WZOR Talks About Windows (Codename) 9, Is a DP Imminent?


Recommended Posts

I wouldn't expect any leaks, employees have to request a build if they want to test a dogfooding build, and the requester will get a specific build with their employee ID.

Plus, we're expecting to see some kind of peek at Windows vNext at WPC, so no one thinks it's worth it.

WPC is two weeks away, or a bit more.  So it should come quick but who knows if they'll show people or if it'll be behind closed doors and just for partners who have NDAs signed etc?

The interactive live tiles seems like the next logical step to me, and I like the idea a lot, it should be coming IMO.  If they don't do this and just leave the live tiles as they are now and just have them show info then it'd be a wasted chance to advance the platform. 

 

As far as start screen folders, I don't think of those as a major new feature, probably more useful on smaller devices like say phones where screens are a limiting factor but on my 24" desktop screen I have little need for them at the moment.   There could be more of a need in the future once we get the new start menu though, as that will be a smaller scale of the start screen it sounds like.

 

 

I *REALLY* want those interactive live tiles... :yes:

The 3 videos were from MS Research Labs, I am not so sure if this would be Metro2. :)

Last night I posted this in MDL and a number of guys shared their ideas, maybe Neowin guys would share their ideas too? :)

 

http://forums.mydigitallife.info/threads/55109-News-Discussions-On-Windows-Upcoming-Products-W8-1Update-x-W365-WThreshold-Win9/page40?p=927729&viewfull=1#post927729

 

Something for you guys to think about : biggrin.png

This is the desktop with start menu and windowed apps shown in Build, enlarged to 300%, bottom right is a watermark

screen1668.jpg


Top line: Windows 8.1 Enterprise
Bottom line: For testing purposes only. Build 9600

Now, if the start menu and windowed apps were mock-up's, they could easily mock-up on a current win8.1, why on a lab build?

Previously, I have mentioned that these 2 features were not mock-up's, but actually working but buggy features.

A guy said in a previous post that why the IE icon didn't show - it's because these 2 are metro apps, and is actually shown as the other metro icons on the task bar.

OK, the next question, why build 9600? We know current known win9 build is 97xx, that means these 2 features are for win8.1, windowed apps is definitely not for Update2, it needs quite a lot of API treatments, and MJF claimed that start menu won't appear in Update2 either.

What's your ideas? tongue.gif

Last night I posted this in MDL and a number of guys shared their ideas, maybe Neowin guys would share their ideas too? :)

 

http://forums.mydigitallife.info/threads/55109-News-Discussions-On-Windows-Upcoming-Products-W8-1Update-x-W365-WThreshold-Win9/page40?p=927729&viewfull=1#post927729

 

Something for you guys to think about : biggrin.png

This is the desktop with start menu and windowed apps shown in Build, enlarged to 300%, bottom right is a watermark

screen1668.jpg

Top line: Windows 8.1 Enterprise

Bottom line: For testing purposes only. Build 9600

Now, if the start menu and windowed apps were mock-up's, they could easily mock-up on a current win8.1, why on a lab build?

Previously, I have mentioned that these 2 features were not mock-up's, but actually working but buggy features.

A guy said in a previous post that why the IE icon didn't show - it's because these 2 are metro apps, and is actually shown as the other metro icons on the task bar.

OK, the next question, why build 9600? We know current known win9 build is 97xx, that means these 2 features are for win8.1, windowed apps is definitely not for Update2, it needs quite a lot of API treatments, and MJF claimed that start menu won't appear in Update2 either.

What's your ideas? tongue.gif

I think that there are 2 possible explanations for this. One, Windows Threshold could really be Windows 8.1 Update 3, and "Windows NT 6.4" could be something different (Windows 8.2, Windows 9, etc.). Another possibility is that that build number is there because Microsoft had originally planned it for Windows 8.1 Update 2, which would have also been Build 9600. Since that plan was changed, then the build number would now be 97xx.

It's always interesting when they bump the kernel version, shows something on the big side, has changed.  I really hope the rumor about them talking/showing the next update at the WPC later this month comes true and we finally get some info on update 2 at least.

 

I think that there are 2 possible explanations for this. One, Windows Threshold could really be Windows 8.1 Update 3, and "Windows NT 6.4" could be something different (Windows 8.2, Windows 9, etc.). Another possibility is that that build number is there because Microsoft had originally planned it for Windows 8.1 Update 2, which would have also been Build 9600. Since that plan was changed, then the build number would now be 97xx.

