Mac OS X Lion Discussion


Recommended Posts

The Mac App Store makes total sense. 50% of the Macs sold this past quarter were to first-time Mac owners, a lot of them interested in a Mac having used an iPhone or iPad. One of the first things (if not the first) people do when they open up their new iOS device is hit the App Store and download an array of games and apps.

Why not have that experience on OS X?

True, the amount of people who have bought macs, iPod Touches or iPhones and came to me asking "what are the best apps" is ridiculous. Hell, even NW gets topics like that almost weekly.

It's so annoying that people even consider writing that apple are going to close down OSX to an AppStore.

It would be complete desktop suicide.

It works for mobile devices, not for desktop.

Exactly. At college we use a specially written application to manage our accounts. It doesn't make much sense for them to put that in the App Store considering only we need it.

True, the amount of people who have bought macs, iPod Touches or iPhones and came to me asking "what are the best apps" is ridiculous. Hell, even NW gets topics like that almost weekly.

I still don't think the App Store is a convenient way to find 'good' apps, but it's a start.

I rarely browse the App Store on the off chance I'll find something good, simply because it is too diluted with junk.

It's one distribution channel. Apple will never close down OS X, nor do they have any reason to. They know that would be too drastic.

Apple is all about serving the total package they want a slice of everything and eventually they will want 30% from all apps sold regardless. Eventually they will make it more difficult for app developers to release Mac software that isn't served via their store. Things like providing API's only to App Store approved apps with security certificates, offering driver level access only to certified apps. Stuff like that.

I know it's coming and I think you all do too. Once it does I'm out of the Mac ecosystem as-well. I'm sure they will sell like hot cakes regardless but for me Closed is not something I want on my computer. I was willing to make a concession on my Mobile Device because it was the birthing of a new platform and software installs on mobile devices was always painful before the App Store came about. But Computers? This is a whole other territory where we have enjoyed openness for many years, I am not willing to lose that just for a store front with a search field.

In your post you say 'Apple will never close down OS X' people said the same thing about their move in to the Mobile space 'Apple will never make a Phone, it just isn't their business' and their switch to Intel 'Apple will never move to x86 processors, it would be to difficult'.

If there is one thing we know it is that predicting what Apple will do and making your ideas conservative and reasonable will only mean you will end up being wrong because Apple is not a conservative company. It was not so long ago that they outright banned applications on the iPhone that used emulators or execution layers above the normal stuff just to make it more difficult for app developers to port software between devices (Android <-> iPhone). And they still do not support Flash on the iPhone and they just announced that they will no longer be updating their Java runtimes within OS X on the desktop. Let us be clear, Apple cares about Apple and they don't give a toss about any other developer which is why a locked down Mac where they take a slice of every pie is right up their street and totally not out of the question.

I still don't think the App Store is a convenient way to find 'good' apps, but it's a start.

I rarely browse the App Store on the off chance I'll find something good, simply because it is too diluted with junk.

I believe we'll see a redesign when Mac App Store launches. Seeing as it's not constrained by running in iTunes, it'll probably be a lot nicer to browse.

Did you watch the Keynote? The App Store will be an easier way for developers to distribute their apps, but not the only way. Life will still go on the same way, BUT the App Store will come in.

Seems you guys didn't read my post very well. I said if this was Jobs' way of transitioning us into the idea of closed app environment on OS X, I'd be out. I never said that this would be a closed app environment from the get-go.

I agree with all of you that it's unlikely and it would kill OS X, but Apple is unpredictable like that. Since when have they not done something because it was "unlikely"? All I'm saying is that I'm worried about the future of OS X. Not Lion, but maybe the next version. Apple is getting too swept up in it's iOS dreamland.

Simple yes but this WILL happen eventually! Sooner or later...

If and when that happens it's more than likely Microsoft will jump on board sooner rather than later as well. There have been talks about an App Store in Windows 8. So beyond switching to Linux, where does that leave you?

Apple won't do it. Or will, but not for every line of their products. See, the consumer products might very well one day run some kind of iOS on steroids, pretty closed but offering the best possible experience for the user with easy to find apps for everyday tasks and nice revenue for Apple.

