Malaysia Airlines 'loses contact with plane' (and search effort updates)


Recommended Posts

they have been stating all morning, that there are several plans and norwegian boats on the scene and they have not spotted anything yet. Assuming that the photos are showing something under the water not something floating.

they have been stating all morning, that there are several plans and norwegian boats on the scene and they have not spotted anything yet. Assuming that the photos are showing something under the water not something floating.

 

i don't get it; Norwegian boats where Australia is much nearer?? Possibly they aren't any AUS boats near, but still...

 

edit: oh i totally forgot that the globe is round, my bad! :laugh: :laugh: :rofl:

There are plenty of floatsam in all oceans and it is not unheard of ships losing several containers during storms.

 

http://www.maritimedenmark.dk/?Id=17587

 

 


Around 5 pm on Friday February 14th 2014, Maersk Svendborg lost between 200 and 300 containers, according to Lloyds List. During a severe storm, near Cap Finistere by Bretagne, the containers began to fall overboard. The ship was en route from Rotterdam to the Suez Canal.

Luckily there were no hazardous materials in the containers that the ship lost. The ship immediately warned the French authorities about the drifting containers and they sent the warning to all other ships in the area. Supposedly there are many damaged containers still on board the ship.

Maersk Svendborg was around 60 nautical miles from Brest, when the first container fell into the sea. The waves were up to eight meters high and there was a wind speed of up to 46 meters per second, which is equivalent to about 165 kilometers per hour.

 

Some shipping containers sinks, other floats: it depends on the cargo inside and that makes navigational hazards.

 

This is a lead and it is investigated so that is good.

We will get some answers once the said debris are found and verified by ships crews.

Given the fact that the zone is far from Australia and that the weather is apparently not that good there, it may take some time.

These won't be part of the plane. From what it looks now, I am guessing the plane won't be found at all. Because it never crashed and Malaysian airline/government won't announce the truth.

Wouldn't a shipping container sink...I doubt they're water tight...might stay afloat if it was, but if water got in that would sink for sure.

 

depends on what's in them... there have been shipping containers full of Styrofoam products that have fallen off ships and floated... and some containers seal air tight, which would make it possibly a buoyant thing and float alright or at least not sink to far below the surface

Anyone thinking the further they look south, the more large floaty objects they're going to find..? :hmmm:


... and does anyone have a link to why they withdrew interest in the earlier Chinese satellite images of 'large objects', and what they explained them as actually being, please?   Dismissed quickly... explained.. never..?

The batteries would be just about drained by now; they're only good for about 5 days iirc.

According to news reports the black box batteries last 30 days before going dead.  There's about 18 +/- days left.

According to news reports the black box batteries last 30 days before going dead.  There's about 18 +/- days left.

 

And several interviews I've seen on the BBC news said about 5 days.

And several interviews I've seen on the BBC news said about 5 days.

Just did a quick google search, none suprisingly all results are in reference to this incident but at least the first 4 or 5 quote 30 days. TBH I would rather find some form of official airline guidance on this rather than a news site but thats all that came up in a quick search.

The batteries would be just about drained by now; they're only good for about 5 days iirc.

 

i thought it would last for 30 days; in fact the Air France BB were retrieved several days after the crash.

Just did a quick google search, none suprisingly all results are in reference to this incident but at least the first 4 or 5 quote 30 days. TBH I would rather find some form of official airline guidance on this rather than a news site but thats all that came up in a quick search.

 

I posted this early on: Posted 09 March 2014 - 05:58

 

https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1203937-malaysia-airlines-loses-contact-with-plane-and-search-effort-updates/page-5

 

If a plane crashes into the water, this beacon sends out an ultrasonic pulse that cannot be heard by human ears but is readily detectable by sonar and acoustical locating equipment. There is a submergence sensor on the side of the beacon that looks like a bull's-eye. When water touches this sensor, it activates the beacon.

 

The beacon sends out pulses at 37.5 kilohertz (kHz) and can transmit sound as deep as 14,000 feet (4,267 m). Once the beacon begins "pinging," it pings once per second for 30 days. This beacon is powered by a battery that has a shelf life of six years. In rare instances, the beacon may get snapped off during a high-impact collision.

