[Feedback needed] Atlas, the next version of Neowin


Recommended Posts

Because that's how the content fits. It's a news site with a limited amount of content on the front page. If you make it fluid, you destroy the ability to control how that content looks. I for one cannot stand the fluid version of our current front page because it just looks absolutely ridiculous.

I have absolutely nothing to do with the workings of the Neowin frontend or design; what I said was simply my point of view.

But if you ask me, we can't do everything to please everybody. At some point, the designers of a website have to decide how much they'll bend their own design goals to suit the wants of the users, especially a minority like those using a 1900x1200 screen that don't like non-maximized windows.

That question was aimed more at the devs, your post just happened to be above mine. Should have quoted, sorry

Not a problem. I should have written that in my post in the first place as I do not want to speak as a representative of those who are actually doing this work.

Is there actually any point to asking for member feedback if it isn't going to be listened to?

We have listened to ALL of the feedback that has been provided here, and have already made some changes based on the comments made. What we were requesting was feedback, not dictation of how we should build the new site. Some design decisions have been made for a good reason, if you read the thread fully, you'll see the width issue has been addressed multiple times. Simply put, we want to provide all members with a consistent appearance on the front page, and there is no way to output varying lengths of text for the stories to fill the space given by varying widths, as the server has no way of knowing the resolution used by the client. Allowing the page to expand without additional content, leaves large chunks of white space on the page, as you'll notice on the current site. This doesn't look good. Also, there are elements of the front page that won't expand dynamically, and would look terrible if we allowed them to do so.

Members are not being ignored, but at the same time, you can't expect us to fulfil 100% of the requests made of us, as they conflict with requests from other members, or specific design decisions we have made ourselves.

White space isn't a problem for me but then I don't run at as high rez as some other people, its just puzzling that a lot of members seem to want that feature left behind and a general unwillingless to do so. Surely leaving the feature optional at least makes it up to the user whether to put up with the white space or not?

I would much rather have white space than those huuuuge borders at the side. At least white gives the illusion that the space is being used. Having the content restricted to a thin strip in the middle honestly just looks retarded.

And I agree with Frank Fontaine. Why not just give us the option!?!? If we're happier having the whitespace, why deny us of it?

Ok what about the huge blank space underneath the affiliates box?

that looks ugly to me, according to the logic currently put forth for having a fixed width front page,

then wouldn't it also be true that by the same logic that the total amount of front page articles not go beyond the bottom of the sidebar content?

Not that I want it that way i'm just saying,

I think the current selectable width is perfect, maybe instead of making it a button on the front page itself make it a user setting,

those of us that want the wider scale obviously know there are going to be some trade off's yet we seem to be ok with that.

We're not denying anyone the option of increasing the width of the site via Stylish or a custom CSS file of any sort. What we are saying is that the site does not operate as designed if we offer it.

We don't want to offer options that make the site work in ways we did not intend. If users want to have the width increased, they can do a simple CSS file with the contents #container { width: 100%; }, and be done with it. Otherwise, we have to put the code in to offer a feature which, in our opinion, breaks the site, and requires a lot more support because of it.

Personally, I think that's perfectly reasonable.

Firefox: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/2108

Safari: http://webdesign.about.com/od/css/ht/htcssusersafari.htm

Internet Explorer: http://webdesign.about.com/od/css/ht/htcssuseriewin.htm

Opera: http://operawiki.info/OperaUserCSS

Chrome does not support user styles as far as I can tell, but they do support (at least basic) greasemonkey. If they have improved upon their greasemonkey support, then it should work just fine.

Keep in mind someone will probably come up with the styles needed for you, if you don't know how.

Edited by simon360

Paper Icon - Developer - Developer tools - find #container { what ever goes in here when done } - replace with #container { width: 100%; } amirite?

I don't think that change would stick if you changed/refreshed the page, though :/

Google is the only company with a browser that doesn't handle "userContent.css" in one way or another, without JS.

We're not denying anyone the option of increasing the width of the site via Stylish or a custom CSS file of any sort. What we are saying is that the site does not operate as designed if we offer it.

We don't want to offer options that make the site work in ways we did not intend. If users want to have the width increased, they can do a simple CSS file with the contents #container { width: 100%; }, and be done with it. Otherwise, we have to put the code in to offer a feature which, in our opinion, breaks the site, and requires a lot more support because of it.

