facebook, making it easier to keep a consistent identity across Meta's apps. Furthermore, privacy is a big part of how WhatsApp is introducing usernames. There won't be a public directory where people can browse or search for usernames. Instead, people will need to know your exact username before they can start a conversation with you. Additionally, users can also choose to enable a username key, which adds another layer of control by requiring people to enter that key before sending a message. Once the feature rolls out, people who choose to use a username will no longer have their phone number shown when messaging a person or business for the first time. If you want to reserve a username, make sure you're running the latest version of WhatsApp, then head to Settings > Account > Username. The tech giant says usernames will roll out gradually over the coming months, and users will receive an in-app notification when the feature becomes available in their country.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      536
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      269
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      150
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!