However, products like the iMac or the Mac Pro and imho even the MacBook Pros will never be closed. There is too much to loose. Apple still has a veritable market share among media pros, designers, movie editors, writers and coders that just like to use Mac (although I am aware that all of these tasks can be done with a Windows-machine aswell, not the issue here) and those are customers Apple wants to keep. Sure thing, they might not be the biggest group of customers of Apples but then again, there is still an iPod Classic.

If they "locked down" some kind of consumer OS for the lower end machines, I must say that would not be that bad at all, imho. Afterall, you can still not buy it, if you don't like it. And for the regular customer, that would be quite nice. Less harm from the outside, only quality apps, "all-in-one-experience"... We might hate it but Average Joe would love it. Simple to use, minimal... bought!

But as I said, I don't think Apple is stupid enough to close down their ENTIRE lineup. Most of it, maybe. But not EVERYTHING.

Plus, I for myself, would kinda like that, infact. Great quality control, sure thing, some programs might be missing but I have no interest in running some alpha version of Firefox. While I prefare Chrome anyways, I prefare having a final built here. It's the same reason why I like the closed iOS ecosystem... I don't need root access for everyday tasks. As long as they have Photoshop, InDesign and WriteRoom in Stock, I wouldn't mind a closed ecosystem for sure.

Apple won't do it. Or will, but not for every line of their products. See, the consumer products might very well one day run some kind of iOS on steroids, pretty closed but offering the best possible experience for the user with easy to find apps for everyday tasks and nice revenue for Apple.

However, products like the iMac or the Mac Pro and imho even the MacBook Pros will never be closed. There is too much to loose. Apple still has a veritable market share among media pros, designers, movie editors, writers and coders that just like to use Mac (although I am aware that all of these tasks can be done with a Windows-machine aswell, not the issue here) and those are customers Apple wants to keep. Sure thing, they might not be the biggest group of customers of Apples but then again, there is still an iPod Classic.

If they "locked down" some kind of consumer OS for the lower end machines, I must say that would not be that bad at all, imho. Afterall, you can still not buy it, if you don't like it. And for the regular customer, that would be quite nice. Less harm from the outside, only quality apps, "all-in-one-experience"... We might hate it but Average Joe would love it. Simple to use, minimal... bought!

But as I said, I don't think Apple is stupid enough to close down their ENTIRE lineup. Most of it, maybe. But not EVERYTHING.

I was just about to say the exact same thing. The conspiracy theories are overwrought.

Apple won't do it. Or will, but not for every line of their products. See, the consumer products might very well one day run some kind of iOS on steroids, pretty closed but offering the best possible experience for the user with easy to find apps for everyday tasks and nice revenue for Apple.

However, products like the iMac or the Mac Pro and imho even the MacBook Pros will never be closed. There is too much to loose. Apple still has a veritable market share among media pros, designers, movie editors, writers and coders that just like to use Mac (although I am aware that all of these tasks can be done with a Windows-machine aswell, not the issue here) and those are customers Apple wants to keep. Sure thing, they might not be the biggest group of customers of Apples but then again, there is still an iPod Classic.

If they "locked down" some kind of consumer OS for the lower end machines, I must say that would not be that bad at all, imho. Afterall, you can still not buy it, if you don't like it. And for the regular customer, that would be quite nice. Less harm from the outside, only quality apps, "all-in-one-experience"... We might hate it but Average Joe would love it. Simple to use, minimal... bought!

But as I said, I don't think Apple is stupid enough to close down their ENTIRE lineup. Most of it, maybe. But not EVERYTHING.

Plus, I for myself, would kinda like that, infact. Great quality control, sure thing, some programs might be missing but I have no interest in running some alpha version of Firefox. While I prefare Chrome anyways, I prefare having a final built here. It's the same reason why I like the closed iOS ecosystem... I don't need root access for everyday tasks. As long as they have Photoshop, InDesign and WriteRoom in Stock, I wouldn't mind a closed ecosystem for sure.

I can agree with this.

And for heavens sake, when is apple going to introduce cut/paste feature for files and folders? A very useful feature being left out just to show "we are different from windows." I hope it's in OSX Lion.

Apple decided to leave cmd + X out of the Finder because it could be potentially be destructive if a user were to accidentally hit it and then do something else. So it's not left out just for the sake of being different than Windows.