Take it as rumor with the usual salt treatment: WinThreshold will be 9600.2xxxx :/

 

I doubt the 7.xxx kernel will come any time soon.

Guess there won't be a NT7 unless there's a "breaking change" :)

 

061056ky9i7w6o849ibi8q.jpg.thumb.jpg

Depends on what the last number means. It usually is either revision (could be multiple revisions per day), or a defaulted value that shows the exact second of the day at which the build was compiled.

 

It's a version number and therefore incremental, it can't be related to the compilation time.

 

Take it as rumor with the usual salt treatment: WinThreshold will be 9600.2xxxx :/

 

Hmm, that sounds wrong, if Threshold is indeed what Neowin and others reported (start menu, windowed apps etc.) it will come with major API changes and therefore it has to be a new full build, not a QFE patch (maybe even a kernel version increase ;) )

What do you think the leaked buildnumbers are? Windows "Codename 9"?  :rofl:

It's a version number and therefore incremental, it can't be related to the compilation time.

 

 

Sure it can. You can default versions by using lets say "6.4.*". This will result in something like 6.4.X.Y. The X would be the number of days since the start of the century and the Y the number of seconds since the start of the day.

Sure it can. You can default versions by using lets say "6.4.*". This will result in something like 6.4.X.Y. The X would be the number of days since the start of the century and the Y the number of seconds since the start of the day.

Seconds alone wouldn't work, in combination with days it could in theory work, but that's not how Windows versioning works.

It's a version number and therefore incremental, it can't be related to the compilation time.

 

 

Hmm, that sounds wrong, if Threshold is indeed what Neowin and others reported (start menu, windowed apps etc.) it will come with major API changes and therefore it has to be a new full build, not a QFE patch (maybe even a kernel version increase ;) )

What do you think the leaked buildnumbers are? Windows "Codename 9"?  :rofl:

AFAIK there is no such rule to applying build nos., and yes, AFAIK, build 97xx is Windows Codename9. :)

Wzor talks about Windows 9 release, expected this fall, with new activation method through the store.

http://forum.ru-board.com/topic.cgi?forum=29&topic=7345&start=2320#18

Super User translation

 

For all asking about Windows 8.1 Update XXX
All these updates, of course, are RTM-GDR releases followed by QFE updates? It means, after release of Windows 8.1 Update 2 new updates will be released, but no new features will be added to the operating system. Update 2 is the final rebuild of all SKUs with QFE GDR updates included.
Windows 9 will be announced this fall, Microsoft?s advertising budget this time will be fantastic. The slogan of a promotional campaign will be ?You want Start button and new menu and you will get that?.
On the advice of marketing experts, flaws of Windows 8 will be accepted and used as lessons for developers while releasing Windows 9.
Also?
After facing problems in China, Microsoft is thinking about a new activation system of Windows 9. Apparently this is slowing down development right now.
It?s assumed that the activation of products distributed via ESD-RETAIL channels will be more tightly associated with a specific PC and that activation will be done when user will log in to Microsoft Store. Activation key won?t be given to user and he won?t need to enter key manually.
If user will want to change his PC or reinstall/restore system (not on OEM PCs), he will need to download specific ESD-RETAIL distribution in a special format and then burn it on DVD or flash media using special wizard. With this new type of BIOS, large OEMs will download distributions for ?bare metal? and deploy systems without need of having boot disks. It similar to method Apple uses now. Although it?s is planned to implement this feature only on hardware manufactured by Microsoft and large manufacturers such as Lenovo, Dell, etc. Also this method will be used on mobile devices, tablets, smartphones, etc.
Installing ESD-RETAIL systems on new hardware or restoring system on the old one, will require to ?detach? old installation from Microsoft Store, and only after that, it?ll be possible to activate new system.
As you know, at the Microsoft Store could be more than one license or product, so it is necessary to take into account that the data of the license holder (an address, credit card numbers, etc.) will be stored on Microsoft?s servers. If someone won?t detach previously activated system, and same distribution will be activated on 2-3 PCs, while only one license was bought, after 3 days activation will be cancelled till problems with license will be solved. User will be prompted to purchase missing license or ?detach? extra system if he wants to further use a product.
Right now developers of the new activation system and experts of new products promotion are discussing on these topics. To be more specific, they are discussing how to make possible to rent a product or working time on it.
This is also a major problem of promoting the product, protecting personal data from transferring them to third parties, such as NSA...
Therefore, there is an idea to issue corporate version without these bindings to online and cloud services of Microsoft.