Personally, I think that's perfectly reasonable.

Fair enough :D

So.... When are we gonna see at least a beta of the skin?

Yeah, 'specially us subscriber?:pp

And bah, do away with the wide version of the front page, I for one welcome our new, slim-only homepage overlord...

Looks good though:))

Honest criticism( only noting out the bad things/things i don't like, can't bother with all the awesome stuff :p )

Spacing seems to me a bit large in the picture, the line below the tabs (news,downloads,forums) doesn't look good separated in my opinion, it makes it less continuous and fluid.

i don't like the way everything is gray, including the buttons, they look like part of the window but not like a button to me, more like just text, they should pop more in my opinion (biggest thing bothering me)

there wont be the top bar right? its only on admin screen?.

Yeah, 'specially us subscriber?:pp

And bah, do away with the wide version of the front page, I for one welcome our new, slim-only homepage overlord...

Looks good though:))

the slim Homepage is annoying when you got wide screen LCD ,like in my case

All in all, it's kind of ironic they haven't recognized that technology has moved forward and everyone either has a widescreen monitor or a high res 4:3 monitor, you know since they're doing a solo crusade to force some browser to ugprade to a work in progress standard.

after all the people who don't use a high res 4:3 monitor or widescreen monitor could use one of the low res device(i.e. mobile) layouts.

Common web designer practice is to design for 1024x768 at a minimum. It used to be 800x600, but in the last few years pretty much everyone has moved up. But a lot of people use a lower resolution, such as 1024x768, because they like the bigger text. Is it the best way to get bigger text? No. But people do it, and we need to support it.

Our ideas required a fixed width, and so we designed with the 1024x768 resolution in mind. It simply isn't an option to downgrade these people to the mobile experience.

Overall, it's looking very nice! Much more efficient use of the available space...

One thing bothering me though - the rounded corners are only supported by Firefox, whereas IE users will get the non-rounded corners? Argh! Neowin making me switch to IE for browsing purposes? I suppose there's no need to be too dramatic, as long as it's not too difficult to revert to the non-rounded through some simple CSS tweaks!

Apologies if this was mentioned already, but I might've missed it when quickly skimming through the 9 pages.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
    • For me, the fundamental problems with these "smartglasses" is that they really don't work well for people with significant prescriptions and massively up the price if you use attached lenses if they have displays, and if they don't, then they're not actually "smart" anything, rather just connecting to your phone and relaying voice to an AI. In a few cases like this, they throw in small cameras to feed video to the AI. All around, these feel like both a solution looking for a problem, and the problems it tries to solve seem more easily solved by different approaches and designs. Oddly, if the rumours are true, Apple may actually have invented something for once and it kind of does this right: put cameras in ear buds and manage the interface to AI exactly as most of us do: tapping on an ear bud and saying "Hey Google" or "Hey Siri." That makes them compatible with almost everyone, can double up as a hearing assist device, an impaired vision assist device, a "smart" device... and answer your phone and play music. That just seems like a better solution all around.
    • Usually the bigger ones with many fixes/changes take a few, theyre an exception to the rule most likely
    • If you don’t get lucky with Valve’s Steam Machine reservation system, you can make your own Steam Machine instead. Valve says that “starting with the SteamOS 3.8 release, you can put together your own Steam Machine using whatever PC parts you want.” SteamOS 3.8.10 launched last week with a slew of updates, including “improved compatibility with recent Intel and AMD platforms.” Alongside that improved compatibility, Valve is giving gamers the green light to install SteamOS on their own desktops. In an interview with The Verge, Valve’s Pierre-Loup Griffais said Valve has been “rolling out improvements to [SteamOS] so it’s more compatible with desktop hardware,” including eventual support for Nvidia graphics. Griffais says Valve has “a growing team” working on Nvidia driver support for SteamOS, adding, “We’re collaborating with Nvidia very closely.” While he mentioned that Nvidia support might not come this year, Griffais emphasized that “it’s certainly something that we’re working on in the background.”     Subscription not needed: https://archive.fo/Tssfc Subscription needed: https://www.theverge.com/games/953411/valve-steamos-desktop-nvidia
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      162
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      84
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!