[Official] F.E.A.R. 2: Project Origin


Recommended Posts

Unless you're playing Football Manager, gaming on a laptop is fail :rofl:

*runs*

I've never completed Fear 1, I probably should. Played about half of it!

You sound just like me Audio. Your reasons may be different, but it just scared the crap out of me. :p

Question. Can anyone clarify whether I'll need to play the expansion to FEAR1 in order to understand the story of FEAR2?

I am a huge fan of the original. I played it through 3x, and played multiplayer for a bit. However, I never got around to playing the expansion, whatever it was called (I can't even remember, hah). I am definitely going to pick this one up if it's on par with the original; but, I'm worried that I may have missed something, story wise, by not having played the expansion.

To be honest, I'm not optimistic about FEAR 2, for numerous reasons. Firstly, the graphics are only slightly better than the original, with improved lighting, and there are some destructible environments too. Once you look past the special effects and lighting, the graphics in the game are, to be frank, not much better than Doom 3 was, which was released before FEAR 1. FEAR 2 doesn't, graphics wise, and as a whole, appear all that different from FEAR, the original.

The other thing is the horror element. FEAR was great for this, and if they could of added more variety into the levels then it would have been even better. However, before it was even in development, Monolith had stated they were aiming to make more open spaces, which, for me at least, completely ruins the horror element. Granted, there are some claustrophobic one offs from what I have seen, but when they brought in the EPAs, I knew it didn't look good. The point of a survival-horror is that you struggle, and things aren't always easy.

The unofficial expansions didn't help either (although that couldn't be helped), but I'm just not expecting something amazing out of this. I was hoping to do a writeup on the new, innovative features that would be shown in FEAR 2, just like we saw in FEAR 1, only to find.. there weren't any.

Question. Can anyone clarify whether I'll need to play the expansion to FEAR1 in order to understand the story of FEAR2?

I am a huge fan of the original. I played it through 3x, and played multiplayer for a bit. However, I never got around to playing the expansion, whatever it was called (I can't even remember, hah). I am definitely going to pick this one up if it's on par with the original; but, I'm worried that I may have missed something, story wise, by not having played the expansion.

FEAR 2 ignores the 2 expansions, because they weren't made by Monolith. I bought one of the expansions, and stopped playing after about 5 minutes into it. It's dull to be frank, as the reviews of the expansions will tell you. FEAR 2 is independant of them, and carries on from where FEAR 1 left off.

To be honest, I'm not optimistic about FEAR 2, for numerous reasons. Firstly, the graphics are only slightly better than the original, with improved lighting, and there are some destructible environments too. Once you look past the special effects and lighting, the graphics in the game are, to be frank, not much better than Doom 3 was, which was released before FEAR 1. FEAR 2 doesn't, graphics wise, and as a whole, appear all that different from FEAR, the original.

The other thing is the horror element. FEAR was great for this, and if they could of added more variety into the levels then it would have been even better. However, before it was even in development, Monolith had stated they were aiming to make more open spaces, which, for me at least, completely ruins the horror element. Granted, there are some claustrophobic one offs from what I have seen, but when they brought in the EPAs, I knew it didn't look good. The point of a survival-horror is that you struggle, and things aren't always easy.

The unofficial expansions didn't help either (although that couldn't be helped), but I'm just not expecting something amazing out of this. I was hoping to do a writeup on the new, innovative features that would be shown in FEAR 2, just like we saw in FEAR 1, only to find.. there weren't any.

FEAR 2 ignores the 2 expansions, because they weren't made by Monolith. I bought one of the expansions, and stopped playing after about 5 minutes into it. It's dull to be frank, as the reviews of the expansions will tell you. FEAR 2 is independant of them, and carries on from where FEAR 1 left off.

Couldn't disagree more about the graphics. Even when it was first announced and shown on SpikeTV, the graphics looked far better than the original's. Screenshots don't really do it justice (IMO) if you haven't seen the videos. I went back and played the original recently, and it's crazy how much better F.E.A.R. 2 looks.