 

The ELT is 2 days:

 

Transmission duration : 48H min 100mW PERP

 

http://www.airsatori.com/doc/AP%20brochures/elt_90_91.pdf

 

The two aviation recorders currently combined in a single assembly referred to by the media as a "black box" are the Flight Data Recorder and a Cockpit Sound Recorder also identified as a Cockpit Voice Recorder.

 

http://www.airlines.org/Pages/Flight-Data-Recorders.aspx

 

All large commercial airliners are equipped with two types of devices to record information for the purpose of investigating accidents and incidents. The cockpit voice recorder (CVR) records intercom and radio communications of the flight crew, the aural warnings of flight systems, and the sounds of the cockpit environment. The other so-called "black box" is the flight data recorder (FDR), which chronicles the airplane?s speed, position, altitude, and a number of other flight parameters. Federal Aviation Regulations (e.g., 14 CFR 121) require operators of commercial airplanes to carry and use these recording devices.

 

On July 17, 1997, FAA adopted the regulations to again increase the minimum number of parameters that FDRs must record. Under this "97 rule," airlines were required to modify, by August 20, 2001, airplanes manufactured before October 12, 1991, to digitally record either 18 or 22 parameters, depending on whether or not the plane was equipped with a flight data acquisition unit. By the same deadline, airlines modified newer airplanes to record 34 parameters. Airplane manufacturers modified airplanes manufactured after August 18, 2000, to record 57 parameters, and airplanes made after August 19, 2002, must record 88 parameters. These parameters are derived from scores of sensors imbedded throughout the airplane - more than 1,100 sensors are needed in some models to collect 88 parameters. Collectively, this array of sensors reads not only the status of key data items, such as altitude, but documents the overall performance of systems, including: engines; navigational aids; warning systems; hydraulic systems; electrical systems; and flight controls. Current FDRs must retain the most recent 25 hours of flight data.

I posted this early on:

 

https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1203937-malaysia-airlines-loses-contact-with-plane-and-search-effort-updates/page-5

 

If a plane crashes into the water, this beacon sends out an ultrasonic pulse that cannot be heard by human ears but is readily detectable by sonar and acoustical locating equipment. There is a submergence sensor on the side of the beacon that looks like a bull's-eye. When water touches this sensor, it activates the beacon.

 

The beacon sends out pulses at 37.5 kilohertz (kHz) and can transmit sound as deep as 14,000 feet (4,267 m). Once the beacon begins "pinging," it pings once per second for 30 days. This beacon is powered by a battery that has a shelf life of six years. In rare instances, the beacon may get snapped off during a high-impact collision.

No source?  :shiftyninja:

Planes involved in southern search corridor

Australia 5

Indonesia 4

Japan 4

China 3

Malaysia 2

India 2

South Korea 2

New Zealand 1

US 1

UAE 1

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-03-21/bad-weather-hampers-search-for-possible-mh370-debris/5335582

No source?  :shiftyninja:

 

 

Ka-pow ... straight from the horse's data sheet:

 

http://www.l-3ar.com/pdf/datasheets/MKT068-AP_SRVIVR_12-12rev4.pdf

Skiver, you just got owned :laugh: and I usually don't say that!

Anyways, so the bad weather is delaying the search right?

 

 

Skiver, you just got owned :laugh: and I usually don't say that!

Anyways, so the bad weather is delaying the search right?

They are reporting better weather today, in the search area.

'ED-56' is a European Aviation Safety Agency standard, industry crash survivability requirements.

 

Technical Standard Orders (TSO)

A TSO is a minimum performance standard for specified materials, parts, and appliances used on civil aircraft. When authorized to manufacture a material, part, or appliances to a TSO standard, this is referred to as TSO authorization. Receiving a TSO authorization is both design and production approval.

