Girl Gets Flu Shot - Now She Can Only Walk Backwards


Recommended Posts

How many of those 5382 people were already severely ill with an unrelated complication? How many of those with a complication would have died had they contracted the seasonal flu as opposed to an h1n1 variant? Don't know huh? Speculation speculation speculation. Your post is full of what ifs, and that about sums up the whole swine flu pandemic scam.

Does it matter? People die from flus whether they are H1N1 or season flus. The key difference is that the season flu tends to kill people over 60 while the H1N1 tends to kill people under 40.

So long as this H1N1 strand does not mutate then we won't see the millions of dead that happened in 1918. Of course, they less expose it has in the wild the less chance there will be of a mutation. Getting the H1N1 vaccine helps to keep other people around you safe even if you're not particularly worried about yourself. For most healthy people it just means a few days at home in bed. Some people will not even know that they have it. However, there is more to the world than just our individual selves.

How many of those 5382 people were already severely ill with an unrelated complication? How many of those with a complication would have died had they contracted the seasonal flu as opposed to an h1n1 variant? Don't know huh? Speculation speculation speculation. Your post is full of what ifs, and that about sums up the whole swine flu pandemic scam.

More than likely a whole lot.. as most i've heard is they were old. or very young, and the old people usually had underlying conditions, and the very young just don't have a very good immune system..

You wanna try to spread propaganda, take it to Area 51..

More than likely a whole lot.. as most i've heard is they were old. or very young, and the old people usually had underlying conditions, and the very young just don't have a very good immune system..

You wanna try to spread propaganda, take it to Area 51..

Old people are not typically dying from H1N1. They likely have partial immunity from previous outbreaks. Since the last outbreak was in 1976 then it is mostly people in their 30's and younger that are dying from it. Again, unless people have other conditions.

It obvously does not matter to you. Lets play the what if game.

What if 300 million people take a virtually untested vaccine with an unknow efficacy rate for a disease that may or may not mutate within the next few weeks. What if 500 people become severely disabled or die and the efficacy of the vaccine turn out to be rather poor? What if the vaccine turns out to be totaly worthless? What if you get teh vaccine then the disease mutates, then you find out that becuase you had the first the second may be largely ineffective? What if what if what if.

How about; If you are healthy, there is absolutely no reason to have the vaccine. Not only that but there is absolutely no proven case for anyone to be vaccinated, healthy or otherwise.

It obvously does not matter to you. Lets play the what if game.

What if 300 million people take a virtually untested vaccine with an unknow efficacy rate for a disease that may or may not mutate within the next few weeks. What if 500 people become severely disabled or die and the efficacy of the vaccine turn out to be rather poor? What if the vaccine turns out to be totaly worthless? What if you get teh vaccine then the disease mutates, then you find out that becuase you had the first the second may be largely ineffective? What if what if what if.

Untested? It's the exact same process as the seasonal vaccine. It is only marginally tweaked to target the H1N1 cells. The complications will be the exact same as the season flu and are about the best understood of any medication.

Old people are not typically dying from H1N1. They likely have partial immunity from previous outbreaks. Since the last outbreak was in 1976 then it is mostly people in their 30's and younger that are dying from it. Again, unless people have other conditions.

That's what I said :p

and the old people usually had underlying conditions
Fred, why is it propaganda. the same damn people who make these vaccines won't take the H1N1.

no, what's being said is the makers of the small pox vaccine are refusing to take the H1N1 vaccine... Guess when the Small Pox Vaccine was created...

Yup 1796

Edit:This video shows the small pox vaccine creators.. as posted by Revvo

The process of vaccination was discovered by Edward Jenner in 1796, who acted upon his observation that milkmaids who caught the cowpox virus did not catch smallpox.[1]

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=A...b9739902219af1e

I'm not gonna listen to people who don't know what they're talking about.

Untested? It's the exact same process as the seasonal vaccine. It is only marginally tweaked to target the H1N1 cells. The complications will be the exact same as the season flu and are about the best understood of any medication.

No it is not the same. You might want to take a trip over the the WHO website and read up on the process as you have no idea what you are talking about (the seasonal flu is not without it's complications nor is it's effectiveness proven). The efficacy of the H1N1 vaccines are unknown, even the WHO at least admits that much. The vaccines are approved on a fast track program based of the performance of similar vaccines. The simple fact is, and as they themselves state in black and white, the effectiveness of the vaccines will not be known until the vaccination program has started.

If people started dropping dead because of the vaccine it is a little too late. When a pandemic has been declared, we are all potential guinea pigs.

Guillain-Barr? Syndrome (GBS) is an acute disorder of the nervous system. It sometimes develops following a variety of infections, including influenza. Studies suggest that seasonal influenza vaccines could sometimes be associated with an increased risk of Guillain-Barr? syndrome on the order of one to two cases per million vaccinated persons. During the 1976 influenza vaccination campaign, about 10 persons per million vaccinated persons developed GBS which stopped the vaccination campaign and led to the withdrawal of the vaccine.

