Windows 7 build 7068 Screenshot (Yes, it's real)

[Berserk87]

7068 is 100% real, testers can get this build 100%, i'm sick of so many people calling fake just because they cannot find it on BT network.

Latest build is 6.1.7070.0.winmain.090324-1853 and will probably be Public RC as stated of today

im aware its real. i was laughing at the last thread being locked, being called fake, while this one is open.

[SoLoR1]

im aware its real. i was laughing at the last thread being locked, being called fake, while this one is open.

well people are stupid :< i will lough my ass off, when x86 will leak it will have same size as that yesterdays "fake" leaked torrent when seeder withdraw and mirrcle happend with 1 guy out of couple of thousands managed to extract setup.exe from 0.7% of iso and "lol proved" its fake.

[sundayx Veteran]

What resolution is this... is this on the Vaio P or something?

[Nepobedimas]

For those who do not believe:

http://pic.ipicture.ru/uploads/090327/m0K0TScga2.png

http://pic.ipicture.ru/uploads/090325/aAR7mR4DQt.jpg

[crazlunatic]

heh, the neowin editor scared me a bit when he claimed my ss fake...

good news to everyone im glad we'll have it soon

[SoLoR1]

heh, the neowin editor scared me a bit when he claimed my ss fake...

good news to everyone im glad we'll have it soon

btw next time tell your friend its not illigal to share this builds! :D altho it is... :p but im sure police wont come to his doors because of it, since its only free mostly positive publicty at the end for MS.

[crazlunatic]

btw next time tell your friend its not illigal to share this builds! :D altho it is... :p but im sure police wont come to his doors because of it, since its only free mostly positive publicty at the end for MS.

oh. If it's not illegal why does neowin not permit links on here?

with the oncoming recession, he couldn't "risk it"...

######...

[iamwhoiam]

oh. If it's not illegal why does neowin not permit links on here?

For the same reason that you're not supposed to list ISO names...that info is reserved for the front page.

[crazlunatic]

ohhhh i had no idea! i seriously thought it was "illegal" lol but I will respect the rules. well tbh dont know whats taking so long, if my friend wasn't such a chicken it would have been up yesterday 11pm

Edited March 27, 2009 by crazlunatic

[iamwhoiam]

ohhhh i had no idea! i seriously thought it was "illegal" lol. well tbh dont know whats taking so long, if my friend wasn't such a chicken it would have been up yesterday 11pm

It is against the rules to post that info in the forums. But for some reason front page news has no issues with the rules.

[SoLoR1]

Well, what i undestand this beta products are evaluation. For whatever company your friend works for, would break NDA with MS with spreading this builds or leaking screenshots. However its not against EULA of win7 beta to actualy use it. So its kinda gray area. But main issue is, this isos are NOT watermarked and considering how many companys is in TAP program, there is no way they can find out who exactly leaked it. So at the end....

[Calum Veteran]

It is against the rules to post that info in the forums. But for some reason front page news has no issues with the rules.

Just to clarify something for you.

The rules state members cannot post warez links or talk about warez in the forums or comments sections of news articles. The rules state nothing about the content of the actual articles themselves.

This is not me talking on behalf of Neowin at all. This is just me using my common sense and my eyes to realise what the rules actually state.

The Neowin rules couldn't be any more clear.

Now, may we please stay on topic? Thank you :)

[UncleSpellbinder]

still not worth clearing the stable 7057 for me

Indeed, 7057 is rock solid stable for me as well. And if 7068 is a TAP build, then why bother. Isn't a TAP build filled with debugging

code and such? If so, seems it may not be an ideal candidate for anyone looking for something that is a step up from 7057.

[SoLoR1]

And if 7068 is a TAP build, then why bother. Isn't a TAP build filled with debugging

code and such?

And what you think 7057 was? it was also TAP build. Roughly MS have roughly 4 different kind of builds. Most of them are internal only, then you have group of internal "testers" that gets build every few days after them you get TAP/OEM program that gets build roughly every 3 weeks after them there is rest of us sheeps that get 2 offical builds in whole period of beta :) Most likely all beta builds not matter milestone or daily builds from "winmain" branch have same amount of debug code. Or there wouldnt be point of beta right?

[UncleSpellbinder]

And what you think 7057 was? it was also TAP build. Roughly MS have roughly 4 different kind of builds. Most of them are internal only, then you have group of internal "testers" that gets build every few days after them you get TAP/OEM program that gets build roughly every 3 weeks after them there is rest of us sheeps that get 2 offical builds in whole period of beta :) Most likely all beta builds not matter milestone or daily builds from "winmain" branch have same amount of debug code. Or there wouldnt be point of beta right?

Point taken.

[atleeit]

Anyway if I'm right i think build x64 will be out in the wild first :) time to sleep and wake up too good news, but anyway i will wait for 7070 because that's the version i want.

[JonathanVP]

looks noice!

[non.sequitur2]

Fake.

[Nepobedimas]

translation (why you cannot to download setup.exe):

At this moment foreign traffic for this file is bigger than Russia's. You can get this file only if you visit our advertisers help pay for our servers and channels. Click here to go to the selection of advertisers.

:D

[scumdogmillionaire]

but anyway i will wait for 7070 because that's the version i want.

why? because it's a round number? build number has no relevance.

[koinonia]

Hmmm because 7070 is his favourite number and probably is not a Fake build? =o

why? because it's a round number? build number has no relevance.

[Randolph]

Fake.

Be quiet please.

It's not fake and has been confirmed several times in the thread if you even bothered to read. :rolleyes:

[Digitalx]

only time build numbers are rounded up or anything is usually with final RTM build which with windows 7 will most likely be 7100. xp was 2600 vista was 6000.

[SoapyHamHocks Member]

Looks great :) Can't wait for a 64bit leak.

[Joni_78]

For the same reason that you're not supposed to list ISO names...that info is reserved for the front page.

WTF, thats ridiculous.

7068.0.090321-1322_x64fre_client_en-us_Retail_Ultimate-GRC1CULXFRE_EN_DVD.iso

7068.0.090321-1322_x86fre_client_en-us_Retail_Ultimate-GRC1CULFRE_EN_DVD.iso

Edited March 27, 2009 by Joni_78