 

Microsoft communications chief Frank Shaw dismissed Wzor, tweeting ?Was there a ?crazy rumor day? declaration that I missed??

Are they suggesting that we will get Windows Threshold in Q2 2015 but that this is not Win 9

But it will include the new start menu/screen and floating Windows Store Apps

Windows 9 is supposed to be a continuation of Windows 8, and Threshold is supposed to be an upgraded desktop.

I'm not sure if Wzor is right about the fall release date, but it might be true to compete with Mac OS X Yosemite.

I really think that both would come in Q1-Q2 2015, as that was the original plan, but the development pace may have sped up.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • 10 games join Xbox Free Play Days this weekend by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe Another Free Play Days offer has just landed, and this one is a unique one. On top of offering 10 games to jump into for Xbox players, all the titles are from a single publisher: No More Robots. The promotion has games like Little Rocket Lab, Spirittea, Descenders Next, Let's Build a Zoo, and much more. Almost every game in the selection does need an Xbox Game Pass Ultimate, Premium, or Essential subscription, so keep this in mind when browsing. Many of the titles are Xbox Play Anywhere titles though, so both Xbox console and PC players can jump in. Here's how the announcement blog post described some of the available titles: There is one game that's available to all Xbox players without the need for any subscriptions, which is Descenders. Here are the announced games and the platforms they are available to play on: Little Rocket Lab (Xbox Series X|S, Xbox One, PC) Spirittea (Xbox Series X|S, Xbox One, PC) Soccer Story (Xbox Series X|S, Xbox One, PC) Descenders Next (Game Preview) (Xbox Series X|S, Xbox One, PC) Let's Build a Zoo (Xbox Series X|S, Xbox One, PC) Hypnospace Outlaw (Xbox Series X|S, Xbox One, PC) Slayers X: Terminal Aftermath: Vengance of the Slayer (Xbox Series X|S, Xbox One, PC) Nowhere Prophet (Xbox Series X|S, Xbox One, PC) Family Man (Xbox Series X|S, Xbox One) Descenders (Xbox Series X|S, Xbox One, PC) To easily find the titles on Xbox consoles, first head to the Store, then in the sidebar, find the Home section. In there, open the Subscriptions tab. The Free Play Days collection will show up in this area. This week's Free Play Days promotions will end on Sunday, June 7, at 11:59 pm PT.
    • It STILL has horrid theme support. Hard to look at for me. The white is too bright, and the black too dark. I'm using classic outlook for the Dark Grey theme. It's just right for me.
    • inb4 someone leaves the usual "what an unfortunate name" comment
    • Cuktech 10 Ultra charger review: big display, four ports, 110W total power by Taras Buria Cuktech recently announced a couple of Ultra-branded chargers, including a desktop 300W charger, which I reviewed a few weeks ago. For those who do need that much (or who do not want to spend that much on a charger), Cuktech also offers the 10 Ultra, a traditional wall charger with similar features. Four ports, a big display, and up to 110W of power output. After using it for a few weeks, here are my impressions. Disclaimer: Cuktech provided the review unit without any editorial input or pre-approval. Like the 30 Ultra, the 10 Ultra arrived in a box made of nice cardboard with quality print all over it. Inside, besides the charger, you will find a 240W 6A charger, which, this time, is fully braided. While Cuktech always bundles high-power cables with its chargers and power banks, they are usually regular and unassuming. This time, the cable is much nicer, matching the charger's $59.99 price tag. The charger itself measures 67 x 76 x 33 mm or 2.6 x 3.0 x 1.3 inches and weighs about 250 grams. Considering the charger has four ports and a big display, I would say the compact size is quite impressive, albeit a little hefty. The overall design is similar to other chargers from the manufacturer, minus the chrome Cuktech logo next to the four ports. The Cuktech 10 Ultra has retractable prongs for better portability. Its front side is covered with piano black plastic housing two elements: a capacitive button with backlight and a quite large display for various charging stats. Ports are downward-facing, and I have mixed feelings about such a design. It is not the most convenient when you frequently connect and disconnect cables. It makes you bend over to find the right port to connect, and it is a no-go with outlets mounted closer to the floor. On the bright side, design like this eliminates clutter and sagging, especially when using four cables at once. Plus, you get plenty of space for a big display. Ports include two high-speed USB Type-C ports, one Type-C for less demanding devices, and one classic USB Type-A. The first two ports deliver full 100W, while the third is capped at 45W. As for the Type-A port, its maximum output is 18W. In total, the charger delivers 110W of power, but in my testing, I managed to squeeze 117W when charging two power banks and a tablet. Quite impressive. Type-C1 Type-C2 Type-C3 Type-A Single-port 100W 100W 45W 18W Two ports 80W 20W - - Three ports 65W 20W 20W - Four ports 65W 20W 10W 10W The charger can detect handshake protocols and balance power