Is it the best looking game out there? Nah. Will it challenge Gears of War 2/Killzone 2? Nah. But I think it looks good, personally -- although to each his own :)

I'm not too worried about the horror aspect, as every preview so far has said it's very scary. I trust Monolith to make a scary game, at the very least. I have to agree with you, though... I'm not too excited about the EPAs. I know a lot of the people in the community wanted them, but I certainly don't. But Monolith did make Shogo, so I'm sure it'll be at least a decent change of pace. Still don't care for it, though.

If it's not any good, though (at least IMO)... believe me, I'll be the first to say it :)

(You're right about the expansions, though. Monolith ignores them. Extraction Point wasn't horrible, but Perseus Mandate certainly was. Neither holds a candle to the original, though.)

FEAR 2 ignores the 2 expansions, because they weren't made by Monolith. I bought one of the expansions, and stopped playing after about 5 minutes into it. It's dull to be frank, as the reviews of the expansions will tell you. FEAR 2 is independant of them, and carries on from where FEAR 1 left off.

Thanks Sazz. I'll stear clear of the expansions. Lets just hope the lack of innovative features in FEAR2 is overshadowed by a quality, lengthy single-player campaign. (Y)

Couldn't disagree more about the graphics. Even when it was first announced and shown on SpikeTV, the graphics looked far better than the original's. Screenshots don't really do it justice (IMO) if you haven't seen the videos. I went back and played the original recently, and it's crazy how much better F.E.A.R. 2 looks....

Well, it's a personal thing, but perhaps I should wait to play the demo before I say anymore regarding that.

Don't get me wrong, I really want FEAR 2 to be a damn good game; :) I spent many happy, if not frightened, hours playing FEAR, and would hope that FEAR 2 is the same. However, FEAR was new, and innovative, with graphics that made E3 drool, and gameplay to match. FEAR 2 just feels a little 'stale', if you will.

However, despite my negative tone towards it, I'll be getting the demo as soon as it's available, and, all being well, it'll be on my Steam pre-oder list too.

I'm purchasing FRAPS soon, so once the demos released I'll be putting some effort into making a video review of the game (or rather, a review with video, depending on how things go :))

Well, it's a personal thing, but perhaps I should wait to play the demo before I say anymore regarding that.

Don't get me wrong, I really want FEAR 2 to be a damn good game; :) I spent many happy, if not frightened, hours playing FEAR, and would hope that FEAR 2 is the same. However, FEAR was new, and innovative, with graphics that made E3 drool, and gameplay to match. FEAR 2 just feels a little 'stale', if you will.

However, despite my negative tone towards it, I'll be getting the demo as soon as it's available, and, all being well, it'll be on my Steam pre-oder list too.

I'm purchasing FRAPS soon, so once the demos released I'll be putting some effort into making a video review of the game (or rather, a review with video, depending on how things go :))

Yeah, I get what you're saying (Y)

Question. Can anyone clarify whether I'll need to play the expansion to FEAR1 in order to understand the story of FEAR2?

I am a huge fan of the original. I played it through 3x, and played multiplayer for a bit. However, I never got around to playing the expansion, whatever it was called (I can't even remember, hah). I am definitely going to pick this one up if it's on par with the original; but, I'm worried that I may have missed something, story wise, by not having played the expansion.

Wait, there's a STORYLINE to these games?

Paxton Fettle, that crazy guy!

I kid, I kid :laugh:.

PS3 owners:

"F.E.A.R. 2 Demo will become available today - January 15th for Qore Subscribers. Just open Qore Episode 8 and download."

Gonna check now.

UPDATE - Not available yet in US

Anyway, to answer Spacer's question; I really don't feel that you need to play the expansions to understand where FEAR 2 will be taking off from.

The amount of story telling in the expansions is pretty poor, you just learn a bit more about Project Origin I think.. Can't really remember what happens in them... I don't think I even bothered with the last expansion, the previous one made FEAR feel very stale after completing it(Or did I even bother with getting that far? :unsure:) and I felt my FEAR quota had been filled sufficiently.

I honestly think that the story is pretty rubbish, it's just awesome to shoot 5 people in the face right after a grenade you threw at them explodes all in slow-mo. The story's nice to have the background though.

