Recommended Posts

Just checking if anybody else has this. I normally put the taskbar at the top of my screen. This time i notice that after i have set it to the top, restart the system and the taskbar look weird. I've attached a picture cos i don't know how to describe it.

There is an extra transparent layer that is bigger than the taskbar thus covering the "X" button and titles at the top.

Anybody else having this bug and anyway to fix it? U don't get this if you keep the taskbar at the bottom.

There are a couple of ways to fix it... not permanently, as it doesn't prevent it from happening again..

Here's the fast one -

Switch the taskbar to be on the bottom, kill explorer.exe, start it again from task manager, set the taskbar to be on top again.

This happened to me a couple times in 7077.. and I've seen it happen with my clean install of 7100 at the office. I've never seen it happen at home.

re: WinSat complaint -

7.9 is the maximum score it gives for anything.

What is your gfx card? are you using the latest WDDM 1.1 drivers? are they final not beta drivers (rhetorical)

I doubt very much a lot of cards, if any, at this point would be validly given the maximum possible score.

+1 for it was a bug that gave you too high a score, or they scaled it down even further in new builds.

lol a bit low? My GTX280 gets 6.5. Lets assume a GTX295 gets a 6.9.

Can you see the scaling pattern here?

I could imagine a GTX380 will get a 7.4 and a GTX395 will get a 7.6 and a GTX480 will push the 7.9 around the time it starts all over again for Windows 8?

Isn't this logical?

So its normal for my 4850 to get 6.8? Better than a GTX280 and almost as good as a GTX295?

No, thats not very logical.

There are a couple of ways to fix it... not permanently, as it doesn't prevent it from happening again..

Here's the fast one -

Switch the taskbar to be on the bottom, kill explorer.exe, start it again from task manager, set the taskbar to be on top again.

This happened to me a couple times in 7077.. and I've seen it happen with my clean install of 7100 at the office. I've never seen it happen at home.

That's not the fast way to fix it. The fast way to fix it is to just leave your taskbar unlocked and then drag the bar to the right side of the screen and back up to the top in one motion. There's a pattern to the bug occurring. You'll get the leftover glass if the bar resizes, or if you move the bar from the top of the screen to the left of the screen, while moving it to the right side of the screen or to the bottom will clear the leftovers. I'm getting reaaaally used to this bug, haha.

I'm not being funny but who cares what their WinSAT score is? It may be a bug or, more likely, a change in the scoring methodology (as the Win7 blog was updated recently with information about it) but at the end of the day it really doesn't matter. Games publishers haven't embraced it and the people it's targeted at - inexperienced users buying a new PC - don't even know it's there. So until these is an official comment from Microsoft can we please just drop it? It's not getting us anywhere and is derailing the topic.

I'm not sure if this is a new bug or not, but I don't recall seeing it in earlier builds. I may have just not noticed.

If I have an explorer window open like the one below and happen to be downloading or moving something into that folder, the new items do not always appear or if they do appear they are not sorted properly until I click on a different folder/drive and come back to it. Notice that I have it set to sort by date modified which I use most often, especially for download folders. The test.zip file I just created and moved to this folder from another explorer window. It should be sorted and show at the top of the list rather than the bottom.

Also, not a bug...just a question. What happened to the free space showing at the bottom when I view status bar? I always loved that feature in vista/xp, but it seems to be missing in win7.

post-288342-1240946852_thumb.jpg

Internet loss bug finally fixed here!

For those who have read my posts "Lose Internet Yet?" in 7077 and 7100 tracking the internet loss bug in every build since 7022, I wanted to post how I finally fixed it on my one (of 4) machine that was affected.

It became clear that this was an adapter driver issue as less people reported it in 7100 and various reports said that Internet loss issues were fixed in 7100. I went ahead and swapped my WUSB54GSCv.2 Linksys adapter on the problem p.c. with another WUSB54GSCv.1 Linksys adapter on another p.c. here which was not affected by the problem. Both computers have now been holding their internet signal for 3 days, even under bittorrent stress testing on the problem p.c.

So it must have been the peculiarities of the p.c. interacting with the adapter, as the problem didn't repeat when the two Linksys adapters were switched machines.

Hope this helps if you are having connection problems. Try swapping out your card or adapter just for trial.