across all four ports according to each device's needs. As such, power is not limited to the values in the table above. You can have two ports charging at 55W, three ports at 45W + 20W, and more. For some reason, Cuktech is not listing the supported protocols, but a quick test showed that it is compatible with PD3.0, PPS, QC5, DCP, and UFCS. When you connect a compatible device, the charger automatically detects its charging standard and displays it on the screen, for example, Apple 6A or Samsung 3A. Speaking of the screen. The main highlight of the 10 Ultra is its 1.57-inch display with a maximum brightness of 700 nits and 160-degree viewing angles. The display takes up most of the front, and it shows various charging-related information, including total output power, current temperature, power distribution across ports with watts, volts, and amps, a screensaver, and more. You can toggle between the different views by tapping the button, and holding it changes the screen orientation (portrait or horizontal, plus flipped) according to your socket position. The screen is very nice. It is sharp, vivid, and the fonts are easy to read. As for settings, you can change the following: Keep the screen on or off Lock the screen orientation (hold the button to change the screen orientation) Keep the USB Type-A port on Toggle power modes The charger has three power modes: AI: standard mode that automatically allocates power to each connected device. Power Priority: prioritizes power for high-demand devices, such as laptops or power banks. Balanced: splits power evenly across connected devices according to their needs I was skeptical at first, but after testing a few devices in different modes, I can see the benefit of these three modes. The most useful is power priority, which gives the first Type-C port more power. When I was charging a 100W power bank (port 1) alongside a 140W power bank (port 2), Power Priority split the total output about 75-30. Balanced mode, as the name suggests, splits the total output between the two ports more or less equally. As for AI mode, the charger uses its brain to detect which device needs more power. In my testing, it figured out that the 140W power needs a bit more juice. As I said, I expected this to be more of a gimmick, but the three built-in modes turned out quite useful. For example, you can prioritize your laptop while giving other ports a little less power, but still enough to charge at acceptable speeds. Unfortunately, unlike the 30 Ultra, this charger cannot display the battery level of the device being charged. This small feature turned out to be very useful when I was testing the 30 Ultra, as it allowed me to see my phone's battery level without picking it up. Like other Cuktech chargers I tested, the 10 Ultra one proved itself reliable and well-made. It uses Gallium nitride semiconductor technology to reduce the charger's size and improve efficiency. It is also better at dissipating heat, but I have to say that when charging two power banks at 117W total, the charger got hotter than what I would call comfortable (hold it for a few seconds, and you start feeling a burning sensation at your fingertips). However, the built-in thermal indicator remained below the temperature threshold, with the screen reassuring that the device operated at "High performance" (I tested it in a 21 °C / 69 °F room). Overall, the Cuktech 10 Ultra is a solid choice. If you need four ports and you like to nerd out on various stats, it is a very easy recommendation. It will take care of your laptop, phone, tablet, and power bank without breaking a sweat, plus the build, material, and cable quality are top-notch. The mode switcher is handy when charging different devices with different power needs, too. I cannot say a display is a must-have in a charger, especially when it makes you more conscious about where to plug it, but it is a neat addition if you have a socket at your table or bed level, so that you can actually use the display and its features. The more important fact is that despite its size and quality, the display does not make the charger that much more expensive than similarly powerful chargers from competitors. Plus, you can save 10% on the 10 Ultra with a promo code on Amazon. Buy Cuktech 10 Ultra charger - $53.99 on Amazon with a promo code As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Last week I was investigating an issue with contacts and tried using the new Outlook. In the real (Classic) Outlook, you can easily go to any Outlook folder and present it in a Table View, then customize the columns to show/sort any field, which was exactly what I needed. But of course, the new Outlook doesn't have this feature at all. I gave up. Oh, and can we possibly stop claiming the new Outlook has PST support? What it really has is the ability to use the real Outlook in the background to pretend to have PST support. There is no PST support without the real Outlook installed.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      mobandz earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Apprentice
      fernan99 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      476
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      247
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!