The reason why GBS developed in association with that specific vaccine has never been firmly established. The potential for the development of a similar risk with future vaccines can never be firmly excluded. However, the influenza A (H1N1) vaccine will be manufactured according to established standards and post marketing surveillance will be conducted to monitor potential development of any serious adverse events following administration of vaccine. Safety monitoring systems are an integral part of strategies for the implementation of the new pandemic influenza vaccines.

WHO

Post marketing surveillance, in other words, after the fact. They do not know that it will not have serious complications, but they are going to give it to you anyway and cross their fingers. IIRC swine flu vaccine licenses started being issued by the WHO around May and they are only now getting approval. That is less than 6 months to manufacturing. Are you seriously attempting to tell me and others that less than 6 months is sufficient time to research, develop, test and manufacture a range of new vaccines? If so then I truly feel sorry for you as you are one gullible sob. I'm sorry, but unless I can be shown some proof before the fact that it is in my best interest, I couldn't give a monkeys what the propaganda says.

Why mock someone who is clearly suffering? Are you claiming that she's just making it up as a joke?

OK, so she seizes up when she walks. Seizing is not controllable right, otherwise if she could control it she wouldn't do it.

So how can she control her seizure to accelerate to running speed?

Why can't people think for themselves?

Why do I bother?

No it is not the same. You might want to take a trip over the the WHO website and read up on the process as you have no idea what you are talking about (the seasonal flu is not without it's complications nor is it's effectiveness proven). The efficacy of the H1N1 vaccines are unknown, even the WHO at least admits that much. The vaccines are approved on a fast track program based of the performance of similar vaccines. The simple fact is, and as they themselves state in black and white, the effectiveness of the vaccines will not be known until the vaccination program has started.

...

Post marketing surveillance, in other words, after the fact. They do not know that it will not have serious complications, but they are going to give it to you anyway and cross their fingers. IIRC swine flu vaccine licenses started being issued by the WHO around May and they are only now getting approval. That is less than 6 months to manufacturing. Are you seriously attempting to tell me and others that less than 6 months is sufficient time to research, develop, test and manufacture a range of new vaccines? If so then I truly feel sorry for you as you are one gullible sob. I'm sorry, but unless I can be shown some proof before the fact that it is in my best interest, I couldn't give a monkeys what the propaganda says.

I didn't say the efficacy was the same, I said the process was the same and the expectations of complications will be the same.

Yes, six months is sufficient time when the process to research, develop, test and manufacture a range of new vaccines that are almost identical to the steps taken every year to produce a seasonal vaccine. Every year that needs to be tweaked as well so this isn't particularly different in that regard.

Why do I bother?

You didn't answer the question. Do you people that she's faking it just for laughs and giggles? Yes or no?

There are many variants of the illness, including this: http://www.dystonia-foundation.org/pages/more_info/86.php

This is completely real, not voluntary, and not faked. It's real suffering, and I think you're way out of line.

I assume 8993 is talking about:

"Dr. Vincour, from the U. of Maryland has called Ms. Jennings's symptoms, "psychogenic," which means originating in the mind, not in true physiological illness."

Some of her symptoms do not fit dystonia. Whether or not her individual case is real, there are people who are negatively affected by flu vaccines but it is generally a one in a million type of thing.

You didn't answer the question. Do you people that she's faking it just for laughs and giggles? Yes or no?

There are many variants of the illness, including this: http://www.dystonia-foundation.org/pages/more_info/86.php

This is completely real, not voluntary, and not faked. It's real suffering, and I think you're way out of line.

(Y)

such an aweful thing to happen, just goes to show how little we really know about the human body :(

I didn't say the efficacy was the same, I said the process was the same and the expectations of complications will be the same.

Yes, six months is sufficient time when the process to research, develop, test and manufacture a range of new vaccines that are almost identical to the steps taken every year to produce a seasonal vaccine. Every year that needs to be tweaked as well so this isn't particularly different in that regard.

Ok, I'll agree to disagree, however, we do not vaccinate the entire population on an annual basis to prevent the spread of the seasonal flu, and there is zero evidence to suggest swine flu is any worse than seasonal flu in terms of mortality, so again, there is insufficient reason to explain either the hype, nor the expense of a publicly funded vaccination program for a disease that otherwise no one is bothered with. It is hype, and it is a scam and there is more to this than a concern for the public health.

Ok, I'll agree to disagree, however, we do not vaccinate the entire population on an annual basis to prevent the spread of the seasonal flu, and there is zero evidence to suggest swine flu is any worse than seasonal flu in terms of mortality, so again, there is insufficient reason to explain either the hype, nor the expense of a publicly funded vaccination program for a disease that otherwise no one is bothered with. It is hype, and it is a scam and there is more to this than a concern for the public health.

We do here in Ontario, Canada.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
    • Cheers everyone for the replies. It's been very useful. 👍
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!