Recommended Posts

Just checking if anybody else has this. I normally put the taskbar at the top of my screen. This time i notice that after i have set it to the top, restart the system and the taskbar look weird. I've attached a picture cos i don't know how to describe it.

There is an extra transparent layer that is bigger than the taskbar thus covering the "X" button and titles at the top.

Anybody else having this bug and anyway to fix it? U don't get this if you keep the taskbar at the bottom.

There are a couple of ways to fix it... not permanently, as it doesn't prevent it from happening again..

Here's the fast one -

Switch the taskbar to be on the bottom, kill explorer.exe, start it again from task manager, set the taskbar to be on top again.

This happened to me a couple times in 7077.. and I've seen it happen with my clean install of 7100 at the office. I've never seen it happen at home.

re: WinSat complaint -

7.9 is the maximum score it gives for anything.

What is your gfx card? are you using the latest WDDM 1.1 drivers? are they final not beta drivers (rhetorical)

I doubt very much a lot of cards, if any, at this point would be validly given the maximum possible score.

+1 for it was a bug that gave you too high a score, or they scaled it down even further in new builds.

lol a bit low? My GTX280 gets 6.5. Lets assume a GTX295 gets a 6.9.

Can you see the scaling pattern here?

I could imagine a GTX380 will get a 7.4 and a GTX395 will get a 7.6 and a GTX480 will push the 7.9 around the time it starts all over again for Windows 8?

Isn't this logical?

So its normal for my 4850 to get 6.8? Better than a GTX280 and almost as good as a GTX295?

No, thats not very logical.

There are a couple of ways to fix it... not permanently, as it doesn't prevent it from happening again..

Here's the fast one -

Switch the taskbar to be on the bottom, kill explorer.exe, start it again from task manager, set the taskbar to be on top again.

This happened to me a couple times in 7077.. and I've seen it happen with my clean install of 7100 at the office. I've never seen it happen at home.

That's not the fast way to fix it. The fast way to fix it is to just leave your taskbar unlocked and then drag the bar to the right side of the screen and back up to the top in one motion. There's a pattern to the bug occurring. You'll get the leftover glass if the bar resizes, or if you move the bar from the top of the screen to the left of the screen, while moving it to the right side of the screen or to the bottom will clear the leftovers. I'm getting reaaaally used to this bug, haha.

I'm not being funny but who cares what their WinSAT score is? It may be a bug or, more likely, a change in the scoring methodology (as the Win7 blog was updated recently with information about it) but at the end of the day it really doesn't matter. Games publishers haven't embraced it and the people it's targeted at - inexperienced users buying a new PC - don't even know it's there. So until these is an official comment from Microsoft can we please just drop it? It's not getting us anywhere and is derailing the topic.

I'm not sure if this is a new bug or not, but I don't recall seeing it in earlier builds. I may have just not noticed.

If I have an explorer window open like the one below and happen to be downloading or moving something into that folder, the new items do not always appear or if they do appear they are not sorted properly until I click on a different folder/drive and come back to it. Notice that I have it set to sort by date modified which I use most often, especially for download folders. The test.zip file I just created and moved to this folder from another explorer window. It should be sorted and show at the top of the list rather than the bottom.

Also, not a bug...just a question. What happened to the free space showing at the bottom when I view status bar? I always loved that feature in vista/xp, but it seems to be missing in win7.

post-288342-1240946852_thumb.jpg

Internet loss bug finally fixed here!

For those who have read my posts "Lose Internet Yet?" in 7077 and 7100 tracking the internet loss bug in every build since 7022, I wanted to post how I finally fixed it on my one (of 4) machine that was affected.

It became clear that this was an adapter driver issue as less people reported it in 7100 and various reports said that Internet loss issues were fixed in 7100. I went ahead and swapped my WUSB54GSCv.2 Linksys adapter on the problem p.c. with another WUSB54GSCv.1 Linksys adapter on another p.c. here which was not affected by the problem. Both computers have now been holding their internet signal for 3 days, even under bittorrent stress testing on the problem p.c.

So it must have been the peculiarities of the p.c. interacting with the adapter, as the problem didn't repeat when the two Linksys adapters were switched machines.

Hope this helps if you are having connection problems. Try swapping out your card or adapter just for trial.

I have IE8 set to clear history when the application is closed, but in build 7100 the history doesn't clear, i have to do it manaually instead, this bug isn't evident in previous builds, i have build 7100 installed on 3 other of my computers and it's there too.

Can anyone confirm this?

So you are saying that every single card above, say a 9600 should get a flat 7.9?

Yes, a 9600 or 2600 should be fully sufficient for 7.9 in Aero Graphics, because those cards are already fully sufficient to get optimal Aero performance. Any card above that won't get any better Aero performance. It doesn't need room for future cards, because with a 9600 or 2600, Aero is already running at its best, with no improvement left.

7.9 is also how it was until 7048, before it broke in 7057 onwards.

For the actual performance of the card in games and 3D applications, there's already Game Graphics, which is a completely different score - don't mix the two up.

It of course has a much lower score. No card manages to get a 7.9 there now - even a 4870 only gets a 6.8 so there's still room for future cards.

For the actual performance of the card in games and 3D applications, there's already Game Graphics, which is a completely different score - don't mix the two up.

It of course has a much lower score. No card manages to get a 7.9 there now - even a 4870 only gets a 6.8 so there's still room for future cards.

