Person of Interest (Season 1)


Recommended Posts

Those of you who like spotting little trivia things in movies/TV shows would appreciate this...

xQmVP.jpg

See the name circled in red? It's in Russian and translates into "Bad Robot", which happens to be JJ Abrams (aka creator of this series) production company and one that makes this show. You're welcome.

I'm kind of neutral on this show and putting it on hold to see how the rest of the season pans out before deciding whether to continue or not.. I'm all for the show coming out JJ Abrams production company, but this is sort of following along the path of Burn Notice with the whole case by case plot and characters with hidden pasts where they reveal bits a pieces until they finally tell us who is after them. The plot has excitement and action, but that excitement does not engage me as the viewer.

Those of you who are enjoying it, I hope the show keeps going to your liking.

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

lost reference as well!

OMG Rappy, you caught it too ! :D I'm on episode 8 now and I've already spotted 3 LOST references : the Virgin Mary (2 times in different episodes) and of course Ben's List (seriously, just hearing Michael Emerson in the first episode saying "I have a list" gave me goosebumps). Now, the show's backbone is great, but I felt the acting was really lacking. Mind you, Emerson and Caviezel deliver a great performance, but Carver ... meh. That Keyser S?ze guy ... wasn't convincing AT ALL. Felt completely out of place. Fusco is so-so.

Still, it's a great show that I'll be watching. The idea is totally awesome, especially the fact that you never know if the person of interest is going to be a bad guy or just a victim. I just hope they cast better actors for the secondary roles, like they did with Linda Cardellini :wub:

  • 2 months later...

Is this show any good? Is it worth starting to watch? The viewership ratings don't seem to be all that good.

I think it's definitely worth watching. You may or may not like it but you won't know for sure until you do. I've seen every episode so far and I think it's a great show.

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

i think 23 was the finale as everyone talks about it like if it was the last episode

but at the end of the episode, i head finch say "stay stuned for scenes from our next episode"

yea, saw that too, but kinda find any reference to the next episode, and that felt like a season final.

also this happened in another show recently, right at the end it said stay stuned for scenes from our next episode....can't remember which one it was though.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 27 is out.
    • My ice blue precision 3550 laptop
    • A coalition of publishers sued OpenAI and Microsoft over scraping content without consent by Hamid Ganji Image via Depositphotos.com AI companies often rely on readily available internet content to train their chatbots and provide users with instant answers. This method of AI training is fast and relatively inexpensive, but using a website’s content without permission or compensation is not something publishers like to see, and this is exactly why Microsoft and OpenAI are now being sued. As reported by Bloomberg, a group of publishers that collectively own nearly 400 newspapers has filed a lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft. The coalition argues that the two companies scraped their content to build AI chatbots like ChatGPT and Copilot without paying any compensation. The complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, argues that while AI products have generated billions of dollars in market value using publishers’ work, none of that value has been shared with the publishers. The plaintiffs are seeking statutory damages and injunctive relief for alleged copyright infringement and violations of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. “Defendants systematically and secretly crawled the Publishers’ websites—including content behind paywalls and other access restrictions—and copied the Publishers’ articles, stories, and other original works onto their own servers without authorization,” the complaint states. The publishers also described the AI boom as a “death knell for local journalism” if AI companies that scrape content for free are not held accountable. Former New Jersey Attorney General Matthew Platkin and his law firm, Platkin LLP, are representing the publishers. “Our models empower innovation, are trained on publicly available data, and are grounded in fair use,” OpenAI spokesperson Drew Pusateri told Bloomberg. This is not the first lawsuit involving the unauthorized use of publishers’ content by AI firms, but it is one of the largest coalitions ever formed against the free use of content by AI chatbots. In 2024, OpenAI and Microsoft also faced a similar lawsuit from eight newspapers that claimed AI products were benefiting from their content without permission.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      445
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      173
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      134
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!