 

 

Apparently flight MH370 carries a Honeywell 'Black box', and 30 days is the standard:

 

http://aerospace.honeywell.com/~/media/UWSAero/common/documents/Data-_Combined_Recording.pdf

post-37120-0-57005500-1395357932.jpg

Am I reading it correctly that the black box would be useless if it did crash in salt water after 30 days in 10 feet of water? The area where those objects were found as an average depth of 3900 meters, way surpassing that limit.

Am I reading it correctly that the black box would be useless if it did crash in salt water after 30 days in 10 feet of water? The area where those objects were found as an average depth of 3900 meters, way surpassing that limit.

unless I'm mistaken, I believe it's to do with salt water corroding parts inside, so partly yes, though bonalste might be a better person to ask, as he has civil aviation knowledge

(if you needed more covert, then I'd recommend McKay)

Am I reading it correctly that the black box would be useless if it did crash in salt water after 30 days in 10 feet of water? The area where those objects were found as an average depth of 3900 meters, way surpassing that limit.

 

i think it means that the minimum is 10 feet (that's the test value), but it can sustain 20k for 30 days in deep sea pressure.

  • Like 2
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • "Not found" - this is what you get when you embed a tweet instead of just taking a screenshot.
    • Wonder if they will let you go into an Apple Store and have your white glass back swapped for a silver one, will they refuse even if you pay?
    • Honestly that feels even more useless than it did when Win11 was first released. In 2021, the uproar was somewhat justified, but only when comparing how good we've had it since Windows 7. Prior to that, a new Windows release would often require new, or very recent hardware. Windows XP wouldn't run (in any usable way) on hardware released when it's predecessor Win98 was released (let's ignore ME). It was time to shift the goal post, and the way Microsoft did that was actually ok. People have still had another FIVE YEARS of free software support with Windows 10, and those of us who want to have used these tools to bypass the limitations, all while understanding the impacts that may have. Most laptops don't last 5 years (sadly), so now the youngest unsupported hardware is 9 years old, and apparently has another year of support with Windows 10. That's good. Meanwhile, understanding the impacts and limitations, I have my 2013 laptop running Win11 perfectly fine. The thing that's failing on it is the hardware, the 2.5" SATA cable/chip is failing and corrupting the SSDs I put in. Thankfully it has a functional M.2 sata drive that works fine!
    • iPhone 18 Pro drop-test video and photos leak on the dark web following a data breach by Hamid Ganji iPhone 17 Pro - Image via Apple Apple is seemingly facing one of the biggest data breaches in its history, and just a few months before the official debut of the iPhone 18 Pro series, photos, a drop-test video, a supplier list, and key phone components have reportedly been leaked by hackers. Last week, we reported that Tata Electronics, an Apple supplier and iPhone producer in India, was hit by a data breach. As a result, it was reported that more than 200,000 trade secrets and confidential documents belonging to Apple and Tesla were stolen by the ransomware group World Leaks. According to Reuters, the group has now leaked supplier lists, component details, and photos of the upcoming iPhone 18 Pro models on the dark web. One of the materials leaked by the hackers is a drop-test video of the iPhone 18 Pro, which is due to launch this September. The phone is shown in a gray color and has the same familiar design we saw on last year's iPhone 17 Pro series. The device also appears to be quite durable, though it seems to be thicker than last year's model. One possible explanation is that Apple may be using a larger battery in the iPhone 18 Pro series. Moreover, Reuters says it has seen at least six documents mapping many components in the iPhone 18 Pro models to their respective suppliers, including details on chips on the main circuit board and on battery and camera components. The documents reportedly detail hundreds of parts that will be used in the iPhone 18 Pro models. A person familiar with the matter told the outlet that Apple classifies this data as sensitive and “is concerned about the documents being shared on the dark web as they relate to unreleased models.” Apple is reportedly investigating the issue but has yet to issue an official statement.
    • You do you, I've just said that it first appeared in "home" version before it will be available in "work" one. I use Edge only because it still supports MV2 uBO extension even on Android - I'll switch when they stop.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      Juan Dela earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Collagen Project earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      Wakeen1966 earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Rookie
      Almohandis went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      516
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      273
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      141
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      100
    5. 5
      macoman
      53
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!