[Official] Apple WWDC 2011 Keynote


Recommended Posts

The developer previews (downloaded from the App Store) so far have actually contained a disc image that people have managed to use for a clean install, so I'm guessing it will still be possible in the final release.

That clears up some air though I wish it was sold in a box set as well. It feels great to own a physical version of it.

That might be the case, but I doubt it because there are strong rumours that Facebook are integrating Spotify into their service, and Spotify is a major rival of Microsoft's Zune Pass service.

But spotify isnt mainly for apple devices its for other platforms as well. I wonder if anyone brought it during the Q & A session about apple and facebook.

Keynote is online: WWDC 2011 Keynote

Thanks. Did anyone find a youtube link to watch the keynote? Apple havent uploaded it still :/

One quick question. Did anyone manage or know how to get a new @me.com id? Since mobileme is closed now I wonder how the system works. I dont want my apple ID to be included in that though.

That clears up some air though I wish it was sold in a box set as well. It feels great to own a physical version of it.

But spotify isnt mainly for apple devices its for other platforms as well. I wonder if anyone brought it during the Q & A session about apple and facebook.

Thanks. Did anyone find a youtube link to watch the keynote? Apple havent uploaded it still :/

One quick question. Did anyone manage or know how to get a new @me.com id? Since mobileme is closed now I wonder how the system works. I dont want my apple ID to be included in that though.

Ya they did, I watched it on the apple website 3 hours ago.

http://www.apple.com/apple-events/wwdc-2011/

So, it would definitely seem that Apple has backed away from merging the server and client releases of Lion into one product, as they initially said they were going to do.

They specifically talked about that in the keynote. Server is simply a set of apps that you run on the standard client of Lion, and it is included.

edit: hmm, they do have a separate page for Server now though, and it costs extra ($50). Weird. Maybe they did change their minds about it http://www.apple.com/macosx/server/

They specifically talked about that in the keynote. Server is simply a set of apps that you run on the standard client of Lion, and it is included.

edit: hmm, they do have a separate page for Server now though, and it costs extra ($50). Weird. Maybe they did change their minds about it http://www.apple.com/macosx/server/

Except for the very first DP, all the Lions builds have had separate Server builds, as well. This is why I'm thinking they changed their mind about integrating the two.

Do you get a free upgrade to Lion if you recently bought your Mac? Has anyone heard anything about this?

I believe you get a free update if you buy a Mac once the actual release date has been announced. All we have at the moment is "July."

I **** my pants when the 1 came off the 129...

I was like Holy crap is this really apple?

Apple makes their profit margin off hardware sales, not software sales. Not to mention they already set a $29 precedent with Snow Leopard, so I'm not surprised they kept the price the same with Lion.

Besides, by going solely to digital distribution, it also cuts down the pressing and packaging that would normally inflate the price.

It's still a nice price. Especially for those that thought the new features are not superduperawesome or as big as Expos? or Spotlight were when they came out.

29? is perfectly reasonable for those new features, whether you think they are small or big and a few new UI elements and redesigns. It's enough to be a real update but less enough to be a great deal for everyone. At least that's my feeling. No reason not to upgrade now, even if you think it's not that big of a leap forward.

If I had some ideas for an App which I would like to finish by fall when iOS5 officially comes out... would you reccomend installing this (early) beta on your main iOS device? I guess not so much? Common sense tells me "don't do it, fall is far away" but the playful child in me says "dude, do it, that way you have plenty of time left"...

I tend to jump right in. If you want to submit it before iOS5 is out you can download the normal xCode and build it for 4.3. You might want to have access to a 4.x device somewhere though just to make sure things are running as planned on that version as well as your going along

I tend to jump right in. If you want to submit it before iOS5 is out you can download the normal xCode and build it for 4.3. You might want to have access to a 4.x device somewhere though just to make sure things are running as planned on that version as well as your going along

The thing is that this would be an experiment. I have no idea on how it will play out and since there is no going back from iOS5 Beta to iOS4 once upgraded, I'm a little bit worried that I'm stuck with ... yeah, what it is, a Beta-OS on the device I use the most day to day... Normally, I would just get an iPod Touch from somewhere but I can't this time. Sooo... If I took this super seriously and had a well laid out plan ahead of me and knew exactly what I was doing, I would jump right in and live with that until fall, my iPhone will only be as capable as the Beta. But then again, I really want to see how it worked out with the notifications and the new APIs...

I'm just scared that the Beta is just that... a Beta... Pretty stupid, I know... :laugh: But then again, from most of what I've heard, iOS Betas tend to be quite stable already. Awww I just don't dare it. I'm a *****.