I have IE8 set to clear history when the application is closed, but in build 7100 the history doesn't clear, i have to do it manaually instead, this bug isn't evident in previous builds, i have build 7100 installed on 3 other of my computers and it's there too.

Can anyone confirm this?

So you are saying that every single card above, say a 9600 should get a flat 7.9?

Yes, a 9600 or 2600 should be fully sufficient for 7.9 in Aero Graphics, because those cards are already fully sufficient to get optimal Aero performance. Any card above that won't get any better Aero performance. It doesn't need room for future cards, because with a 9600 or 2600, Aero is already running at its best, with no improvement left.

7.9 is also how it was until 7048, before it broke in 7057 onwards.

For the actual performance of the card in games and 3D applications, there's already Game Graphics, which is a completely different score - don't mix the two up.

It of course has a much lower score. No card manages to get a 7.9 there now - even a 4870 only gets a 6.8 so there's still room for future cards.

For the actual performance of the card in games and 3D applications, there's already Game Graphics, which is a completely different score - don't mix the two up.

It of course has a much lower score. No card manages to get a 7.9 there now - even a 4870 only gets a 6.8 so there's still room for future cards.

That seems low.....my 4850 gets 6.7 in gaming graphics.......a 4870 should give enough of an increase over a 4850 to gain more than 0.1 points.....then again maybe it was designed in a way that the difference between a 4850 and 4870 is 0.1 in their rating, offering expansion much beyond release date.

That seems low.....my 4850 gets 6.7 in gaming graphics.......a 4870 should give enough of an increase over a 4850 to gain more than 0.1 points.....then again maybe it was designed in a way that the difference between a 4850 and 4870 is 0.1 in their rating, offering expansion much beyond release date.

Its not a huge bug, but after trying to connect to an adhoc wireless point, i typed the password wrong, and hit enter to cancel it. After doing so it left the wireless icon unresponsive for a while.

That seems low.....my 4850 gets 6.7 in gaming graphics.......a 4870 should give enough of an increase over a 4850 to gain more than 0.1 points.....then again maybe it was designed in a way that the difference between a 4850 and 4870 is 0.1 in their rating, offering expansion much beyond release date.

Guess it will still get more once the drivers for Win7 are out of beta.

somebody found an awesome BUG!:.

whenever u maximise an explorer window.. u see control panel search box thing...

that is so so so weird.. where the heck does it come from??

it is a frame in the maximising animation??

mistakenly..

but it is a big bug.. totally turns off

somebody found an awesome BUG!:.

whenever u maximise an explorer window.. u see control panel search box thing...

that is so so so weird.. where the heck does it come from??

it is a frame in the maximising animation??

mistakenly..

but it is a big bug.. totally turns off

Like this?

post-70638-1241003294.png

Righto, 7100 have by far been the buggiest of all builds I've tested, with the best one being 7077.

Some issues unique to me for 7100, same drivers that I used in 7077 are used in 7100 as well.

Randomly freezes after being awakened from sleep, have to do cold reboot to fix this.

Screen brightness on my laptop is randomly changed, I get dimmed display for no reason what so ever, and yes, I AM using the computer, this happens during CoD4, while surfing etc.

WinAmp, spotify, WMP etc. crashes when changing songs.

7100 will not recognize my Ethernet connection until I've logged out and logged in to my user if I plug it in when I use the computer.

Cannot kill processes sometimes, neither Windows Task manager or process explorer does the trick.

yea same experience here.. its slower.... previously i was using 7057..

and it installed faster then RC even ran tad faster..

other then that ive got sum crashes i never had..

but best part..

there is a crash i used to have on every build due to my old card and the drivers not being new..

my pc used to crash every damn 30min..

but now its reduced alot..

it crashes like once or twice a day.. thats it ...