That seems low.....my 4850 gets 6.7 in gaming graphics.......a 4870 should give enough of an increase over a 4850 to gain more than 0.1 points.....then again maybe it was designed in a way that the difference between a 4850 and 4870 is 0.1 in their rating, offering expansion much beyond release date.

That seems low.....my 4850 gets 6.7 in gaming graphics.......a 4870 should give enough of an increase over a 4850 to gain more than 0.1 points.....then again maybe it was designed in a way that the difference between a 4850 and 4870 is 0.1 in their rating, offering expansion much beyond release date.

Its not a huge bug, but after trying to connect to an adhoc wireless point, i typed the password wrong, and hit enter to cancel it. After doing so it left the wireless icon unresponsive for a while.

That seems low.....my 4850 gets 6.7 in gaming graphics.......a 4870 should give enough of an increase over a 4850 to gain more than 0.1 points.....then again maybe it was designed in a way that the difference between a 4850 and 4870 is 0.1 in their rating, offering expansion much beyond release date.

Guess it will still get more once the drivers for Win7 are out of beta.

somebody found an awesome BUG!:.

whenever u maximise an explorer window.. u see control panel search box thing...

that is so so so weird.. where the heck does it come from??

it is a frame in the maximising animation??

mistakenly..

but it is a big bug.. totally turns off

somebody found an awesome BUG!:.

whenever u maximise an explorer window.. u see control panel search box thing...

that is so so so weird.. where the heck does it come from??

it is a frame in the maximising animation??

mistakenly..

but it is a big bug.. totally turns off

Like this?

post-70638-1241003294.png

Righto, 7100 have by far been the buggiest of all builds I've tested, with the best one being 7077.

Some issues unique to me for 7100, same drivers that I used in 7077 are used in 7100 as well.

Randomly freezes after being awakened from sleep, have to do cold reboot to fix this.

Screen brightness on my laptop is randomly changed, I get dimmed display for no reason what so ever, and yes, I AM using the computer, this happens during CoD4, while surfing etc.

WinAmp, spotify, WMP etc. crashes when changing songs.

7100 will not recognize my Ethernet connection until I've logged out and logged in to my user if I plug it in when I use the computer.

Cannot kill processes sometimes, neither Windows Task manager or process explorer does the trick.

yea same experience here.. its slower.... previously i was using 7057..

and it installed faster then RC even ran tad faster..

other then that ive got sum crashes i never had..

but best part..

there is a crash i used to have on every build due to my old card and the drivers not being new..

my pc used to crash every damn 30min..

but now its reduced alot..

it crashes like once or twice a day.. thats it ...

that is my biggest relief. :)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I doubt that Google will keep the same price... it may go up from that list published.
    • Sennheiser's audiophile grade HD 600 hits lowest ever price on Amazon Prime Day 2026 by Sayan Sen If you are in the market for high-quality audiophile-grade over-ear headphones then Sennheiser's HD 600 are a great choice for sure, especially today on Prime Day 2026 as the product has hit its lowest ever price (purchase link under the specs table down below). The Sennheiser HD 600 has long been regarded as a reference headphone for listeners seeking a detailed and natural listening experience. It is an open-back design that is built around the idea of acoustic transparency which is essentially said to allow sound waves to move freely for a more spacious and accurate presentation by reducing turbulence and the type of distortion that can result from it. At the heart of the product is Sennheiser’s proprietary driver system featuring a 42 mm driver paired with a lightweight diaphragm and aluminum voice coils. The company says this design helps deliver fast response times and better articulate sound across the audible frequency range. Comfort and durability are also key aspects of the HD 600 as the headphones feature soft velour ear pads designed for extended listening sessions. The HD 600 comes with a detachable 3-meter cable, a 6.3 mm stereo connector, and a 3.5 mm adapter for compatibility with a wide range of audio equipment. The technical specs of the Sennheiser HD 600 are given in the table below: Specification Value Transducer Principle Dynamic, Open-Back Ear Coupling Circumaural (Over-Ear) Frequency Response 12 Hz – 40,500 Hz Sound Pressure Level (SPL) 97 dB (1 V) Impedance 300 Ω Total Harmonic Distortion (THD) < 0.1% (1 kHz, 1 V) Cable Length 3 m (9.8 ft) Connector 3.5 mm Stereo Jack Plug Included Adapter 6.3 mm (1/4") Stereo Jack Adapter Weight 260 g Magnetic Field Strength 1.8 mT Driver Size 42 mm Dynamic Driver Diaphragm Size 38 mm Get it at the link below: Sennheiser HD 600: $237.00 (Sold by Electronics Expo, Shipped by Amazon US) (Was: $449.95) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases
    • So the card is targeted at headphone users - so the review should be from someone that uses this - maybe I can review a card next time.
    • I have a older F4-210 NAS, it is pretty basic, the CPU is not the fastest by a long way and only 1GB of ram, but it works fine. I don't understand the need for A.I in a NAS. It seems like A.i is being shoved into everything, if we like it or not. i will stick to my old Terramsater NAS, thankfully the OS is not being updated. Also, got myself a small NAs built using a Raspberry Pi 5. iy usesd less energy, so stays on all the time. As for the unit above, if it is as reliable as my old Terramaster Nas, then it will be a good unit.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      476
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      104
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      88
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!