Can't you just reset your iPhone and shift-click the restore button in iTunes to select a clean, non-beta .ipa? If the beta really turns out disastrous

From all I've heard... no. I thought so too but a friend of mine told me once you are on iOS5 Beta there is no going back, as long as you don't to some kind of SHSH-Backup or something.

If anyone could confirm that going back to pre-iOS5 with a clean 4.3.3 ipa... I'm all in. I mean, it's only logical... you can't expect developers to use a beta full time until fall, can you? :whistle:

The thing is that this would be an experiment. I have no idea on how it will play out and since there is no going back from iOS5 Beta to iOS4 once upgraded, I'm a little bit worried that I'm stuck with ... yeah, what it is, a Beta-OS on the device I use the most day to day... Normally, I would just get an iPod Touch from somewhere but I can't this time. Sooo... If I took this super seriously and had a well laid out plan ahead of me and knew exactly what I was doing, I would jump right in and live with that until fall, my iPhone will only be as capable as the Beta. But then again, I really want to see how it worked out with the notifications and the new APIs...

I'm just scared that the Beta is just that... a Beta... Pretty stupid, I know... :laugh: But then again, from most of what I've heard, iOS Betas tend to be quite stable already. Awww I just don't dare it. I'm a *****.

The beta's aren't usually that buggy, and Apple tends to release new builds every couple of weeks which means if there are showstoppers you wont be stuck with them for too long. Personally I'd say upgrade to the beta and enjoy the new features/testing your app with the new build

From OS Lion's feature page:

Search tokens

Building on the power of search suggestions, the Finder in OS X Lion includes tokens ? a smart new way to filter your searches. When you select a suggestion, a token is created. Instantly your search is filtered, and you see only the files that meet those criteria. You can change the scope of the token by clicking the arrow. If you want to narrow your search even more, you can use multiple tokens together. For example, to find all the Keynote presentations sent by Chris, enter ?Keynote? and ?Chris? in the search field. This creates two tokens, so the Finder displays only presentations from Chris.

That sounds so sweet!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Plans. Christ at least editorialise this tripe for what it is or put your own journalistic take on it.
    • If you have a TV in your living room, chances are you can probably just use the Steam Link app and play your huge PC in big picture mode, effectively giving you the Steam Machine experience to see if you'd actually like it. The good news is the Steam Machine can have it's drives upgraded. It has a USB-C 10Gbs port as well, so the 512GB drive could be quickly moved to an external enclosure and repurposed.
    • This machine could very well be a second gaming PC for their living room as a console experience. So we would have to assume their main PC exists as well; With that said, I have 10gb home network with a 2.5gigabit internet connection here so we tend to have more than enough speed to download games. However, we can't make use of the 10gb LAN using Steam's built in transfer tool because it always compresses transfers and that slows the transfer down to well below a standard gigabit port speeds, sometimes as slow as 200-300Mb/s transfers. While that's probably still faster than most internet connections anyway, if they'd fix the LAN transfer issue it'd be upto x5 faster even on a gigabit LAN, than simply dropping a 2.5gbe port on there with hopes of a few people having fast internet connections. There are solutions, work arounds, like using LANCache if you run a NAS... or simply copying the files over manually using a network share.
    • Samsung announces ultra-fast UFS 5.0 storage to supercharge mobile AI by Paul Hill Local AI models tend to run a lot more slowly than cloud services like Claude and Gemini; however, Samsung has just announced that it has developed its UFS 5.0 solution, which increases data transfer to speeds of 10.8GB/s, enabling faster storage and processing in mobile memory that has the potential to provide more optimal local AI experiences. Commenting on this development, Jangseok Choi, head of Memory Product Planning at Samsung Electronics, said: If you’ve tried local AI, you’ll know it can be quite slow, especially if using the larger parameter models. By developing this new solution, Samsung says that storage is evolving from just storing data to a core piece of infrastructure that supports AI computation, too. The Korean company said that UFS 5.0 integrates the latest embedded memory interface standard from JEDEC and achieves up to 10.8 gigabytes per second (GB/s) transfer speeds. Regarding write speeds, Samsung UFS 5.0 can reach 9.5 GB/s. Both the read and write speeds are twice as fast as those of the previous UFS 4.1 standard. Aside from being ideal for local AI, Samsung’s UFS 5.0 is more power efficient by 40% compared to UFS 4.1. Samsung achieved this by implementing innovations such as clock gating and multi-voltage technologies. UFS 5.0 is also ultra-compact at just 7.5mm x 13mm x 0.9mm; that is 16.7% smaller than UFS 4.1. The company said it will be bringing it to multiple devices in the future, including mobile, wearable, and extended reality.
    • A bit like the steamdeck, this probably isn't for you.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      mnsgroup earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      496
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      209
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      99
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      86
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!