that is my biggest relief. :)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • So size is the ONLY selling point????? People have been plugging in PC's to TV's in living rooms for 20+ years. I would take a bigger box for more peformance. Also lot and lots of SFF/Mini ITX build guides out there.
    • My point is, if you buying this instead of a console for TV purposes, that you need to understand that you will not be able to play the most popular MP games with Steam OS. Now if you are not into those games, and into some of the perputual alpha/beta games on Steam then this is an option. I would argue a gaming PC would be the better route, more expensive but take the 1k -1.4k you are about to spend on this thing and build a better one. Because it is running Linux you can overide its 1080p settings. However The Verge complained about its 1080p cap and how you would have to get around it at the CLI, so someone buying this instead of a PS5 or Xbox might have a challege on their hands.
    • A review of Synology's BeeCamera software for the BeeStation Plus by Christopher White Synology is leaning into the BeeStation and the BeeStation Plus, and it's easy to understand why. While power users will want something more customizable, the BeeStation and its more powerful sibling, the BeeStation Plus, are great for those who want a device they can simply plug in, click a few buttons, and have it work as their own personal cloud. Until recently, the device was mostly used for the storage of files, photos, and videos, and with the Plus model, you could install and stream media through Plex. Synology recently released a new free application for the BeeStation Plus called BeeCamera, which is basically a stripped-down version of Surveillance Station. First, let's get the confusing naming out of the way. While you might initially think that BeeCamera is a physical device, perhaps a camera that Synology created specifically for the BeeStation Plus, that would be incorrect. BeeCamera is simply the name for the application that runs on the NAS and on your mobile device. I think the marketing team missed the mark here, but it does fit the other naming on the device, like BeePhotos and BeeFiles, I guess. Camera Support As of right now, only Synology-branded cameras are supported, which many will see as a callback to the drive locking the company implemented and then backtracked on. That said, while I 100% disagree on drive locking, I agree that camera locking for a device made to simply plug and play is the right decision. The whole point of the BeeStation line is simplicity. There are currently three camera model lines available, a wireless device for indoor use, and two PoE models for external use. CC400W (Wi-Fi): Plug it into power using the included power adapter, and connect it to your wireless network. This camera is rated only for indoor use and is the one I was provided to review the BeeCamera. $198.36, in line with the Unifi G6 Compact. BC510 (PoE): A bullet-style camera. Connect it to an Ethernet cable that is providing Power over Ethernet (PoE). This camera is rated for both indoor and outdoor use. $240. TC510 (PoE): A dome-style camera. Connect it to an Ethernet cable that is providing Power over Ethernet (PoE). This camera is rated for both indoor and outdoor use. $240. Although this isn't a review of the actual Synology camera, I did want to note that a positive for the Synology CC400W is that it uses a magnetic base. This means you can mount it on any magnetic surface, which is pretty handy. However, a downside to the camera is that it's powered by a built-in USB cable that's about six and a half feet (two meters) long. This means that the cable will probably be either too long or too short, but more importantly, if the cable is damaged at all, you'll likely need to buy an entirely new camera because there doesn't appear to be a way to replace it, unlike many competitors, like the Unifi G6 Instant. Hopefully, this is something Synology addresses in a future revision of the hardware. The BeeStation Plus supports up to four cameras. Setup The setup of BeeCamera is, like everything in the BeeStation family, very straightforward. Simply make sure you're on at least version 1.5 of the BeeStation OS, and BeeCamera is automatically installed on the device. BeeCamera Setup Screenshots Setting up the CC400W was just as easy. Plug it in, open up the BeeCamera app, and follow the on-screen steps to add the camera. During this process, you'll configure the camera name and how many days of retention you want to keep. The system will also automatically update the firmware for you. The whole thing took only a couple of minutes, excluding the time it took for the camera to update the firmware. Once the camera is connected to the BeeStation Plus, you can manage the various camera settings within the app, although there aren't many to choose from. You're able to configure whether the microphone will record audio (some privacy laws may preclude you from recording it), select what codec to use (H.264 or H.265), configure the color and exposure of the camera, and determine what data you want to overlay onto the video. Finally, you can set up AI detections so that BeeCamera will alert you if it sees certain things. These are all of the common detections you would expect in a camera system, such as people, pets, and vehicles. Under people and vehicles, you can also add extra monitoring for lingering and congestion detection, although pets are currently in "Lab" and therefore have no extra features yet. Recording in 4K using H.265 for 30 days will take roughly 300 GB of storage, which is very reasonable for most regular households, as the BeeStation Plus has 8TB of native storage. If you want to set up detection zones, you can. These are areas that BeeCamera will look at for the various detections, and are helpful if, for example, there's a tree in your frame and you don't want to be notified each time the wind makes the branches move around in the frame. Finally, you can also schedule when the camera