I missed cmd + X for about a week when I switched to Mac OS X and then got over it. At this point I can't say I even miss not having it. Dragging and dropping works perfectly fine for me, especially because folders, stacks and windows are spring-loaded. A feature Windows lacks.

Apple decided to leave cmd + X out of the Finder because it could be potentially be destructive if a user were to accidentally hit it and then do something else. So it's not left out just for the sake of being different than Windows.

I missed cmd + X for about a week when I switched to Mac OS X and then got over it. At this point I can't say I even miss not having it. Dragging and dropping works perfectly fine for me, especially because folders, stacks and windows are spring-loaded. A feature Windows lacks.

Yup. I never cut and paste anyway. There was a time when using Windows XP that I cut and paste a bunch of files, and some error occurred during the transfer half way. I lost a good chunk of the files because they simply disappeared for no reason.

Ever since, I've simply copied and pasted everything. And if I really need to just move a small file, I'll drag and drop. I even forgot this was even an "issue".

I didn't even notice that it was not there, when I came back to Apple in the Panther days. I only realized it wasn't there a few years later, when everyone on the internetz seemed to miss it. For reasons I cannot imagine.

But then again I am not so much of a... Finder power user... or whoever that may be, who is in desperate need of a new Finder and misses cut/paste every single day...

But then again I am not so much of a... Finder power user... or whoever that may be, who is in desperate need of a new Finder and misses cut/paste every single day...

I don't get why people are still obsessed with file/folder management. I hardly spend any time in the Finder beyond installing a new application, create backups or delete the occasional obsolete download.

I don't get why people are still obsessed with file/folder management. I hardly spend any time in the Finder beyond installing a new application, create backups or delete the occasional obsolete download.

QFT. I don't even do that. I got stacks for my Applications, Downloads, most important Documents and recent projects. I do it all from there and hardly ever see a Finder-window... Let alone feel the need to cut and paste.

I haven't really been following this thread, but did skim the last few pages or so.

I am not making a decision just yet if I am going to migrate from Snow Leopard to Lion next summer. From what I have read on the net and seen in pics, vids etc... it really isn't enough to get me "pumped" up to go out and buy it. I am fully aware that what they did was merely show a WIP for them concerning Lion and that features will probably (hopefully) be added to help motivate me from moving away from where I am now. I would hope that they do unlock the 64-bit boot modes for people like me that can, but Apple doesn't think I can. (Mid-2007 iMac 20"). Sure, I know that I really don't need that feature and that natively Snow Leopard will run programs as 64-bit which are written that way from the 32-bit kernel, but it is one of those things that bugs me a bit. Or perhaps some new enhancements to the functionality like they did with Snow Leopard from Leopard (Being able to keep a grid open and browse into a folder and go back in the Application folder inside the dock for example).

I can maybe see them pushing a more "unified" GUI moving away from the currently mixed one they have right now. I sense that they will be moving in that direction for the native apps like Finder and other ones. Probably with the "traffic lights" being moved to the left like they are with the recent iTunes release. It is too early though to speculate beyond that for me.

I use the Finder more than any other application. Some of you may not need it but millions of us do. Finder could really use some help but TotalFinder has eased my concerns. mmm tabs.