But I'll be sure to check the demo out, I'm not entirely sure that my laptop will cope too well with it but It's worth a shot and I really enjoyed the original. FEAR's got some really good replay value, which I like in single player games.

Well I have to say, I just watched the Qore stuff on FEAR 2 since I could not get the Demo yet, and first and foremost, the graphics look noticeably better than the first one (on consoles I am talking about). Qore always does a very good job at showing straight gameplay video, and it really does look much, much, much better.

And I actually really liked the first game, but for some reason was not really looking forward to this game all that much, now watching the two preview vids on Qore, I am very much looking forward to it, and the MP actually looks much, much better than the first games, which was actually pretty damn fun.

The F.E.A.R. 2: Project Origin demo is now out for Qore PS3 subscribers. The following message was posted on the F.E.A.R. 2 message board but the community manager:

I want everyone to know that the Community team has been trying to get permission to release the dates of the PC and Xbox demo for FEAR2. The best that I can tell you is that there will be an official announcement about the demo tomorrow. Please, check back us!

Best,

Yurei

That seems to be the response I'm hearing from everyone, which makes me extremely happy :) On a lot of PS3 forums there's now an argument over which will be better -- F.E.A.R. 2 or Killzone 2 :woot: PS3 owners certainly have a lot to be thankful for in February when it comes to FPS games!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Now comes with a money back guarantee instead of a replacement! Hah
    • Rufus 4.15.2391 Beta by Razvan Serea Rufus is a small utility that helps format and create bootable USB flash drives, such as USB keys/pendrives, memory sticks, etc. Despite its small size, Rufus provides everything you need! Oh, and Rufus is fast. For instance it's about twice as fast as UNetbootin, Universal USB Installer or Windows 7 USB download tool, on the creation of a Windows 7 USB installation drive from an ISO (with honorable mention to WiNToBootic for managing to keep up). It is also marginally faster on the creation of Linux bootable USBs from ISOs. A non-exhaustive list of Rufus supported ISOs is available here. It can be especially useful for cases where: you need to create USB installation media from bootable ISOs (Windows, Linux, UEFI, etc.) you need to work on a system that doesn't have an OS installed you need to flash a BIOS or other firmware from DOS you want to run a low-level utility Rufus 4.15.2391 Beta changelog: Improve the guards for using the "silent" option Improve the ability to cancel during write retries Fix unrestricted XML entity expansion and integer overflow in ezxml parser (courtesy of @esadowski4) [GHSA-55r2-34wg-8mv9] Fix "silent" Windows installation failing at 75% in most cases [#2960] Fix a crash during boot when using UEFI:NTFS on Snapdragon X based ARM64 platforms [#2934] Fix the first WUE option always being checked by default [#2965] Fix an infinite loop when using Windows ISOs that contain multiple WIMs Fix "Enable runtime UEFI media validation" checkbox not always being properly enabled Other WUE improvements/fixes for OneDrive removal and username validation (with thanks to @christian8641) [#2984, #2991] Download: Rufus 4.15 Beta | 1.9 MB (Open Source) Links: Rufus Home Page | Project Page @GitHub | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Media Player Classic - Home Cinema 2.7.3 by Razvan Serea Media Player Classic - Home Cinema (MPC-HC) is a free and open-source video and audio player for Windows. MPC-HC is based on the original Guliverkli project (which is no longer maintained) and contains many additional features and bug fixes. As the continuation of the original Media Player Classic, MPC-HC isn’t flashy but it works with nearly any media format. MPC-HC uses DXVA technology to pass decoding operations to your modern video card, enhancing your viewing experience. And MPC-HC supports both physical and software DVDs with menus, chapter navigation, and subtitles. Overview of features A lot of people seem to be unaware of some of the awesome features that have been added to MPC-HC in the past years. Here is a list of useful options and features that everyone should know about: Dark interface Menu > View > Dark Theme When using dark theme it is also possible to change the height of the seekbar and size of the toolbar buttons. Options > Advanced Video preview on the seekbar Options > Tweaks > Show preview on seek bar Adjust playback speed Menu > Play > Playback rate The buttons in the player that control playback rate take a 2x step by default. This can be customized to smaller values (like 10%): Options > Playback > Speed step Adjusting playback speed works best with the internal audio renderer. This also has automatic pitch correction. Options > Playback > Output > Audio Renderer MPC-HC can