should and should not be recording, which is a very useful feature. For example, you may want to record only at night when you're sleeping, but not during the day when you're up and about the house, so you can easily shut the camera off between 8 am and 10 pm. Each hour of each day can be configured to record continuously, only upon a detection event, or disabled completely. You can't fine-tune to record at a specific time, though, only hourly blocks on the hour. Daily Use The best part of BeeCamera is that it's easy and just works. If you only care about being notified when things happen, the mobile app sends those notifications and lets you click the button to bring up the video and see what's going on. For example, when I went out of town and had the camera pointed at the cat tower in our hallway, it was nice to be able to drop in and check that my furry friends were doing okay without me. Initiating the remote connection to the BeeStation Plus through the app is very responsive, but this will heavily depend on your ISP. In my case, using Xfinity, I'm able to go from starting the app to seeing live video in roughly three seconds, which is about the same amount of time it takes to connect to my Unifi UNVR system that costs much more. If you want to see footage from a specific day and time, you can do so using the calendar icon. You can also scroll through the timeline, looking for detections that are labeled in blue (vs. the normal gray when there's nothing of interest). There are buttons that let you go to the last/next detection on the timeline, which is helpful if you missed the notification on your mobile device. That's where the ease of use stops, though. While you can download clips that are flagged by detection, there's apparently no way to select generic time frames you're interested in, and the only place to download is to your phone. In addition, sharing a video shares the actual video, not just a link back to your BeeStation Plus. While that's good from a security and privacy perspective, it's a little awkward for sharing large videos. Limitations While the ease of implementation is great, there are some things that are lacking from BeeCamera. The most obvious is that there is no way to view the footage on the desktop. You can log in to the BeeStation Plus to see how much storage BeeCamera is using, but unlike BeePhotos and BeeFiles, there is no BeeCamera on the web console to manage or view footage. This means you'll be viewing all of your security footage on your mobile device, which is pretty limiting. In addition, there's no way to download the video to your PC without first using your phone as the intermediary. The one exception to this is that you can use BeeFiles to see the raw MP4 files. They're saved in 5-minute increments, and it's just raw data with no detection information or any other way to identify what any of them are. The lack of a way to interact with BeeCamera on the desktop also makes configuration of the cameras more difficult. For example, trying to set up detection zones using a tiny screen and your finger to draw boxes is more cumbersome than it needs to be. This reinforces the idea that BeeCamera is not made for power users. It's also missing some of the more advanced functionality of Surveillance Station. For example, I couldn't find a way to say, "Alert me if the thing in this zone is no longer there." Another major deficiency with BeeCamera, and a feature I suspect may come out in the future, is that while it can detect generic people, there is no specific facial recognition yet. This is an interesting omission, given the fact that other Synology tools can detect specific individuals, and competitors such as Unifi Protect also do it. This is probably a software limitation, so we will have to wait and see if this feature is added in the future. Conclusion If you need a security guard to monitor surveillance cameras to make sure your property is secure, then BeeCamera is not the solution for you. That said, you probably wouldn't be using a BeeStation Plus as the brains behind the system either. BeeCamera (and BeeStation in general) is clearly aimed at households that want to avoid sending personal data to Google and Amazon, and now want to add some cameras to keep an eye on their home and their pets while they're away. BeeCamera excels at doing this. The target market isn't interested in creating cases, tying multiple views together in a single pane of glass, or the like, and for the intended use case, the system works great. Where it starts to fall apart a bit is with more advanced features. Not being able to use a desktop app is a major compromise in my opinion, and having to do all of the configuration on a mobile device is annoying, but not impossible. If you don't want to have a full-fledged NAS device in your home, but still want control over your data (or maybe want an easy way to backup your data for World Backup Day), and want to add a couple of cameras to keep an eye on your house and your pets, this is a great, cheap, and easy way to go, and I suspect more functionality will come over time. If Synology releases a desktop app or at least a way to configure cameras and view footage on a desktop browser, this would be a near-perfect solution for a general home user. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • I forgot to add on my comment that when robots will take physical jobs, it's when they become more cheaper to manufacture and sell. That will be the starting point of the end to lanscaping, trash pickup, factory jobs, etc.
    • How many people can actually use a 2.5gig ethernet port? Most people do not have more than a 1gig internet connection, heck most have less than that. Most people at home do not have a switch that has multiple 2.5gig ports either.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      477
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      104
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      88
    5. 5
      neufuse
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!