TotalFinder is one of those Finder extensions that I wish Apple would buy and fully integrate into Mac OS X. It works really well, but obviously will never be as deeply integrated as it could be, due to it being a third-party extension, and thus prone to weird bugs and random crashes.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • ...but you're Johnny, from Australia?    
    • Glow 26.9 by Razvan Serea Glow provides detailed reporting on every hardware component in your computer, saving you valuable time typically spent searching for CPU, motherboard, RAM, graphics card, and other stats. With Glow, all the information is conveniently presented in one clean interface, allowing you to easily access and review the comprehensive hardware details of your system. Glow provides detailed information on various system aspects, including OS, motherboard, processor, memory, graphics card, storage, network, battery, drivers, and services. The well-organized format ensures easy access to the required information. You can export all the gathered data to a plain text file, facilitating sharing with others for troubleshooting purposes. No installation needed. Just decompress the archive, launch the executable, and access computer-related information. Glow runs on Windows 11 and Windows 10 64-bit versions. Glow 26.9 changelog: New Features The processor hardware detection engine has been significantly enhanced beyond traditional Intel and AMD architectures. Native support is now available for modern platforms such as Apple Silicon (M-Series) and the newly introduced NVIDIA Spark. In addition, all ARM-based processors can now be accurately distinguished between ARM32 and ARM64 architectures, providing precise hardware reporting. This marks a major milestone for Glow's hardware detection capabilities. The RAM manufacturer identification algorithm has been expanded. JEDEC vendor codes for popular brands such as Patriot, PNY, Team Group, GeIL, Lexar (Longsys), and Asgard/Gloway have been integrated into the database. This significantly reduces the likelihood of incorrect or "Unknown Manufacturer" results and improves overall hardware detection accuracy. New Public IP Address and Internet Service Provider (ISP) features have been added to the Network section. To ensure reliability, this information is retrieved from the trusted service ipwho.is. When Hiding Mode is enabled, no requests are sent and these features remain hidden, as they may expose sensitive information. The search engine used in the Installed Drivers, Installed Services, and Installed Applications sections has been enhanced. You can now perform more flexible and accurate searches using initials, partial matches, and loosely arranged character sequences. The TS Preloader loading bar has been rebuilt using our modern TS Custom Controls graphics library, developed entirely in-house. As a result of this infrastructure upgrade, the loading bar now features smooth rendering and rounded corners that align with the visual style of Windows 11. [TS Updater] A new validation algorithm has been added to check whether the target application is currently running before the update process begins. Bug Fixes Resolved a condition that could prevent TS Preloader from shutting down safely during rare application crash scenarios. Fixed a text alignment issue in the Network section affecting the display of DNS addresses. Alignment is now rendered correctly. [TS Updater] Fixed an issue that could prevent the updated application's executable "*.exe" file from being located after the update process. [TS Updater] Fixed a bug that could leave outdated "*.sha256" files in the application directory after an update. [TS Updater] Fixed a rare issue that could cause subfolders to be moved into the root directory after an update. [TS Updater] Fixed an issue during the first launch that could cause flickering and a temporary white window appearance due to Windows Defender interactions. Changes A small improvement has been made to the internet connectivity detection algorithm. Connectivity checks are now performed in the background with minimal impact on the user interface thread. The keyboard shortcuts in the top menu have been reorganized and simplified to provide a consistent experience across all Türkaysoft applications and to avoid potential conflicts with standard Windows shortcuts. The TS Preloader splash image has been updated with a Türkiye-themed stadium design to celebrate Türkiye's qualification for the 2026 FIFA World Cup—its first appearance in 24 years. Congratulations, Türkiye! The TS Custom Controls module has been updated to version 26.6, delivering improved stability and a more polished visual appearance. [TS Updater] The application icon has been redesigned to provide a more modern and refined look. Note: Always unzip the program before using it. Otherwise you may get an error. Download: Glow 26.9 | 1.8 MB (Open Source) Links: Glow Homepage | Screenshot | Github Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • DWARF mini review: the world's smallest smart telescope for night and day sky captures by Steven Parker DWARFLAB reached out to me asking if I was interested in checking out the DWARF mini, which is a portable astronomy telescope designed for amateur astronomers. Why do I say it's for amateurs? Well, for starters, it's not what you'd call "high end"; it's more of a professional-grade starting point for amateurs serious about capturing what's up there in our night and day skies. A typical amateur astronomer is most likely thousands of dollars deep into the hobby, and I will make no claims that this DWARF mini (at a fraction of the cost) could replace it all, okay? Well, if you read on, it will be clearer what I am trying to convey. Disclosure: DWARFLAB provided a free sample without any editorial input or review pre-approval. I have always been interested in looking up and observing the night sky. I see satellites crossing the sky above my garden most nights, and I am always looking at the moon. Yeah, I have a 200MP camera on my phone, but at 200X zoom, AI takes over and makes the pretty moon pictures that I snap, the DWARF mini does not, you get an actual true picture of what you can barely see with the naked eye. Before we start, let's share the highlights of the DWARF mini in bite-sized format: Pocket-Sized & Ultra-Lightweight Weighing just 1.85 lbs (840g), the DWARF mini easily fits into a backpack or large pocket. Its all-in-one, compact design makes it the ultimate grab-and-go digital telescope for hiking, camping, or traveling to dark-sky locations. Intuitive App Control & Built-in Sky Atlas Go from unboxing to your first shot in just 3 minutes! The DWARFLAB App provides a seamless experience with an interactive star map. Simply select your target and start exploring without the steep learning curve of traditional setups. Auto GOTO & 360° Pivot Freedom Enjoy pinpoint automated tracking with full 360° rotation. Powered by a high-sensitivity Sony IMX662 sensor (1/2.8-inch, 2.9μm pixels), it captures amazing, low-noise astro details, bringing faint nebulas and star clusters to life with stunning clarity. Pro-Level EQ Mode & Long Exposure Unlock advanced deep-space imaging with Equatorial (EQ) Mode. Supporting impressive single-frame exposures up to 90 seconds and featuring built-in light pollution filters, it easily cuts through city glow to reveal intricate celestial structures. Smart Cloud Processing & All-Ages Fun Effortlessly enhance your raw data with integrated cloud processing for professional-grade results. Perfect for beginners, kids, and adults, this telescope makes exploring and sharing the wonders of the universe an exciting, family-friendly adventure. The packaging is a pretty minimal affair with the outer box opening like a flap to reveal the plastic mould of the DWARF mini sitting in it. Below, the Sun filter, charging cable, cleaning cloth, and documentation can be found. DWARFLAB also provided a Mini Hydraulic Tripod ($89.99), and I highly recommend getting it if you plan on purchasing the DWARF mini, as it fully supports the motorized tracking feature of the telescope; plus, at 840g, the weight of the telescope, you will need a tripod that supports more than the weight of a smartphone anyway. What's in the box DWARF Mini Smart Telescope × 1 Sun Filter x 1 Type-C to Type-C Cord x 1 Cleaning Cloth x 1 User Guide With that out of the way, here are the full specs: DWARF mini Dimensions (DWH): 60.70 mm x 100.38 × 183.61 (2.39" x 3.95" x 7.23") Weight: 840g (1.85lbs) Aperture diameter: 30 mm (telephoto), 3.4 mm (wide angle) Image Sensor: SONY IMX662 1/2.8" (Telephoto) OmniVision OS02K10 1/2.8" (Wide-angle) Focal length: 150 mm (telephoto), 6.7 mm (wide-angle) Equivalent focal length: 1016 mm (telephoto), 45 mm (wide-angle) Shutter Speed: Tele - 1/10000-90s, Wide - 1/10000-30s Maximum exposure time: 90s (telephoto & wide-angle), Both in EQ mode Rotation range: Lens: 225°, Base: 360° Effective Pixels: 2.07M Maximum Resolution: 1920 × 1080 (Telephoto & Wide-angle) Built-in filters: Astro, Dark, Duo-Band (Telephoto), Astro (Wide-angle) Output: JPG, FITS, TIFF, MP4 Shooting Mode: Photos, Videos, Astronomy, Burst Shooting, Time-lapse Photography Storage: 64 GB Battery: Built-in 7000 mAh, supports external USB charging Charging Port: Type-C NPU: 1 TOPS Features: WiFi, NFC NFC One-Touch Connection Astronomy Post-Processing/Appointment Shooting/Astronomy Mosaic Wi-Fi Transmission Range: 15m (open environment) Color: Black Compatibility: iOS & Android smartphones/tablets Warranty: 2-years (24-months) MSRP: $399 Design Charge port On/off button Lens On the DWARF mini itself, it is a pretty minimal affair. On one side, there is a Type-C USB port to charge the non-removable 7000 mAh battery, and on the other side, a large button to power on or off the telescope. The button is flanked by an LED that is green when connected via the DWARFLAB app, or lights up red when being powered off. Below the button, there are four LEDs that indicate battery power. The DWARF mini does not have any sharp edges as all sides are rounded off; it has a good heft to it, but the weight of it feels quite balanced in the hand, so it isn't top or bottom-heavy. On the front there is the DWARFLAB logo which is quite small and there are no other markings on it. The tripod offers full 360° rotation of the motorized base, which allows for tracking for the time-lapse mode, but also for the 90-second captures of nearer objects in the sky, such as the Sun or the moon. Usage To get started, simply power on the DWARF mini and open the DWARFLAB app, tap on Connect, and it will scan for the DWARF mini over the Wi-Fi network. The device supports both 