remember playback position, so you can resume from that point later Options > Player > History You can quickly seek through a video with Ctrl + Mouse Scrollwheel. You can jump to next/previous file in a folder by pressing PageUp/PageDown. You can perform automatic actions at end of file. For example to go to next file or close player. Options > Playback > After Playback (permanent setting) Menu > Play > After Playback (for current file only) A-B repeat - You can loop a segment of a video. Press [ and ] to set start and stop markers. You can rotate/flip/mirror/stretch/zoom the video Menu > View > Pan&Scan This is also easily done with hotkeys (see below). There are lots of keyboard hotkeys and mouse actions to control the player. They can be customized as well. Options > Player > Keys Tip: there is a search box above the table. You can stream videos directly from Youtube and many other video websites You can stream videos directly from Youtube and many other video websites Put yt-dlp.exe or youtube-dl.exe in the MPC-HC installation folder. Then you can open website URLs in the player: Menu > File > Open File/URL You can even download those videos: Menu > File > Save a copy Tip: to be able to download in best quality with yt-dlp/youtube-dl, it is recommended to also put ffmpeg.exe in the MPC-HC folder. Several YDL configuration options are found here: Options > Advanced This includes an option to specify the location of the .exe in case you don't want to put it in MPC-HC folder. Play HDR video This requires using madVR or MPC Video Renderer. After installation these renderers can be selected here: Options > Playback > Output Ability to search for and download subtitles, either automatically or manually (press D): Options > Subtitles > Misc Besides all these (new) features, there have also been many bugfixes and internal improvements in the player in the past years that give better performance and stability. It also has updated internal codecs. Support was added for CUE sheets, WebVTT subtitles, etc. Media Player Classic - Home Cinema 2.7.3 changelog: Updated LAV Filters to version 0.82 Updated MPC Video Renderer to version 0.10.4.2550 Updated MPC Audio Renderer A few crash fixes, bug fixes and small improvements. Download: MPC-HC 2.7.3 (x64) | Standalone | ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Download: MPC-HC 2.7.3 (x86) | Standalone Links: MPC-HC Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Microsoft will finally let you sign in to Edge with a Google account by Usama Jawad As things currently stand, Microsoft Edge only allows you to sign in to the browser with a Microsoft Account (MSA). This allows you to sync your browser settings and other data across other devices, as long as you sign in with the same account. However, Microsoft is now modifying this mechanism in a way that will likely please many users. In an update to its Microsoft 365 Roadmap, Microsoft has indicated that it will soon let users sign into Edge using a Google account from the profile menu and the Edge sign-in screen. This will be in addition to the MSA login option, and it opens up new doors for people who prefer using Edge, but cannot be bothered to configure a Microsoft account. This brings several advantages such as the ability to sync your data across devices using just a Google account. It may even facilitate flexible single sign-on (SSO) experiences where you can quickly login to websites and services through a single Google account that is presented as the preferred sign-in option. Up until now, Microsoft allowed customers to indirectly use a Google account, by configuring a Google account as a Microsoft account, or by setting up a one-way sync option between Edge and Chrome. This is a rather interesting development, especially considering that Google Chrome still limits you to a Google account sign-in, but it will be interesting to see if the company reciprocates Microsoft's gesture in the future. This is not the only recent instance in which Microsoft has extended a handshake to Google via Edge. In April 2026, it began tracking the development of a work search banner for Google Search queries, just like the one present in Edge. However, if we go back almost seven years, to January 2020, Microsoft had emphasized that it had no plans to "integrate Google services into Microsoft Edge by default", in response to people requesting Google sign-in services on Edge. Fast-forward to today, and Microsoft is planning to release this feature in July 2026, with IT admins having the option to control its availability on Windows and macOS through the NonMicrosoftAccountSignInEnabled policy.
    • If they ever come out and say the AI is no longer accessible to the gen pop people aren't going to know how to tie their own shoelaces.
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      509
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      89
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      76
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!