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz Wi-Fi, as well as Bluetooth for discovery, so connection issues were minimal in my experience with it. As previously noted in the specs, the DWARF mini will stay connected with a phone or tablet up to 15 meters in an open environment, such as a backyard. Lighting status Powering on: The green circular light will rotate and breathe in turn Powering off: The red circular light is gradually extinguished Connecting: Green light strip rotating Connected: Green light strip solid/always on 4 lights 1= 0-25%, 2= 25-50%, 3= 50-75%, 4= 75-100% battery power To view the full lighting status, such as tracking mode and connection failure, you can check the user guide on the official DWARFLAB page. DWARFLAB app Above, you can see the steps undertaken to connect the DWARFLAB app to my Galaxy S26 Ultra. Weirdly, I got an alert that a firmware update failed to get uploaded to the DWARF mini the first time, but upon retrying, it worked. Then place the DWARF mini outside, make sure your smartphone or tablet is connected to it, and then head back inside, because you can manage it from the comfort of your home. Simply enter the Atlas tab in the app and search for what you want to capture, and then tap on the camera icon; the DWARF mini will then attempt to track the object and give you a live view right on your connected device. Results I've had the DWARF mini since April, but even though my garden is south-facing, I had a lot of trouble trying to capture a good image of the moon. In the end, it was possible after I took it with me on a trip to my parents in Southend, UK, at the end of May. Here is a capture of the moon, resulting from 20 stacked images over a 90-second exposure. What you are seeing here is not AI-assisted. A good example of what I mean is the latest flagships with their 200MP cameras claiming to capture things like closeups of the moon, and while they are not as good as the above example on the DWARF mini, the resulting image on smartphones is actually AI-assisted above 30X zoom. Here is an example of a similar shot at the moon at 200X zoom using an HONOR Magic8 Pro. The difference is clear. Next, here we have a shot of the daytime moon. Here is a shot of Arcturus, the red giant star, which is the fourth brightest in the night sky. As previously mentioned, it could be a bit clearer, but clouds passing in front of it muddied the shot a bit. The Sun The DWARF mini also ships with a sun filter, meaning you can take great shots of the sun as well. Tracking Sun Resulting (stacked) shot Live zoom The pictures themselves are limited to Full HD, and some of the examples actually came out in HD (1280x720), but this is because the standard telescopic result is in 720p while "Wide" is in 1080p. Above you can see how in the app the Sun is tracked, the resulting capture, and Live zoom. I have only scratched the surface of what is possible with this telescope; I found several examples online of shots of the Milky Way, among others, such as nebulae and galaxies. All of this requires patience and knowledge, although if you know what you are looking for, simply enter it in the Atlas tab in the DWARFLAB app, tap the camera icon, and the telescope will attempt to track it. Conclusion The good The DWARF mini definitely places itself in a price point that makes astrology accessible to anyone looking to get started in the hobby. Say you want to have a closer look at the moon, simply enter it in the Atlas, and the Live view also lets you zoom in and snap pictures. The bad Some issues I came across while operating the DWARF mini were that it sometimes failed to connect unless I held my smartphone right next to it, and finding and tracking sometimes took several attempts to get it calibrated. I discovered that it helped if I sort of positioned and pointed the telescope in the general area it was supposed to detect, but this obviously wouldn't work with objects you can't see with the naked eye; more testing is required for that. Another bit of advice is to ensure that the lens is clean. While making the examples of live zooming on the sun, I discovered that the telescope lens and sun filter were not completely clean, and only after cleaning with a microfiber cloth was I able to get a decent shot of the sun. Where to buy and a coupon Okay, $399 is not cheap for a side hobby, but nor is a $1,500 smartphone flagship that you'll most likely have for a couple of years. This is a one-time entrance into astrology, and it won't become obsolete in one year like a smartphone. It's a thumbs up from me. The DWARF mini is available to buy right now in the U.S. and U.K. at the links below. DWARF mini for $399 on the official site DWARF mini for $399 on Amazon U.S. Use the NEOWIN5OFF coupon code for an additional 5% off at checkout (expires June 21) As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Adobe Acrobat Reader Dis Continued
    • The name, you mean? If so, it's actually the objects common name. There's another one called NGC 7293 which is also known as Helix Nebula (because we're looking at a helix structure top down) but other times also known as the Eye of God. You'll understand when you see it
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      270
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      71
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!